[00:00:02]
[1. Call to Order]
MY SINCERE APOLOGIES FOR MY TARDINESS.WE'RE GOING TO BEGIN THE MEETING.
IF YOU WILL RISE WITH ME FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, PLEASE.
DAVID LEVIN AND ERIC GNAGE ARE ABSENT AND EXCUSED.
[4. Approval of Minutes]
WE'LL MOVE ON NEXT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LAST MEETING MINUTES FROM JUNE 7TH, 2023.I'D LIKE TO CALL FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES.
YES. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 7TH TWO 2023.
OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY PLANNING BOARD DISCLOSURES THIS MORNING? DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO DISCLOSE REGARDING THE AGENDA THIS MORNING? NO. NO SITE VISITS, NO CONVERSATIONS.
I WILL NOW TURN THE AGENDA OVER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE STATEMENT AND SWEARING IN.
[6. City Attorney Statement & Swearing In]
THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.ALL EVIDENCE WILL REASONABLY PRUDENT PERSON TO THEIR BUSINESS SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE, WHETHER SUCH EVIDENCE SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE IN COURT OF LAW, HOWEVER, IMMATERIAL, UNDULY REPETITIOUS EVIDENCE SHALL BE EXCLUDED.
STATEMENT OF COUNCIL SHALL ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS ARGUMENT, NOT BE CONSIDERED AS TESTIMONY.
HOWEVER, COUNCIL FOR PARTIES SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO CROSS-EXAMINE.
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE MAY BE PRESENTED IN THE FORM OF A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL IF AVAILABLE .
UPON REQUEST, PARTIES SHOULD BE GIVEN OPPORTUNITY TO COMPARE THE COPY.
GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES ARE THE MANNER IN WHICH THE PRESENTATION IS MADE IS FIRST, THE PETITIONER OR HIS OR HER REPRESENTATIVE WILL MAKE THE PRESENTATION AND THE PETITIONER CHOOSE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION AND SHALL INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE NATURE OF THE OF THE PETITION.
IF THERE WAS ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
STAFF WILL THEN PRESENT ITS REPORT.
STAFF REPORT WILL GENERALLY INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS OF THE PETITIONER AND ANALYSIS OF THE PETITION CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CITY CODE. PARTIES WHO ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION SHALL MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION.
FINALLY, THE BOARD SHALL DELIBERATE ON THE PETITION.
I COULD SWEAR IN THE WITNESS IF YOU WANT ME TO.
PARDON ME. TO SWEAR IN ANY WITNESSES THAT WILL TESTIFY?
[00:05:03]
SURE. YES. OKAY.IF ANYONE PLANNING TO TESTIFY TODAY, PLEASE STAND UP.
DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH UNDER GOD? THANK YOU. YOU MAY SIT. THANK YOU.
WE'LL NOW OPEN THE FLOOR FOR GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT BEFORE WE BEGIN? OKAY. THE FLOOR IS NOW CLOSED.
THE FIRST ITEM THAT WE'LL HEAR, ITEM 8A TEMPORARY ORDER TWO FIVE.
MADAM CHAIR BEFORE YOU INTRODUCE THE ITEM, WE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT WE TAKE 9C BEFORE 8A 9A AND 9B AS 8A, 9A AND 9B ALL GO TOGETHER.
SURE. SO WE ARE REQUESTING THAT WE DO WE TAKE 9C FIRST FOR EDEN WEST.
AND THEN WE'LL DO 8A 9A AND 9B, PLEASE.
ALL RIGHTY. SO WE'RE GOING TO HEAR ITEM 9C TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 75.
[9.c TBO 75 - Board Order approving/denying variance application for Eden West, from Section 10-4.10(D)(2)(b)(ii), to allow for Entrance Wall signs to be located on the perimeter walls of the site, in lieu of the requirement of Entrance Wall signs to be located at vehicular entrance.]
BOARD ORDER APPROVING OR DENYING VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR EDEN WEST FROM SECTION 10-4.10, SUBSECTION D, SUBSECTION 2.SUBSECTION B, SUBSECTION 2 TO ALLOW FOR EAST EXCUSE ME, TO ALLOW FOR ENTRANCE WALL SIGN TO BE LOCATED ON THE PERIMETER OF THE WALLS ON THE SITE IN LIEU OF THE REQUIREMENT OF AN ENTRANCE WALL SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE.
WE'LL FIRST HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
THANK YOU. HELLO, I'M JOHN VOIGT DOUMAR, ALLSWORTH ATTORNEY FOR THE APPLICANT EDEN WEST.
AND THE PROPOSAL IS TO MOVE BASICALLY THE LOCATION WHERE THE FINAL TWO SIGNS FOR THE EDEN WEST APARTMENT COMPLEX WOULD GO.
YOU SEE, ON THE BOARD, THAT'S JUST THE ARTIST RENDERING.
I'M SURE YOU'VE SEEN THEM RIGHT DOWN THE STREET THAT THEY'RE IN EXISTENCE NOW.
YOU SEE THE EXISTING TWO SIGNS WHICH COMPLY WITH THE CODE AND THEIR LOCATION.
THAT'S THE MAIN ENTRANCE ON MCNAB ROAD.
THE CODE ALLOWS TWO SIGNS ON EACH SIDE OF THE TWO DIFFERENT ENTRANCES.
IF YOU SEE LOOKING TO THE TOP OF THE PHOTO ONTO NORTHWEST 70TH, YOU SEE WHERE THE OTHER ENTRANCE IS AND THAT'S WHERE THE CODE WOULD SAY THE OTHER TWO SIGNS WOULD GO.
AND THE REASON OF FILING THIS APPLICATION IS WE WANT TO MOVE THEM TO THE TWO CORNERS ON PINE ISLAND ROAD, THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER, WHERE THEY WOULD BE MUCH MORE VISIBLE, AS YOU SEE THERE, WOULD BE FACING SOME TREES AND THERE'S NOT A LOT OF REALLY USE FOR TWO SIGNS OVER THERE.
IT'S NOT A OBVIOUSLY HIGHLY TRAFFICKED STREET LIKE BOTH PINE ISLAND AND MCNAB.
THIS IS THE APPROVED SITE PLAN.
AND YOU SEE UP IN BLUE WHAT I WAS JUST SAYING, THAT'S WHERE THE CODE WOULD PUT THE SIGNS.
THOSE WALLS EXIST AND THE LANDSCAPING IS THERE.
THIS IS WHAT THE SIGN LOOKS LIKE.
AND IT SHOWS YOU THE WALLS THAT ARE THERE.
IT WOULD GO ON THE MIDDLE DIAGONAL PORTION OF EACH WALL.
AND IN THE UPPER RIGHT, YOU SEE THE RELATIVE SIZE.
THERE'S NO VARIANCE AS FAR AS THE SIZE OF THE SIGN.
IT'S JUST THE LOCATION OF PUTTING THEM THERE.
AND YOU SEE THESE ARE GOING TO BE 16 INCH LETTERS WHERE THE CODE WOULD ALLOW 18 INCH LETTERS.
AS I SAID, THE LANDSCAPING IS ALREADY THERE.
SO THEY OBVIOUSLY THEY WANT IT TO LOOK NICE TO ATTRACT PEOPLE.
IT'S PARTIALLY BRANDING OF THE FACILITY AND IT'S CERTAINLY AN ADVERTISING FEATURE FOR THE BUSINESS.
AND I THINK ALSO IT HELPS WITH THE SAFETY ON PINE ISLAND ROAD.
THAT'S ACTUALLY THE APPROVED SITE PLAN.
AND THESE ARE THE TWO WALLS ON THE LEFT.
AND YOU SEE THE WHERE THE SIGNS OBVIOUSLY WOULD GO.
THE WORDING IS EDEN WEST WOULD BE ABOVE WHERE THE PLANTS ARE THERE.
AND I THINK THAT'S IT AS FAR AS THE SLIDES.
SO. THE VARIANCE TO CERTAIN STANDARDS.
[00:10:06]
ORIENTATION OF THE PROPERTY, IT WOULD NOT BE SAFE HAVING AN ENTRANCE ON PINE ISLAND.SO HAVING THE ENTRANCE ON NORTHWEST 70TH WOULD THEN DEPRIVE THEM OF SIGNAGE ON PINE ISLAND WHERE WE FEEL IT IS MORE APPROPRIATE AND THE SHAPE AND CONFIGURATION IS NOT OUR DOING, IT'S WHAT WE HAVE.
