IT IS NOW 10:00 ON MONDAY, MARCH 20TH.
[00:00:03]
WE ARE HERE FOR OUR WORKSHOP.AND IF EVERYBODY WOULD ACTUALLY TURN THEIR ATTENTION TO OUR CITY CLERK WHILE SHE CALLS THE ROLL.
AND IF WE WOULD ALL STAND AND COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS WILL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
ALLEGIANCE]. WE'RE A VERY QUIET GROUP.
PLEASE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT THE VICE MAYOR HAS JUST COME IN.
[1.a Woodlands Development Agreement]
AND TODAY WE WILL BE HAVING THE WOODLANDS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PRESENTED BY MRS. MAXINE CALLOWAY, OUR ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, AND SCOTT BECKMAN OF DONAY, MEZCAL AND BECKMAN AND COLLEAGUES.NOW, WE HAVEN'T BEEN IN A WORKSHOP FOR A MONTH.
I REMIND YOU THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO THE CARDS.
YOU LIFT IT OVER AND I'LL KNOW THAT YOU WANT TO SPEAK.
AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE DONE SPEAKING, I ASK THAT YOU ROLL IT BACK OVER.
AND WE'RE GOING TO LET OUR PRESENTERS PRESENT ALL THE WAY THROUGH AND THEN WE WILL ASK QUESTIONS.
MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS SCOTT BACKMAN, A PLEASURE TO SEE YOU ALL.
IS THERE A CLICKER? YES. EXCELLENT.
PERFECT. GREAT TO BE GOING ON AND OFF WITH MY GLASSES.
I FIND THAT I CAN'T SEE TOO MANY THINGS THESE DAYS AS THE YEARS GO ON.
VERY EXCITED TO BE HERE BEFORE YOU TODAY IN THE WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING IN THE PRESENTATION I'M GOING TO BE MAKING IN COORDINATION WITH MS .
CALLAWAY IS EFFECTIVELY AN OUTLINE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
VERY, VERY THOROUGH PRESENTATION ON WEDNESDAY.
BUT I'VE BEEN ASKED TO KIND OF LIMIT THIS PRESENTATION TO EXACTLY WHAT IS IN THIS AGREEMENT.
SO WITH THAT IN MIND, AND I BELIEVE YOU'VE ALREADY GOT A STAFF REPORT AND BACK UP ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT DOES INCLUDE AN OUTLINE, VERY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT I'M GOING TO SHARE WITH YOU TODAY.
OBVIOUSLY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY.
THE GOLF COURSE ITSELF IS COMPRISED OF ABOUT 275 ACRES, OF WHICH WE ARE PROPOSING TO DEVELOP ABOUT 160 ACRES. ACTUALLY, IT'S LESS THAN THAT IN TERMS OF THE HOMES AND THE ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT ITSELF.
AND WE'LL GET INTO THAT IN A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL AS WE GO.
WE ARE PROPOSING TO RESTRICT THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS WELL, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN THROUGH PLAT AND OTHER DEED RESTRICTIONS THAT WILL BE RECORDED AGAINST THE PROPERTY TO THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF THE VARIOUS ASSOCIATIONS AND SECTIONS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY SUCH THAT THESE RESTRICTIONS, WHICH INCLUDE THE 335 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS THAT WE'RE NOW PROPOSING, OPEN SPACE, THINGS OF THAT NATURE, RUN WITH THE LAND AND GO TO THE BENEFIT OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS.
ESSENTIALLY, IT TAKES ALL OF THE ASSUMING THAT THIS PROJECT DOES MOVE ITSELF FORWARD AND THESE DOCUMENTS ARE IMPLEMENTED, THE DEVELOPER ESSENTIALLY HAS NO ABILITY TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR SOMETHING MORE, AND THAT HAS BEEN A BIG CONCERN THAT WE'VE HEARD OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST SIX YEARS.
[00:05:01]
IF THIS IS WHAT'S BEING APPROVED, THIS IS WHAT'S BEING APPROVED, AND WE'RE PUTTING THAT POWER FROM OUR PROPERTY, ENCUMBERING OUR PROPERTY BACK INTO THE HANDS OF THE CITY AND RESIDENTS WITHIN. SO THE OVERALL GROSS DWELLING OF THE 275 UNITS, I'M SORRY, 275 ACRES IS PROPOSED AT 1.2 UNITS TO THE ACRE. WHEN YOU TAKE THE DEVELOPMENT PARCELS THAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT, IT GOES TO 2.1 UNITS TO THE ACRE.SO THE AGREEMENT OUTLINES A NUMBER OF STANDARDS, RIGHT? THE IDEA AND THE GOAL HERE WAS TO ENSURE THAT THIS AGREEMENT REALLY PUT ALL OF THE OBLIGATIONS AND EXPECTATIONS THAT THE CITY AND THAT THE COMMUNITY HAS ESTABLISHED OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST SEVEN YEARS, SIX YEARS INTO THIS AGREEMENT, TO ENSURE, AS I SAID EARLIER, THAT THINGS CAN'T CHANGE, THIS NEEDS TO MOVE FORWARD AND LOOK A CERTAIN WAY AND HAVE CERTAIN STANDARDS.
AND SO THERE'S A RESIDENTIAL POD STANDARD SECTION WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
IT TALKS ABOUT THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE YOU WILL SEE ON WEDNESDAY.
BUT THESE ARE ALL ABSOLUTE MINIMUMS. MAXIMUM HEIGHT WOULD BE 30FT.
HOMES, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF POD G, WHICH IS THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN THERE.
THE SOUTHERNMOST SECTION DOES ALLOW FOR TWO STORY HOMES, GIVEN ITS PROXIMITY TO 44TH STREET AND THE HIGH RISE CONDOMINIUMS ACROSS THE STREET IN LAUDERHILL. WHAT YOU SEE HERE, AND THIS IS AN EXHIBIT TO OUR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, ARE RENDERINGS OF SOME OF THE PROPOSED MODELS.
WE WILL HAVE MULTIPLE MODELS FOR THE VARIOUS LOTS.
THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNED, AGAIN, WITH A LOT OF INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY.
THE NEXT SECTION OF THE AGREEMENT TALKS ABOUT THE RECREATION POD.
IT ESTABLISHES, AGAIN, MINIMUM STANDARDS.
BUT BUT STILL VERY SIGNIFICANT.
THE CLUBHOUSE IS OUT THERE RIGHT NOW IS MASSIVE AND HOSTED WEDDINGS AND ALL SORTS OF OTHER THINGS.
8000FT² IS A VERY LARGE, UNCOMFORTABLE CLUBHOUSE WITH A NUMBER OF AMENITIES.
BUT THERE WILL BE A CAFE THAT WILL BE AVAILABLE TO RESIDENTS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AS WELL AS.
SO A LOT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TALKS ABOUT THE OTHER ITEMS, THE OBLIGATIONS, ENSURING THAT A LOT OF THE PROMISES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE OVER THE LAST SIX YEARS ARE ENFORCEABLE AND PROVIDE THE PROTECTIONS TO THE CITY, TO THE COMMUNITY.
AND SO OPEN SPACE IS ONE OF THEM.
AGAIN, I MENTIONED EARLIER THAT WOULD BE TO THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY TO, I BELIEVE, THE HOA, WHICH IS THE WOODLANDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, AS WELL AS EACH INDIVIDUAL SECTION WITHIN THE COMMUNITY ITSELF.
YOU CAN KIND OF SEE IT HIGHLIGHTED THERE IN THE ORANGE.
IT WILL TRAVERSE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY.
WE WILL HAVE SIDEWALKS ON ALL OF THE NEW STREETS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.
AND THEN YOU CAN SEE IT TRAVERSING ITS WAY THROUGH VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE OPEN SPACE AS WELL.
AND SO I WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT.
AND THEN THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT THAT WOULD INCLUDE KIND OF DOWN LIGHTING, SAFETY, LIGHTING, SEATING, YOU KNOW, BENCHES, THINGS OF THAT NATURE TO REALLY ENSURE THAT THE OPEN SPACE IS BEING USED, YOU KNOW, IN A PASSIVE WAY THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY.
SO ANOTHER BIG COMPONENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
I'LL FOCUS YOU ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE SCREEN.
FIRST, OUR SIGNIFICANT ENTRANCE RENOVATIONS.
[00:10:01]
AND SOME OF THE THINGS THAT IF THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS GOING TO MOVE FORWARD, WHAT COULD WE DO TO ENHANCE THE COMMUNITY, MAKE IT BETTER, MAKE IT SAFER, MAKE IT STRONGER, MAKE IT MORE VIBRANT THINGS OF THAT NATURE, AND A BIG PIECE OF THAT.AND SO WE REALLY STARTED EXPLORING THAT.
WE WOULD HAVE, AS YOU CAN SEE NOW, IF YOU LOOK TO THE LEFT THERE WITH THE ARROWS, THE RED IN AND OUT IS THE MAIN GATE AT WOODLANDS BOULEVARD AND COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD, AND THAT IS THE EFFECTIVELY DESIGN AND ENTRANCE FEATURES THAT YOU WOULD SEE ON THE RIGHT IN THAT GRAPHIC THERE, THERE WOULD BE A RESIDENT ONLY GATE AND THEN THERE WOULD BE A VISITOR'S GATE. AND THE IDEA WOULD BE SIMILAR TO OTHER GATED COMMUNITIES, VENDORS AND RESIDENTS I'M SORRY, VENDORS AND GUESTS WOULD COME IN THROUGH THE GATED ACCESS POINT.
