Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:08]

>> WE'RE HAVING SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES HERE. I'LL START AGAIN.

GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. IT IS NOW 9:32.

[CALL TO ORDER:]

WELCOME TO THE WEDNESDAY COMMISSION MEETING.

ACTUALLY I'M GOING TO DO A LITTLE HOUSEKEEPING.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS IS ONLINE ON TEAMS AND OUR CITY MANAGER IS ALSO ON TEAMS ALONG WITH SOME OF OUR OTHER EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS.

CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU MADAM MAYOR. MAYOR GOMEZ.

>> GOOD MORNING,.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> GOOD MORNING.

>> VICE MAYOR, GELIN.

>> GOOD MORNING.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS? HE'S ON TEAMS. COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

>> GOOD MORNING.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

>> THANK YOU. IF EVERYONE WILL PLEASE STAND.

WE WILL BE LED BY VICE MAYOR GELIN IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND HAVE A MOMENT OF SILENCE THEREAFTER. THANK YOU.

CITY ATTORNEY YOUR REPORT?

[1. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT]

>> YES MADAM MAYOR JUST ONE ITEM.

I'VE SPOKEN WITH SEVERAL OF YOU REGARDING ONGOING ISSUES OVER OUR ATTEMPTS TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY AT SHAKER VILLAGE.

I'VE SPOKEN TO COMMISSIONER BOLTON ABOUT IT AND KEPT HIM IN [INAUDIBLE].NOT THAT WE'VE REACHED, BUT WE BELIEVE WE'VE COME TO A POINT WHERE WE THINK WE MAY BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES OF THE TITLE DISPUTES AS TO WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY AND HOPEFULLY BE SPEAKING TO THE REPRESENTATIVES FOR SHAKER VILLAGE LATER TODAY AND THEN ULTIMATELY HOPEFULLY BEFORE THE BREAK OR AFTER THE FIRST MEETING AFTER THE BREAK BRINGING FORWARD A PROPOSAL TO BEGIN THE PROCESS OF TRYING TO RESOLVE THAT ACQUISITION.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> [OVERLAPPING] A MOMENT TO RECOGNIZE VICE MAYOR GELIN PLEASE MAY I GO ON?

>> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY.

CAN YOU GIVE THE AUDIENCE AN UPDATE ON THE LAWSUIT THAT [INAUDIBLE] INVESTMENTS HAS AGAINST THE CITY?

>> CITY ATTORNEY, IF IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE TO GIVE AT THIS TIME JUST BECAUSE WE'VE ASKED FOR IT, PLEASE MAKE NOTE OF THAT.

>> YES. THE ONLY THING THAT I'M GOING TO SAY IS TO REPEAT WHAT THE ORDER FROM THE APPELLATE COURT HAS STATED, WHICH IS THE MOTION TO STOP THE INJUNCTION WAS UNSUCCESSFUL.

HOWEVER THE COURT DID STATE THAT ANY SUBSEQUENT REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THE LEGISLATIVE DETERMINATION WHICH IS THE POSITION THAT WE'VE TAKEN OR THAT I'VE ADVOCATED.

SINCE I HAVE BEEN YOUR CITY ATTORNEY THAT'S THE APPROPRIATE STANDARD IRRESPECTIVE OF WHO THE APPLICANT IS.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE WILL NOW GO TO OUR CITY MANAGER.

[2. CITY MANAGER REPORT]

>> GOOD MORNING, MAYOR AND COMMISSION,. CAN YOU HEAR ME?

>> YES.

>> GREAT. WE'RE GOING HAVE FOR THE FIRST TIME OUR EMPLOYEES COME FOR THEIR SERVICE AWARDS TODAY, BUT WE'VE BEEN HAVING SOME RISING NUMBERS WITH COVID SO WE'RE GOING TO POSTPONE THAT TO A LATER MEETING WHEN EVERYBODY CAN COME IN PERSON AND BE CELEBRATED ONCE AGAIN.

