Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:02]

OKAY. GOOD MORNING.

[1. Call to Order]

MY SINCERE APOLOGIES FOR MY TARDINESS.

I HAD AN ISSUE THIS MORNING.

THANK YOU FOR ALL BEING HERE.

WE'RE GOING TO BEGIN THE MEETING.

IT IS NOW 9:10 A.M.

IF YOU WILL RISE WITH ME FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, PLEASE.

ALEXANDRO ALVAREZ.

NO. SAJEEN BELL-CLARK.

HERE. VIOLA WATSON.

HERE.

JACQUES MOISE.

HERE. NIKOLE CLEARE.

PRESENT.

DAVID LEVIN AND ERIC GNAGE ARE ABSENT AND EXCUSED.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

[4. Approval of Minutes]

WE'LL MOVE ON NEXT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LAST MEETING MINUTES FROM JUNE 7TH, 2023.

I'D LIKE TO CALL FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES.

I APPROVE. I SECOND.

NIKOLE CLEARE.

YES. ALEXANDRA ALVAREZ.

YES. SAJEEN.

BELL-CLARK. YES.

JACQUES MOISE.

YES. VIOLA WATSON.

YES. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 7TH TWO 2023.

PASSED 5 TO 0.

OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY PLANNING BOARD DISCLOSURES THIS MORNING? DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO DISCLOSE REGARDING THE AGENDA THIS MORNING? NO. NO SITE VISITS, NO CONVERSATIONS.

AWESOME. OKAY.

I WILL NOW TURN THE AGENDA OVER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE STATEMENT AND SWEARING IN.

[6. City Attorney Statement & Swearing In]

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

ALL PERSONS TESTIFYING BEFORE THIS BOARD MUST BE SWORN IN, IN REGARD TO ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE AGENDA.

THE PETITIONER, AN EFFECTIVE PERSON, SHALL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT EVIDENCE, TO BRING FORTH WITNESSES, CROSS-EXAMINE ANY WITNESSES AND REBUFF ANY TESTIMONY.

ALL EVIDENCE WILL REASONABLY PRUDENT PERSON TO THEIR BUSINESS SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE, WHETHER SUCH EVIDENCE SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE IN COURT OF LAW, HOWEVER, IMMATERIAL, UNDULY REPETITIOUS EVIDENCE SHALL BE EXCLUDED.

STATEMENT OF COUNCIL SHALL ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS ARGUMENT, NOT BE CONSIDERED AS TESTIMONY.

HOWEVER, COUNCIL FOR PARTIES SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO CROSS-EXAMINE.

THE BOARD SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REFUSE TO HEAR ANY TESTIMONY WHICH IS RELEVANT, IRRELEVANT OR REPETITIVE.

HEARSAY EVIDENCE MAY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUPPLEMENT AND EXPLAIN OTHER EVIDENCE, BUT IT SHOULD NOT BE SUFFICIENT BY ITSELF.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE MAY BE PRESENTED IN THE FORM OF A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL IF AVAILABLE .

UPON REQUEST, PARTIES SHOULD BE GIVEN OPPORTUNITY TO COMPARE THE COPY.

THE PARTY SHALL BE ENTITLED TO CONDUCT CROSS-EXAMINATION WHEN TESTIMONIES ARE PROVIDED, DOCUMENTS ARE MADE.

GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES ARE THE MANNER IN WHICH THE PRESENTATION IS MADE IS FIRST, THE PETITIONER OR HIS OR HER REPRESENTATIVE WILL MAKE THE PRESENTATION AND THE PETITIONER CHOOSE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION AND SHALL INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE NATURE OF THE OF THE PETITION.

IF THERE WAS ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

IN ADDITION, THE PETITIONER SHALL INTRODUCE ANY EXHIBITS WITNESSES AT THE SIZE OF THE CITY OF THE BOARD TO CONSIDER.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PETITION TO DEMONSTRATE THE APPLICATION CONSISTENT WITH CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY CODE.

STAFF WILL THEN PRESENT ITS REPORT.

STAFF REPORT WILL GENERALLY INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS OF THE PETITIONER AND ANALYSIS OF THE PETITION CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CITY CODE. PARTIES WHO ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION SHALL MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION.

THE PARTY SHALL INTRODUCE ANY EXHIBITS OR WITNESSES PARTIES WHO ARE NOT IN OPPOSITION AND MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION.

CITY PERSON IN ATTENDANCE SHALL PROVIDE RESPONSE TO ANY PARTY TO THE PROCEEDING AND FINAL PRESENTATION ARE THEN MADE BY THE APPLICANT AND CITY STAFF.

FINALLY, THE BOARD SHALL DELIBERATE ON THE PETITION.

NO FURTHER TESTIMONY SHALL BE TAKEN AND MEMBERS OF CITY OF THE BOARD SHALL NOT ASK FURTHER QUESTIONS OF PERSON PRESENT TESTIMONY.

THE BOARD SHALL DISCUSS THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS PRESENTED AT THE PROCEEDING AND VOTE ON THE PETITION BASED UPON THE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

I COULD SWEAR IN THE WITNESS IF YOU WANT ME TO.

PARDON ME. TO SWEAR IN ANY WITNESSES THAT WILL TESTIFY?

[00:05:03]

SURE. YES. OKAY.

IF ANYONE PLANNING TO TESTIFY TODAY, PLEASE STAND UP.

RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH UNDER GOD? THANK YOU. YOU MAY SIT. THANK YOU.

WE'LL NOW OPEN THE FLOOR FOR GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS.

IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT BEFORE WE BEGIN? OKAY. THE FLOOR IS NOW CLOSED.

THE FIRST ITEM THAT WE'LL HEAR, ITEM 8A TEMPORARY ORDER TWO FIVE.

MADAM CHAIR BEFORE YOU INTRODUCE THE ITEM, WE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT WE TAKE 9C BEFORE 8A 9A AND 9B AS 8A, 9A AND 9B ALL GO TOGETHER.

SURE. SO WE ARE REQUESTING THAT WE DO WE TAKE 9C FIRST FOR EDEN WEST.

AND THEN WE'LL DO 8A 9A AND 9B, PLEASE.

NO PROBLEM. OKAY. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHTY. SO WE'RE GOING TO HEAR ITEM 9C TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 75.

[9.c TBO 75 - Board Order approving/denying variance application for Eden West, from Section 10-4.10(D)(2)(b)(ii), to allow for Entrance Wall signs to be located on the perimeter walls of the site, in lieu of the requirement of Entrance Wall signs to be located at vehicular entrance.]

BOARD ORDER APPROVING OR DENYING VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR EDEN WEST FROM SECTION 10-4.10, SUBSECTION D, SUBSECTION 2.

SUBSECTION B, SUBSECTION 2 TO ALLOW FOR EAST EXCUSE ME, TO ALLOW FOR ENTRANCE WALL SIGN TO BE LOCATED ON THE PERIMETER OF THE WALLS ON THE SITE IN LIEU OF THE REQUIREMENT OF AN ENTRANCE WALL SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE.

WE'LL FIRST HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. HELLO, I'M JOHN VOIGT DOUMAR, ALLSWORTH ATTORNEY FOR THE APPLICANT EDEN WEST.

AND THE PROPOSAL IS TO MOVE BASICALLY THE LOCATION WHERE THE FINAL TWO SIGNS FOR THE EDEN WEST APARTMENT COMPLEX WOULD GO.

YOU SEE, ON THE BOARD, THAT'S JUST THE ARTIST RENDERING.

I'M SURE YOU'VE SEEN THEM RIGHT DOWN THE STREET THAT THEY'RE IN EXISTENCE NOW.

LET'S SEE IF I CAN WORK THIS.

SEE, THIS IS ON THE LEFT.

YOU SEE THE EXISTING TWO SIGNS WHICH COMPLY WITH THE CODE AND THEIR LOCATION.

THE ARROWS ARE SHOWING THEM.

THAT'S THE MAIN ENTRANCE ON MCNAB ROAD.

THE CODE ALLOWS TWO SIGNS ON EACH SIDE OF THE TWO DIFFERENT ENTRANCES.

IF YOU SEE LOOKING TO THE TOP OF THE PHOTO ONTO NORTHWEST 70TH, YOU SEE WHERE THE OTHER ENTRANCE IS AND THAT'S WHERE THE CODE WOULD SAY THE OTHER TWO SIGNS WOULD GO.

AND THE REASON OF FILING THIS APPLICATION IS WE WANT TO MOVE THEM TO THE TWO CORNERS ON PINE ISLAND ROAD, THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER, WHERE THEY WOULD BE MUCH MORE VISIBLE, AS YOU SEE THERE, WOULD BE FACING SOME TREES AND THERE'S NOT A LOT OF REALLY USE FOR TWO SIGNS OVER THERE.

IT'S NOT A OBVIOUSLY HIGHLY TRAFFICKED STREET LIKE BOTH PINE ISLAND AND MCNAB.

THIS IS THE APPROVED SITE PLAN.

AND YOU SEE UP IN BLUE WHAT I WAS JUST SAYING, THAT'S WHERE THE CODE WOULD PUT THE SIGNS.

WE HAVE THE TWO EXISTING ONES THERE AT THE BOTTOM, WHICH I HAD SHOWN YOU, AND THE TWO RED CIRCLES ON THE LEFT.

THOSE WALLS EXIST AND THE LANDSCAPING IS THERE.

THEY'RE JUST LOOKING ESSENTIALLY TO PUT THE NAME OF THE APARTMENT COMPLEX THERE RATHER THAN WHERE THE MAIN NORTHERN ENTRANCE WOULD BE.

THIS IS WHAT THE SIGN LOOKS LIKE.

AND IT SHOWS YOU THE WALLS THAT ARE THERE.

IT WOULD GO ON THE MIDDLE DIAGONAL PORTION OF EACH WALL.

AND IN THE UPPER RIGHT, YOU SEE THE RELATIVE SIZE.

THERE'S NO VARIANCE AS FAR AS THE SIZE OF THE SIGN.

IT'S JUST THE LOCATION OF PUTTING THEM THERE.

AND YOU SEE THESE ARE GOING TO BE 16 INCH LETTERS WHERE THE CODE WOULD ALLOW 18 INCH LETTERS.

AS I SAID, THE LANDSCAPING IS ALREADY THERE.

SO THEY OBVIOUSLY THEY WANT IT TO LOOK NICE TO ATTRACT PEOPLE.

IT'S PARTIALLY BRANDING OF THE FACILITY AND IT'S CERTAINLY AN ADVERTISING FEATURE FOR THE BUSINESS.

AND I THINK ALSO IT HELPS WITH THE SAFETY ON PINE ISLAND ROAD.

IF YOU SEE EXACTLY WHERE THEY ARE, YOU'RE NOT AT THE LAST MINUTE TRYING TO GET OVER, YOU KNOW, WHERE ON MCNAB IT'S VERY CLEAR WHERE THE ENTRANCE IS.

THE NEXT ONE HERE.

THAT'S ACTUALLY THE APPROVED SITE PLAN.

AND THESE ARE THE TWO WALLS ON THE LEFT.

AND YOU SEE THE WHERE THE SIGNS OBVIOUSLY WOULD GO.