IT'S CERTAINLY NOT A IT'S THE MINIMUM VARIANCE.
WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR TWO ADDITIONAL SIGNS TO HAVE SIX.
WE'RE ASKING TO MOVE TWO OF THEM.
AND IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
CERTAINLY IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM.
DO WE HAVE ANY? DO WE? DOES THE BOARD REQUIRE OR NEED A PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY? WOULD YOU LIKE TO HEAR IT? NO. OKAY.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? YES. YES, THEY ARE.
OKAY. IS IT GOING TO BE MORE VISIBLE FOR PEOPLE WHO MIGHT BE DRIVING BY AND LOOKING? BECAUSE I JUST CAME I DRIVE BY THERE ALL THE TIME.
RIGHT. AT LEAST COMING IN FROM THE MCNAB BECAUSE I CAME UP ON MCNAB AND THEN TURN ON PINE ISLAND.
SO EVEN IF I WAS IN THE LEFT LANE, I'D SAY, OKAY, I GOT TIME TO GET OVER AND MAKE THE RIGHT AND GO ON 70TH AS OPPOSED TO, OH, I'VE GOT TO GO OVER TO MCNAB AND TRY TO GET IN ON THAT SIDE.
SO LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE GARISH.
THEY'RE HOPEFULLY TASTEFUL SIGNS, BUT I BELIEVE THEY WILL BE VERY VISIBLE FROM PINE ISLAND.
AND, YOU KNOW, THE ROAD GOING NORTH CURVES A LITTLE THERE.
SO COMING SOUTH, THAT HELPS WITH THE VISIBILITY.
DOES THE SIGNS HAVE ANY LIGHT AROUND IT? LIKE, LET'S SAY IN THE EVENING TIME? WOULD THERE BE LIGHT REFLECTING ON THE SIGNS AT ALL? I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE A PICTURE.
YOU SEE THE EXISTING SIGNS THERE? I BELIEVE THEY HAVE A BACKLIGHT ON THEM BEHIND THE LETTERING.
I DON'T KNOW BECAUSE I JUST SAW IT THIS MORNING AGAIN.
IT'S THERE'S NO SPOTLIGHT OR ANYTHING ON THERE, CERTAINLY.
BUT I BELIEVE THE SIGNS HAVE SOME ILLUMINATION BEHIND THEM.
SO YOU'RE REMOVING THE SIGNS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLACED ON THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY? THAT'S CORRECT, YES.
AND HOW ARE YOU? WILL THERE BE ANY SUBSTITUTION FOR THAT? HOW ARE YOU GOING TO IDENTIFY THE? I BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE NOT PLANNING TO HAVE A SIGN THERE THAT THEY FEEL LIKE THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A LOT OF TRAFFIC ON NORTHWEST 70TH EXCEPT SOMEONE WHO WOULD HAVE SEEN IT ON PINE ISLAND AND TURNING IN.
I THINK THERE'S GOING TO BE ONE OF THOSE LITTLE ENTRANCE.
BUT THAT'S WHAT I SAID, WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNS JUST TO MOVE THOSE OVER.
AND WHAT IS THAT ENTRANCE LIKE ON 70TH? IS IT GATED OR IS IT JUST OPEN TO DRIVE? IT'S AN OPEN ENTRANCE.
OKAY. AND I DIDN'T SEE THE HEIGHT OF THIS THE WALL.
CAN YOU GO BACK ONE? I BELIEVE.
VERY, VERY SMALL. I'D HAVE TO PULL OUT MY FILE.
IS IT TOO SMALL TO READ UP THERE? BUT I BELIEVE. OH, NO THE SIGN IS 29 INCHES.
OKAY. IT SEATS ALL THE WAY TO THE TOP.
MAYBE IT'S BIGGER ON THIS, THOUGH.
IT'S LIKE AN EIGHT FOOT WALL, 65 INCHES.
YOU CAN SEE THIS. THE WIDTH IS THE 65 INCHES THE HEIGHT.
[00:15:03]
NO, NO, NO. THAT'S THE SIGN.I'M TALKING ABOUT THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL.
RIGHT. AND I'M SAYING I CAN PULL THE PLAN OUT OF MY FILE AND LOOK AT IT MORE CAREFULLY.
CHRISTIAN WATERVAL, CITY OF TAMARAC, ASSOCIATE PLANNER.
YES. IT'S A CONTINUATION OF A SIX FOOT HIGH WALL ON THE CORNERS.
AND THEN IT HAS AN ALUMINUM FENCE AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPERTY.
CORRECT. I CAN IF I MAY ASSIST.
MY PART IS REALLY THE LOCATION OF THE SIGNS.
AND SO SAYING I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT BEING MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE ON THAT.
NO PROBLEM. SURE. SO JUST QUICKLY, JUST TO BE BRIEF, SO THE TWO STARS, THE FOUR STARS THAT'S INDICATED IS WHERE THE SIGNS ARE TO BE, YOU KNOW, PERMITTED PER CODE.
SO THIS IS THE EXISTING WALL SIGNS ON THE SOUTH ENTRANCE ALONG MCNAB ROAD.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS A NIGHT TIME VIEW AND IT HAS ILLUMINATED LIGHT FEATURES IN THE REAR.
IT'S A REVERSE ILLUMINATED CHANNEL, LETTERS ON BOTH SIDES.
SO AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE RIGHT SIDE AND THE LEFT SIDE.
SO WHERE YOU SEE THE RED BUBBLE IS WHERE THE CODE REQUIRES THE LOCATION.
AND THIS IS THE NORTH ENTRANCE FROM 70TH STREET.
SO YOU SEE IT'S AN OPEN ENTRANCE.
AND ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS A NIGHT VIEW.
AND THIS IS THE ACTUAL SITE OR THE WALL ITSELF IS SIX FEET HIGH.
AND THIS IS HOW IT WOULD LOOK ON THE CORNERS.
SO YOU HAVE THIS PHOTO, WHICH IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER.
IT'S 16 INCHES WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING.
AT MINIMUM, THIS IS EASTBOUND WEST MCNAB ROAD.
TRAFFIC FLOW ON THE LEFT IS A SOUTHBOUND PHOTO OF NORTH PINE ISLAND.
ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS A NORTHBOUND PHOTO OF NORTH PINE ISLAND ROAD.
AND YES, WE'RE HERE FOR A VARIANCE.
THE STRATEGIC PLAN, IT MEETS GOAL NUMBER FOUR AND IT COMPLIES WITH OUR CODE TO THE EXTENT OF THEY ARE JUST RELOCATING THE TWO LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT TO THE SIDES OF THE PROPERTY.
THANK YOU. AND I ASKED ABOUT THE [INAUDIBLE] ENTRANCE, BECAUSE IF IT'S A SECURITY, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE PLANNING A SECURITY GATE OR IF IT'S PROBABLY ONLY GOING TO BE MAINLY BY THE RESIDENTS, I WOULD UNDERSTAND NOT HAVING A SIGN.
THEY DON'T HAVE A WALL ON THAT LOCATION.
SO, YOU KNOW, THE INTENT WOULD BE TO HAVE A WALL AT THAT LOCATION FOR THE SIGNAGE.
QUESTION. THIS LOCATION ON 70TH STREET.
YOU SAID THERE IS GOING TO BE A GUARD GATE THERE OR SOME TYPE OF GATE THERE.
OKAY. SO THAT'S WHERE THE CITY THE INITIAL SIGN SHOULD HAVE BEEN THAT YOU'RE REQUESTING.
AND THAT'S WHAT IS REQUESTING TO MOVE THOSE TWO TO THE CORNERS ON PINE ISLAND.
YES. JUST FOR REFERENCE IN COMPARISON, THIS IS THE SOUTH WALL ON MCNAB.
ALL THEY HAVE IS THOSE CONCRETE PILLARS.
SO BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE A WALL, THAT'S WHY THEY ARE UTILIZING PINE ISLAND.