MY APOLOGIES TO ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO WERE TO BE RECOGNIZED TODAY.

WE WERE LOOKING FORWARD TO HAVING EVERYBODY IN PERSON AND UNFORTUNATELY WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

WE MADE THAT LAST MINUTE DECISION THIS MORNING BECAUSE OF RISING NUMBERS.

MOVING ON I WOULD JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF ANNOUNCEMENTS.

OUR PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT WANTED TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT THE CITY OF TAMARAC WILL TEMPORARILY BE TURNED TO USING FREE CHLORINE IN THE DRINKING WATER SYSTEM SERVING WEST TAMARAC.

SO THAT'S WEST OF STATE ROAD 7 US 441.

THIS PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE WILL BEGIN AT 9:00 AM TUESDAY YESTERDAY AND WILL END AT 9:00 AM ON JULY 12TH.

[00:05:04]

FREE CHLORINATION IS A COMMON PRACTICE FOR WATER SYSTEMS USING COMBINED CHLORINE DISINFECTION.

THE CHLORINATION PERIOD IS ANTICIPATED TO BE TRANSPARENT TO WATER CUSTOMERS.

HOWEVER, SOME MAY NOTICE A SLIGHT CHANGE IN THE TASTE OR SMELL OF THEIR TAP WATER.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL THE WATER DEPARTMENT AT 954-597-3775.

AT OUR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT WE'D LIKE TO REMIND EVERYONE OF SOME FUN EVENTS WE HAVE COMING UP.

AS YOU KNOW WE HAD TO POSTPONE CARIBBEAN FAMILY FUN DAY ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY JUNE 4TH DUE TO BAD WEATHER.

THE EVENT HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO SATURDAY JULY 30TH.

THE EVENT WILL STILL TAKE PLACE AT WATERS EDGE PARK FROM NOON TO 2:00.

THERE'LL BE FOOD, MUSIC, GAMES AND FUN FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY.

WE ALSO WELCOME EVERYONE TO JOIN US AS WE CELEBRATE THE BIGGEST INVEST BIRTHDAY PARTY IN THE CITY OF TAMARAC AT THE JULY 4TH ALL AMERICAN CELEBRATION EVENT.

WE INVITE YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY TO JOIN US AT THE TAMARAC SPORTS COMPLEX FROM 6:00 TO 9:30 FOR A FREE OUTDOOR CONCERT FEATURING THE CACHE BAND, KIDS AREAS WITH INFLATABLES, FACE PAINTING, ARTS AND CRAFTS, AND FOOD TRUCKS.

GRAB YOUR LAWN CHAIRS AND YOUR CAMERA AND GET A SNAPSHOT WITH UNCLE SAM AND BETSY ROSS AS THEY MAKE AN APPEARANCE DURING THE EVENT.

THE NIGHT'S NOT OVER UNTIL THE IMPRESSIVE CHOREOGRAPHED PYROTECHNICAL FIREWORK DISPLAY, WHICH KICKS OFF PROMPTLY AT 9:00 PM.

LIMITED ON-SITE PARKING, SO PLEASE USE THE SHUTTLE FROM TAMARAC CITY HALL, 7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE AT A TAMARAC COMMUNITY CENTER 86601, WEST COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD.

THE SHUTTLE WILL RUN FROM 5:30 PM TO 8:15 PM AND FOLLOWING THE FIREWORKS. IT'S ALL FREE.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF TAMARAC PARKS AND REC AT 954-597-3620.

THANK YOU AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS I SEE YOUR HAND IS RAISED.

>> CAN YOU HEAR ME?

>> YES.

>> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I CAN HEAR YOU GUYS FROM THE COMPUTER.

>> OKAY.

>>.I HAVE YOU ON THE PHONE.

>> AN IT IS GOING TO BE IN TOUCH WITH YOU, COMMISSIONER TO TRY TO FIX THAT.