THE WORDING IS EDEN WEST WOULD BE ABOVE WHERE THE PLANTS ARE THERE.

AND I THINK THAT'S IT AS FAR AS THE SLIDES.

SO. THE VARIANCE TO CERTAIN STANDARDS.

WE SUBMIT WE AGREE WITH THE STAFF REPORT THAT WE FEEL WE MEET THE STANDARDS FOR A VARIANCE, THAT THERE ARE SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES, OBVIOUSLY BEING THAT THE

[00:10:06]

ORIENTATION OF THE PROPERTY, IT WOULD NOT BE SAFE HAVING AN ENTRANCE ON PINE ISLAND.

SO HAVING THE ENTRANCE ON NORTHWEST 70TH WOULD THEN DEPRIVE THEM OF SIGNAGE ON PINE ISLAND WHERE WE FEEL IT IS MORE APPROPRIATE AND THE SHAPE AND CONFIGURATION IS NOT OUR DOING, IT'S WHAT WE HAVE.

IT'S CERTAINLY NOT A IT'S THE MINIMUM VARIANCE.

WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR TWO ADDITIONAL SIGNS TO HAVE SIX.

WE'RE ASKING TO MOVE TWO OF THEM.

AND CERTAINLY NOT A SPECIAL PRIVILEGE BECAUSE IF IT WAS STILL THE COLONY SHOPPING CENTER, YOU KNOW, THE SIGNS WOULD BE ON PINE ISLAND.

THIS JUST BECAUSE IT'S A RESIDENTIAL, IT SAYS TO PUT THEM AT THE ENTRANCE, WHICH NORMALLY MAKES SENSE.

WE BELIEVE IT'S IN GENERAL HARMONY WITH THE PURPOSE INTENT OF THE CODE WILL NOT HARM THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE OR ANYTHING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR THE OTHER BUSINESSES.

AND IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO WE HOPE THAT YOU AGREE.

CERTAINLY IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE ANY? DO WE? DOES THE BOARD REQUIRE OR NEED A PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY? WOULD YOU LIKE TO HEAR IT? NO. OKAY.

DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? YES. YES, THEY ARE.

OKAY. IS IT GOING TO BE MORE VISIBLE FOR PEOPLE WHO MIGHT BE DRIVING BY AND LOOKING? BECAUSE I JUST CAME I DRIVE BY THERE ALL THE TIME.

I JUST PASS THE AREA AS MATTER OF FACT, THIS MORNING COMING IN AND YOU REALLY DON'T SEE THE SIGN UNTIL YOU'RE ALMOST UP ON IT.

RIGHT. AT LEAST COMING IN FROM THE MCNAB BECAUSE I CAME UP ON MCNAB AND THEN TURN ON PINE ISLAND.

YES. YES. SO, WELL, YOU SEE ON THIS SLIDE, THEY'VE GOT THE EDEN WEST, THE BANNERS UP THERE, THE TEMPORARY BANNERS, AND THAT'S WHERE THE SIGNS WOULD GO.

AND I ACTUALLY, AGAIN, CHECKED THAT OUT THIS MORNING, I THINK WHEN I WAS SITTING COMING NORTH ON PINE ISLAND THAT YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN THAT ONE THERE.

SO EVEN IF I WAS IN THE LEFT LANE, I'D SAY, OKAY, I GOT TIME TO GET OVER AND MAKE THE RIGHT AND GO ON 70TH AS OPPOSED TO, OH, I'VE GOT TO GO OVER TO MCNAB AND TRY TO GET IN ON THAT SIDE.

SO LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE GARISH.

THEY'RE HOPEFULLY TASTEFUL SIGNS, BUT I BELIEVE THEY WILL BE VERY VISIBLE FROM PINE ISLAND.

AND, YOU KNOW, THE ROAD GOING NORTH CURVES A LITTLE THERE.

SO COMING SOUTH, THAT HELPS WITH THE VISIBILITY.

DOES THE SIGNS HAVE ANY LIGHT AROUND IT? LIKE, LET'S SAY IN THE EVENING TIME? WOULD THERE BE LIGHT REFLECTING ON THE SIGNS AT ALL? I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE A PICTURE.

YOU SEE THE EXISTING SIGNS THERE? I BELIEVE THEY HAVE A BACKLIGHT ON THEM BEHIND THE LETTERING.

I DON'T KNOW BECAUSE I JUST SAW IT THIS MORNING AGAIN.

IT'S THERE'S NO SPOTLIGHT OR ANYTHING ON THERE, CERTAINLY.

BUT I BELIEVE THE SIGNS HAVE SOME ILLUMINATION BEHIND THEM.

IT'S OKAY.

COLLETTE, I HAVE A QUESTION.

GO AHEAD. GOOD MORNING.

GOOD MORNING. I DEFINITELY AGREE WITH THE SIGNS BEING PLACED ON MCNAB BECAUSE I DRIVE PAST THAT LOCATION MANY, MANY TIMES.

WHILE IT WILL CERTAINLY HELP.

SO YOU'RE REMOVING THE SIGNS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLACED ON THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY? THAT'S CORRECT, YES.

AND HOW ARE YOU? WILL THERE BE ANY SUBSTITUTION FOR THAT? HOW ARE YOU GOING TO IDENTIFY THE? I BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE NOT PLANNING TO HAVE A SIGN THERE THAT THEY FEEL LIKE THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A LOT OF TRAFFIC ON NORTHWEST 70TH EXCEPT SOMEONE WHO WOULD HAVE SEEN IT ON PINE ISLAND AND TURNING IN.

I THINK THERE'S GOING TO BE ONE OF THOSE LITTLE ENTRANCE.

BUT THAT'S WHAT I SAID, WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNS JUST TO MOVE THOSE OVER.

AND WHAT IS THAT ENTRANCE LIKE ON 70TH? IS IT GATED OR IS IT JUST OPEN TO DRIVE? IT'S AN OPEN ENTRANCE.

OKAY. AND I DIDN'T SEE THE HEIGHT OF THIS THE WALL.

CAN YOU GO BACK ONE? I BELIEVE.

VERY, VERY SMALL. I'D HAVE TO PULL OUT MY FILE.

IS IT TOO SMALL TO READ UP THERE? BUT I BELIEVE. OH, NO THE SIGN IS 29 INCHES.

OKAY. IT SEATS ALL THE WAY TO THE TOP.

MAYBE IT'S BIGGER ON THIS, THOUGH.

IT'S LIKE AN EIGHT FOOT WALL, 65 INCHES.

YOU CAN SEE THIS. THE WIDTH IS THE 65 INCHES THE HEIGHT.

[00:15:03]

NO, NO, NO. THAT'S THE SIGN.

I'M TALKING ABOUT THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL.

RIGHT. AND I'M SAYING I CAN PULL THE PLAN OUT OF MY FILE AND LOOK AT IT MORE CAREFULLY.

SIX FEET HIGH.

YES. I'M SORRY.

CHRISTIAN WATERVAL, CITY OF TAMARAC, ASSOCIATE PLANNER.

YES. IT'S A CONTINUATION OF A SIX FOOT HIGH WALL ON THE CORNERS.

AND THEN IT HAS AN ALUMINUM FENCE AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPERTY.

OKAY. AND LANDSCAPING BELOW.

CORRECT. I CAN IF I MAY ASSIST.

GO AHEAD AND DO THE PRESENTATION. YEAH, BECAUSE THE CITY NORMALLY ANSWERS MOST OF THE QUESTIONS I'M GOING TO ASK ANYWAY.

YES, I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT, BECAUSE OUR SIGN PERSON DID THE TECHNICAL PART, WHICH IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE.

MY PART IS REALLY THE LOCATION OF THE SIGNS.

AND SO SAYING I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT BEING MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE ON THAT.

NO PROBLEM. SURE. SO JUST QUICKLY, JUST TO BE BRIEF, SO THE TWO STARS, THE FOUR STARS THAT'S INDICATED IS WHERE THE SIGNS ARE TO BE, YOU KNOW, PERMITTED PER CODE.

SO THIS IS THE EXISTING WALL SIGNS ON THE SOUTH ENTRANCE ALONG MCNAB ROAD.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS A NIGHT TIME VIEW AND IT HAS ILLUMINATED LIGHT FEATURES IN THE REAR.

IT'S A REVERSE ILLUMINATED CHANNEL, LETTERS ON BOTH SIDES.

SO AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE RIGHT SIDE AND THE LEFT SIDE.

SO THE PROPOSED LOCATION.

SO WHERE YOU SEE THE RED BUBBLE IS WHERE THE CODE REQUIRES THE LOCATION.

BUT IF YOU LOOK TO THE LEFT ON THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF THE BLUE TRIANGLES, YOU'LL SEE THOSE ARE THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS.

AND THIS IS THE NORTH ENTRANCE FROM 70TH STREET.

SO YOU SEE IT'S AN OPEN ENTRANCE.

THE INTENT ON THE RIGHT WHEN YOU ENTER ON THE RIGHT IS GOING TO BE A GATE, A SECURITY GATE, AND ALSO LOCATED ON THE LEFT BECAUSE THE TWO BUILDINGS ARE SEPARATED.

AND ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS A NIGHT VIEW.

AND THIS IS THE ACTUAL SITE OR THE WALL ITSELF IS SIX FEET HIGH.

AND THIS IS HOW IT WOULD LOOK ON THE CORNERS.

SO YOU HAVE THIS PHOTO, WHICH IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER.

AND THIS PHOTO, WHICH IS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER, THEY BOTH MEET CODE AS FAR AS THE HEIGHT OF THE SIGN, THE EXCUSE ME, THE LETTERS.

IT'S 16 INCHES WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING.

OUR CODE REQUIRES 18 INCHES.

AT MINIMUM, THIS IS EASTBOUND WEST MCNAB ROAD.

TRAFFIC FLOW ON THE LEFT IS A SOUTHBOUND PHOTO OF NORTH PINE ISLAND.

ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS A NORTHBOUND PHOTO OF NORTH PINE ISLAND ROAD.

AND YES, WE'RE HERE FOR A VARIANCE.

THE STRATEGIC PLAN, IT MEETS GOAL NUMBER FOUR AND IT COMPLIES WITH OUR CODE TO THE EXTENT OF THEY ARE JUST RELOCATING THE TWO LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT TO THE SIDES OF THE PROPERTY.

THANK YOU. AND I ASKED ABOUT THE [INAUDIBLE] ENTRANCE, BECAUSE IF IT'S A SECURITY, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE PLANNING A SECURITY GATE OR IF IT'S PROBABLY ONLY GOING TO BE MAINLY BY THE RESIDENTS, I WOULD UNDERSTAND NOT HAVING A SIGN.

OKAY UNDERSTOOD. OKAY.

OKAY. YES.

THEY DON'T HAVE A WALL ON THAT LOCATION.

SO, YOU KNOW, THE INTENT WOULD BE TO HAVE A WALL AT THAT LOCATION FOR THE SIGNAGE.

BUT IT'S BETTER FOR THE PROPOSAL TO BE ALONG PINE ISLAND ROAD AS FOR VISIBILITY AND TRAFFIC FLOW PURPOSES.