SO WHERE WAS THE ORIGINAL SIGN SUPPOSED TO GO IF THEY DON'T HAVE A WALL? WAS IT GOING TO BE A STANDALONE MONUMENT SIGN.
NO THEY'RE ALLOWED TO PER THE CODE.
THEY'RE ALLOWED ENTRANCE SIGNS TWO ENTRANCE SIGNS ON EACH SIDE AT THE MEDIAN.
[00:20:09]
MONUMENT SIGNS PERMITTED PER SUBDIVISION OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EACH VEHICULAR ENTRANCE.SO BECAUSE THERE'S TWO ENTRANCES, THEY'RE ALLOWED FOUR SIGNS, TWO ON EACH SIDE.
NO, NO, NO. I UNDERSTAND THAT.
SO NOW WE HAVE THREE ENTRANCES.
IS THAT CORRECT? OR IS JUST THE VISIBILITY? SO WE'RE NOT CREATING AN ENTRANCE ON PINE ISLAND? ONLY VISIBILITY.
THE TWO STARS INDICATED TO THE TOP THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE LOCATED.
BUT PER THIS PHOTO, THE RED CIRCLE IS THE SAME LOCATION.
THIS IS THE CODE REQUIRED LOCATION.
HOWEVER, ON THE LEFT SIDE, THEY'RE SHOWING THE TWO SIGNS GOING TO BE ALONG PINE ISLAND ROAD.
WHERE THE CIRCLE, THE RED CIRCLE LOCATION, IS THERE GOING TO BE A LIFEGUARD THERE? SO IF SOMEONE SHOULD DRIVE UP, IF THERE IS NO SIGN, THEY WILL KNOW WHERE THEY ARE.
MY UNDERSTANDING IS THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A GUARD THERE.
NO, IT'S AS YOU SEE ON THE ENTRANCE ON MCNAB, THERE'S NOT A GUARD EITHER.
IF THAT BECOMES A PROBLEM, OBVIOUSLY THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ADDRESS IT.
THEY DON'T WANT TO CREATE EITHER A TRAFFIC HAZARD OR HARM THERE, BUT THEY DIDN'T WANT TO COME IN ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNS UNLESS IT TURNS OUT THEY NEED THAT OR IF THEY NEED SECURITY OF SOME SORT THERE.
WELL, I THINK THERE SHOULD BE SOME TYPE OF SIGN THERE, EVEN IF IT'S JUST ONE SIGN, BECAUSE ALL THE SIGNS ARE REALLY ON THE THERE WILL BE NOTHING INDICATING ON THAT SIDE OF THE STREET OR THE AREA SHOWING THAT THIS IS THE LOCATION.
SO IF YOU'RE DRIVING, IT CAN CREATE A CONFUSION LATER AND PEOPLE ARE PULLING IN AND THEN FINDING OUT LATER THEY'RE AT THE WRONG PLACE AND THEN THEY'RE TRYING TO GET OUT, THAT COULD CAUSE PROBLEMS. YES, I AGREE.
SO AS PER CODE, THIS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, DOESN'T MEET THE STANDARD IN REGARDS TO THE ENTRANCE AND THE EXIT.
SO I GUESS THE QUESTION WOULD BE WITH THAT SOUTH SIDE BE CONSIDERED AN EXIT AND THIS SIDE CONSIDERED THE ENTRANCE? NO, MA'AM. BOTH SIDES ARE THE PURPOSE IS FOR ENTRANCE AND EXITS, INGRESS AND EGRESS.
SO THAT'S WHAT THE CONCERN IS IN REGARDS TO TRAFFIC.
CORRECT. SO, YES, THIS ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE VIEW.
SO THERE'S TWO OPTIONS TO ENTER THE COMMUNITY.
AND ALL OF THE BUILDINGS ARE GUARDED BY GATES AS FAR AS ENTRY.
SO YOU CAN ACCESS FROM MCNAB AND GET TO NORTHWEST 70TH STREET WITHOUT ENTERING INTO THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THERE'S A GATE LOCATED HERE FOR EXIT AND ENTRANCE.
THERE'S A GATE LOCATED ON THE LEFT SIDE.
AND EVEN ON THIS SIDE, THIS IS STILL BEING BUILT.
BUT WHY CAN'T WE JUST ADD LIKE AN ADDITIONAL SIGN THERE? YOU KNOW.
AS SOON AS YOU ENTER NORTHWEST 70TH STREET, IT'S ON YOUR RIGHT HAND SIDE.
I'M NOT SAYING YOU CAN'T MISS IT, BUT THIS IS A PRETTY VISIBLE LOCATION.
YOU SHOULDN'T MISS IT AT ANY POINT.
BUT I THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE AN ADDITIONAL SIGN, EVEN ONE SIGN ON THAT 70TH STREET.
[00:25:03]
JUST YOU CAN MAKE THIS RECOMMENDATION ADDED THAT YOU SUGGEST THAT THEY KEEP AT LEAST ONE SIGN AT THE NORTHERN ENTRANCE SO WE CAN PROCEED WITH THE VARIANCE AND YOU CAN RECOMMEND THAT YOU WANT A SIGN AT THE NORTH ENTRANCE AS WELL.AND CERTAINLY THEY WOULDN'T BE OPPOSED TO THAT.
THEY JUST DIDN'T WANT TO COME IN SAYING WE WANT SIGNS EVERYWHERE.
YOU KNOW, THEY WANTED TO JUST ASK TO MOVE THEM, BUT THEY'D BE HAPPY TO HAVE A SIGN THERE AS WELL.
WHEN WE VOTE VIOLA, YOU CAN RECOMMEND THAT IN THE WHEN YOU MAKE THE MOTION.
YES, YOU CAN. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I WILL MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE GET.
THE FLOOR IS NOW OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WANTS TO MAKE A STATEMENT OR ASK A QUESTION? OKAY. THE FLOOR IS NOW CLOSED.
OKAY. I MOTION THAT WE DO THE TWO VARIANCES REQUESTED AND ALSO AN ADDITIONAL SIGN AT THE 70TH STREET LOCATION, SOME TYPE OF SIGN INDICATING WHERE THEY ARE AND THE NAME OF THE BUILDING, WHETHER IT'S EAST WEST.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I SECOND THAT.
SO THE VARIANCE THEY'RE REQUESTING IS FOR THESE TWO ADDITIONAL, LET ME SAY ADDITIONAL SIGNS TO BE ADDED TO PINE ISLAND. AND YOU'RE ASKING THAT THEY KEEP THE CODE APPROVED LOCATION ON 70TH? YES. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE LIKE THE OTHER SIGNS THAT THEY ALREADY HAVE THERE JUST SOMETHING INDICATING TO SOMEONE WHEN SOMEONE DRIVES UP THERE, THEY WILL KNOW, OKAY, THIS IS WHERE THEY'RE INTENDING TO BE AND NOT HAVING A CONFUSION, THEY COME AND THEY'RE NOT SURE.
THERE'S NO SIGN. THERE IS NOT DON'T MAKE ANY SENSE.
SO MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE THE VARIANCE SHOULD BE FOR ADDITIONAL NOT REPLACEMENT, THE ADDITIONAL TWO SIGNS ON PINE ISLAND, BECAUSE ON 70TH IT'S GOING TO BE HARD ADDING ONLY ONE SIGN BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE ENTRANCE RIGHT NOW.
SO I THINK THEY WOULD GO AHEAD AND DO THE CODE APPROVE TWO SIGNS.
SO YOU CAN SEE FROM EACH SIDE.
ACCORDING TO CODE, THEY CAN ONLY HAVE TWO SIGNS.
MADAM CHAIR. YES, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
AND LET ME CLARIFY THE RECORD ON THIS MOTION IS BASICALLY A MOTION TO GRANT THE VARIANCE AND ALSO REQUEST THAT APPLICANT KEEP THE SIGNS THAT THEY HAVE ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PROJECT.
YES. AND THAT'S HER MOTION TOO.
OKAY. ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENTS.
OKAY. SO I'LL REITERATE IF THAT'S OKAY.
YEAH. YOU GUYS, I THINK I'M JUST SAYING YOU GUYS ARE ON THE SAME PAGE.
OKAY. SO AS A THIRD CONFIRMATION, WE'RE MAKING A MOTION TO GRANT THE VARIANCE WITH A CAVEAT OF ADDING ADDITIONAL SIGNS AT THE ORIGINAL CODE REQUIRED LOCATION.