THERE ARE THINGS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT REQUIRE LICENSE PLATE READERS.
AGAIN, THE IDEA BEING SAFETY AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
AND SO EVERYTHING THAT YOU SEE IN BLUE WOULD BE RESIDENT ONLY.
AND SO THERE WOULD BE INBOUND EVERYWHERE.
SO AT SAGO PALM, AT THE BEASLEY SITE WHERE WE'VE ACQUIRED SOME ADDITIONAL PROPERTY AND ON 60 FOURTH THERE WOULD BE ADDITIONAL ENTRY POINTS, RESIDENT ONLY SCANNERS, CLICKERS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE DISTRIBUTED TO EVERY SINGLE RESIDENT WITHIN THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY AND THEN EXIT POINTS IN CERTAIN LOCATIONS.
AND THAT'S ALL PART OF THIS AGREEMENT.
THAT'S BEEN PART OF DISCUSSIONS THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY AND THROUGHOUT DISCUSSION POINTS.
WE'VE SPOKEN WITH CITY STAFF ABOUT IT, ENSURING THAT IT WORKS FROM A PUBLIC SERVICES STANDPOINT AS WELL IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE MEANS OF GETTING IN AND GETTING OUT OF THE COMMUNITY SAFELY AND EFFICIENTLY.
ANOTHER BIG COMPONENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATES TO BUFFERS.
THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF YOUR SCREEN, THERE IS AN EXHIBIT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
THERE ARE VARIOUS TYPES OF BUFFERS THAT INCLUDE WALLS, FENCES, STRUCTURED COLUMNS WITH ALUMINUM, PICKET FENCING, WITH WITH LANDSCAPING AROUND IT. THERE ARE WE DIDN'T WANT TO BLOCK THE VIEW OF THE TO ESTHETIC THE ESTHETIC VIEW OF THE LAKES AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE.
AND SO WE'RE ALSO PUTTING UP PROTECTIVE BARRIERS.
YOU CAN KIND OF SEE IT DOWN IN THAT LITTLE CORNER OF THE LITTLE ROUND SPIKY THING.
YOU SEE THAT IN A LOT OF SITUATIONS WHERE THERE IS WATER TO DISCOURAGE PEOPLE FROM CLIMBING AROUND AND THROUGH AND UTILIZING THE AREAS AROUND THE LAKE, BUT STILL BEING ABLE TO KEEP THE SAFETY COMPONENT AND PROVIDE THAT THAT THAT SECURITY FEATURE ASSOCIATED WITH TRYING TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM KIND OF WORKING THEIR WAY IN AND AROUND THE LAKES.
YOU SEE THERE IS A PER LINEAR FOOT WALL COST THAT'S BASED ON THE CITY'S WALL PROGRAM THAT'S ALREADY GOING IN PLACE TO PROVIDE A WALL ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROCK ISLAND. SO JUST TO THE RIGHT OF THIS SCREEN HERE IN FRONT OF THE MAINLAND, SIX SECTIONS.
I BELIEVE THAT ACTUALLY THIS SAME CLIENT ON ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT THAT IT BUILT WITHIN THE CITY, FUNDED AS PART OF A DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT, THE WALL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COMMERCIAL ADJACENT TO MAINLAND SEVEN, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN AS WELL, THERE WAS A MISSING LINK.
SO IT'S A SIMILAR TYPE OF CONCESSION TO ADDRESS IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT.
ALMOST DONE. INTERIOR ROADWAYS, ALL THE NEW INTERIOR ROADWAYS ARE OBVIOUSLY GOING TO BE BUILT AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE THE APPROVALS AND WORKING WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION.
BUT OBVIOUSLY, YOU'VE GOT EXISTING ROADWAYS AND THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF CONCERN.
WE'VE DONE INTERIOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FROM THE 335 ADDITIONAL HOMES, BUT OBVIOUSLY THERE WILL BE MORE TRAFFIC.
[00:15:06]
MIGHT BE NECESSARY.AGAIN, TRAFFIC HAS BEEN A MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT OF THIS PROJECT FOR YEARS AND YEARS, AND WE HAVE DONE A LOT OF ANALYZES AND WE'RE VERY CLOSELY WITH THE CITY, THE COUNTY FDOT, AND WE ARE PROPOSING, I BELIEVE IT'S FIVE VERY SIGNIFICANT, VERY EXPENSIVE OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
WE'VE HEARD FDOT SAY THAT AS PART OF THIS REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS.
AND SO I'LL START FIRST WITH ANOTHER ITEM THAT'S ON YOUR AGENDA WEDNESDAY.
MAXINE MAY ADDRESS IT IN MORE IN MORE DETAIL, BUT THROUGH DISCUSSIONS WITH FDOT AND THE CITY, THERE IS A FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF IMPROVEMENTS THAT FDOT PLANS ON MAKING ALONG THIS CORRIDOR ON COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD THAT IS $114,964 THAT THAT WE THE CITY IS ENTERING INTO THAT AGREEMENT WITH FDOT AND THEN WE ARE AGREEING TO FUND THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
AND THEN THE NEXT FEW SLIDES, YOU'LL SEE A FEW IMPROVEMENTS HERE.
BUT THERE ARE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL TURN LANES ON ROCK ISLAND ROAD HEADING EASTBOUND ONTO COMMERCIAL, A TURN LANE AT THE HARD CORNER OF COMMERCIAL AND ROCK ISLAND, HEADING EASTBOUND SO THAT YOU WOULD BE GETTING INTO A TURN LANE TO HEAD SOUTHBOUND ON ROCK ISLAND.
THAT IMPROVEMENT IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE THE PROPERTY FROM THE GOLF COURSE.
I'M SORRY, I'M JUST GOING TO GO BACK TO THE SLIDE FOR ONE SECOND.
YOU WILL SEE ON WEDNESDAY I'LL GET INTO A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
OBVIOUSLY, OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL BE AT THAT MEETING.
BUT BUT THESE COUPLE OF IMPROVEMENTS HERE, ACTUALLY, ALTHOUGH IT'S, THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC OUT THERE, NO ONE'S SAYING THAT THERE'S NOT THESE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVE THE SITUATION BY I CAN'T REMEMBER IF IT'S 30 OR 40 SECONDS AT THESE SIGNALS AND SO EVEN THOUGH IT'S BAD, IT WILL MAKE IT IT WILL MAKE IT BETTER.
AND SO THAT'S WHAT A COUPLE OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS DO.
ANOTHER IMPROVEMENT THAT WE ARE PROVIDING WOULD BE A RIGHT TURN LANE INTO SAGO.
PALM, WHICH IS ON ROCK ISLAND, DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST.
AND THEN A RIGHT TURN LANE ON COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD.
AGAIN, THIS IS PART OF THE GOLF COURSE PROPERTY INTO THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY.
AND WHAT A LOT OF THESE TURN LANES DO IS IT HELPS GET VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OFF OF THE ROADWAYS SO THEY CAN CONTINUE TO WORK THEIR WAY THROUGH EAST AND WEST AND ALLOW THE TURNING MOVEMENTS IN A MUCH SAFER AND EFFICIENT MANNER.
AND THEN THE LAST IMPROVEMENT HERE IS ON 64TH, WHICH IS ON THE FAR WEST SIDE OF OUR PROPERTY.
AND WE STUDIED A CONGESTED AREA.
THERE'S A LOT OF RIGHT OF WAY OUT THERE.
WE'RE CREATING THREE SEPARATE LANES DEDICATED LEFT TO HEAD WESTBOUND, DEDICATED THROUGH AND DEDICATED RIGHT TO HEAD EASTBOUND THAT WE ARE EXTENDING THE LEFT TURN LANE SIGNIFICANTLY.
AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THERE'S A LOT OF A LOT OF CONGESTION THAT'S CREATED BECAUSE PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING THROUGH THEN ARE WAITING OR DON'T GO THROUGH BECAUSE OF TURN LANE. THE TURN LANES NOT LONG ENOUGH.
AND SO I UNDERSTAND THAT CREATES A LOT OF ISSUES.
AND SO WE ARE MAKING THAT IMPROVEMENT.
AND THEN LASTLY, AS IT RELATES TO WHAT'S IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, BUT I DON'T HAVE ANY PICTURES FOR THERE ARE SOME PARKING DISCUSSIONS AND I'M GOING TO BE ADDING OVER THESE NEXT FEW SLIDES, SOME ADDITIONAL SUGGESTIONS AS TO LANGUAGE THAT CAN BE PUT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ENSURE THAT THERE'S SUFFICIENT GUEST PARKING AROUND THE COMMUNITY. THERE'S AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRIBUTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR $2,000 PER UNIT.
I BELIEVE WE STARTED AT MAYBE 500.
WE'RE AT $2,000 PER THE LAST DRAFT.
AND AGAIN, THAT'S OVER THE PERIOD OF THE LAST, LIKE I SAID, 5 OR 6 YEARS.