YEAH, I TOTALLY AGREE.

THANK YOU. NO PROBLEM.

QUESTION. THIS LOCATION ON 70TH STREET.

YOU SAID THERE IS GOING TO BE A GUARD GATE THERE OR SOME TYPE OF GATE THERE.

YES. YES, THAT'S WHAT.

OKAY. SO THAT'S WHERE THE CITY THE INITIAL SIGN SHOULD HAVE BEEN THAT YOU'RE REQUESTING.

RIGHT. THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ON BOTH SIDES OF THAT NORTHWEST 70TH ENTRANCE IN THE PICTURE, IN THE LANDSCAPING.

AND THAT'S WHAT IS REQUESTING TO MOVE THOSE TWO TO THE CORNERS ON PINE ISLAND.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

YES. JUST FOR REFERENCE IN COMPARISON, THIS IS THE SOUTH WALL ON MCNAB.

THIS IS EXISTING.

SO THEY HAVE A WALL AND THEN IT GOES INTO THE COMPLEX, WHEREAS NORTHWEST 70TH STREET DOESN'T HAVE A WALL.

ALL THEY HAVE IS THOSE CONCRETE PILLARS.

SO BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE A WALL, THAT'S WHY THEY ARE UTILIZING PINE ISLAND.

SO WHERE WAS THE ORIGINAL SIGN SUPPOSED TO GO IF THEY DON'T HAVE A WALL? WAS IT GOING TO BE A STANDALONE MONUMENT SIGN.

THEY'RE ALLOWED.

NO THEY'RE ALLOWED TO PER THE CODE.

THEY'RE ALLOWED ENTRANCE SIGNS TWO ENTRANCE SIGNS ON EACH SIDE AT THE MEDIAN.

SO PER CODE SECTION 10-4.10, SUBSECTION D2B1 GENERAL SIGN REQUIREMENTS ALLOWS FOR A MAXIMUM OF TWO ENTRANCE WALL OR

[00:20:09]

MONUMENT SIGNS PERMITTED PER SUBDIVISION OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EACH VEHICULAR ENTRANCE.

SO BECAUSE THERE'S TWO ENTRANCES, THEY'RE ALLOWED FOUR SIGNS, TWO ON EACH SIDE.

BUT WHAT THEY'RE REQUESTING RELIEF FROM IS PERMITTING THE ENTRANCE WALL OR MONUMENT SIGN TO BE LOCATED AT THE ADJACENT SIDES OF THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE.

NO, NO, NO. I UNDERSTAND THAT.

WHAT I'M SAYING IS ORIGINALLY, WHEN IT WAS DESIGNED, THE SITE PLAN AND THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL [INAUDIBLE] LOCATED ON THE 70TH.

NO, MA'AM. OKAY.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING.

SO IF TWO ARE PERMITTED PER ENTRANCE AND NOW WE'RE SHIFTING ONE FROM ONE OF THE SIDE ENTRANCES TO THE FRONT.

SO NOW WE'RE ESSENTIALLY MOVING THE TWO ENTRANCES INTO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS, BUT THAT STILL HAS AN OPENING.

SO NOW WE HAVE THREE ENTRANCES.

IS THAT CORRECT? OR IS JUST THE VISIBILITY? SO WE'RE NOT CREATING AN ENTRANCE ON PINE ISLAND? ONLY VISIBILITY.

THE TWO STARS INDICATED TO THE TOP THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE LOCATED.

BUT PER THIS PHOTO, THE RED CIRCLE IS THE SAME LOCATION.

THIS IS THE CODE REQUIRED LOCATION.

HOWEVER, ON THE LEFT SIDE, THEY'RE SHOWING THE TWO SIGNS GOING TO BE ALONG PINE ISLAND ROAD.

SO IT'S STILL ADVOCATING TWO ENTRANCES, ONE FROM NORTHWEST 70TH STREET, THE OTHER FROM WEST MCNAB ROAD.

THANK YOU. YEAH.

I HAVE ONE FINAL QUESTION.

WHERE THE CIRCLE, THE RED CIRCLE LOCATION, IS THERE GOING TO BE A LIFEGUARD THERE? SO IF SOMEONE SHOULD DRIVE UP, IF THERE IS NO SIGN, THEY WILL KNOW WHERE THEY ARE.

THAT'S PART OF THE APPLICANT.

MY UNDERSTANDING IS THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A GUARD THERE.

NO, IT'S AS YOU SEE ON THE ENTRANCE ON MCNAB, THERE'S NOT A GUARD EITHER.

SO IT'S I THINK JUST BECAUSE THERE'S NOT MUCH REASON TO BE TRAVELING DOWN NORTHWEST 70TH, THEY'RE GOING TO KNOW WITH THE SIGN THERE.

IF THAT BECOMES A PROBLEM, OBVIOUSLY THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ADDRESS IT.

THEY DON'T WANT TO CREATE EITHER A TRAFFIC HAZARD OR HARM THERE, BUT THEY DIDN'T WANT TO COME IN ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNS UNLESS IT TURNS OUT THEY NEED THAT OR IF THEY NEED SECURITY OF SOME SORT THERE.

WELL, I THINK THERE SHOULD BE SOME TYPE OF SIGN THERE, EVEN IF IT'S JUST ONE SIGN, BECAUSE ALL THE SIGNS ARE REALLY ON THE THERE WILL BE NOTHING INDICATING ON THAT SIDE OF THE STREET OR THE AREA SHOWING THAT THIS IS THE LOCATION.

SO IF YOU'RE DRIVING, IT CAN CREATE A CONFUSION LATER AND PEOPLE ARE PULLING IN AND THEN FINDING OUT LATER THEY'RE AT THE WRONG PLACE AND THEN THEY'RE TRYING TO GET OUT, THAT COULD CAUSE PROBLEMS. YES, I AGREE.

I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION.

SO AS PER CODE, THIS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, DOESN'T MEET THE STANDARD IN REGARDS TO THE ENTRANCE AND THE EXIT.

SO I GUESS THE QUESTION WOULD BE WITH THAT SOUTH SIDE BE CONSIDERED AN EXIT AND THIS SIDE CONSIDERED THE ENTRANCE? NO, MA'AM. BOTH SIDES ARE THE PURPOSE IS FOR ENTRANCE AND EXITS, INGRESS AND EGRESS.

SO THAT'S WHAT THE CONCERN IS IN REGARDS TO TRAFFIC.

CORRECT. SO, YES, THIS ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE VIEW.

THIS IS OFF MCNAB.

SO THIS IS, WE WOULD SAY, THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE BECAUSE THEY HAVE ACCESS TO GET FROM MCNAB TO NORTHWEST 70TH STREET FROM THIS SAME LOCATION.

SO THERE'S TWO OPTIONS TO ENTER THE COMMUNITY.

AND ALL OF THE BUILDINGS ARE GUARDED BY GATES AS FAR AS ENTRY.

SO YOU CAN ACCESS FROM MCNAB AND GET TO NORTHWEST 70TH STREET WITHOUT ENTERING INTO THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THERE'S A GATE LOCATED HERE FOR EXIT AND ENTRANCE.

THERE'S A GATE LOCATED ON THE LEFT SIDE.

AND EVEN ON THIS SIDE, THIS IS STILL BEING BUILT.

THAT'S WHY THE PHOTOS ARE LIKE THIS, BUT RIGHT HERE IS GOING TO BE ANOTHER GATE FOR ENTRY AND EXIT AS LONG AS ALSO ON THE LEFT SIDE AS WELL.

QUESTION. I THINK THERE SHOULD BE A SIGN ON THE NORTH ENTRANCE BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE YOU GUYS TRY TO MOVE THE SIGN.

BUT WHY CAN'T WE JUST ADD LIKE AN ADDITIONAL SIGN THERE? YOU KNOW.

WE'RE NOT OPPOSED TO IT.

THEY'RE ALLOWED TO IF THEY WOULD LIKE, JUST THIS IS THE FIRST BUILDING RIGHT OFF OF NORTH PINE ISLAND ROAD.

AS SOON AS YOU ENTER NORTHWEST 70TH STREET, IT'S ON YOUR RIGHT HAND SIDE.

I'M NOT SAYING YOU CAN'T MISS IT, BUT THIS IS A PRETTY VISIBLE LOCATION.

YOU SHOULDN'T MISS IT AT ANY POINT.

OKAY. WELL, I'M OKAY WITH THEM REQUESTING THE TWO SIGNS TO BE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER.

BUT I THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE AN ADDITIONAL SIGN, EVEN ONE SIGN ON THAT 70TH STREET.

[00:25:03]

JUST YOU CAN MAKE THIS RECOMMENDATION ADDED THAT YOU SUGGEST THAT THEY KEEP AT LEAST ONE SIGN AT THE NORTHERN ENTRANCE SO WE CAN PROCEED WITH THE VARIANCE AND YOU CAN RECOMMEND THAT YOU WANT A SIGN AT THE NORTH ENTRANCE AS WELL.

AND CERTAINLY THEY WOULDN'T BE OPPOSED TO THAT.

THEY JUST DIDN'T WANT TO COME IN SAYING WE WANT SIGNS EVERYWHERE.

YOU KNOW, THEY WANTED TO JUST ASK TO MOVE THEM, BUT THEY'D BE HAPPY TO HAVE A SIGN THERE AS WELL.

WHEN WE VOTE VIOLA, YOU CAN RECOMMEND THAT IN THE WHEN YOU MAKE THE MOTION.

YES, YOU CAN. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I WILL MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE GET.

ONE SECOND I'M GOING TO ASK THE IF THERE'S ANY ONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WANTS TO MAKE A COMMENT OR ASK A QUESTION.

THE FLOOR IS NOW OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WANTS TO MAKE A STATEMENT OR ASK A QUESTION? OKAY. THE FLOOR IS NOW CLOSED.

NOW WE'LL ASK FOR THE MOTION.

OKAY. I MOTION THAT WE DO THE TWO VARIANCES REQUESTED AND ALSO AN ADDITIONAL SIGN AT THE 70TH STREET LOCATION, SOME TYPE OF SIGN INDICATING WHERE THEY ARE AND THE NAME OF THE BUILDING, WHETHER IT'S EAST WEST.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I SECOND THAT.

VIOLA, JUST TO BE SURE.

SO THE VARIANCE THEY'RE REQUESTING IS FOR THESE TWO ADDITIONAL, LET ME SAY ADDITIONAL SIGNS TO BE ADDED TO PINE ISLAND. AND YOU'RE ASKING THAT THEY KEEP THE CODE APPROVED LOCATION ON 70TH? YES. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE LIKE THE OTHER SIGNS THAT THEY ALREADY HAVE THERE JUST SOMETHING INDICATING TO SOMEONE WHEN SOMEONE DRIVES UP THERE, THEY WILL KNOW, OKAY, THIS IS WHERE THEY'RE INTENDING TO BE AND NOT HAVING A CONFUSION, THEY COME AND THEY'RE NOT SURE.

THERE'S NO SIGN. THERE IS NOT DON'T MAKE ANY SENSE.