>> HOPEFULLY YOU HEARD THAT IT WILL BE IN TOUCH WITH YOU.

TECHNOLOGY, IT GETS THERE.

WE WILL NOW BE GOING TO PART 3,

[3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION]

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND WE ASK OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO PLEASE READ THE RULES OF THE ROAD.

>> YES, MADAM MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION ON THE OVERHEADED THE RULES.

MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY SPEAK ONLY AT TIMES DESIGNATED BY THE MAYOR OR PRESIDING OFFICER OF THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CHAPTER 4. [INAUDIBLE] HIS OR HER NAME AND ADDRESS IN AN AUDIBLE TONE FOR THE CLARK'S RECORD.

IN LIEU OF PROVIDING THEIR ADDRESS THEY CAN PROVIDE THEIR CITY OF RESONANCE.

REMARKS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE QUESTIONS UNDER DISCUSSION UNLESS SUCH REMARKS COME DURING THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SECTION OF THE MEETING.

DURING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REMEMBER THE PUBLIC MAY SPEAK IN ANY ISSUE THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA FOR PUBLIC HEARING DURING THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING.

SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES DURING THIS TIME.

THERE'LL BE A 30-MINUTE AGGREGATE TIME LIMIT FOR THIS ITEM AND SPEAKERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SIGN UP IN ADVANCE WITH CITY CLERK PERHAPS THEIR PARTICIPATION.

I'LL MARK SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO THE CITY COMMISSION AS A BODY THROUGH THE MAYOR AND NOT TO ANY MEMBER THEREOF.

CUMULATIVE AND REPETITIVE TESTIMONY SHOULD BE AVOIDED IN ON ANY MATTER.

PERSONS OF THE SAME POSITION AS THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER MAY SIMPLY STATE THEIR NAMES, ADDRESS AND THE POSITION WITH WHICH THEY AGREE.

ANY PERSON MAKING DISRUPTIVE AND PERTINENT OR SLANDERS, REMARKS WHO SHALL BECOME BOISTEROUS WHILE DRESSING THE CITY COMMISSION OR REFUSE TO STOP, MAYBE REQUESTED LEAVE THE MEETING BY THE CITY COMMISSION.

PERSONS WHOSE A LOT OF TIMES SPEAK IT'S EXPIRED SHALL BE SO ADVISOR CITY CLERK, TO CONCLUDE.

PUBLIC HEARINGS CONSIST OF THOSE AGENDA ITEMS WHERE THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE, THE PUBLIC SHALL SPEAK ONLY ON THE AGENDA IS SUBJECT.

SPEAKING TIME FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IS LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES FOR ANY PARTICULAR TOPIC, ADDITIONAL TIME MAY BE ADDED BY THE CITY COMMISSION.

MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SHALL NOT DELEGATE OR GIVE THEIR TIME OR ANY PORTION THEREOF TO ANOTHER PARTY FOR PUBLIC HEARING.

THE CITY COMMISSION MAY SET AN AGGREGATE LIMIT FOR TIME LIMIT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WHEN AN ISSUE HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS JUDICIAL PUBLIC REMARKS SHALL ONLY BE HEARD DURING A QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING THAT HAS BEEN PROPERLY NOTICED FOR THAT MATTER.

>> THANK YOU, CITY ATTORNEY. I'M GOING TO REQUEST THAT WE FIX WHERE YOUR MIC IS LOCATED ON YOUR DESK FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO HEAR YOU, PLEASE.

SO WE WILL NOW GO TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. DR. GARCIA.

>> GOOD MORNING. DORSI SCHILLER, KINGS POINT IN TAMARAC.

[00:10:01]

I HAVE JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENTS.

I'VE BEEN COMING TO THE COMMISSION FOR OVER A YEAR, AND I DO REMEMBER HISTORICALLY THERE WAS A LOT OF TO-DO ABOUT THE BUDGET AND THE JUNE 10TH, THE HAITIAN OR THE CARIBBEAN CELEBRATION, AND THERE WAS ANOTHER, I BELIEVE, BLACK CELEBRATION.