AND THINGS HAVE CHANGED AND OBVIOUSLY THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISCUSSION AND THEN THE LAST IS THERE'S CURRENTLY IN THE CODE AND HAS BEEN FOR A LOT OF YEARS A WOODLANDS OVERLAY DISTRICT THAT ESTABLISHES AND SETS STANDARDS.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS WE WE SET OUT TO DO AT THE VERY BEGINNING OF THIS WAS TO TRY AND FIGURE OUT A WAY TO TO BRING ALL OF THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY TOGETHER INTO A SINGLE ASSOCIATION.
THEY WOULD STILL HAVE SUBASSOCIATIONS AND IT WASN'T POSSIBLE FOR A LAUNDRY LIST OF REASONS.
[00:20:04]
AND SO THE BEST SOLUTION THAT WE WERE ABLE TO COME UP WITH THAT STILL PROVIDES THE ASSURANCES AND THE PROTECTIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY.IS THAT THE NEW SECTION? SO THE DEVELOPER AND THE NEW SECTION WOULD ACTUALLY BE FUNDING A DEDICATED CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR THE CITY.
AND SO THAT'S LANGUAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT.
I'M SURE THAT THERE'S THERE'S MORE HERE OR THERE.
MAXINE AND I DID GO THROUGH THIS.
IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE THAT SHE'D LIKE TO ADD, CERTAINLY, CERTAINLY CAN.
IF YOU ALL HAVE LOOKED AT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND HAVE ANY MORE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS.
BUT I THINK THIS IS PRIMARILY THE HIGHLIGHTS.
BEFORE I END, I'VE GOT THREE MORE SLIDES THAT I WOULD LIKE TO EFFECTIVELY PRESENT TO THE COMMISSION.
AND OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST SEVERAL WEEKS THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF DISCUSSIONS THAT HAVE BEEN TAKING PLACE WITH STAKEHOLDERS, WITH WITH WITH SOME OF YOU ALL SITTING UP THERE IN FRONT OF ME.
VOLUNTARY PROFFERS THROUGH DISCUSSIONS THAT WE THINK ARE CERTAINLY TO THE BENEFIT OF OF THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY, THE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT AREA OUTSIDE THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY AND THE CITY AS A WHOLE.
AND SO I'D LIKE TO RUN THOSE BY YOU NOW.
THERE'S PROBABLY ANOTHER 11 OR 12 OF THEM ON HERE.
SO THE FIRST ITEM RELATES TO THE TRAFFIC CALMING I HAD MENTIONED EARLIER.
THERE IS A WE WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT AT A MINIMUM WOODLAND BOULEVARD, BANNING LANE, BAYBERRY LANE AND I BELIEVE ROYAL POINCIANA WOULD ACTUALLY BE THE RECIPIENTS OF SOME OF THESE FUNDS FOR TRAFFIC CALMING.
AND SO THAT IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COMMERCIAL BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND BAILEY.
AND AND THE STUDY SHOULD FUND AND REVIEW THAT.
BUT THERE THERE MAY NOT BE ENOUGH FUNDING FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS BASED ON THE CURRENT AGREEMENT.
AND AGAIN, ALL ALL FUNDED BY A STUDY THERE.
WE WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THE AGREEMENT AND A LOT OF THIS STUFF I THINK MAKES A LOT OF SENSE.
THERE WILL BE A SAFE PICKUP AND DROP OFF LOCATION FOR STUDENTS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.
WE WOULD BE SHOWING IT ON OUR PLAN.
THE PROBLEM IS THE SCHOOL BOARD.
YOU KNOW, WE WE DON'T WE WE CAN'T DICTATE TO THE SCHOOL BOARD.
AND SO ULTIMATELY, THEY'RE GOING TO DICTATE TO US WHAT THEY BELIEVE TO BE MOST APPROPRIATE.
AND SO THAT IS SOMETHING WE'RE PUTTING.
THAT IS SOMETHING WE'RE PUTTING LANGUAGE IN THE AGREEMENT TO AT LEAST ADDRESS.
I MENTIONED THIS DURING MY PRESENTATION, BUT IN ADDITION TO THE LICENSE PLATE READER AT THE MAIN GATE, THERE WILL ALSO BE VIDEO CAMERAS AT ALL OTHER ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND THEY WILL ALL BE COORDINATED WITH BSO TO CONNECT TO THE REAL TIME CRIME CENTER.
THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION, AS I MENTIONED, ABOUT MAINLAND SIX ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROCK ISLAND FOR WALL IMPROVEMENTS FOR APPROXIMATELY 500FT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD, WEST OF ROCK ISLAND.
THERE'S SOME SOME HOMES THERE VERY SIMILAR TO THE OTHERS THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THAT DON'T HAVE.
I THINK THERE'S A HEDGE OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA.
WE WILL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 60 GUEST PARKING SPACES.
WE BELIEVE IT WILL BE PRETTY SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN THAT.
BUT WE'VE IDENTIFIED A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN THAT'S ALREADY IN TO THE CITY WHERE THERE WOULD BE GUEST PARKING THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY AND THEN OBVIOUSLY AT THE CLUBHOUSE. AND SO WE'RE AGREEING TO A MINIMUM NUMBER RECREATION TRAIL WOULD INCLUDE LIGHTING.
WE WILL WORK WITH CITY ENGINEERING AND THERE'S LANGUAGE TO THIS EFFECT IN THE AGREEMENT ALREADY.
[00:25:08]
AND AGAIN, THESE ARE ALL THIS IS ALL INFORMATION.I'VE ALREADY SPOKEN WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY.
WORKING WITH MS. CALLOWAY AND MR. ARNOTT, WE WILL BE MAKING $120,000 CONTRIBUTION TO THE CITY'S RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
IT WILL BE SPECIFICALLY ALLOCATED FOR FOR THE SERIES OF COMMUNITIES IN THE EAST SIDE OF THE CITY AS IDENTIFIED. AND AGAIN, WE'LL COME UP WITH MORE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS WELL.
WE WILL BE MAKING A CONTRIBUTION WITHIN THE COMMUNITY TO THE TUNE OF $200 PER HOME.
I BELIEVE THAT THAT AMOUNT OF $178, 400 IS CORRECT.
SO EACH HOME FOR, YOU KNOW, VARIOUS WASHING AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
WE AGAIN, AS IT RELATES TO IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE COMMUNITY, WE'LL BE MAKING KIND OF A COMBINED CONTRIBUTION TO A VARIETY OF ASSOCIATIONS FOR AN AGGREGATE OF $895,000 TO ASSOCIATIONS NORTH OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD, EAST AND WEST OF ROCK ISLAND ROAD WITHIN THE WITHIN THE CITY.
SO AGAIN, AS IT RELATES ALL TAMARAC RELATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MOVING FORWARD, THE LAST COUPLE OF POINTS ARE REALLY MORE TECHNICAL IN NATURE IN TERMS OF TIMING FOR PAYMENT OF THESE VARIOUS ITEMS AS WELL AS IMPACT FEE CREDITS WHERE APPLICABLE.
SOME OF THESE ARE, SOME OF THESE AREN'T.
YOUR CODE DICTATES WHAT THAT IS.
I'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED IT WITH MS. CALLOWAY, BUT WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT LANGUAGE MAKES.
I'M HAPPY TO GO BACK TO ANY OF THE SLIDES, ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, AND MS. CALLOWAY MAY WANT TO SUPPLEMENT MY PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU, SCOTT. THAT'S A PRESENTATION.
IT REALLY GOES OVER WHAT'S CONTAINED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND SOME OF THE VOLUNTARY PROFFERS THAT THE DEVELOPER WILL BE INCLUDED IN, PROVIDED THIS MOVES FORWARD, WHICH WOULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PRIOR TO SECOND READING.
AT THIS TIME WE'LL OPEN FOR A DISCUSSION OR ANY QUESTIONS.
I DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING IMPORTANT, I PROMISE.
I WILL THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR THE PROFFERS SCHOOL BUS SHELTER, THE ASSISTANCE AND THE WALLS AND STUFF TO OUR MAINLAND SIX AND FIVE AREA.
I WAS NOT AWARE OF SOME OF THE FUNDS BEING ASKED FOR OTHER LOCATIONS, BUT I APPRECIATE THOSE.
SOME OF THE STUFF YOU TOUCHED ON.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I'M GOING TO ASK.
IS THAT ON PAGE FOUR? IN SECTION FOUR, IT DEALS WITH.
IT SAYS TO THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY.
IF YOU WOULD, PLEASE PUT A REFERENCE IN THERE TO USE THE ACTUAL LEGAL NAMES OF EACH OF THE SECTIONS.
AND THERE'S SOME ISSUES THERE.
IN THE AGREEMENT ITSELF, IT SAYS TWO PICKLEBALL COURTS.
BUT I KNOW THAT YOU HAVE PADDLE BALL COURTS UP THERE.
I APPRECIATE THAT. IT'S A PADDLE BALL WHILE PEOPLE ARE ENJOYING PICKLEBALL.
AND I'VE SEEN THE STRUCTURES FOR IT ARE VERY.