SO MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE THE VARIANCE SHOULD BE FOR ADDITIONAL NOT REPLACEMENT, THE ADDITIONAL TWO SIGNS ON PINE ISLAND, BECAUSE ON 70TH IT'S GOING TO BE HARD ADDING ONLY ONE SIGN BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE ENTRANCE RIGHT NOW.

SO I THINK THEY WOULD GO AHEAD AND DO THE CODE APPROVE TWO SIGNS.

SO YOU CAN SEE FROM EACH SIDE.

ACCORDING TO CODE, THEY CAN ONLY HAVE TWO SIGNS.

MADAM CHAIR. YES, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

SO WE CAN'T CONTINUE.

WELL, YOU HAVE TO VOTE ON IT.

AND LET ME CLARIFY THE RECORD ON THIS MOTION IS BASICALLY A MOTION TO GRANT THE VARIANCE AND ALSO REQUEST THAT APPLICANT KEEP THE SIGNS THAT THEY HAVE ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PROJECT.

AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT YOU.

YES. AND THAT'S HER MOTION TOO.

YES. THAT THEY WOULD KEEP THE NORTHERN SIGN ON THE SIGNS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT AND ALSO GRANT THE VARIANCE WITH RESPECT TO THIS ADDITIONAL SIGN.

OKAY. ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENTS.

OKAY. SO I'LL REITERATE IF THAT'S OKAY.

YEAH. YOU GUYS, I THINK I'M JUST SAYING YOU GUYS ARE ON THE SAME PAGE.

OKAY. SO AS A THIRD CONFIRMATION, WE'RE MAKING A MOTION TO GRANT THE VARIANCE WITH A CAVEAT OF ADDING ADDITIONAL SIGNS AT THE ORIGINAL CODE REQUIRED LOCATION.

YEAH, THAT'S THE VOTE WE ALL UNDERSTAND.

I DON'T KNOW THAT THE THIRD SIGN HAS TO BE LIKE A SIX FOOT SIGN.

IT COULD JUST BE FLAGS IN THAT AREA OF THESE NORTHWEST 70TH STREET.

SINCE WE'RE DOING THE OTHER TWO SIGNS.

HOWEVER, I WOULD ASK YOU GUYS IF THAT'S WHAT YOU ALSO RECOMMEND, A NEWER SIGN OR JUST THE FLAGS IN THAT 70TH? IF WE DO THE MOTION FOR THE VARIANCE TO BE ACCEPTED WITH EXTRA SIGNAGE, NOW WE'RE CREATING ANOTHER HIGH VISIBILITY ZONE ON THE OTHER SIDE WITH SIX FOOT WALLS.

AM I CORRECT OR NO? IT COULD BE A STANDALONE SIGN AS WELL.

YEAH.

THAT'S A REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE.

AND SO I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS NOT OBJECTING TO MEET THOSE REQUIREMENTS IN LIEU OF GRANTING THE VARIANCE TO HAVE THE SIGN ON PINE ISLAND AND MCNAB.

SO THEY HAVE NO OBJECTION TO DOING WHAT THE MAJORITY SEEMS LIKE THE MAJORITY OF COMMISSION WANTS.

OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.

[00:30:01]

BOARD. OKAY.

ALL RIGHTY. ARE WE READY TO VOTE? LET'S GO. SO.

NIKOLE CLEARE.

YES. JACQUES MOISE.

YES. ALEXANDRA ALVAREZ.

YES. SAJEEN BELL-CLARK.

YES. VIOLA WATSON.

YES. MOTION TO MAKE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITH CONDITIONS OUTLINED BY STAFF AND THE BOARD.

PASS 5 TO 0.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IF I MAY ADD, WE'RE GOING TO LOOK FURTHER INTO THE CODE JUST TO VERIFY THE TWO SIGNS THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING NOW, BECAUSE THERE'S ONE CODE RELIEF.

ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS FOR ONE CODE RELIEF FOR THE LOCATION OF THE NORTHERN SIGN.

AND WE HAVE TO VERIFY IF A MONUMENT SIGN WOULD BE ALLOWED THERE, YOU KNOW, FOR THE ADDITIONAL LOCATION THAT YOU GUYS REQUESTED OR RECOMMENDED.

IF WE'RE NOT ABLE TO DO A MONUMENT SIGN, CAN THEY DO A VARIANCE AND DO A SMALLER SOMETHING SMALLER OR ANYTHING ELSE? THEIR MINIMUM REQUIRED IS SIX FEET HIGH SO THEY CAN GO SHORT IF THEY LIKE HIGH, IT STILL REQUIRES A LANDSCAPING BASE.

SO THAT'S TO TAKE A CONSIDERATION.

GO AHEAD. DO HAVE MADAM CHAIR.

YES. ROBERT JOHNSON, SENIOR PLANNER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

A DIRECTIONAL SIGN WOULD BE PERMITTED ON ONE OF THOSE COLUMNS.

OKAY. AND THAT'S PERMITTED BY CODE.

OKAY, THAT WORKS.

OKAY. OKAY.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AWESOME WILL NOW MOVE ON.

WE'RE GOING TO READ ITEM 8A AND ITEM 9A TOGETHER AS THEY ARE RELATED.

[8.a TO2534 - An ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, adopting a Small Scale Local Land use Plan Amendment to the City of Tamarac’s Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map in accordance with Chapter 163, specifically Section 163.3187 of the Florida state statutes, for an area of approximately 3.0 net acres in size, located on the Northeast corner of Northwest 21 Avenue and West Prospect Road, addressed as 2099 West Prospect Road, fully described as Parcel “A,” “Prospect Plaza” according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 136, page 2 of the public records of Broward County, Florida, to change the future land use designation from “Low-Density Residential” to “Low-Medium, Residential” in order to allocate one (1) flexibility unit to facilitate the allowance of a school use and provide consistency with the Land Development Code in accordance with the intent of the comprehensive plan of the City of Tamarac; (Case No. 1-LUA-23) authorizing transmittal of the Small Scale Land Use Map Amendment to the Department of Economic Opportunity and the Broward County Planning Council for recertification of the City of Tamarac Future Land Use Map; providing for amendment to the land use plan to reflect such change; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date.]

AND 9B AS WELL.

AND 9B AS WELL.

OKAY. YEAH, I TOOK A LOOK AT THAT ONE.

I DIDN'T REALIZE IT. ITEM 8A IS TEMPORARY ORDER 2534.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A SMALL SCALE LOCAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE USE MAP IN ACCORDANCE TO CHAPTER 163, SPECIFICALLY SECTION 163.3187 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES FOR AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY THREE NET ACRES IN SIZE LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST 21ST AVENUE AND WEST PROSPECT ROAD, ADDRESSED AS 2099 WEST PROSPECT ROAD FULLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A PROSPECT PLAZA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREFORE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 136, PAGE TWO OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOCATE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE THE ALLOWANCE OF SCHOOL USE AND PROVIDE CONSISTENCY WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ORDINANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC CASE NUMBER 1LUA-23.

ACCORDING TO TRANSMITTAL OF THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND THE BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE PLAN TO REFLECT SUCH CHANGE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WE'LL ALSO HEAR ITEM 9A TEMPORARY ORDER 2535 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC REFERENCED IN SECTION 10-2.1 B OF THE CHAPTER 10 OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCE TO REFLECT REZONING OF A CERTAIN REAL ESTATE PROPERTY FULLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A PROSPECT PLAZA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREFORE THEREOF AS RECORDED A PLAT BOOK 136, PAGE TWO OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM CURRENT RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO R3 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2099 WEST PROSPECT ROAD IN ORDER TO ALLOCATE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE ALLOWANCE. EXCUSE ME.

I'M READING THE SAME ONE OVER.

SORRY ABOUT THAT.

I'M GOING TO MOVE DOWN TO 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 79.

BOARD ORDER, APPROVING, DENYING OR APPROVING SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION FOR A PROPOSED SCHOOL USE IN AN R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL

[00:35:06]

ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCE, AS WELL AS ITEM 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 75 BOARD ORDER APPROVING OR DENYING VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR.

I GOT CONFUSED WITH 9A, 9B AND 8A.

9A AND 8A READ ALMOST IDENTICALLY.

SO I APOLOGIZE. I WAS READING THE CORRECT ONE.

IT SOUNDED FAMILIAR.

SO I'LL REREAD 9A STARTING FROM THE TOP.

9A TEMPORARY ORDER 2535.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC REFERENCED IN SECTION 10.2.1 B OF THE CHAPTER 10 OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCE TO REFLECT REZONING OF A CERTAIN REAL ESTATE PROPERTY FULLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A PROSPECT PLAZA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 136, PAGE TWO OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM THE CURRENT RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ZONING CLASSIFICATION R3 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2099 WEST PROSPECT ROAD.

IN ORDER TO ALLOCATE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE THE ALLOWANCE OF A SCHOOL USE AND PROVIDE CONSISTENCY WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC.

CASE NUMBER 5-Z-23 AND 1-FLX-23 PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT FOR OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REFLECT SUCH CHANGE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

I WILL READ AGAIN 9B JUST FOR CLARITY.

WE'LL ALSO HEAR ITEM 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 79 BOARD ORDER APPROVING AND OR DENYING SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION FOR A PROPOSED SCHOOL USE IN OUR, A, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO TAMARAC CODE FOR ORDINANCE.

WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT FIRST ON ITEMS 8A, 9A, AND 9B.

AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE ON THAT.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

I PRINTED COPIES OF THE PRESENTATION IN CASE YOU WANTED TO FLIP THROUGH IT AS WELL.

KEITH POLIAKOFF HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR, FOR READING A VERY LONG EXPLANATION OF WHY WE'RE HERE.

BUT I'M GOING TO TRY TO MAKE IT CLEARER WHY WE'RE HERE.

AND IT'S GREAT SEEING YOUR CITY ATTORNEY AGAIN.

AND I'D LIKE TO START BY THANKING CHRISTIAN, ROB AND OF COURSE, MAXINE CALLOWAY FOR FIGURING OUT WHAT WE NEEDED TO DO TO GET BETHLEHEM AT THIS LOCATION.

THIS PROPERTY HAS ALWAYS BEEN A SCHOOL.

BEFORE I START, I WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE KNOWS WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.

THIS IS BUILT AS A SCHOOL.

IT WAS DEVELOPED AS A SCHOOL.

IT'S ALWAYS BEEN A SCHOOL.

THE PROBLEM OCCURRED IN 2018.

THE CITY DID A REWRITE OF ITS ZONING CODE, AND WHEN IT DID, THIS PROPERTY WAS NO LONGER DESIGNATED AS A SCHOOL.

COULD HAVE BEEN A SCRIVENER'S ERROR.

NO ONE CAN REALLY TELL WHAT OCCURRED WHEN WE LOOKED THROUGH THE MAPS AND THE SYSTEM.

THERE WAS A SCHOOL THERE, SO NO ONE CARED.

YOU KNOW, IT WAS FINE.

IT WAS OPEN. IT WAS CONSIDERED A NON-CONFORMING USE BECAUSE THE SCHOOL OPERATED AS IT ALWAYS HAS.

THEN COVID OCCURRED, AND WHEN COVID OCCURRED, THE SCHOOL WENT OUT OF BUSINESS.