AT THE TIME, THEY WANTED TO PUT DOWN 150 PER ITEM.

I WENT TO THE JUNE 10TH AND IT WAS A LOVELY EVENT.

IT WAS REALLY NICE.

I SAW COMMISSIONER PLACKO, I SAW THE MAYOR.

I DIDN'T SEE THE GENTLEMAN WHO HAD ARGUED SO VEHEMENTLY FOR THE 150,000 FOR THE PARTY, AND SADLY, THERE WERE MAYBE 150 PEOPLE.

I'M STRETCHING IT CLOSER PROBABLY TO 100, AND I WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED WE ALLOCATED SO MUCH MONEY AND VERY FEW PEOPLE SHOWED UP.

I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING TO BE SAID.

NEXT ISSUE, I NOTICED THAT ONE OF OUR COMMISSIONERS WAS REQUESTING MONEY FOR HIS BIRTHDAY, FOR HIS CAMPAIGN ON FACEBOOK, AND I QUESTION THE APPROPRIATENESS OF ANYBODY ASKING FOR MONEY ON FACEBOOK UNLESS IT'S FOR A GOFUNDME FOR ST. JUDE'S OR SOMETHING.

BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE PLACE OUR VICE MAYOR OR COMMISSIONERS SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR MONEY.

THAT WAS A CONCERN OF MINE.

THAT WAS ALL I HAD TO SAY. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. WILLIAM GOFFINETTE, ARE YOU HERE FOR A GENERAL MATTER OR POSSIBLY FOR SOMETHING THAT'S ON THE AGENDA LATER ON FOR PUBLIC HEARING?

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> THEN THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT HERE FOR AN AGENDA ITEM.

GO AHEAD. NAME.

>> WILLIAM GOFFINETTE, 5106 MAYBERRY LANE, TAMARAC.

>> THANK YOU.

>> I'D LIKE TO APOLOGIZE FOR YOU, IT WAS ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO NOW, WHEN WE FIRST MET, I THINK I WAS A LITTLE HARSH ON YOU.

NOW I WOULD LIKE TO GO INTO A COUPLE OF ISSUES.

ONE WOULD BE MANOR PARK.

THERE SEEMS TO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE ARSENIC IN THE SOIL AND IT WAS NEVER CLEANED UP.

NOW, I JUST WONDER WHETHER ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION MAY KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS.

WERE THE RESIDENTS THERE EVER INFORMED OF ANYTHING ABOUT THIS AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU, MICHELLE, AND MR. BECKMAN, THAT GOES WAY BACK.

YOU SAY 2010, ON SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2019, MY INTUITIVE FEELING IS THAT IT PROBABLY GOES BACK FURTHER THAN THAT, BUT I'LL ACCEPT THAT AS YOUR ANSWER.

NOW, I BELIEVE THAT REPRESENTS QUITE A CONFLICT.

I DON'T BELIEVE YOU SHOULD HAVE EVER BEEN VOTING ON THIS.

I BELIEVE HAD YOU BROUGHT THESE CONFLICTS TO THE FOREFRONT IN THE BEGINNING, I DON'T BELIEVE THE WOODLANDS ISSUE WOULD HAVE EVER BEEN AN ISSUE BECAUSE I DON'T BELIEVE IT EVER WOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO COME TO THE DAIS.

NOW I HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF INFORMATION HERE FOR A LITTLE LEGAL WORK THAT I'VE LOOKED AT.

THE SOURCE IS LAND MATTERS, WORDPRESS.COM.

PARTIES HAVE TO HAVE A STANDING.

THEY HAVE TO BE ESSENTIAL PARTIES, VENUE, FORM OF CASE, WHAT CLAIMS TO BRING, AND A DIRECT CHALLENGE TO ZONING CHANGES.