[00:30:01]
I THINK THEY'RE PRETTY. THEY'RE GLASS.AND THEY'RE QUIETER FOR COMMUNITY, FOR NOISE AND STUFF.
THERE IS SOME LANGUAGE IN THERE THAT SAID.
I DON'T THINK CORRESPONDING IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN THERE.
SO I DISCUSSED WITH MS. CALLOWAY BRIEFLY THIS MORNING, I THINK THE LANGUAGE ENDED UP BECAUSE OF ALL THE ITERATIONS OF THIS OVER SIX YEARS.
AT THE END OF THE DAY, I THINK IT'S REDUNDANT.
I THINK IT SAYS THE SAME THING THAT THE SENTENCE BEFORE IT SAYS AND IT WAS SIMPLY EXPANDED UPON.
AND SO AGAIN, I'D WANT EVERYONE TO REVIEW THIS MS. CALLOWAY AND WHATNOT.
I THINK IT COULD JUST BE STRICKEN FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
THINK IF YOU WOULD TAKE A LOOK AT THAT ON NUMBER SIX ON PAGE SIX.
IN THAT SAME PARAGRAPH, YOU SAY HOA DOCUMENTS.
IF YOU WOULD FURTHER DEFINE THAT AS SECTION NINE.
AND THEN ALSO THERE IS A WORDING AS WELL AS POSSIBLE CAFE.
I WOULD APPRECIATE IF WE'RE GOING FORWARD WITH THIS THE WORD POSSIBLE CAFE POSSIBLE BEING REMOVED.
YEAH, SINCE YOU MENTIONED THAT TO ME WHEN WE LAST MET AND I JUST WANT TO AT LEAST POINT OUT FOR EVERYONE FOR THE RECORD THAT IT'S VERY CLEAR IN THE REC POD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT THERE WILL BE A CAFE.
WE WILL DELETE THE WORD POSSIBLE.
I APPRECIATE SOME OF THESE THINGS ARE HOUSEKEEPING BECAUSE IF WE'RE TO MOVE FORWARD.
I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE WE DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES.
GOING TO PAGE EIGHT, SECTION NINE.
THAT'S REFERRING BACK TO WHAT I JUST SPOKE ABOUT EARLIER.
THE LAST LINE SAYS H OR ANY SUBSECTION, SUB-ASSOCIATIONS, WOODLANDS DOESN'T HAVE SUB-ASSOCIATIONS.
SO WHEN YOU CLEAN UP THE LANGUAGE, PLEASE INCLUDE THAT.
SO I'M NOT REALLY SURE WHERE TO PUT THIS.
SO I'LL PUT THIS FOR RECREATION TRAIL.
THIS MIGHT BE FOR SOMEWHERE ELSE, BUT THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY IS AN OLDER COMMUNITY.
I KNOW THERE'S A POTENTIAL OF ADDING NEW IN HERE, AND I UNDERSTAND VERY MUCH.
WHAT WE TRY TO DO NOWADAYS WITH ADDING SIDEWALKS TO THINGS.
BEFORE. JUST AS I GOT ON THE COMMISSION, THERE WAS AN ISSUE IN THE COMMUNITY.
I DID NOT LIVE ON THE BOULEVARD, SO IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LIVING ON THE BOULEVARD.
THE COMMUNITY HAS BEEN OUTSPOKEN, NOT WANTING A SIDEWALK ON WOODLANDS BOULEVARD.
BUT I ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S CLEAR THERE WILL BE NO SIDEWALK ON WOODLANDS BOULEVARD.
THE COMMUNITY DOESN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THAT IN THE FUTURE.
SO FOR SECTION 12 FOR SIGNAGE.
WHAT I THINK IS MISSING IN HERE IS WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN THEM FOR THE FUTURE.
I BELIEVE IT SAYS SECTION NINE, BUT WHO HAS THE SAY TO REPAIR OR OBTAIN INSURANCE PROCEEDS AS PEOPLE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH? SIGN WAS HIT.
IT WAS HIT AGAIN. IT WAS HIT AGAIN.
WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT THE INSURANCE FUNDS? WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT, WE NEED A CHANGE OF THE SIGNS? WHO IS GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPLACEMENT AND WHO PAYS FOR IT? I THINK IT'S MISSING IN HERE.
AND I THINK WE NEED TO GO THROUGH AND FIGURE THAT OUT.
LAND ON OR BE WILLING AND HAS BEEN ASKED OF US TO UNDERTAKE THE MAINTENANCE, POTENTIALLY CONSTRUCTION FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE, ESPECIALLY FOR THE ENTRANCE SIGNAGE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.
BUT I ALSO DON'T WANT TO TAKE LIBERTIES.
SOME OF THAT IS WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
SECTION NINE IS WILLING TO TAKE IT.
[00:35:01]
THE DEVELOPER IN SECTION NINE IS WILLING TO TAKE IT.I AGREE THAT THE LANGUAGE COULD BE EXPANDED AND CLARIFIED.
AND IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION, WE ARE HAPPY TO WORK WITH MR. AND MS. CALLAWAY TO DO SO.
OKAY. AND I BELIEVE SINCE THAT'S MORE OF A CHANGE THAN IT NEEDS TO BE, A CONSENSUS ITEM THAT I NEED TO ASK, IS THAT WHAT I'M HEARING? YES. NO, THAT'S FOR LESLIE.
SO BASICALLY IF I'M HEARING RIGHT, SINCE THIS PART OF THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT IS A LITTLE UNCLEAR, BUT IT IS THE INTENT OF THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THAT SECTION NINE WOULD BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE COLLECTION AND POINT OF CONTACT SHOULD ANYTHING HAPPEN TO ANY OF THE SIGNS THAT ARE PUT UP.
TO CLARIFY THAT WITHIN THE AGREEMENT.
DO I NEED I DON'T THINK YOU NEED CONSENSUS.
I THINK THE DEVELOPER AGREED TO CLARIFY THE LANGUAGE.
YEAH. MAYOR I BELIEVE THAT THAT'S THE INTENTION.
I BELIEVE THE INTENTION IS WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING.
COULD IT BE MAYBE A LITTLE CLEARER THAN THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN HERE TO FURTHER ON SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT YOU'RE RAISING? IT COULD SO I DON'T AGAIN, THIS IS FOR MAYOR SO THEY CAN JUST CLARIFY.
YEAH. OKAY. JUST CLARIFICATION.
THANK YOU. BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY THE INTENT.
IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT'S A CHANGE.
OKAY. ON 4.1 PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES.
CORRECT. IT'S JUST A CLARIFICATION PIECE.
HE'LL BE THERE ON WEDNESDAY, BUT THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING.
ALL RIGHT. YOU'VE ALREADY ADDRESSED THESE TRAFFIC CALMING SPEED BUMPS.
REMODELING AND. MILL AND RESURFACE PORTIONS AND BASICALLY FOR WHERE THERE WILL BE CONSTRUCTION DONE ON THESE STREETS, THAT THERE WILL BE THE EXISTING PROPERTY 100FT INTO IT.
YEAH. LET ME, HERE, LET ME THINK SO EVERYONE CAN UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION.
SO AT ALL OF THOSE INTERSECTIONS OF ANY OF THE NEW ROADS.
AND I KNOW YOU HAVE IMPACT FEES THAT YOU SPOKE ABOUT IN 14.3 ON ANYTHING THAT.
THE DEVELOPER IS DOING THAT EXPANDS AND UPGRADES.
THE PUBLIC FACILITIES COULD BE USED AS A CREDIT TOWARDS THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES BECAUSE I THINK THERE WAS SOME MISUNDERSTANDING BY THERE'S JUST A MISUNDERSTANDING THAT THERE MIGHT PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE NO IMPACT FEES THAT ARE BEING ATTRIBUTED TO THIS PROJECT, BUT THERE ARE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF IMPACT FEES THAT THE CITY HAS THAT ARE BEING ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY.
BUT IF WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING MORE THAN WHAT WE WOULD OTHERWISE HAVE TO DO HERE THAT GO OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF WHAT'S NECESSARY TO DEVELOP THE PROJECT, THEN YOUR CODE PROVIDES FOR AND WE'RE SIMPLY CONFIRMING THROUGH THE AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN IMPACT FEE CREDITS.
IF THERE SHOULD EVER BE A PROBLEM, THE CITY WOULD BE MADE WHOLE.
SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE LITTLE TUBES OF PLUMBING, THINGS STICKING OUT OF THE GROUND.
IF SOMETHING SHOULD HAPPEN TO THE COMPANY, IT HAS TO GO AWAY.
THE CITY WOULD BE LEVELED AND MADE WHOLE WITH THE COMMUNITY TO BE LEVELED AND MADE WHOLE.
SO IT WOULD NOT BE AN AESTHETIC PROBLEM EITHER.
I'LL ANSWER ON BEHALF OF MY CLIENT.
AND THAT IS THE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHY IT WAS ALL INSERTED AND ESSENTIALLY WHAT.
AND ALL THAT GOOD OLD BONDING MENTIONED ABOUT THE COMMUNITY WHEN IT COMES TO THE GATING AMONG.
GATING SECTION RIGHT NOW OR ENTRANCE RENOVATIONS.