AND SINCE THAT SCHOOL WENT OUT OF BUSINESS FOR SIX MONTHS, IT LOST ITS RIGHTS TO BE A SCHOOL UNDER THE CODE.

SO THEN WHEN BETHLEHEM CAME AND SAID, WE'D LOVE TO OPEN THIS YEAR, WE'RE ALREADY IN TAMARAC.

WE'VE BEEN IN TAMARACK FOREVER.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL KNOW BETHLEHEM, BUT BY WAY OF BACKGROUND, IT'S 100% MINORITY PRIVATE SCHOOL, ONE OF THE TOP TEN PUBLIC PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN THE AREA.

IT'S GOT A 90% RATE OF STUDENTS THAT MATRICULATE ONTO COLLEGE, EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE K THROUGH 8 PRE K THROUGH 8.

MOST OF THE STUDENTS END UP GOING TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS ON SCHOLARSHIPS TWO STUDENTS GOT INTO COLLEGES AT AGE OF 16 WITH RIDES AT UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI.

STUDENT RECENTLY JUST GRADUATED FOR FROM AN IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL IN ENGINEERING SO TRULY FANTASTIC FAMILY THAT IS A REAL TAMARAC SUCCESS STORY.

IN FACT, I WAS FORTUNATE THAT I'M HERE BECAUSE I GOT TO LEARN SO MUCH ABOUT THE SCHOOL AND THEIR OWNERSHIP.

THE MATRIARCH OF THE SCHOOL, ACTUALLY, THEY'RE FROM JAMAICA AND TEACH THE ENGLISH SYSTEM.

[00:40:05]

AND THE ENGLISH SYSTEM IS, QUITE FRANKLY, MUCH MORE ADVANCED THAN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF EDUCATION.

AND SHE WAS TEACHING STUDENTS HOW TO WRITE AT AGE OF FOUR IN HER SCHOOL AND GOT IN TROUBLE AND SAID, THEY ARE FOUR YEARS OLD.

THEY DON'T THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO WRITE AT AGE FOUR.

YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE YOU DOING? SO SHE ENDED UP LEAVING THE SCHOOL AND YEARS AND YEARS AGO STARTED THE SCHOOL ACTUALLY IN HER HOUSE, YOU KNOW, WITH TUTORING STUDENTS HOW TO WRITE AT A YOUNG AGE. AND THAT EVENTUALLY DEVELOPED INTO THE FIRST TAMARAC SCHOOL AT 6855 WEST COMMERCIAL.

THEY'VE BEEN BEYOND SUCCESSFUL.

THEY HAVE TWO CAMPUSES NOW, ONE IN TAMARAC, AND THEN THEY HAD TO OPEN UP A PRE K NOT TOO FAR AWAY, BUT ACROSS THE BORDER IN NORTH LAUDERDALE.

AND THIS WOULD GIVE THEM THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME TO ONE CAMPUS, WHICH IS WHAT THEY'VE DESIRED.

THE FACT THAT IT LOST ITS GRANDFATHERED STATUS IS WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY.

IT PROBABLY TOOK 90 DAYS OR MORE FOR STAFF TO EVEN FIGURE OUT HOW TO UNWIND THIS BECAUSE IT'S SO CONFUSING ONCE IT WENT THROUGH THE SYSTEM IN 2018.

SO I'M GOING TO TRY TO EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED AND HOW WE'RE GOING TO UNDO IT SO THAT THE SCHOOL CAN OPEN.

THE LOCATION IS 2900 WEST PROSPECT ROAD.

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO KNOW THIS LOCATION, IT'S RIGHT NEXT TO THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS BUILDING, THE NEW ONE THAT'S BEING BUILT THERE.

IF YOU GO THERE, IT'S LIKE REALLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

YOU CAN SEE IT BEING BUILT.

AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, THAT'S A PHOTO OF THE SCHOOL.

IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THERE.

IT'S BEEN THERE AS LONG AS I CAN REMEMBER.

AND IT PROBABLY DATES BACK TO THE 1980S FROM WHAT THE RECORDS SHOW.

AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS A SIMPLIFIED VIEW OF IT.

2018, THE CITY OVERHAULED ITS LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CHANGED IT TO SAY THAT SCHOOLS AREN'T PERMITTED.

THE PREVIOUS SCHOOL CLOSED DURING COVID, WHICH STOPPED ITS NON-CONFORMING USE, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY.

SO IN ORDER TO PUT IT BACK TO THE WAY IT IS, WE'VE HAD TO GO THROUGH THIS INCREDIBLY ARDUOUS, LONG PROCESS THAT INVOLVES BOTH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY.

AND ESSENTIALLY WE HAVE TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO R3 BECAUSE THAT'S THE DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS SCHOOL.

WE HAVE TO DO A LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR LOW MEDIUM BECAUSE THAT'S THE DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS SCHOOL.

AND THEN THE COUNTY SAYS WE HAVE TO ADD ONE FLEX UNIT TO MAKE IT CONSISTENT WITH ITS COMP PLAN TO ALLOW A SCHOOL.

AND THEN WE HAVE TO GET A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A SCHOOL.

SO ALL THESE THINGS, JUST TO PUT IT BACK TO THE WAY IT WAS AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN SINCE THE 1980S.

BUT UNFORTUNATELY, THAT'S WHAT TRANSPIRED AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE.

TO SHOW YOU THE MAP AND THIS IS WHAT'S EVEN INTERESTING.

THIS IS YOUR EXISTING LAND USE PLAN.

LOOK, EVERYTHING AROUND IT IS YOU HAVE THE GREEN, THEN THE ORANGE AND THEN THE INDUSTRIAL, WHICH, YOU KNOW, WHICH IS RIGHT ACROSS THE ROAD, WHICH I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY.

IT'S RIGHT ON THE BORDER.

I MENTIONED BETWEEN OAKLAND PARK AND FORT LAUDERDALE AS WELL.

BUT LOOK, IT'S YELLOW.

WHY IS IT YELLOW? IT REALLY DIDN'T MAKE SENSE WHEN WE LOOKED AT IT.

IT WAS CLEARLY SOMETHING HAPPENED IN ERROR.

SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE SWITCHING IT TO ORANGE, WHICH MATCHES EVERYTHING AROUND IT.

AND THAT ORANGE CATEGORY ALLOWS IT TO MAINTAIN A SCHOOL.

SO THAT CHANGE IS THE LAND USE CHANGE.

THEN FOR THE ZONING CHANGE AGAIN, WE DON'T KNOW HOW IT WAS ASSIGNED THIS COLOR BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EVEN MATCH THE COLORS AROUND IT.

SO IT WAS ASSIGNED THIS RESIDENTIAL ESTATE CATEGORY FOR THE SCHOOL.

WE'RE SWITCHING IT TO THE BROWN ONLY BECAUSE YOUR CODE CHANGE AND YOUR CODE SAID THAT YOU NEED TO BE IN THE BROWN CATEGORY IN ORDER TO HAVE A SCHOOL.

SO ESSENTIALLY WHY WE'RE HERE, WE'RE HERE AGAIN TO REESTABLISH THE LAWFUL USE OF THE SCHOOL ON THE SITE.

WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THIS LAND USE CATEGORY WHICH MATCHES THE LAND USE NEXT DOOR TO IT.

THE SUBJECT SITE IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO OTHER CITIES.

IT IS SUBJECT SITES NOW ALSO ADJACENT TO THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS BUILDING.

I'M VERY PROUD OF THIS SCHOOL, SO I'LL JUST TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IT.

EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT REALLY PART OF THE APPLICATION, THEY HAVE 300 OR THEY PROPOSE TO HAVE 300 K THROUGH EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS, 150 PRESCHOOL STUDENTS. THE SCHOOL CAN ACCOMMODATE MORE, HOPEFULLY BASED ON SUCCESS.

SCHOOL HOURS ARE THE SAME AS THE PRIOR ONES THAT USED TO BE THERE 8 TO 3 WITH AFTER CARE OF 4 TO 6.

THEY ALWAYS HAVE STAGGERED DROP OFF AND PICK UP AND TRAFFIC'S NEVER BEEN AN ISSUE HERE.

THEY HAVE SAFE AND EFFICIENT CIRCULATION.

IT'S THE SAME CIRCULATION THAT IT'S ALWAYS BEEN FOR THE SCHOOL WITH THE PRESCHOOL IN ONE LANE AND THE OLDER GRADES IN THE OTHER LANE.

SOME PICTURES THAT WE TOOK RECENTLY OF THE SCHOOL.

[00:45:01]

IT'S GOT PLAYGROUNDS.

IT'S, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU GO INSIDE WITH THE LINOLEUM FLOORS AND EVERYTHING, IT'S TOTALLY DESIGNED AS A SCHOOL.

THIS WAS NEVER RESIDENTIAL.

IN FACT, IT'S GOT A HUGE WALL BEHIND IT BETWEEN ITSELF AND THE RESIDENTS NEXT TO IT.

I THINK IT MUST BE EIGHT FEET OR HIGHER, WHICH MIGHT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED IN THE CODE BACK THEN, BUT IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THERE SEPARATING THEM.

A LITTLE BIT ABOUT BETHLEHEM.

THEIR MISSION IS TO EMPOWER MINORITY STUDENTS TO EXCEL AND ACHIEVE IN A FAITH BASED ENVIRONMENT.

THEY CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH STUDENTS DEVELOP SPIRITUALLY, EMOTIONALLY, SOCIALLY AND INTELLECTUALLY.

I THOUGHT THIS WAS REALLY COOL.

SO I PUT THIS IN HERE.

IT SHOWS THAT THEIR TEST SCORES ARE FAR ABOVE THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.

AND WHEN SPEAKING WITH THE OWNER SEVERAL TIMES BUT EVEN THIS MORNING I SAID, HOW DID YOU GUYS DO DURING COVID? WHAT DID YOU ALL DO? AND OF COURSE THEY WENT VIRTUAL.

BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? ALL OF THEIR KIDS PASSED AND ALL OF THEIR KIDS STILL EXCEEDED STATE LEVELS FOR EDUCATION, WHICH IS REALLY IMPRESSIVE.

SO IT'S A WONDERFUL INSTITUTION.

IT'S A GREAT ONE FOR TAMARAC.

WE'RE SORRY YOU HAD TO READ THREE PAGES OF WHY WE'RE HERE, BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION.

I'M SURE STAFF IS AND THE SCHOOL WOULD BE WILLING TO SPEAK TO YOU AND TELL YOU HOW GREAT THEY ARE AS WELL.

BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT.

WE'LL HEAR FROM THE CITY PRESENTATION.

OKAY. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

FOR THE RECORD, I'M ROB JOHNSON, I'M SENIOR PLANNER OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

SO KEITH POLIAKOFF, ESQUIRE DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER CHARTER BC TAMARAC PROSPECT, LLC.

SO THEY'RE REQUESTING THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT TO GO FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW, MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL.

AND IT'S LOCATED IN COMMISSION DISTRICT ONE, WHICH IS VICE MAYOR MARLON BOLTON.

THEN ALSO, THEY'RE REQUESTING THE REZONING FROM RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE TO R-3 AND THE ALLOCATION OF ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT.