YEAH, THAT'S THE VOTE WE ALL UNDERSTAND.
I DON'T KNOW THAT THE THIRD SIGN HAS TO BE LIKE A SIX FOOT SIGN.
IT COULD JUST BE FLAGS IN THAT AREA OF THESE NORTHWEST 70TH STREET.
SINCE WE'RE DOING THE OTHER TWO SIGNS.
HOWEVER, I WOULD ASK YOU GUYS IF THAT'S WHAT YOU ALSO RECOMMEND, A NEWER SIGN OR JUST THE FLAGS IN THAT 70TH? IF WE DO THE MOTION FOR THE VARIANCE TO BE ACCEPTED WITH EXTRA SIGNAGE, NOW WE'RE CREATING ANOTHER HIGH VISIBILITY ZONE ON THE OTHER SIDE WITH SIX FOOT WALLS.
AM I CORRECT OR NO? IT COULD BE A STANDALONE SIGN AS WELL.
THAT'S A REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE.
SO THEY HAVE NO OBJECTION TO DOING WHAT THE MAJORITY SEEMS LIKE THE MAJORITY OF COMMISSION WANTS.
OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.
[00:30:01]
BOARD. OKAY.ALL RIGHTY. ARE WE READY TO VOTE? LET'S GO. SO.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IF I MAY ADD, WE'RE GOING TO LOOK FURTHER INTO THE CODE JUST TO VERIFY THE TWO SIGNS THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING NOW, BECAUSE THERE'S ONE CODE RELIEF.
ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS FOR ONE CODE RELIEF FOR THE LOCATION OF THE NORTHERN SIGN.
IF WE'RE NOT ABLE TO DO A MONUMENT SIGN, CAN THEY DO A VARIANCE AND DO A SMALLER SOMETHING SMALLER OR ANYTHING ELSE? THEIR MINIMUM REQUIRED IS SIX FEET HIGH SO THEY CAN GO SHORT IF THEY LIKE HIGH, IT STILL REQUIRES A LANDSCAPING BASE.
SO THAT'S TO TAKE A CONSIDERATION.
GO AHEAD. DO HAVE MADAM CHAIR.
YES. ROBERT JOHNSON, SENIOR PLANNER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
A DIRECTIONAL SIGN WOULD BE PERMITTED ON ONE OF THOSE COLUMNS.
OKAY. AND THAT'S PERMITTED BY CODE.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AWESOME WILL NOW MOVE ON.
WE'RE GOING TO READ ITEM 8A AND ITEM 9A TOGETHER AS THEY ARE RELATED.
[8.a TO2534 - An ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, adopting a Small Scale Local Land use Plan Amendment to the City of Tamarac’s Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map in accordance with Chapter 163, specifically Section 163.3187 of the Florida state statutes, for an area of approximately 3.0 net acres in size, located on the Northeast corner of Northwest 21 Avenue and West Prospect Road, addressed as 2099 West Prospect Road, fully described as Parcel “A,” “Prospect Plaza” according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 136, page 2 of the public records of Broward County, Florida, to change the future land use designation from “Low-Density Residential” to “Low-Medium, Residential” in order to allocate one (1) flexibility unit to facilitate the allowance of a school use and provide consistency with the Land Development Code in accordance with the intent of the comprehensive plan of the City of Tamarac; (Case No. 1-LUA-23) authorizing transmittal of the Small Scale Land Use Map Amendment to the Department of Economic Opportunity and the Broward County Planning Council for recertification of the City of Tamarac Future Land Use Map; providing for amendment to the land use plan to reflect such change; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date.]
AND 9B AS WELL.OKAY. YEAH, I TOOK A LOOK AT THAT ONE.
I DIDN'T REALIZE IT. ITEM 8A IS TEMPORARY ORDER 2534.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A SMALL SCALE LOCAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE USE MAP IN ACCORDANCE TO CHAPTER 163, SPECIFICALLY SECTION 163.3187 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES FOR AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY THREE NET ACRES IN SIZE LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST 21ST AVENUE AND WEST PROSPECT ROAD, ADDRESSED AS 2099 WEST PROSPECT ROAD FULLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A PROSPECT PLAZA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREFORE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 136, PAGE TWO OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA TO CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOCATE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE THE ALLOWANCE OF SCHOOL USE AND PROVIDE CONSISTENCY WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ORDINANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC CASE NUMBER 1LUA-23.
ACCORDING TO TRANSMITTAL OF THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND THE BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE PLAN TO REFLECT SUCH CHANGE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WE'LL ALSO HEAR ITEM 9A TEMPORARY ORDER 2535 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC REFERENCED IN SECTION 10-2.1 B OF THE CHAPTER 10 OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCE TO REFLECT REZONING OF A CERTAIN REAL ESTATE PROPERTY FULLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A PROSPECT PLAZA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREFORE THEREOF AS RECORDED A PLAT BOOK 136, PAGE TWO OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM CURRENT RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO R3 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2099 WEST PROSPECT ROAD IN ORDER TO ALLOCATE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE ALLOWANCE. EXCUSE ME.
I'M READING THE SAME ONE OVER.
I'M GOING TO MOVE DOWN TO 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 79.
[00:35:06]
ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCE, AS WELL AS ITEM 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 75 BOARD ORDER APPROVING OR DENYING VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR.I GOT CONFUSED WITH 9A, 9B AND 8A.
9A AND 8A READ ALMOST IDENTICALLY.
SO I APOLOGIZE. I WAS READING THE CORRECT ONE.
SO I'LL REREAD 9A STARTING FROM THE TOP.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC REFERENCED IN SECTION 10.2.1 B OF THE CHAPTER 10 OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCE TO REFLECT REZONING OF A CERTAIN REAL ESTATE PROPERTY FULLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A PROSPECT PLAZA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 136, PAGE TWO OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM THE CURRENT RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ZONING CLASSIFICATION R3 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2099 WEST PROSPECT ROAD.
IN ORDER TO ALLOCATE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE THE ALLOWANCE OF A SCHOOL USE AND PROVIDE CONSISTENCY WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC.
CASE NUMBER 5-Z-23 AND 1-FLX-23 PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT FOR OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REFLECT SUCH CHANGE, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I WILL READ AGAIN 9B JUST FOR CLARITY.
WE'LL ALSO HEAR ITEM 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 79 BOARD ORDER APPROVING AND OR DENYING SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION FOR A PROPOSED SCHOOL USE IN OUR, A, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO TAMARAC CODE FOR ORDINANCE.
WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT FIRST ON ITEMS 8A, 9A, AND 9B.
AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE ON THAT.
I PRINTED COPIES OF THE PRESENTATION IN CASE YOU WANTED TO FLIP THROUGH IT AS WELL.
KEITH POLIAKOFF HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.
THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR, FOR READING A VERY LONG EXPLANATION OF WHY WE'RE HERE.
BUT I'M GOING TO TRY TO MAKE IT CLEARER WHY WE'RE HERE.
AND IT'S GREAT SEEING YOUR CITY ATTORNEY AGAIN.
AND I'D LIKE TO START BY THANKING CHRISTIAN, ROB AND OF COURSE, MAXINE CALLOWAY FOR FIGURING OUT WHAT WE NEEDED TO DO TO GET BETHLEHEM AT THIS LOCATION.
THIS PROPERTY HAS ALWAYS BEEN A SCHOOL.
BEFORE I START, I WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE KNOWS WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.
COULD HAVE BEEN A SCRIVENER'S ERROR.
NO ONE CAN REALLY TELL WHAT OCCURRED WHEN WE LOOKED THROUGH THE MAPS AND THE SYSTEM.
THERE WAS A SCHOOL THERE, SO NO ONE CARED.
IT WAS OPEN. IT WAS CONSIDERED A NON-CONFORMING USE BECAUSE THE SCHOOL OPERATED AS IT ALWAYS HAS.
THEN COVID OCCURRED, AND WHEN COVID OCCURRED, THE SCHOOL WENT OUT OF BUSINESS.
SO THEN WHEN BETHLEHEM CAME AND SAID, WE'D LOVE TO OPEN THIS YEAR, WE'RE ALREADY IN TAMARAC.