[00:40:06]
ANY OF THE GATING FOBS OR WHATNOT WILL BE CONTROLLED THROUGH SECTION NINE, THROUGH ALL THE COMMUNITY.CORRECT? WE WILL BE IN PERPETUITY FOR THE COMMUNITY.
THE AGAIN, WHETHER IT'S DECALS OR FOBS OR WHAT HAVE YOU, FOR ACCESS.
WE'LL HAVE A PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND WE'LL ENSURE THAT OBVIOUSLY PRIOR TO ANY.
AND THESE ARMS WILL ALL BE DOWN, BUT THEY AUTOMATICALLY GO UP.
CORRECT. THESE ARE NOT ONLY AT THE MAIN GATE.
THE ACCESS POINTS I SHOWED EARLIER ARE RESIDENT ACCESS POINTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE MAIN GATE.
THE CONCEPT IS CALLED A SOFT GATE CONCEPT AND THAT YES, NO ONE CAN BE PROHIBITED ACCESS, BUT YOU CAN SLOW SOMEONE DOWN AND HAVE THE LICENSE PLATE READER AND HAVE THE CAMERAS.
OKAY. AND IT DOES NOT CHANGE THE.
STREETS. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY.
WHEN IT DOES NOT CHANGE THAT THERE ARE PUBLIC ROADS.
THAT IS THE WAY THE, THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING, THE WAY THE AGREEMENT IS.
YOU'RE READY TO ADDRESS THE AIR RAIDERS.
AND THAT THEY ALL CONNECT, THAT THEY'RE ALL INTERCONNECTED.
AND THIS IS ALL PART OF KEEPING THE WATER MOVING AND WILL BE HANDLED WITH PUBLIC SERVICES FOR THE ABILITY TO LOWER CANALS THAT NEED BE FOR STORMS AND THINGS THAT WE NEED TO TAKE CARE OF 16B WITH BUFFERS AND I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT IF THIS IS TO GO FORWARD, THAT THE OVERLAYS ARE UPDATED AND ARE SECTION NINE DOCUMENTS UPDATED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT SPECIFIES THE HEIGHT WIDTH OF THE HEDGES AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SAME SO THAT WHEN CODE ENFORCEMENT COMES OUT.
THEY HAVE SOME ABILITY TO SAY YOU'RE NOT THICK ENOUGH.
IN THIS WAY, PEOPLE WHO ARE BELIEVING THAT WE'RE HAVING THE BUFFERS PUT IN, IT'S NOT SCARCE.
IT'S NOT. IT IS WHAT THEY ARE PROMISED TO RECEIVE.
I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY. WE SPOKE ABOUT THIS AND IT'S A CODE REQUIREMENT, RIGHT? IT'LL BE ON OUR PLAN.
WE'RE HAPPY TO INCLUDE THE LANGUAGE HERE, BUT I BELIEVE ALL OF THAT IS.
I'M DOING A LITTLE SUSPENDERS AND BELTS, YOU KNOW? AND BECAUSE ANYTHING ADDITIONAL THAT IS NEEDED IN THE OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THIS BODY WOULD AMEND THAT AND ALMOST AT 20.
THERE WERE SOME WORDING OF THE OVERLAYS THAT WAS ACTUALLY CHANGED BECAUSE THERE WAS A REFERENCE IN THE ACTUAL OVERLAYS THAT SAYS GOLF COURSE AND BEING AT ONE OF THE COMMUNITY MEETINGS RECENTLY, I DON'T THINK THE COMMUNITY WOULD ACTUALLY STILL FAVOR THE WAY THE WORDING WAS CHANGED.
THERE'S NO GOLF COURSE RIGHT NOW, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THE COMMUNITY WOULD ACCEPT.
AND THAT NEEDS TO BE DISCUSSED FURTHER.
AND SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT WERE NOT IN THE DEVELOPMENT.
SO I DON'T KNOW WHY IT WASN'T IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
IT'S JUST A REFERENCE TO LIKE SEVEN OF THEM.
AND IF WE NEED TO MAKE A BETTER REFERENCE IN THE AGREEMENT SAYING THE OVERLAYS WHICH INCLUDE BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, I DON'T SEE THE WHICH INCLUDE LANGUAGE IN HERE, SO I DON'T WANT TO HAVE A CHANCE OF SOMEBODY SAYING THE CODE OFFICER ONLY HAS TO TAKE CARE OF THESE SEVEN OR SO ITEMS VERSUS THE REST OF IT BECAUSE THE OVERLAYS ARE A LITTLE LONGER THAN THAT. SO I WOULD LIKE AT A FUTURE TIME IF THIS SHOULD MOVE FORWARD, SOME REVISIONS OR UPGRADES IN CLARITY TO THE OVERLAY SPACE.
UM. I HAVE CONCERNS WITH 16C IN THE RESPECTS OF SOME OF THE BUFFER WALL ITEMS. WHILE I'M HAPPY THAT.
IF THIS TO GO THROUGH, THE BUFFER WALLS WILL BE THERE.
BUT WE HAVE 16 PRIVATELY OWNED LOTS, AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE COMMUNITY DOES IF THEY DO NOT AGREE.
IF THESE HOMEOWNERS DON'T AGREE, WHAT DOES THAT DO TO THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE COMMUNITY? IF THEY SHOULD FAIL TO AGREE FOR THE HEDGING OR THE WALLS WALL SYSTEM IN PLACE? THERE ALSO, THERE WAS AN OFFER THAT WAS MADE.
FOR THE YEARS WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON IT, I'VE BEEN TRYING TO GET MORE MONEY INTO THAT LITTLE FUND THAT WOULD GO INTO HELPING OUR HOMEOWNERS WHO WILL HAVE POTENTIAL DIRT AND DEBRIS AFTER CONSTRUCTION FALLING ON THEIR HOME FROM CONSTRUCTION.
[00:45:01]
BUT IF.THIS IS A WAY TO BE ABLE TO SAY TO THE COMMUNITY YOUR.
THESE ARE THE DEVELOPER IS OFFERING SOME OF THESE FUNDS INTO THE CITY FOR THE CITY TO DISTRIBUTE TO PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE WOODLANDS FOR THIS DO THOSE SAME PEOPLE. SO 16 PEOPLE COUNT IN THAT NUMBER OR NOT.
THAT'S SOMETHING YOU CAN GET BACK TO US FOR WEDNESDAY.
SO THIS IS A REMNANT OF AN OLD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BEFORE ALL OF THAT WAS CONFIRMED.
SO THAT BEGINNING PART OF THE SENTENCE.
THANK YOU. SAME THING WITH 17 DEVELOPERS SHALL TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE OTHER THAN THE 16 PEOPLE WHO ON SAGO PALM AREA WHO MAY NOT WANT TO.
AGREE TO THE HEDGE OR THE FENCING.
EVERYTHING ELSE, MY UNDERSTANDING IS POSSIBLE.
SO BASICALLY THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED AS WELL.
AND MS. GALLOWAY AND I HAD A CONVERSATION.
THAT LANGUAGE WAS PROPOSED TO BE DELETED IN A RED LINE.
AND JUST AGAIN, WITH DRAFTS GOING BACK AND FORTH, SO TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, WILL BE REMOVED AND WE'LL LIKELY WORK ON ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE JUST TO ENSURE THAT IT YES, ALL OF THESE REQUIREMENTS, WE UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE OBLIGATIONS AND THEY ARE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THESE AMENDMENTS AND THINGS THAT YOU MAY WANT TO CHANGE AND FIX.
COULD NOT HAVE BEEN DONE EARLIER DUE TO THE FACT THAT DUE TO NOTICE EVERYTHING HAD BEEN POSTED, EVERYTHING HAD BEEN PUBLISHED, AND WE CAN'T UNILATERALLY MAKE ANY OF THESE CHANGES UNLESS IT WAS DISCUSSED HERE.
AND THAT IS BASICALLY THE REASON FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT NUMBER 18.
THIS IS GOING TO BE FULL UP A LITTLE BIT BETTER.
AND IT'S UNDERSTOOD THAT IT'S GOING TO POTENTIALLY TAKE YEARS.
WE KNOW THAT MOST CONSTRUCTION IS PREFERRED EARLIER IN THE DAY AND CURRENTLY IN CONSTRUCTION IS ALLOWED MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FROM 8 TO 6 WITH FURTHER DISCUSSION TO BE HAD ON SATURDAYS.
PLEASE, IF YOU WOULD, AT LEAST 8 TO 4 AND THEN AT ALL TIMES, NO BULLDOZERS, JACKHAMMERS, DIGGING OR OTHER LOUD NOISES WOULD START BEFORE 9:00 AND THAT THERE WOULD BE EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO MAKE SURE WITH TWO WEEKS NOTICE FOR OUTSIDERS FOR ROUTING AND DETOURING, DOING THE BEST POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE ANY.
ADDITIONAL DELAYS ON OUR ROADWAYS, ESPECIALLY DURING RUSH HOUR IN THE MORNING AND EVENING.
AND BEST EFFORTS I KNOW WILL BE USED.
I ALREADY SPOKE ABOUT NEEDING TO MAKE SOME MODIFICATIONS ON THE WOODLANDS OVERLAYS.