AND THEN WELL, AND THEN ALSO AND THEN FINALLY, THEY'RE REQUESTING THAT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW FOR THE SCHOOL IN THE R3 ZONING DISTRICT BETHLEHEM JUNIOR ACADEMY THEY'RE CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 6827 WEST COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD IN THE MARKETPLACE OF TAMARAC.

AND THEN ON AUGUST 5TH OF 2020, THEY RECEIVED BETHLEHEM JUNIOR ACADEMY.

THEY RECEIVED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL IN THEIR LOCATION TO EXPAND FOR GRADES K THROUGH 8.

AND SO NOW THEY'RE PROPOSING TO RELOCATE TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT 2099 TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY.

SO HERE'S THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

SO WE TALKED ABOUT THE USE TO THE NORTH, TO THE SOUTH, ACROSS PROSPECT, YOU HAVE A SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION IN OAKLAND PARK AND THEN TO THE WEST IS A TELECOMMUNICATION BUILDING AND THEN TO THE EAST IS THE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION OF THE TAMARAC LAKE SECOND SECTION.

SO THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY COMPRISED OF TWO BUILDINGS.

YOU'VE GOT A COVERED WALKWAY THAT CONNECTS THE TWO BUILDINGS WITH A COMMON ROOF.

YOU GOT PARKING, PLAYGROUND AND LANDSCAPING.

YOU HAVE THE BUILDING ON THE BUILDING A IT'S 9085FT².

BUILDING B SHOWN ON THE SCREEN, 9120FT² FOR A TOTAL COMBINED OF 18,205FT².

AND THEN IT'S SEPARATED.

THEN THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATED, AS KEITH SAID, FROM THE SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST BY A WALL AND A BUNCH OF MATURE TREES.

OKAY. SO THROUGH THE HISTORY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A FORMER SITE OF THE KATHLEEN C WRIGHT CHARTER SCHOOL, WHICH WAS OCCUPIED THE SPACE THROUGH 2010 THROUGH 2013. THEY TAUGHT K THROUGH EIGHT.

IN 2014, SITE WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF HOUSE CHAMPS CAREER PREP HIGH SCHOOL.

THEY EXPECTED AN ENROLLMENT OF 400 STUDENTS, BUT THE SCHOOL NEVER OPENED FOR INTERNAL REASONS.

THEN ON JULY 11TH, 2018, THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL FOR EXCELSIOR CHARTER OF BROWARD TO ALLOW FOR THE SCHOOL IN AN R-1C ZONING DISTRICT

[00:50:03]

WITH A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE REQUIRED SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ONLY REMAIN VALID DURING THE PERIOD OF WHICH CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND BUSINESS LICENSE HAS EXPIRED.

THEN, ADDITIONALLY, ON JUNE 11TH, ON THAT SAME DAY, THE CITY DID THE CITYWIDE REZONING AND REZONED THE PROPERTY FROM R-1C TO RE AS PART OF THE CITYWIDE REZONING, THEREBY MAKING IT A NON-CONFORMING USE.

THEN ON AUGUST 9TH OF 2018, EXCELSIOR CHARTER THEY FILED.

THEN THEY MOVED INTO THE 2099 LOCATION.

AND, YOU KNOW, AND THEN IT BECAME THE NONCONFORMING USE DURING THE DUE TO THE SCHOOL BEING PROHIBITED IN THE RE ZONING DISTRICT.

EXCELSIOR CHARTER AT THE TIME, THEY HAD OVER 200 STUDENTS IN GRADES K THROUGH EIGHT, K THROUGH FIVE, AND THEY DESIRED TO INCREASE ENROLLMENT TO 450 STUDENTS FOR GRADES K THROUGH EIGHT AT THE 2099 LOCATION.

DURING THE 2020-2021 SCHOOL YEAR EXCELSIOR CHARTER, THEY SERVED 157 STUDENTS.

AND THEN ON OCTOBER, AUGUST 10TH OF 2021, THEY CONSTRUCTED THE NEW PLAYGROUND THAT WAS DESTROYED BY HURRICANE IRMA.

BUT UNFORTUNATELY, EXCELSIOR CHARTER, THEY SHUTTERED IN 2022 DUE TO FINANCIAL ISSUES FROM THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC. AND UNFORTUNATELY, THE BUSINESS LICENSE WAS NOT RENEWED AND THEN IT EXPIRED.

AND SO THEN IT NO LONGER THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, NO LONGER MET THAT CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, WHICH IS WHY NOW SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE REZONING AND THE NEW ZONING DISTRICT.

SO YEAH, SO THESE SO THE EXISTING USE OF THE SCHOOL CEASED FOR MORE THAN 60 DAYS AND THE BUSINESS LICENSE EXPIRED, THEREBY REQUIRING THE NEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION.

OKAY. SO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT, THEY'RE GOING FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO ALLOW FOR THE SCHOOL USE.

IT'S A SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT, SO IT DOES NOT REQUIRE EVALUATION BY A REVIEWING AGENCIES PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE.

IT ONLY INVOLVES LESS THAN 50 ACRES AND DOES NOT INVOLVE A TEXT CHANGE AND ISN'T LOCATED IN AN AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN.

SO IT DOESN'T REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT THROUGH BROWARD COUNTY, BUT IT WILL REQUIRE RECERTIFICATION OF OUR LAND USE MAP AND FLEX TABLE AND WILL REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO DO THAT AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.

THE PROPOSED REZONING FROM RE TO R3 ALLOWS FOR THE SCHOOL THROUGH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION.

THE ALLOCATION OF ONE FLEX UNIT IS NEEDED TO PROVIDE THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TO GET US TO THAT R3 ZONING WITHOUT AMENDING THE BROWARD COUNTY LAND USE PLAN AND TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES DOCUMENT THAT BROWARD COUNTY PROVIDES.

SO BETHLEHEM, THEY'RE PROPOSING TO HAVE AN ENROLLMENT OF UP TO 300 KINDERGARTEN THROUGH EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AND WILL ALSO HOUSE A PRE KINDERGARTEN PROGRAM OF UP TO 150 STUDENTS.

BETHLEHEM, THE SCHOOL HOURS ARE GOING TO BE 8 A.M.

TO 3 P.M. FOR THE K THROUGH EIGHTH GRADE.

THE PRE KINDERGARTEN IS GOING TO BE 8:30 A.M.

TO 2:30 P.M..

PARENTS, THE DROP OFF IS GOING TO BE 7:30 A.M.

TO 9 A.M.

AND THEN PICK UP IS 2:30 TO 6:00 P.M.

. AND THEN KINDERGARTEN THE PRE KINDERGARTEN PARENTS MAY CHOOSE TO PARK AND PICK UP THEIR STUDENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AND THEN THEY'LL HAVE STAFF MEMBERS TO ASSIST WITH THAT. OKAY, SO BACK TO THE ACCESS PLAN.

ACCESS IS PROVIDED VIA THE TWO DRIVEWAYS.

THE SOUTH SIDE CONNECTS TO PROSPECT ROAD.

HAS A RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT.

HOWEVER, DURING THE PICKUP AND DROP OFFS, IT WILL BE THE EXIT ONLY PER THE PLAN.

THE WEST SIDE CONNECTS TO 21ST AVENUE.

THAT'S A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT.

AND THEN DURING THE PICKUP AND DROP OFF, THAT'S GOING TO BE THE ENTRANCE.

BROWARD COUNTY, THEY PREVIOUSLY DETERMINED THAT NO SCHOOL FLASHERS OR REDUCED SPEED ZONES ARE REQUIRED IN THE AREA FOR THE SCHOOL.

THEY SUBMITTED A TRAFFIC STUDY THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO ADDRESS THE INTERNAL QUEUING AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION FOR THE DROP OFF AND PICKUP.

THE VEHICLE CIRCULATION PLAN THAT'S SHOWN THAT SHOWS THE INTENDED METHOD FOR THE ACCESS AROUND THE SCHOOL, THE CIRCULATION AND THE EGRESS ONTO PROSPECT.

IT SHOWS THERE'S 535FT BETWEEN THE EGRESS INGRESS EXCUSE ME, ON NORTHWEST 21ST AVENUE AND THE DROP OFF PICKUP AREA

[00:55:02]

OVER THERE ON THE EAST SIDE.

THE 75 FOOT, IT'S A 75 FOOT DROP OFF PICKUP AREA THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE THREE VEHICLES AT A TIME.

225 STUDENTS WILL BE PICKED UP USING THIS PICKUP LANE AND THE REMAINING 50 WILL BE PICKED UP BY PARENTS WHO'S GOING TO WALK OR IS GOING TO PARK? SCHOOL STAFF MEMBERS ARE GOING TO ENSURE PROPER CIRCULATION ON SITE.

AND YOU CAN SEE THE GREEN POINTS THAT SHOW WHERE THE STAFF MEMBERS ARE GOING TO BE LOCATED AT THE ENTRANCE ON 21ST AND THEN THE EGRESS ON PROSPECT. ADDITIONALLY, YOU GOT THE THERE'S THAT EXIT ONLY SIGN THAT'S SHOWN THAT REINFORCES THE TRAFFIC FLOW.

A TRAFFIC STUDY.

THE TRAFFIC STUDY ALSO PROVIDED A PARKING ANALYSIS.

A TOTAL OF 47 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED SCHOOL AND 133 PARKING SPACES ARE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY, OF WHICH FIVE ARE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE.

THE STUDY EXPECTED THAT 150 STUDENTS WOULD BE WALKED INTO SCHOOL AND THE REMAINING 300 ARE GOING TO BE TRANSPORTED BY THEIR PARENTS.

AND THEN THERE'S ALSO GOING TO BE NO BUSSES THAT WILL TRANSPORT THE STUDENTS OR WILL PARK ON THE PROPERTY.

THE DURATION THEY'RE EXPECTING THE VEHICLES TO BE PARKED IS LESS THAN FIVE MINUTES.

ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES ARE SPREAD OUT IN AN HOUR AND A HALF IN THE AFTERNOON.

SO THE 133 PARKING SPACES THAT ARE ON SITE WILL ACCOMMODATE THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO PARK AND PICK UP.

SO THEN THE TRAFFIC STUDY CONCLUDES THAT THE SCHOOL WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT ROADWAY, NETWORK LEVEL OF SERVICE AND ON SITE VEHICULAR STORAGE AND IS NOT EXPECTED TO HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT ROADWAY TRAFFIC IN THE PARKING SUPPLY IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE FOR THE DEMAND OF THE PROPOSED SCHOOL.

THE CITY'S TRAFFIC CONSULTANT TRAFF TECH, THEY REVIEWED THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND CONCURRED WITH THE METHODOLOGY, THE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES AND THE FINDINGS IN THE STUDY.

SO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IT IDENTIFIES THESE REVIEW STANDARDS FOR EACH ONE OF THESE ITEMS. SO YOU HAVE THE FIVE STANDARDS FOR THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE DIRECTOR OF SPORTS REQUEST FOR THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS WITH THE REVIEW STANDARDS EMPLOYED.

THEN WE GOT THE REVIEW STANDARDS FOR THE FLEX UNITS.