WE'VE BEEN IN TAMARACK FOREVER.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL KNOW BETHLEHEM, BUT BY WAY OF BACKGROUND, IT'S 100% MINORITY PRIVATE SCHOOL, ONE OF THE TOP TEN PUBLIC PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN THE AREA.
MOST OF THE STUDENTS END UP GOING TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS ON SCHOLARSHIPS TWO STUDENTS GOT INTO COLLEGES AT AGE OF 16 WITH RIDES AT UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI.
STUDENT RECENTLY JUST GRADUATED FOR FROM AN IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL IN ENGINEERING SO TRULY FANTASTIC FAMILY THAT IS A REAL TAMARAC SUCCESS STORY.
THE MATRIARCH OF THE SCHOOL, ACTUALLY, THEY'RE FROM JAMAICA AND TEACH THE ENGLISH SYSTEM.
[00:40:05]
AND THE ENGLISH SYSTEM IS, QUITE FRANKLY, MUCH MORE ADVANCED THAN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF EDUCATION.THEY DON'T THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO WRITE AT AGE FOUR.
YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE YOU DOING? SO SHE ENDED UP LEAVING THE SCHOOL AND YEARS AND YEARS AGO STARTED THE SCHOOL ACTUALLY IN HER HOUSE, YOU KNOW, WITH TUTORING STUDENTS HOW TO WRITE AT A YOUNG AGE. AND THAT EVENTUALLY DEVELOPED INTO THE FIRST TAMARAC SCHOOL AT 6855 WEST COMMERCIAL.
THEY'VE BEEN BEYOND SUCCESSFUL.
AND THIS WOULD GIVE THEM THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME TO ONE CAMPUS, WHICH IS WHAT THEY'VE DESIRED.
THE FACT THAT IT LOST ITS GRANDFATHERED STATUS IS WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY.
IT PROBABLY TOOK 90 DAYS OR MORE FOR STAFF TO EVEN FIGURE OUT HOW TO UNWIND THIS BECAUSE IT'S SO CONFUSING ONCE IT WENT THROUGH THE SYSTEM IN 2018.
THE LOCATION IS 2900 WEST PROSPECT ROAD.
IF YOU GO THERE, IT'S LIKE REALLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, THAT'S A PHOTO OF THE SCHOOL.
IT'S BEEN THERE AS LONG AS I CAN REMEMBER.
AND IT PROBABLY DATES BACK TO THE 1980S FROM WHAT THE RECORDS SHOW.
AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS A SIMPLIFIED VIEW OF IT.
SO IN ORDER TO PUT IT BACK TO THE WAY IT IS, WE'VE HAD TO GO THROUGH THIS INCREDIBLY ARDUOUS, LONG PROCESS THAT INVOLVES BOTH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY.
AND ESSENTIALLY WE HAVE TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO R3 BECAUSE THAT'S THE DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS SCHOOL.
AND THEN WE HAVE TO GET A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A SCHOOL.
SO ALL THESE THINGS, JUST TO PUT IT BACK TO THE WAY IT WAS AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN SINCE THE 1980S.
BUT UNFORTUNATELY, THAT'S WHAT TRANSPIRED AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE.
TO SHOW YOU THE MAP AND THIS IS WHAT'S EVEN INTERESTING.
THIS IS YOUR EXISTING LAND USE PLAN.
I MENTIONED BETWEEN OAKLAND PARK AND FORT LAUDERDALE AS WELL.
WHY IS IT YELLOW? IT REALLY DIDN'T MAKE SENSE WHEN WE LOOKED AT IT.
IT WAS CLEARLY SOMETHING HAPPENED IN ERROR.
SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE SWITCHING IT TO ORANGE, WHICH MATCHES EVERYTHING AROUND IT.
AND THAT ORANGE CATEGORY ALLOWS IT TO MAINTAIN A SCHOOL.
SO THAT CHANGE IS THE LAND USE CHANGE.
SO IT WAS ASSIGNED THIS RESIDENTIAL ESTATE CATEGORY FOR THE SCHOOL.
WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THIS LAND USE CATEGORY WHICH MATCHES THE LAND USE NEXT DOOR TO IT.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO OTHER CITIES.
IT IS SUBJECT SITES NOW ALSO ADJACENT TO THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS BUILDING.
I'M VERY PROUD OF THIS SCHOOL, SO I'LL JUST TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IT.
EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT REALLY PART OF THE APPLICATION, THEY HAVE 300 OR THEY PROPOSE TO HAVE 300 K THROUGH EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS, 150 PRESCHOOL STUDENTS. THE SCHOOL CAN ACCOMMODATE MORE, HOPEFULLY BASED ON SUCCESS.
SCHOOL HOURS ARE THE SAME AS THE PRIOR ONES THAT USED TO BE THERE 8 TO 3 WITH AFTER CARE OF 4 TO 6.
THEY ALWAYS HAVE STAGGERED DROP OFF AND PICK UP AND TRAFFIC'S NEVER BEEN AN ISSUE HERE.
THEY HAVE SAFE AND EFFICIENT CIRCULATION.
SOME PICTURES THAT WE TOOK RECENTLY OF THE SCHOOL.
[00:45:01]
IT'S GOT PLAYGROUNDS.IN FACT, IT'S GOT A HUGE WALL BEHIND IT BETWEEN ITSELF AND THE RESIDENTS NEXT TO IT.
THEIR MISSION IS TO EMPOWER MINORITY STUDENTS TO EXCEL AND ACHIEVE IN A FAITH BASED ENVIRONMENT.
I THOUGHT THIS WAS REALLY COOL.
IT SHOWS THAT THEIR TEST SCORES ARE FAR ABOVE THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.
AND WHEN SPEAKING WITH THE OWNER SEVERAL TIMES BUT EVEN THIS MORNING I SAID, HOW DID YOU GUYS DO DURING COVID? WHAT DID YOU ALL DO? AND OF COURSE THEY WENT VIRTUAL.
SO IT'S A WONDERFUL INSTITUTION.
WE'RE SORRY YOU HAD TO READ THREE PAGES OF WHY WE'RE HERE, BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION.
BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.
WE'LL HEAR FROM THE CITY PRESENTATION.
FOR THE RECORD, I'M ROB JOHNSON, I'M SENIOR PLANNER OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
SO KEITH POLIAKOFF, ESQUIRE DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER CHARTER BC TAMARAC PROSPECT, LLC.
AND IT'S LOCATED IN COMMISSION DISTRICT ONE, WHICH IS VICE MAYOR MARLON BOLTON.
AND THEN WELL, AND THEN ALSO AND THEN FINALLY, THEY'RE REQUESTING THAT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW FOR THE SCHOOL IN THE R3 ZONING DISTRICT BETHLEHEM JUNIOR ACADEMY THEY'RE CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 6827 WEST COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD IN THE MARKETPLACE OF TAMARAC.
AND THEN ON AUGUST 5TH OF 2020, THEY RECEIVED BETHLEHEM JUNIOR ACADEMY.
THEY RECEIVED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL IN THEIR LOCATION TO EXPAND FOR GRADES K THROUGH 8.
AND SO NOW THEY'RE PROPOSING TO RELOCATE TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT 2099 TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY.
SO HERE'S THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
SO WE TALKED ABOUT THE USE TO THE NORTH, TO THE SOUTH, ACROSS PROSPECT, YOU HAVE A SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION IN OAKLAND PARK AND THEN TO THE WEST IS A TELECOMMUNICATION BUILDING AND THEN TO THE EAST IS THE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION OF THE TAMARAC LAKE SECOND SECTION.
SO THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY COMPRISED OF TWO BUILDINGS.
YOU'VE GOT A COVERED WALKWAY THAT CONNECTS THE TWO BUILDINGS WITH A COMMON ROOF.
YOU GOT PARKING, PLAYGROUND AND LANDSCAPING.
YOU HAVE THE BUILDING ON THE BUILDING A IT'S 9085FT².
BUILDING B SHOWN ON THE SCREEN, 9120FT² FOR A TOTAL COMBINED OF 18,205FT².