21B PAGE 25 AT THIS POINT I REALLY BELIEVE.
WE TALKED ABOUT THE LICENSE PLATE READER EARLY.
EARLIER SMART LIGHTING FIXTURES IS FAIRLY STANDARD IN MOST NEW HOMES THESE DAYS.
AND I THINK THE IDEA HERE WAS TO ESTABLISH A LINE OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND THE FUTURE MANAGERS, THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE COMMUNITY FOR SECTION NINE AND THE CITY IN THE EVENT THE CITY HAS A NEED TO ACCESS ANY OF THESE THINGS FOR ANY REASON, WHETHER IT BE FOR WATER METERS, WHETHER IT BE FOR SAFETY, SECURITY, THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
THE DURATION AND SUCCESS IS BINDING ON ALL THERE'S PROVISIONS IN HERE.
DID YOU WANT TO? WE WERE DISCUSSED THAT ONE AND TALKED ABOUT, OH, I'M SORRY, I DID NOT HAVE THAT CONVERSATION THAT MS. CALLOWAY. RIGHT NOW IT REFERENCES PARAGRAPH 19 AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
I THINK IT WAS MEANT TO. OKAY.
AND SO IN 24 THERE IS A TYPO THAT IT SHOULD ACTUALLY BE REFERENCING.
[00:50:05]
MEANT TO BE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ITEM, SO THAT'S GOING TO BE CORRECTED.AND. BELIEVE IT OR NOT, PEOPLE.
I'M ALMOST DONE. YOU READY TO DISCUSS THE ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION, THE REPAIRS? SO AT THIS TIME.
I WOULD APPRECIATE IF YOU COULD GIVE MR. CALLAWAY YOUR NOTES OR AT LEAST YOUR ITEMS SO WE CAN.
MS. CALLAWAY AND I WILL SIT AFTER THIS AND BE HAPPY TO GO THROUGH ALL OF IT.
I HAVE NOBODY'S CARDS TURNED OVER.
OKAY. FIRST PERSON UP, COMMISSIONER DANIEL.
WE'VE GOTTEN A LOT OF EMAILS, OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW THAT.
AND I'VE MET WITH SEVERAL RESIDENTS IN THE WOODLANDS.
AND SOME OF THEIR CONCERNS ARE THE MAIN CONCERNS I CAN COME UP WITH.
COMMISSIONER DANIEL, JUST FOR I KNOW IT'S VERY DIFFICULT FOR US NOT TO TALK ABOUT THE PROJECT, BUT NO, I'M JUST, I CAN'T ASK HIM HOW HE'S GOING TO ADDRESS IT. TALK ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND OKAY, ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE BECAUSE THE LAND USE AND ZONING IS WEDNESDAY IS QUASI JUDICIAL AND WE SHOULDN'T MAKE ANY COMMENT RELATED TO THAT.
I INDICATED THAT, SO I CAN ONLY ASK QUESTIONS BASED ON WHAT WAS DISCUSSED.
I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT EVEN EVEN COMMENTS MADE BY RESIDENTS.
IF IT DOESN'T RELATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WE NEED TO STAY AWAY FROM IT.
SO THEN LET ME JUST RELATE TO WHAT YOU DISCUSSED.
YES. ABOUT HOW MANY MORE AND ABOUT HOW MANY SQUARE FOOTAGE? SO WHAT YOU SAW IN THE PRESENTATION WERE JUST THREE EXAMPLES.
THERE'S AN EXHIBIT C TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT HAS ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN, EIGHT, NINE, TEN DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS. OKAY.
IT'LL BE PLUS OR MINUS IN THAT RANGE IN TERMS OF DIFFERENT LOT SIZES.
AND THEN. I'M SORRY, I APOLOGIZE.
SO THAT MEAN IT WON'T BE CRITICAL.
HAS BEEN SOMETHING WE'VE HEARD FOR YEARS.
PERSONALLY, I THINK THESE LOOK REALLY GOOD, BUT I'D ENCOURAGE YOU TO FLIP.
I AGREE. I THINK THEY LOOK GOOD.
AND THEN THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE IS WOULD BE 2000FT² UNDER AIR.
AND THAT IS AGAIN, THE SMALLEST ON THE SMALLEST LOT SIZE GO UP IN SIZE FROM THERE, I BELIEVE, TO OVER 3500FT² OR MORE WITH VARIOUS OPTIONS THAT CUSTOMERS CAN PURCHASE. AND EVERYTHING WE TALK ABOUT, EVERYTHING THAT WE AGREE ON, WILL IS GUARANTEED TO GET DONE.
YES. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT MINIMUMS AND WE PUT THOSE ITEMS ON THE RECORD, THOSE ARE THOSE ARE ITEMS THAT AS PART OF THE SUBMITTAL THAT WE ARE MAKING, THAT WE ALREADY HAVE A SITE PLAN IN. IT'S BEEN COMMENTED IT'S BEEN SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN REVIEWED FOR QUITE SOME TIME THAT THOSE ELEMENTS GET APPROVED WITH THE SITE PLAN, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. AND TO ADD TO THAT, SOME OF THE CHANGES THAT WILL BE MADE BEFORE SECOND READING, WE WILL INCLUDE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY NOT INCLUDED.
SO THAT WILL BE INCLUDED GOING FORWARD FOR IF IT DOES GO TO SECOND READING.
I'M SORRY, I'M GETTING IN TROUBLE.
AND IF IT'S IF HE SEEKS MODIFICATION IN THE FUTURE, THE COMMISSION MUST APPROVE THOSE MODIFICATIONS.
SO IT IS A BINDING CONTRACT THAT THEY ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY.
IF IT'S APPROVED, ANY CHANGES, LANGUAGE COMMISSION NEED TO APPROVE IT.
[00:55:01]
YOUR CODE GOVERNS THAT IN TERMS OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS.IF IT IS ANYTHING GREATER THAN IT COMES BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION.
BUT IT IS OUTLINED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
UM, HE SAID THERE WILL BE 165 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE.
HOW MUCH OF THAT IS WATER AND HOW MUCH OF THAT IS GREENERY? APPROXIMATELY. THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SAYS ONE 60 O C, AND IT'S 165.5 FOR THE LAND USE AND THE REZONING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL. AND IT'S A MINIMUM OF 160 ACRES THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT.
CORRECT. THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S THE THE NUMBERS ARE VERY SIMILAR.
I DON'T KNOW THAT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.
WE'LL HAVE THAT FOR YOU ON WEDNESDAY.
OBVIOUSLY, WE ARE ADDING A NUMBER OF NEW WATER BODIES.
I DON'T THINK IT'S MORE IT'S PROBABLY, I WANT TO SAY.
WE'LL GET YOU THE SPECIFIC ANSWER TO THAT.
OBVIOUSLY, A BIG PIECE OF THIS PROJECT, AS IT'S BEEN SOLD THROUGHOUT, IS ENSURING THAT WE ARE ADDRESSING AND SATISFYING NOT ONLY THE DRAINAGE NEEDS FOR THIS NEW SECTION THAT WE'RE BUILDING, BUT A COMMUNITY THAT'S VERY OLD AND HAD DIFFERENT DRAINAGE STANDARDS WHEN IT WAS ADOPTED AND DOES EXPERIENCE FLOODING AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE TODAY. AND WE'RE GOING TO SOLVE FOR THAT, WHICH IS WHY THERE'S A LOT MORE LAKE AREA.
THAT. THAT BEING SAID, IF IT IMPACTS ONE OF THE RESIDENTS HOMES OR SEVERAL HOMES, YOU WILL MAKE CONCESSION THAT'S AGREEABLE TO THEM.
WE DON'T JUST TAKE THEIR LAND.
WE'RE NOT TAKING LAND FROM. OKAY.
CORRECT? YES. IF WE WE COULDN'T IF WE WERE, WE WOULD OBVIOUSLY HAVE TO ADDRESS THAT.
AND A THREE MILE RECREATION TRAIL.
WILL THAT BE AMONGST PRESERVED? SO THERE'LL STILL BE GREENERY OR HOW IT WILL.
YEAH, IT WILL BE A COMBINATION.
WE WILL BE WHAT'S THE WORD I'M LOOKING FOR? WE WILL BE REPAVING IF ANY, OF THE EXISTING CAR PATHS THAT WE MIGHT CHOOSE TO USE.
AND THEN THERE WILL OBVIOUSLY BE, AS I SAID, A SIDEWALK SYSTEM.
THE INTENTION HERE IS TO BE ABLE TO START AT THE RECREATIONAL AMENITY, THE CLUBHOUSE AND WORK YOUR WAY AROUND THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY SO THAT IT CAN AVOID FROM KEEPING PEOPLE ON THE STREETS BECAUSE THE CURRENT ROADWAYS DON'T HAVE SIDEWALKS.
AT WHAT POINT WOULD IT START? SO SO ALL OF THE NEW ROADS WILL MEET CITY STANDARD, WHICH REQUIRES SIDEWALKS.
AND THIS WAS CONSTRUCTED. THERE WAS NO SIDEWALKS PROVIDED.
AND AND THERE ARE NOT CURRENTLY SIDEWALKS THERE THROUGH THE SITE PLAN COMMENT PROCESS.