AND SO THE DIRECTOR ALSO SUPPORTS THE REQUEST FOR THE FLEX UNITS BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REVIEW STANDARDS EMPLOYED. AND THEN SIMILAR TO THE FLEX UNITS, YOU HAVE THE REZONING WHICH HAS THE [INAUDIBLE] STANDARDS OF APPROVAL AND THE DIRECTOR SUPPORTS THE REQUEST FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING BASED ON THE ANALYSIS.

AND THEN FINALLY, WE HAVE THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION.

AND THE PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALIZED REVIEW OF CERTAIN USES THAT DUE TO THEIR NATURE RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS ON SURROUNDING AREA, THEY REQUIRE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF THE LOCATION, DESIGN AND METHODS OF OPERATION, AS WELL AS IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS TO MITIGATE CONCERNS BEFORE THEY CAN BE DEEMED APPROPRIATE IN THE ZONING DISTRICT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THEIR SURROUNDINGS.

THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE THEN GIVES TEN STANDARDS FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, AND IT IS THE OPINION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THAT THE REQUEST FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION MEETS EACH OF THE REVIEW STANDARDS BASED ON COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

AND THE DIRECTOR SUPPORTS THE PETITION BASED ON THE FACT THAT ALL CONCERNS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE SURROUNDING AREA HAVE BEEN MITIGATED AND THE SCHOOL USE IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT.

ALL RIGHT. SO THEN THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE THAT SUPPORTS GOAL NUMBER FOUR, TAMARAC IS VIBRANT.

THE APPROVAL WILL PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVITALIZE A VACANT PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY.

THE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD FORWARD A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PROPOSED SMALL SCALE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE ALLOCATION OF ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE THE ALLOWANCE OF A SCHOOL USE TO THE CITY COMMISSION AT ITS AUGUST 23RD, 2023, MEETING FOR FIRST READING AND ITS SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 MEETING FOR SECOND READING WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL.

THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS TO THE BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL TO RECERTIFY THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND SUPPLY A COPY OF THE APPROVED RECERTIFIED MAP TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.

[01:00:03]

OKAY. SO IN ADDITION, THE REZONING AND ALLOCATION OF THE FLEX UNIT, IT SUPPORTS POLICY 1.4 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE APPROVAL OF THE REZONING AND FLEXIBILITY UNIT FACILITATES A SCHOOL USE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

AFTER CONSIDERATION OF THE CRITERIA OUTLINED IN THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

THE DIRECTOR SHE SUPPORTS THE PLANNING.

SHE RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD FORWARD A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING CONCURRENT WITH THE ALLOCATION OF ONE FLEX UNIT AT ITS AUGUST 23RD, 2023, MEETING FOR FIRST READING AND ITS SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 MEETING FOR SECOND READING WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.

NUMBER ONE THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS TO THE BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL TO RECERTIFY THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND SUPPLY A COPY OF THE APPROVED RECERTIFIED MAP TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.

AND THEN FINALLY, THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION.

SUPPORT GOAL NUMBER ONE OF THE CITY'S 2040 STRATEGIC PLAN.

TAMARAC IS HOME.

THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR THE SCHOOL FACILITY IN R-3 ZONING DISTRICT.

IT WILL ENHANCE THE CITY'S QUALITY OF LIFE AND EDUCATIONAL GREATNESS OF THE CITY BY REVIVING A FORMER SCHOOL LOCATION.

AS YOU CAN SEE, GREAT EDUCATION THAT'S PART OF THAT GOAL.

SO FINALLY, THE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD APPROVE THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR THE BETHLEHEM JUNIOR ACADEMY TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A SCHOOL USE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT AT ITS SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023, MEETING, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.

NUMBER ONE, THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION SHALL ONLY REMAIN VALID DURING THE PERIOD OF WHICH CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND BUSINESS LICENSE REMAIN ACTIVE.

NUMBER TWO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS TRANSFERABLE ADMINISTRATIVELY PURSUANT TO COMPLIANCE WITH CITY CODE, SUBMITTING DOCUMENTATION OF PAYMENT AND FEES ONLY AFTER THE PREVIOUS CONDITION IS MET.

NUMBER THREE ANY FUTURE FENCING GATING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR SECURITY REASONS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT CREATING A STACKING ISSUE INTO EITHER PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THROUGH THE APPROVAL OF A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT.

NUMBER FOUR NO BUSSES WILL BE STORED ON THE PROPERTY AT ANY TIME UNLESS A SITE PLAN REVISION IS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED TO REVISE THE EXISTING PARKING LOT.

AND THEN NUMBER FIVE, THE PARENT DROP OFF PICKUP OPERATIONS SHALL BE MONITORED BY SCHOOL STAFF TO ENSURE THAT THE VEHICLE QUEUES DO NOT AFFECT THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INCLUDING THE NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE ON NORTHWEST 21ST AVENUE.

STAGGERED START AND RELEASE TIMES SHALL BE PROVIDED IF VEHICLE QUEUES AFFECT THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND THEN SITE PLAN APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO ADD A SECOND DROP OFF PICKUP LANE OF VEHICLE QUEUES CONTINUING TO AFFECT THE PUBLIC LANE CONTINUED, ARE DETERMINED TO CONTINUE TO AFFECT THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOLLOWING THE APPLICATION OF STAGGERED START AND RELEASE TIMES.

AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION.

WE'LL ACCEPT QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? SAJEEN. I DO.

CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO ME THE FLEX UNIT AND WHAT IT IS? YEAH, THE FLEX UNIT.

BROWARD COUNTY GIVES US BASICALLY FLEXIBILITY TO ADD DENSITY TO TO THE PROPERTY WITHOUT HAVING TO GO AND DO A LAND USE CHANGE THROUGH THEM.

SO THAT'S WHAT THIS IS DOING.

WE'RE ALLOCATING THE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT AND THAT'S NEEDED TO TO GET TO THAT R-3 ZONING BECAUSE THAT WOULD ALLOW THAT ADDITIONAL DENSITY IN THE R-3 ZONING.

AND DID YOU SAY ONE FLEXIBLE.

YEAH, WE ONLY NEED TO.

IS IT LIKE? WE ONLY NEED TO ALLOCATE ONE AT THIS POINT.

IF THE PROPERTY WAS TO BE DEVELOPED AS FUTURE MULTIFAMILY, RESIDENTIAL ALLOCATION OF FUTURE FLEXIBILITY UNITS MAY BE REQUIRED.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I GUESS I HAVE TO REVIEW THAT.

THE SECOND QUESTION, WILL THERE BE ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY TO FACILITATE THIS NEW OCCUPATION? WE'LL LET THE APPLICANT.

SORRY. KEITH POLIAKOFF.

THE PROPERTY IS IN MOVING CONDITION.

IT'S IN MOVING CONDITION.

AND IN FACT, WHEN MR. JOHNSON SHOWED YOU THE TRAFFIC PLAN AND ALL THAT, IT'S NOT EVEN LIKE SOMETHING YOU HAVEN'T IT'S BEEN OPERATIONAL FOR SO MANY YEARS THAT WE KNOW THERE'S NO QUEUING PROBLEM.

WE KNOW THERE'S NO PARKING PROBLEM.

I THINK, YOU KNOW, THE OWNERSHIP IS LOOKING.

THEY'RE BUYING THE PROPERTY.

BY THE WAY, I WANT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR.

THEY'RE NOT LEASING IT.

SO THE MINUTE THAT THIS IS APPROVED, THE BANK PROVIDES THEM THE FINANCING AND THEY'RE OWNING.

I'M SURE THEY'LL MAKE THEIR OWN IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS THEY WANT TO REPAINT AND DO SOME OTHER.

WITH NO CONSTRUCTION? NO CONSTRUCTION.

IT'S A MOVEIN CONDITION.

OKAY. YEAH. SORRY.

LONG WINDED ANSWER FOR THAT.

THANK YOU.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

DOES IT MEET AND THE DOES TAMARAC HAVE AN EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT? AND DOES THIS DEVELOPMENT MEET THAT? WE DO NOT HAVE AN EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT?

[01:05:02]

OKAY. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, MY ONLY CONCERN WAS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC, BUT IT SEEMED LIKE YOU HAVE DONE YOUR RESEARCH ALREADY ON THAT AND IT'S APPROPRIATE.

SO IF THAT'S ALL, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH IT.

I THINK IT'S A GOOD THING.

GOING BACK TO THE LAST QUESTION REALLY QUICKLY, BROWARD COUNTY DID REVIEW OR THE SCHOOL BOARD DID REVIEW THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT.

AND WE HAVE THEIR REPORT WAS PROVIDED IN THE BACK UP.

AWESOME. AND ALSO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT SIGNS OFF ON THE SCHOOL AND CAPACITY THROUGH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

SO IT'S ALL IN THAT.

AWESOME. THIS IS JUST FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE CURRENT VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN.

I SEE THAT THERE ARE TWO EXITS, ONE ON THE RIGHT WHERE IT SAYS EXIT ONLY THROUGH THE COMMUNITY AND THEN ANOTHER ON PROSPECT ROAD.

SO THE K THROUGH 8 TRAFFIC, WHICH IS GOING TO BE A HIGHER TRAFFIC FLOW THAN THE PRE SCHOOL TRAFFIC WILL HAVE TWO EXIT OPPORTUNITIES.

AM I CORRECT ABOUT THAT? I SEE A WHITE CIRCLE HERE AND A BOX THAT SAYS EXIT ONLY.

NO, THAT'S JUST A SIGN.

THAT'S A SIGN THAT REINFORCES THE TRAFFIC FLOW TO MAKE SURE.

OKAY, SO THERE'S JUST THE ONE EXIT.

OKAY. RIGHT. PEOPLE DON'T GO UP THERE TO EXIT OR THAT'S AN EXIT ONLY.

THERE IS A EIGHT FOOT WALL ON THAT ENTIRE SIDE.

SO THERE'S NO WAY THROUGH THE COMMUNITY.

OKAY. YEAH, I'M TRYING TO VISUALIZE THE LOCATION.

I KNOW THAT 2800, BUT I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW FAR.

WHAT'S THE ADDRESS AGAIN? 2029. I KNOW 2800 HAS A SCHOOL REDEEMING WORD CHRISTIAN CENTER INTERNATIONAL.

THAT'S CORRECT OVER ON PROSPECT THERE.

OKAY. OKAY.

SO I WASN'T SURE HOW THE CONNECTION OR HOW CLOSE THE CONNECTION WAS BETWEEN THIS PARTICULAR ENTITY AND THE REDEEMING WORD FOR THE TRAFFICKING PURPOSES OF THE SCHOOL. THIS IS SOUTH OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD.

THE REDEEMING WORD IS NORTH OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD.

THANK YOU FAR, VERY FAR.

WILL THIS BE A CHARTER SCHOOL? IS IT A CHARTER SCHOOL? THIS IS NOT A CHARTER SCHOOL.

IT'S A PRIVATE SCHOOL.

OKAY. THAT'S FUNDED IN PART BY THE STATE.

AND THE PARENTS PICK UP THE OTHER HALF.

AND HOW MANY EMPLOYEES OR.

CURRENTLY ABOUT 40.

SORRY. FOR THE RECORD 40.