OKAY. SO THROUGH THE HISTORY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A FORMER SITE OF THE KATHLEEN C WRIGHT CHARTER SCHOOL, WHICH WAS OCCUPIED THE SPACE THROUGH 2010 THROUGH 2013. THEY TAUGHT K THROUGH EIGHT.
IN 2014, SITE WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF HOUSE CHAMPS CAREER PREP HIGH SCHOOL.
THEY EXPECTED AN ENROLLMENT OF 400 STUDENTS, BUT THE SCHOOL NEVER OPENED FOR INTERNAL REASONS.
[00:50:03]
WITH A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE REQUIRED SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ONLY REMAIN VALID DURING THE PERIOD OF WHICH CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND BUSINESS LICENSE HAS EXPIRED.THEN, ADDITIONALLY, ON JUNE 11TH, ON THAT SAME DAY, THE CITY DID THE CITYWIDE REZONING AND REZONED THE PROPERTY FROM R-1C TO RE AS PART OF THE CITYWIDE REZONING, THEREBY MAKING IT A NON-CONFORMING USE.
THEN ON AUGUST 9TH OF 2018, EXCELSIOR CHARTER THEY FILED.
THEN THEY MOVED INTO THE 2099 LOCATION.
EXCELSIOR CHARTER AT THE TIME, THEY HAD OVER 200 STUDENTS IN GRADES K THROUGH EIGHT, K THROUGH FIVE, AND THEY DESIRED TO INCREASE ENROLLMENT TO 450 STUDENTS FOR GRADES K THROUGH EIGHT AT THE 2099 LOCATION.
DURING THE 2020-2021 SCHOOL YEAR EXCELSIOR CHARTER, THEY SERVED 157 STUDENTS.
BUT UNFORTUNATELY, EXCELSIOR CHARTER, THEY SHUTTERED IN 2022 DUE TO FINANCIAL ISSUES FROM THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC. AND UNFORTUNATELY, THE BUSINESS LICENSE WAS NOT RENEWED AND THEN IT EXPIRED.
AND SO THEN IT NO LONGER THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, NO LONGER MET THAT CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, WHICH IS WHY NOW SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE REZONING AND THE NEW ZONING DISTRICT.
SO IT DOESN'T REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT THROUGH BROWARD COUNTY, BUT IT WILL REQUIRE RECERTIFICATION OF OUR LAND USE MAP AND FLEX TABLE AND WILL REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO DO THAT AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
THE PROPOSED REZONING FROM RE TO R3 ALLOWS FOR THE SCHOOL THROUGH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
THE ALLOCATION OF ONE FLEX UNIT IS NEEDED TO PROVIDE THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TO GET US TO THAT R3 ZONING WITHOUT AMENDING THE BROWARD COUNTY LAND USE PLAN AND TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES DOCUMENT THAT BROWARD COUNTY PROVIDES.
SO BETHLEHEM, THEY'RE PROPOSING TO HAVE AN ENROLLMENT OF UP TO 300 KINDERGARTEN THROUGH EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AND WILL ALSO HOUSE A PRE KINDERGARTEN PROGRAM OF UP TO 150 STUDENTS.
BETHLEHEM, THE SCHOOL HOURS ARE GOING TO BE 8 A.M.
TO 3 P.M. FOR THE K THROUGH EIGHTH GRADE.
THE PRE KINDERGARTEN IS GOING TO BE 8:30 A.M.
PARENTS, THE DROP OFF IS GOING TO BE 7:30 A.M.
AND THEN PICK UP IS 2:30 TO 6:00 P.M.
. AND THEN KINDERGARTEN THE PRE KINDERGARTEN PARENTS MAY CHOOSE TO PARK AND PICK UP THEIR STUDENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AND THEN THEY'LL HAVE STAFF MEMBERS TO ASSIST WITH THAT. OKAY, SO BACK TO THE ACCESS PLAN.
ACCESS IS PROVIDED VIA THE TWO DRIVEWAYS.
THE SOUTH SIDE CONNECTS TO PROSPECT ROAD.
HOWEVER, DURING THE PICKUP AND DROP OFFS, IT WILL BE THE EXIT ONLY PER THE PLAN.
THE WEST SIDE CONNECTS TO 21ST AVENUE.
AND THEN DURING THE PICKUP AND DROP OFF, THAT'S GOING TO BE THE ENTRANCE.
THE VEHICLE CIRCULATION PLAN THAT'S SHOWN THAT SHOWS THE INTENDED METHOD FOR THE ACCESS AROUND THE SCHOOL, THE CIRCULATION AND THE EGRESS ONTO PROSPECT.
[00:55:02]
OVER THERE ON THE EAST SIDE.THE 75 FOOT, IT'S A 75 FOOT DROP OFF PICKUP AREA THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE THREE VEHICLES AT A TIME.
225 STUDENTS WILL BE PICKED UP USING THIS PICKUP LANE AND THE REMAINING 50 WILL BE PICKED UP BY PARENTS WHO'S GOING TO WALK OR IS GOING TO PARK? SCHOOL STAFF MEMBERS ARE GOING TO ENSURE PROPER CIRCULATION ON SITE.
AND YOU CAN SEE THE GREEN POINTS THAT SHOW WHERE THE STAFF MEMBERS ARE GOING TO BE LOCATED AT THE ENTRANCE ON 21ST AND THEN THE EGRESS ON PROSPECT. ADDITIONALLY, YOU GOT THE THERE'S THAT EXIT ONLY SIGN THAT'S SHOWN THAT REINFORCES THE TRAFFIC FLOW.
THE TRAFFIC STUDY ALSO PROVIDED A PARKING ANALYSIS.
A TOTAL OF 47 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED SCHOOL AND 133 PARKING SPACES ARE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY, OF WHICH FIVE ARE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE.
THE DURATION THEY'RE EXPECTING THE VEHICLES TO BE PARKED IS LESS THAN FIVE MINUTES.
ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES ARE SPREAD OUT IN AN HOUR AND A HALF IN THE AFTERNOON.
SO THE 133 PARKING SPACES THAT ARE ON SITE WILL ACCOMMODATE THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO PARK AND PICK UP.
SO THEN THE TRAFFIC STUDY CONCLUDES THAT THE SCHOOL WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT ROADWAY, NETWORK LEVEL OF SERVICE AND ON SITE VEHICULAR STORAGE AND IS NOT EXPECTED TO HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT ROADWAY TRAFFIC IN THE PARKING SUPPLY IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE FOR THE DEMAND OF THE PROPOSED SCHOOL.
SO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IT IDENTIFIES THESE REVIEW STANDARDS FOR EACH ONE OF THESE ITEMS. SO YOU HAVE THE FIVE STANDARDS FOR THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE DIRECTOR OF SPORTS REQUEST FOR THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS WITH THE REVIEW STANDARDS EMPLOYED.
THEN WE GOT THE REVIEW STANDARDS FOR THE FLEX UNITS.
AND SO THE DIRECTOR ALSO SUPPORTS THE REQUEST FOR THE FLEX UNITS BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REVIEW STANDARDS EMPLOYED. AND THEN SIMILAR TO THE FLEX UNITS, YOU HAVE THE REZONING WHICH HAS THE [INAUDIBLE] STANDARDS OF APPROVAL AND THE DIRECTOR SUPPORTS THE REQUEST FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING BASED ON THE ANALYSIS.
AND THEN FINALLY, WE HAVE THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
AND THE PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALIZED REVIEW OF CERTAIN USES THAT DUE TO THEIR NATURE RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS ON SURROUNDING AREA, THEY REQUIRE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF THE LOCATION, DESIGN AND METHODS OF OPERATION, AS WELL AS IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS TO MITIGATE CONCERNS BEFORE THEY CAN BE DEEMED APPROPRIATE IN THE ZONING DISTRICT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THEIR SURROUNDINGS.
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE THEN GIVES TEN STANDARDS FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, AND IT IS THE OPINION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THAT THE REQUEST FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION MEETS EACH OF THE REVIEW STANDARDS BASED ON COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
AND THE DIRECTOR SUPPORTS THE PETITION BASED ON THE FACT THAT ALL CONCERNS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE SURROUNDING AREA HAVE BEEN MITIGATED AND THE SCHOOL USE IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT.
ALL RIGHT. SO THEN THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE THAT SUPPORTS GOAL NUMBER FOUR, TAMARAC IS VIBRANT.