THERE'S BEEN A REQUEST FOR SIDEWALKS.
I DON'T KNOW WHATEVER WE'RE TOLD TO DO.
BECAUSE I KNOW WE DO WANT TO ENCOURAGE US WALKING AND.
THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE RECREATION.
IS THAT GUARANTEED? YEAH, THAT IS ONE OF THE MAYOR JUST MENTIONED THIS WHERE THERE WAS LANGUAGE.
AGAIN, THE CITY I THINK TOOK IT OUT BEFORE IT MADE ITS WAY INTO THIS FORM.
BUT YES, IT IS A REQUIREMENT THAT AMONGST THE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT I SHOWED, AS WELL AS EVERYTHING ELSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IN THIS AGREEMENT, ARE REQUIREMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS ON THE DEVELOPER IN ORDER TO DEVELOP THE PROJECT.
BROWARD COUNTY SAYS, OH, YOU CAN'T DO IT SO YOU DON'T DO IT.
THERE WAS A LOT OF AS A LOT OF THIS STUFF WAS DISCUSSED A FEW YEARS AGO, THERE WAS CONCERN RAISED BY THE CITY, BY CONSULTANTS, BY RESIDENTS THAT THESE ITEMS WERE NOT POSSIBLE. FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS.
THEY NEED TO BE PERMITTED, OBVIOUSLY, AND WE UNDERSTAND AS A DEVELOPER COMMITTING AND OBLIGATING OURSELVES TO DO THESE THINGS, THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO FIND A WAY TO DO THEM. AND THAT'S WHY WE'VE DONE OUR HOMEWORK AND OUR DUE DILIGENCE AND OUR RESEARCH IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT WE CAN.
[01:00:06]
BUT YES, WE UNDERSTAND THAT ALL OF THE OBLIGATIONS WE'RE COMMITTING OURSELVES TO ARE REQUIREMENTS OF THE.THANK YOU. THE DEVELOPER, HE SAID.
IN THE NEW SECTION NINE WILL PAY FOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
AT ANY POINT, WILL THIS COST BE PLACED ON THE RESIDENTS? NO, NOT THE EXISTING RESIDENTS WITHIN THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY TODAY.
IT WILL BE A COST SHARED AMONGST NEW SECTION NINE RESIDENTS.
SO ONCE THEY FORM THEIR OWN HOA, CAN THEY THEN SAY, WE DON'T WANT TO DO THAT BECAUSE WOULDN'T THAT BE A VOTE? NO, I DON'T BELIEVE SO.
BUT THEY COULD JUST NOT HAVE A PAY FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
NOT WITHOUT RUNNING AFOUL THE SECTION.
AND IT'S ACTUALLY CLEAR IN HERE THEY WOULD BE A SUCCESSOR OF THE AGREEMENT.
ALL RIGHT. AND THAT'S THE PROVISION.
SURVIVE THE LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT.
AGREEMENT IS FOR TEN YEARS, BUT THAT PROVISION WILL SURVIVE.
SO IT GOES BEYOND THE TEN YEARS.
YOU KEEP REFERRING TO THE DEVELOPER IN SECTION NINE.
IS THAT GOING TO BE A NEW DEVELOPER? NO. SO THE DEVELOPER, OBVIOUSLY THE DEVELOPERS ARE DEFINED TERM.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE BEGINNING, ACTUALLY THE ENTITY IS A 13 FLOOR AFFILIATED ENTITY AND AS THE PROJECT IS BUILT AND CONSTRUCTED, IT WILL TRANSFER TO AN ASSOCIATION OR A SECTION.
AND SO THAT'S A DIVINE TERM WITHIN THE AGREEMENT CURRENTLY.
13 FOUR IS NOT NECESSARILY THE DEVELOPER.
I'M SORRY IF I'M BEING. NO, NO PROBLEM.
YEAH. 13 FLOOR IS THE DEVELOPER.
13 FLOOR IS MOST OF YOU PROBABLY KNOW HAVE ALREADY BUILT.
THEY PROBABLY BUILT MORE HOMES IN THE LAST TWO DECADES IN THE CITY THAN ANYONE I BELIEVE 715 BETWEEN ALL THE COMMUNITIES THAT THEY BUILT OVER THE LAST 10 TO 12 YEARS, DATING ALL THE WAY BACK TO 2009.
I'M SORRY. UM, AND INTENDS ON CONSTRUCTING AND DEVELOPING THIS.
WE'VE BEEN HAD IT FOR SIX YEARS.
SO YES, THAT IS THE ABSOLUTE INTENTION.
OBVIOUSLY THESE AGREEMENTS HAVE TO BE DRAFTED TO THE PROTECTION OF THE CITY, THE RESIDENTS AND MY CLIENT, THAT IF SOMETHING HAPPENS, IF THE IF THE WORLD CHANGES, IF THINGS EVOLVE IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, THAT WHOEVER ENDS UP DEVELOPING THIS PROJECT, AGAIN, THE INTENTION IS THAT IT'S 13 FLOOR.
GOT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE 13TH FLOOR, BUT THEY'RE BOUND BY WHATEVER WE AGREE WITH.
JUST FOR THE PUBLIC? SURE. 13TH FLOOR IS THE INITIAL.
EVENTUALLY, 13TH FLOOR WILL TURN OVER.
AS WE ALL SIT HERE TODAY AND HAVE BEEN FOR THE LAST SIX YEARS, IS THAT 13TH FLOOR.
AND AS THE CITY ATTORNEY JUST MENTIONED, EVENTUALLY WHEN IT'S BUILT OUT ENOUGH AND ENOUGH HOMES ARE SOLD AND OCCUPIED, TRANSFER THE PROPERTY, ALL OF IT TO THE NEW ASSOCIATION.
IT'S SIMILAR TO HOW THEY DID CENTRAL PARK MANOR PARK AND HIDDEN TRAILS.
THANK YOU. I'VE. COMMISSIONER.
RIGHT. HOW'S IT GOING? GOOD. THANK YOU. MY QUESTION IS, MY QUESTIONS ARE DENSITY.
YOU SAID 1.2 PER ACRE AND SOME PART OF IT.
CAN YOU CLARIFY IN TERMS OF DENSITY? SURE. SO OVER THE 275 ACRES, THAT IS ALL OF THE GOLF COURSE TODAY DIVIDED BY 335 IS 1.2.
SO THAT'S OVER THE WHOLE THING.
WE ARE ONLY PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AND LET'S MAKE SURE I GET THIS RIGHT.
AND SO THAT DENSITY IS 2.1 UNITS TO THE ACRE OVER JUST THE LAND USE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.
[01:05:02]
THAT'S CHANGING FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES.EACH OF THE PODS HAVE THEIR OWN DENSITY.
I DON'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHAT IT IS OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, BUT THAT IS A SLIDE IN MY PRESENTATION FOR WEDNESDAY WHERE I WILL SHOW EACH OF THE PODS THAT WE HAVE, THE DENSITY AND THE RELATIONSHIP AND DENSITY TO THE ADJACENT PODS.
SO CERTAIN SECTIONS ARE GOING TO HAVE MORE DENSITY THAN OTHER SECTIONS.
CORRECT? FOR FOR EXAMPLE, POD G, YOU MENTIONED I DON'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHAT THAT DENSITY IS.
IT'S PROBABLY IN THE HIGH TWOS OR THREES IT SEEMS. IT LIKE SEEM MAY HAVE, IT WOULD BE SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN THE 2.1 I MENTIONED.
THE 2.1 IS SPREAD OVER THE ENTIRETY OF THE 165 ACRES.
YEAH. SO G IS 49.67 ACRES AND THAT WILL.
CORRECT? YEAH. YEAH, I THINK THAT'S RIGHT.
HOW HIGH WOULD THE CEILINGS BE FOR EACH HOME? AND WHILE HE'S LOOKING FOR THE HEIGHT OF THE CEILING, THE.
SO INTERIOR CEILING HEIGHT, I THINK MAXINE WAS MENTIONING WE DO HAVE A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT.
INTERIOR CEILING HEIGHT WOULD BE MINIMUM OF NINE FEET.
AND A LOT OF CASES LIKE THE MARLON.
SO NINE DIVIDED BY 30 GIVES ME LIKE THREE POINT SOMETHING.
SO YOU CAN BUILD THREE FLOORS IF YOU.
NO, NO, NO. THEY'RE ALREADY THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RESTRICTS TO TO TO TO TO TWO FLOORS.
CORRECT. AND THAT'S ALSO ONLY IN THAT BOTTOM SECTION.
EVERY OTHER HOME WITHIN THE COMMUNITY WILL BE ONE.
OKAY. SO SO YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SO IT'S TWO FLOORS AND THAT'S WHAT IT'S OKAY.
OKAY. AND THAT'S ONLY IN PART.
EVERYWHERE ELSE IT HAS TO BE ONE.
I SEE 60 FORT AND I SEE ROCK ISLAND.
SO AND AGAIN, ON WEDNESDAY, WE'LL HAVE TRAFFIC ENGINEERS.
WE'LL HAVE A LOT MORE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE INTERNAL TRAFFIC, THE EXTERNAL TRAFFIC AND GENERATION.