40. I'M SORRY. OKAY.

OKAY. I HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION.

WILL THE PARENTS BE PULLING IN AND PARKING TO PICK UP THEIR CHILDREN OR ARE THEY GOING BECAUSE MANY OF THE SCHOOL THAT I HAVE TO PASS BY, THERE ARE THESE LONG LINES THAT SOMETIMES REALLY IMPACT TRAFFIC BECAUSE THEY'RE THERE TO PICK UP THEIR KIDS.

AND IT'S JUST ON HOW IS THAT? THERE'S PLENTY OF PARKING SPOTS, AS MR. JOHNSON SHOWED YOU.

THERE'S LIKE OVER NEARLY 100 EXTRA PARKING SPOTS HERE.

BUT BECAUSE OF THEIR STAGGERED TIMES, THEY DO HALF HOUR PICK UP INCREMENTS.

THERE IS NOT LONG LINES HERE.

IT GOES VERY SMOOTHLY FOR PICK UP AND DROP OFF.

SO WOULD THERE BE PARKING TO PICK UP THEIR CHILDREN? NOT NORMALLY. ONCE IN A WHILE.

FOR THE YOUNGER STUDENTS, THE PRE K AND K.

SOMETIMES PARENTS LIKE TO PARK TO WALK INSIDE TO PICK UP THEIR KIDS.

THERE'S AMPLE PARKING FOR THAT.

BUT THE MAJORITY WILL USE THE TRAFFIC PATTERN THAT'S SHOWN UP THERE, WHICH IS MORE THAN ENOUGH STACKING, IN FACT, FOR THE SINCE THE 1980S THAT THIS BUILDING'S BEEN USED, THERE HAS NOT BEEN A SINGLE COMPLAINT AT THE CITY ABOUT STACKING WITH 450 STUDENTS THERE INTO RIGHT OF WAY.

IT'S NEVER OCCURRED SINCE 1985, ROB OR WHEREVER THAT INITIAL SCHOOL WAS.

YEAH. WAS STARTED SOMEWHERE AROUND THERE.

OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES. SO I DID SEE THAT AT SOME POINT IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS PARTICULAR SITE GO THROUGH A RE CERTIFICATION PROCESS.

WAS THAT DONE? THAT WILL BE DONE FOLLOWING THE APPROVAL OF THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN.

THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO RECERTIFY OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND OUR FLEXIBILITY TABLE THROUGH BROWARD COUNTY.

AND THERE WAS SOME PREVIOUS INTERNAL PROBLEMS IN REGARDS TO WHY THE SCHOOL DIDN'T OPEN UP IN THE FIRST PLACE.

THAT WAS CHAMPS.

THAT WAS LIKE TWO, TWO SCHOOLS AGO, 2 OR 3 SCHOOLS AGO.

OKAY. SO THE INTERNAL PROBLEMS DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE REZONING, RECERTIFICATION? NO. OKAY. THANK YOU.

WILL THERE BE BUSSES? SOME OF THE CHILDREN ARRIVING ON BUSSES? NO.

NO BUSSES.

OKAY. AND THAT'S A CONDITION OF APPROVAL IN THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, THE NO BUSSES.

OKAY. THAT WAS.

OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY.

THANK YOU BOTH. WE'D LIKE TO OPEN THE FLOOR TO THE PUBLIC.

[01:10:02]

IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT OR ASK A QUESTION.

THE FLOOR IS NOW OPEN AND IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT THERE IS ANYONE HERE, SO THE FLOOR IS NOW CLOSED.

I'D LIKE TO ASK FOR A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE VOTE RECOMMENDING.

SO, MADAM CHAIR, WE'LL NEED TO TAKE EACH ITEM SEPARATELY.

YEAH, WE CAN DO IT THIS WAY, MADAM CHAIR.

WE NEED TO VOTE FOR ITEM 8A, WHICH IS THE ORDINANCE, AND THAT'S TO 2534.

CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE IN A SECOND? ITEM 8A.

NO APPROVE. I SECOND.

CAN YOU LET ME KNOW WHO MOVED? I MOVED. WHO MOVED THE MOTION? JACQUES MOISE MADE A MOTION TO MOVE TO APPROVE.

WHO SECOND? VIOLA.

OKAY. NIKOLE CLEARE.

YES. ALEXANDRA ALVAREZ.

YES. SAJEEN BELL-CLARK.

YES. JACQUES MOISE.

YES. VIOLA WATSON.

YES. MOTION TO MAKE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION.

PASSED 5 TO 0.

AWESOME. I'D LIKE TO ASK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM 9A TEMPORARY ORDER 2535.

[9.a TO2535 - An ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Tamarac referenced in Section 10-2.1(B) of Chapter 10 of the City of Tamarac Code of Ordinances to reflect the rezoning of certain real estate property fully described as Parcel “A,” “Prospect Plaza” according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 136, Page 2 of the public records of Broward County, Florida, from the current RE (Residential Estate) zoning classification to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning classification, for the subject property located at 2099 West Prospect Road, in order to allocate one (1) flexibility unit to facilitate the allowance of a school use and provide consistency with the Land Development Code in accordance with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tamarac; (Case No. 5-Z-23 & 1-FLX-23); providing for amendment to the Official Zoning Map to reflect such change; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date.]

DO I HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD.

YES. A MOTION MADE BY JACQUES MOISE.

SECOND. NIKOLE CLEARE.

YES. SAJEEN BELL-CLARK.

YES. ALEXANDRA ALVAREZ.

YES. JACQUES MOISE.

YES. VIOLA WATSON.

YES. MOTION TO MAKE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION.

PASS 5 TO 0.

AND FINALLY, I'M ASKING FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 79 APPROVING A SPECIAL

[9.b TBO 79 - Board Order approving/denying Special Exception application for a proposed School use in an R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning district, pursuant to the Tamarac Code of Ordinances]

EXCEPTION FOR PROPOSED USE IN A R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE? MY MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND IT. VIOLA WATSON.

YES. SAJEEN BELL-CLARK.

YES. ALEXANDRA ALVAREZ.

YES. JACQUES MOISE.

YES. NIKOLE.

CLEARE. YES.

MOTION TO MAKE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITH CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF.

PASS 5 TO 0.

CONGRATULATIONS, BETHLEHEM.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY REPORTS? EXCUSE ME? AT THIS TIME, WE'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM ANYONE ON THE BOARD WHO HAS ANY REPORTS, ANY PLANNING BOARD REPORTS.

NO. AND WE'LL NOW HEAR FROM THE DIRECTOR.

[11. Director's Report]

DIRECTOR IN TRAINING.

MADAM CHAIR. MY NAME IS MAHER MANSOOR.

I'M THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SITTING IN FOR MAXINE CALLOWAY.

I'M GOING TO GO OVER THE UPDATES SINCE YOUR LAST MEETING OF JUNE 7TH.

SO TEMPORAL RESOLUTION 13959 APPROVING THE PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2023 2024 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN WAS APPROVED AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING ON JULY 12TH, 2023.

TEMPORARY ORDINANCE 2530 AMENDING SECTION 10-4.4 ENTITLED LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION TO ALLOW THE CITY OF TAMARAC TO ADOPT AND ENFORCE ITS OWN TREE PRESERVATION REGULATIONS, WAS HEARD AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 14TH, 2023, AND APPROVED ADOPTED ON JUNE 28TH, 2023.

SINCE THEN IT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IS PREPARING THE CERTIFICATE MUNICIPAL CERTIFICATION.

AS SOON AS THE CITY GETS THIS, WE WILL START APPROVING AND ENFORCING OUR OWN TREE ORDINANCE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE.

TEMPORARY ORDINANCE 2532.

AMENDING CHAPTER TEN SIX ENTITLED RULES OF CONSTRUCTION DEFINITIONS BY STATISTICALLY AMENDING SECTION 10-6.2 ENTITLED USE CATEGORIES FOR CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR THE USE OF AUTO TOWING AND THE SCHOOL AND AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF THE USE AUTO WRECKING AND SALVAGE YARD WAS HEARD AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 14TH, 2023.

PURSUANT TO THE CITY COMMISSIONER REQUEST THIS ITEM WAS BIFURCATED INTO TWO AND HEARD AGAIN ON JUNE 28TH, 2023 FOR FIRST READING AND THE CHILD CARE FACILITY AND SCHOOL APPROVED ADOPTED ON JULY 12TH, 2023 ON SECOND READING.

TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 72 APPROVING VARIANCE APPLICATION FROM BERNSTEIN MANUFACTURING WAS APPROVED AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 28TH,

[01:15:08]

2023, AND TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 74 BOARD ORDERS APPROVING SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR DNG TOWING AND RECOVERY LLC WAS ALSO APPROVED AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 28TH, 2023.

FINALLY, I JUST HAVE A REQUEST, PLEASE.

WHEN MISS TIBBY, COLLETTE SHE ALWAYS SENDS EMAILS PRIOR TO THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING AND ASK FOR CONFIRMATION FOR ATTENDANCE.

THE ONLY REASON IS THAT SOMETIMES THE APPLICANTS, THEY MIGHT HAVE TO FLY IN, BUT THEY MIGHT HAVE HIRE A LAWYER WHO IS NOT HERE.

AND IT JUST, YOU KNOW, AS A COURTESY JUST TO CONFIRM YOUR ATTENDANCE, BECAUSE IF WE DETERMINE THAT QUORUM WILL NOT BE ESTABLISHED, WE MIGHT INFORM THE APPLICANT NOT TO COME AT ALL. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU FOR THAT.

HOW MANY MEMBERS? YOU HAVE TO HAVE FOUR FOR A QUORUM? YEAH, FOUR. OKAY.

FOUR OF YOU HAVE TO BE. AND WE WILL CONFIRM ONCE, ONCE MS. TIBBY GETS THE INFORMATION, SHE WILL WRITE BACK TO YOU THAT QUORUM IS PRESENT.

AND THAT'S BASICALLY THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO ESTABLISH.

AND WE PRESENTLY HAVE SIX OF US, SIX ON THE BOARD.

RIGHT. YEAH. WE HAVE FIVE MEMBERS AND TWO ALTERNATES.

OKAY. SO WE HAVE 7 TOTAL.

7 IN TOTAL. YEAH.

OKAY. AS LONG AS WE HAVE FOUR, THE MEETING WILL GO ON.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

JUST ONE MORE THING, IF I MAY, MADAM CHAIR.

THE ELECTION, WHICH SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED TODAY, ALSO WILL BE SHOULD HAPPEN NEXT MEETING.

OKAY. SO IF ALL CAN BE PRESENT, PLEASE.

OKAY. YEAH.

SO FOR NEXT TIME, APPRECIATE IT.

EVERYONE IS HERE SO YOU CAN REALLY ELECT A PERMANENT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR.

AND YOU KNOW THAT WILL BE WHEN ALL OF YOU.

IT WILL BE EVEN BETTER. IF NOT, YOU KNOW, WE'LL GO WITH WITH THE QUORUM.

YEAH, SOUNDS GOOD.

DO WE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE WANT TO DISCUSS? NO. ALL RIGHT.

IT IS NOW 10:26 AND THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.