THE APPROVAL WILL PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVITALIZE A VACANT PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY.
THE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD FORWARD A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PROPOSED SMALL SCALE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE ALLOCATION OF ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT TO FACILITATE THE ALLOWANCE OF A SCHOOL USE TO THE CITY COMMISSION AT ITS AUGUST 23RD, 2023, MEETING FOR FIRST READING AND ITS SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 MEETING FOR SECOND READING WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS TO THE BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL TO RECERTIFY THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND SUPPLY A COPY OF THE APPROVED RECERTIFIED MAP TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
[01:00:03]
OKAY. SO IN ADDITION, THE REZONING AND ALLOCATION OF THE FLEX UNIT, IT SUPPORTS POLICY 1.4 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE APPROVAL OF THE REZONING AND FLEXIBILITY UNIT FACILITATES A SCHOOL USE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.THE DIRECTOR SHE SUPPORTS THE PLANNING.
SHE RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD FORWARD A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING CONCURRENT WITH THE ALLOCATION OF ONE FLEX UNIT AT ITS AUGUST 23RD, 2023, MEETING FOR FIRST READING AND ITS SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 MEETING FOR SECOND READING WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
NUMBER ONE THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS TO THE BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL TO RECERTIFY THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND SUPPLY A COPY OF THE APPROVED RECERTIFIED MAP TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
AND THEN FINALLY, THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
SUPPORT GOAL NUMBER ONE OF THE CITY'S 2040 STRATEGIC PLAN.
THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR THE SCHOOL FACILITY IN R-3 ZONING DISTRICT.
AS YOU CAN SEE, GREAT EDUCATION THAT'S PART OF THAT GOAL.
SO FINALLY, THE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD APPROVE THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR THE BETHLEHEM JUNIOR ACADEMY TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A SCHOOL USE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT AT ITS SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023, MEETING, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
NUMBER TWO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS TRANSFERABLE ADMINISTRATIVELY PURSUANT TO COMPLIANCE WITH CITY CODE, SUBMITTING DOCUMENTATION OF PAYMENT AND FEES ONLY AFTER THE PREVIOUS CONDITION IS MET.
NUMBER THREE ANY FUTURE FENCING GATING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR SECURITY REASONS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT CREATING A STACKING ISSUE INTO EITHER PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THROUGH THE APPROVAL OF A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT.
AND THEN NUMBER FIVE, THE PARENT DROP OFF PICKUP OPERATIONS SHALL BE MONITORED BY SCHOOL STAFF TO ENSURE THAT THE VEHICLE QUEUES DO NOT AFFECT THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INCLUDING THE NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE ON NORTHWEST 21ST AVENUE.
STAGGERED START AND RELEASE TIMES SHALL BE PROVIDED IF VEHICLE QUEUES AFFECT THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND THEN SITE PLAN APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO ADD A SECOND DROP OFF PICKUP LANE OF VEHICLE QUEUES CONTINUING TO AFFECT THE PUBLIC LANE CONTINUED, ARE DETERMINED TO CONTINUE TO AFFECT THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOLLOWING THE APPLICATION OF STAGGERED START AND RELEASE TIMES.
AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? SAJEEN. I DO.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO ME THE FLEX UNIT AND WHAT IT IS? YEAH, THE FLEX UNIT.
BROWARD COUNTY GIVES US BASICALLY FLEXIBILITY TO ADD DENSITY TO TO THE PROPERTY WITHOUT HAVING TO GO AND DO A LAND USE CHANGE THROUGH THEM.
WE'RE ALLOCATING THE ONE FLEXIBILITY UNIT AND THAT'S NEEDED TO TO GET TO THAT R-3 ZONING BECAUSE THAT WOULD ALLOW THAT ADDITIONAL DENSITY IN THE R-3 ZONING.
IS IT LIKE? WE ONLY NEED TO ALLOCATE ONE AT THIS POINT.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I GUESS I HAVE TO REVIEW THAT.
THE SECOND QUESTION, WILL THERE BE ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY TO FACILITATE THIS NEW OCCUPATION? WE'LL LET THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPERTY IS IN MOVING CONDITION.
AND IN FACT, WHEN MR. JOHNSON SHOWED YOU THE TRAFFIC PLAN AND ALL THAT, IT'S NOT EVEN LIKE SOMETHING YOU HAVEN'T IT'S BEEN OPERATIONAL FOR SO MANY YEARS THAT WE KNOW THERE'S NO QUEUING PROBLEM.
WE KNOW THERE'S NO PARKING PROBLEM.
I THINK, YOU KNOW, THE OWNERSHIP IS LOOKING.
BY THE WAY, I WANT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR.
SO THE MINUTE THAT THIS IS APPROVED, THE BANK PROVIDES THEM THE FINANCING AND THEY'RE OWNING.
I'M SURE THEY'LL MAKE THEIR OWN IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS THEY WANT TO REPAINT AND DO SOME OTHER.
WITH NO CONSTRUCTION? NO CONSTRUCTION.
DOES IT MEET AND THE DOES TAMARAC HAVE AN EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT? AND DOES THIS DEVELOPMENT MEET THAT? WE DO NOT HAVE AN EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT?
[01:05:02]
OKAY. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, MY ONLY CONCERN WAS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC, BUT IT SEEMED LIKE YOU HAVE DONE YOUR RESEARCH ALREADY ON THAT AND IT'S APPROPRIATE.SO IF THAT'S ALL, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH IT.
AND WE HAVE THEIR REPORT WAS PROVIDED IN THE BACK UP.
AWESOME. THIS IS JUST FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE CURRENT VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN.
AM I CORRECT ABOUT THAT? I SEE A WHITE CIRCLE HERE AND A BOX THAT SAYS EXIT ONLY.
THAT'S A SIGN THAT REINFORCES THE TRAFFIC FLOW TO MAKE SURE.
OKAY, SO THERE'S JUST THE ONE EXIT.
OKAY. RIGHT. PEOPLE DON'T GO UP THERE TO EXIT OR THAT'S AN EXIT ONLY.
THERE IS A EIGHT FOOT WALL ON THAT ENTIRE SIDE.
SO THERE'S NO WAY THROUGH THE COMMUNITY.
OKAY. YEAH, I'M TRYING TO VISUALIZE THE LOCATION.
I KNOW THAT 2800, BUT I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW FAR.
WHAT'S THE ADDRESS AGAIN? 2029. I KNOW 2800 HAS A SCHOOL REDEEMING WORD CHRISTIAN CENTER INTERNATIONAL.
THAT'S CORRECT OVER ON PROSPECT THERE.
SO I WASN'T SURE HOW THE CONNECTION OR HOW CLOSE THE CONNECTION WAS BETWEEN THIS PARTICULAR ENTITY AND THE REDEEMING WORD FOR THE TRAFFICKING PURPOSES OF THE SCHOOL. THIS IS SOUTH OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD.
THE REDEEMING WORD IS NORTH OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD.
WILL THIS BE A CHARTER SCHOOL? IS IT A CHARTER SCHOOL? THIS IS NOT A CHARTER SCHOOL.
OKAY. THAT'S FUNDED IN PART BY THE STATE.
AND THE PARENTS PICK UP THE OTHER HALF.
OKAY. I HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION.
WILL THE PARENTS BE PULLING IN AND PARKING TO PICK UP THEIR CHILDREN OR ARE THEY GOING BECAUSE MANY OF THE SCHOOL THAT I HAVE TO PASS BY, THERE ARE THESE LONG LINES THAT SOMETIMES REALLY IMPACT TRAFFIC BECAUSE THEY'RE THERE TO PICK UP THEIR KIDS.
AND IT'S JUST ON HOW IS THAT? THERE'S PLENTY OF PARKING SPOTS, AS MR. JOHNSON SHOWED YOU.
THERE'S LIKE OVER NEARLY 100 EXTRA PARKING SPOTS HERE.
BUT BECAUSE OF THEIR STAGGERED TIMES, THEY DO HALF HOUR PICK UP INCREMENTS.
IT GOES VERY SMOOTHLY FOR PICK UP AND DROP OFF.
SO WOULD THERE BE PARKING TO PICK UP THEIR CHILDREN? NOT NORMALLY. ONCE IN A WHILE.