BEASLEY SORRY BEASLEY COMMUNICATION TOWER SITE AND WE ACQUIRED SOME PROPERTY FROM THEM THERE TO ENSURE THAT WHERE THE DENSITIES ARE LOCATED, WE HAVE PODS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE COMMUNITY.
THAT'S WHERE THE ACCESS FOR 64TH WOULD WORK ON THE SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF THE COMMUNITY.
PROBABLY STARTING IN THE $700,000 RANGE AND YOU'RE ONLY GIVING 678,000 FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
UM, THE RIGHT, THE REQUIREMENT FOR $2,000 PER UNIT? YES. ARE YOU OPEN TO GIVING MORE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING? SO AS I MENTIONED DURING MY PRESENTATION, THAT NUMBER STARTED, I BELIEVE, AROUND 500 AND THEN WENT TO 1000 AND IS NOW AT $2,000 A UNIT.
AND AGAIN, BASED ON THE WAY WE'VE WORKED OUR WAY THROUGH THE PROCESS.
SO I GUESS I WOULD SAY OUR PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO NOT THERE'S OBVIOUSLY A LOT OF ADDITIONAL COSTS AND DOLLARS AND COMMUNITY IMPACTS THAT ARE GOING INTO THIS PROJECT. CAN YOU BRING UP THE SLIDE WITH THE CONTRIBUTIONS THAT YOU'RE MAKING AGAIN? CAN YOU CAN YOU PUT THAT ON THE SCREEN? AND AS YOU'VE SEEN ALREADY, THEY'RE NOT ALL LISTED OUT.
BUT I'LL GO TO TOWARDS THE END, WHICH IS WHERE I THINK YOU'RE LOOKING FOR ME TO GO.
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTIONS THROUGHOUT THE PRESENTATION AND AGREEMENT ALREADY.
SO HERE, HERE ARE SOME AND THEN HERE ARE SOME OTHERS.
SEVERAL MILLION DOLLARS PLUS A LOT OF THE OTHER OBLIGATIONS.
AND AGAIN, WE'LL MAKE A LOT MORE OF THIS PRESENTATION ON ON WEDNESDAY.
[01:10:04]
UM. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE NEXT SLIDE? SURE, SURE. ABSOLUTELY. WHATEVER YOU NEED.SO 1 MILLION IS GOING TOWARDS THAT SHAKER VILLAGE.
WELL, IT'S AN EASTSIDE COMMUNITY.
YES, IT IS IN DISTRICT ONE, THAT PARTICULAR PORTION.
IT'S AN EASTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER.
OBVIOUSLY IT WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT SMALLER, I WOULD IMAGINE.
BUT YES, AND THIS DEVELOPMENT IS IN DISTRICT TWO.
AND IF YOU CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.
YES, SIR. SO WE'RE GIVING 2/5.
YOU'RE GIVING 2/5 FOR CHARITIES.
UH, 25,000 TO THE TAMARAC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND 25,000 TO WOMEN IN DISTRESS.
YOU'RE GIVEN THE SAME AMOUNT TO THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AS YOU'RE GIVEN TO WOMEN IN DISTRESS.
DON'T YOU THINK YOU SHOULD GIVE A LITTLE MORE TO A WOMAN IN DISTRESS? WE'LL JUMP IN ON HERE.
YES, THEY. UH, IN FACT, THOSE PROFFERS, YOU KNOW, I WOULD STRONGLY RECOMMEND TO DISCUSS THESE ISSUES WITH THE DEVELOPER STAFF WILL DISCUSS THESE ISSUES THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY SUGGESTION, GIVE IT TO THE MR MANAGER, MS..
UH, LET ME LET ME LET ME MAKE IT CLEAR.
IF YOU HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THEM, JUST GIVE THEM TO STAFF AND WE WILL RELAY THE INFORMATION TO THE DEVELOPER AND WE'LL DISCUSS THAT WITH YOU, MR. WHITE. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY.
THESE ARE VOLUNTARY PROFITS, RIGHT? VOLUNTARY PROFITS OBLIGATION.
AND THIS IS IF IT HAPPENS, THESE ARE THESE ARE THE THE TERMS. IS THAT BASICALLY JUST TO CLARIFY, COMMISSIONER RIGHT.
AND WE'LL STILL BE ABLE TO ASK MORE QUESTIONS ON WEDNESDAY.
IF I HAVE IF WE HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
CORRECT. OKAY. AND COMMISSIONER, I'M HAPPY TO MAKE MYSELF AVAILABLE TO YOU.
IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU'D LIKE TO DISCUSS.
OKAY. THAT'S THOSE ARE ALL MY QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER. DANIEL. I HOPE I ASKED IT THE PROPER WAY.
WHAT ABOUT ARSENIC? BECAUSE THAT WORD HAS BEEN GOING AROUND.
I'M NOT AN EXPERT, BUT THERE'S DEVELOPMENT EVERYWHERE ON GOLF COURSE.
SURE. WHAT IS THE PROPER MEASURE TO ENSURE THAT NOBODY GETS IN THAT OPEN SPACE? VERY GOOD QUESTION.
OUR ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERT WILL BE THERE.
WE'LL BE MAKING A PRESENTATION TO THE CITY.
THE NUMBERS IN SOUTH FLORIDA ALONE ARE STAGGERING.
I THINK APPROACHING OVER 100 GOLF COURSES OVER THE LAST DECADE OR SO.
IT'S A VERY GOOD QUESTION RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING IN HERE SPECIFIC TO THAT, BECAUSE IT'S AGAIN, AS WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, ABOUT CODE, THESE ARE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ON MY CLIENT, REGARDLESS.
HOWEVER, FOR BELTS AND SUSPENDERS, IF IT WERE TO MAKE THE CITY MORE COMFORTABLE, I HAVE NO OBJECTION WHATSOEVER TO ADDING A PROVISION TO THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, CLEARLY OUTLINING WHAT THAT FLOW CHART AND THOSE REQUIREMENTS ARE AND INCLUDING IT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
BUT WE THERE REALLY IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE A LOT OF CONCERN AS IT RELATES TO THE ISSUE BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO FOLLOW ALL THE RULES AND REQUIREMENTS AS WE HAVE DONE ON OTHER COURSES HERE, AS THE CITY HAS DONE ON ON ITS COURSES, AS WELL AS THE OTHER DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THIS CITY AND THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY, WILL MAKE SURE THAT THAT SAME PROCESS IS
[01:15:07]
FOLLOWED. FOR SOMEONE WHO IS AN EXPERT IN THAT AREA WILL SPEAK ON WEDNESDAY, CORRECT? THAT'S RIGHT. YES, IT'S CLOSELY RELATED TO THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT, WHICH IS THE FIRST ITEM YOU'LL HEAR ON WEDNESDAY.SO AT THAT TIME, THAT'S WHEN YOU CAN YOU PLEASE REPEAT AND MOVE THAT FORWARD.
THANK YOU. THAT DISCUSSION IS CLOSELY RELATED TO THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AND IT'S INCLUDED.
SOME OF THAT INFORMATION IS IN YOUR BINDER UNDER THE LAND USE AMENDMENT TAB.
SO AT SOME POINT IT WOULD BE UP TO THE CITY TO ENSURE THAT THE PROPER.
PROTOCOL IS DONE, RIGHT? IT IS. AS WELL AS THE COUNTY.
AND WHAT HAPPENS IF IT'S NOT DONE PROPERLY? DEPARTMENT WILL NOT BE ISSUED TO THE DEVELOPER TO DO THE DEVELOPMENT.
AND I APPRECIATE THE OFFER TO INCLUDE IT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
I THINK THAT WOULD PROBABLY BRING SOME COMFORT TO.
COMMISSIONER RIGHT. I HAD ONE MORE QUESTION.
IN THE INITIAL PRESENTATION, YOU HAD 190 ACRES AND TONS OF OPEN SPACE.
AGAIN, IT'S A MINIMUM AND OUR EXPECTATION WOULD BE THAT THERE WOULD BE MORE THAN 160 ACRES.
SO SO I THINK THE DIFFERENCE COMMISSIONER JUST REMINDING ME AND IT PROBABLY IS ONE OF MY OLDER PRESENTATIONS, BUT STILL WOULD BE APPLICABLE WHAT WE ARE DEED RESTRICTING AND PROVIDING ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS ON VERSUS OPEN SPACE, WHICH IS A DEFINED TERM IN YOUR CODE.
EVERY SINGLE LOT THAT YOU SEE THERE IS NOT PART OF A DEED RESTRICTION THAT'S GOING TO BE PART OF THE 160 ACRES, BUT ALL HAS VERY SIGNIFICANT OPEN SPACE, RIGHT? YOU'VE GOT YOUR BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND THEN OUTSIDE OF THAT, THE YARD AND ALL OF THOSE OTHER COMPONENTS ARE OPEN SPACE AND THAT'S WHERE THAT ADDITIONAL ACREAGE CAME FROM.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, SEEING THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ENJOY YOUR DAY.
WE WILL SEE YOU WEDNESDAY, 630.
WE WILL START THE MEETING AND CELEBRATE WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH AND THEN GO INTO.
IF YOU WANT TO COME, ENJOY NOSH BEFOREHAND.
START IN THE MORNING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
HAVE A GOOD DAY. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.