FOR THE YOUNGER STUDENTS, THE PRE K AND K.
SOMETIMES PARENTS LIKE TO PARK TO WALK INSIDE TO PICK UP THEIR KIDS.
THERE'S AMPLE PARKING FOR THAT.
BUT THE MAJORITY WILL USE THE TRAFFIC PATTERN THAT'S SHOWN UP THERE, WHICH IS MORE THAN ENOUGH STACKING, IN FACT, FOR THE SINCE THE 1980S THAT THIS BUILDING'S BEEN USED, THERE HAS NOT BEEN A SINGLE COMPLAINT AT THE CITY ABOUT STACKING WITH 450 STUDENTS THERE INTO RIGHT OF WAY.
IT'S NEVER OCCURRED SINCE 1985, ROB OR WHEREVER THAT INITIAL SCHOOL WAS.
YEAH. WAS STARTED SOMEWHERE AROUND THERE.
OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES. SO I DID SEE THAT AT SOME POINT IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS PARTICULAR SITE GO THROUGH A RE CERTIFICATION PROCESS.
WAS THAT DONE? THAT WILL BE DONE FOLLOWING THE APPROVAL OF THE SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN.
THAT WAS LIKE TWO, TWO SCHOOLS AGO, 2 OR 3 SCHOOLS AGO.
OKAY. SO THE INTERNAL PROBLEMS DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE REZONING, RECERTIFICATION? NO. OKAY. THANK YOU.
WILL THERE BE BUSSES? SOME OF THE CHILDREN ARRIVING ON BUSSES? NO.
OKAY. AND THAT'S A CONDITION OF APPROVAL IN THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, THE NO BUSSES.
OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY.
THANK YOU BOTH. WE'D LIKE TO OPEN THE FLOOR TO THE PUBLIC.
[01:10:02]
IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT OR ASK A QUESTION.THE FLOOR IS NOW OPEN AND IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT THERE IS ANYONE HERE, SO THE FLOOR IS NOW CLOSED.
I'D LIKE TO ASK FOR A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE VOTE RECOMMENDING.
SO, MADAM CHAIR, WE'LL NEED TO TAKE EACH ITEM SEPARATELY.
YEAH, WE CAN DO IT THIS WAY, MADAM CHAIR.
WE NEED TO VOTE FOR ITEM 8A, WHICH IS THE ORDINANCE, AND THAT'S TO 2534.
CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE IN A SECOND? ITEM 8A.
CAN YOU LET ME KNOW WHO MOVED? I MOVED. WHO MOVED THE MOTION? JACQUES MOISE MADE A MOTION TO MOVE TO APPROVE.
YES. MOTION TO MAKE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION.
AWESOME. I'D LIKE TO ASK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM 9A TEMPORARY ORDER 2535.
[9.a TO2535 - An ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Tamarac referenced in Section 10-2.1(B) of Chapter 10 of the City of Tamarac Code of Ordinances to reflect the rezoning of certain real estate property fully described as Parcel “A,” “Prospect Plaza” according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 136, Page 2 of the public records of Broward County, Florida, from the current RE (Residential Estate) zoning classification to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning classification, for the subject property located at 2099 West Prospect Road, in order to allocate one (1) flexibility unit to facilitate the allowance of a school use and provide consistency with the Land Development Code in accordance with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tamarac; (Case No. 5-Z-23 & 1-FLX-23); providing for amendment to the Official Zoning Map to reflect such change; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date.]
DO I HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD.YES. A MOTION MADE BY JACQUES MOISE.
YES. MOTION TO MAKE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION.
AND FINALLY, I'M ASKING FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 9B TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 79 APPROVING A SPECIAL
[9.b TBO 79 - Board Order approving/denying Special Exception application for a proposed School use in an R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning district, pursuant to the Tamarac Code of Ordinances]
EXCEPTION FOR PROPOSED USE IN A R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE? MY MOTION TO APPROVE.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY REPORTS? EXCUSE ME? AT THIS TIME, WE'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM ANYONE ON THE BOARD WHO HAS ANY REPORTS, ANY PLANNING BOARD REPORTS.
NO. AND WE'LL NOW HEAR FROM THE DIRECTOR.
[11. Director's Report]
DIRECTOR IN TRAINING.MADAM CHAIR. MY NAME IS MAHER MANSOOR.
I'M THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SITTING IN FOR MAXINE CALLOWAY.
I'M GOING TO GO OVER THE UPDATES SINCE YOUR LAST MEETING OF JUNE 7TH.
SO TEMPORAL RESOLUTION 13959 APPROVING THE PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2023 2024 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN WAS APPROVED AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING ON JULY 12TH, 2023.
TEMPORARY ORDINANCE 2530 AMENDING SECTION 10-4.4 ENTITLED LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION TO ALLOW THE CITY OF TAMARAC TO ADOPT AND ENFORCE ITS OWN TREE PRESERVATION REGULATIONS, WAS HEARD AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 14TH, 2023, AND APPROVED ADOPTED ON JUNE 28TH, 2023.
SINCE THEN IT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IS PREPARING THE CERTIFICATE MUNICIPAL CERTIFICATION.
AMENDING CHAPTER TEN SIX ENTITLED RULES OF CONSTRUCTION DEFINITIONS BY STATISTICALLY AMENDING SECTION 10-6.2 ENTITLED USE CATEGORIES FOR CHILD CARE FACILITY FOR THE USE OF AUTO TOWING AND THE SCHOOL AND AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF THE USE AUTO WRECKING AND SALVAGE YARD WAS HEARD AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 14TH, 2023.
PURSUANT TO THE CITY COMMISSIONER REQUEST THIS ITEM WAS BIFURCATED INTO TWO AND HEARD AGAIN ON JUNE 28TH, 2023 FOR FIRST READING AND THE CHILD CARE FACILITY AND SCHOOL APPROVED ADOPTED ON JULY 12TH, 2023 ON SECOND READING.
[01:15:08]
2023, AND TEMPORARY BOARD ORDER 74 BOARD ORDERS APPROVING SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR DNG TOWING AND RECOVERY LLC WAS ALSO APPROVED AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 28TH, 2023.FINALLY, I JUST HAVE A REQUEST, PLEASE.
WHEN MISS TIBBY, COLLETTE SHE ALWAYS SENDS EMAILS PRIOR TO THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING AND ASK FOR CONFIRMATION FOR ATTENDANCE.
AND IT JUST, YOU KNOW, AS A COURTESY JUST TO CONFIRM YOUR ATTENDANCE, BECAUSE IF WE DETERMINE THAT QUORUM WILL NOT BE ESTABLISHED, WE MIGHT INFORM THE APPLICANT NOT TO COME AT ALL. THANK YOU.
HOW MANY MEMBERS? YOU HAVE TO HAVE FOUR FOR A QUORUM? YEAH, FOUR. OKAY.
FOUR OF YOU HAVE TO BE. AND WE WILL CONFIRM ONCE, ONCE MS. TIBBY GETS THE INFORMATION, SHE WILL WRITE BACK TO YOU THAT QUORUM IS PRESENT.
AND THAT'S BASICALLY THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO ESTABLISH.
AND WE PRESENTLY HAVE SIX OF US, SIX ON THE BOARD.
RIGHT. YEAH. WE HAVE FIVE MEMBERS AND TWO ALTERNATES.
OKAY. AS LONG AS WE HAVE FOUR, THE MEETING WILL GO ON.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
JUST ONE MORE THING, IF I MAY, MADAM CHAIR.
THE ELECTION, WHICH SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED TODAY, ALSO WILL BE SHOULD HAPPEN NEXT MEETING.
OKAY. SO IF ALL CAN BE PRESENT, PLEASE.
SO FOR NEXT TIME, APPRECIATE IT.
EVERYONE IS HERE SO YOU CAN REALLY ELECT A PERMANENT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR.
AND YOU KNOW THAT WILL BE WHEN ALL OF YOU.
IT WILL BE EVEN BETTER. IF NOT, YOU KNOW, WE'LL GO WITH WITH THE QUORUM.
DO WE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE WANT TO DISCUSS? NO. ALL RIGHT.
IT IS NOW 10:26 AND THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.