MANIFEST ABUSIVE ZONING POWER.

WHEN NEIGHBORS OF REZONED PROPERTY CHALLENGE THE REZONING IN THE COURT ON ITS OWN MERITS, IT WILL BE SET ASIDE ONLY IF FRAUD OR CORRUPTION IS SHOWN OR THE REZONING POWER IS BEING MANIFESTLY ABUSED TO THE OPPRESSION OF THE NEIGHBORS.

SECONDLY, FRAUD, CONFLICT OF INTERESTS, PROCEDURAL DEFECTS FLATLY VIOLATES THE PROVISIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE, EXAMPLE, ORDINANCE REQUIRING CERTAIN MINIMUM SIZE OR OTHER PROVISION.

[00:15:04]

PROCEDURE, DUE PROCESS OF ZONING.

IF ZONING WAS CONDUCTED WITHOUT COMPLYING WITH THE ZPL, IT WOULD BE INVALID, IE, POSTING SIGNS OF MEETING FACING OPPOSITE WAVE OF TRAFFIC FLOW.

ANOTHER CHALLENGE IS THE CITY FAILURE TO FOLLOW ITS OWN PROCEDURES AND ITS OWN ORDINANCE, IE, TAKING A GOLF COURSES SHALL BE DISCOURAGED.

TRIAL COURTS TYPICALLY REMAND THESE DECISIONS.

THE GENERAL RULE AGAINST INQUIRING INTO THE MOTIVES OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY GIVES AWAY, AS A MATTER OF PUBLIC POLICY WHERE THERE IS AN ALLEGATION OR APPEARANCE.

>> THANK YOU, MR. GOFFNET.

>> CORRUPTION OR FRAUD.

>> THANK YOU, MR. GOFFNET, YOUR TIME IS UP.

>> STILL HAVE MORE.

>> THAT'S OKAY. WE CAN SEE YOU AT ANOTHER TIME.

>> CAN I GET THREE?

>> NO, YOU CANNOT.

>> MAYBE THREE OUT OF FIVE.

>> NO, THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS.

THANK YOU, THOUGH. HAVE A GOOD DAY.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT THE REST TO CITY CLERK.

>> FEEL FREE.

>> CONFLICT VENTURES ZONING PUBLIC LAND.

>> THANK YOU, MR. GOFFNET.

WE ARE NOW UP TO ALEX PEREZ JUNIOR.

>> HELLO. MY NAME IS ALEX PEREZ OF WEDGEWOOD, TAMARAC.

I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT OF TAMARAC FOR OVER 10 YEARS.

I'M HERE REGARDING THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL.

AS A RESIDENT, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE CURRENT DESIGN IS INCLUSIVE NOR DOES IT ACKNOWLEDGE THE DIVERSE STRUGGLES OF THE DIVERSE POPULATION IN OUR CITY. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU, AND ONE ITEM WE MIGHT NOT HAVE MENTIONED IN OUR INSTRUCTOR DIRECTIONS IS THAT WE APPRECIATE THAT YOU'RE SPEAKING TODAY.

IT IS AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA, SO THEREFORE, IT'S ALSO IN OUR WORKSHOPS.

THESE WILL NOT BE NOTES.

THERE'LL BE TAKEN IN LINE FOR THAT ITEM.

BUT YOU ARE VERY WELCOME TO MAKE YOUR COMMENTS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE TODAY.

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> DID GREAT. THANK YOU. ALEX PEREZ SENIOR.

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> THANK YOU. MELISSA MIDY.

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> WELL, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY AS WELL.

EILEEN LIEBERMAN MICHELSON.

>> EILEEN LIEBERMAN MICHELSON, 4809 WOODLANDS BOULEVARDS, TAMARAC.

GOOD MORNING, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, I'M HERE ON TWO ISSUES.

NOW THAT THE FOURTH DCA HAS RULED ON 13TH FLOOR LAWSUIT, I WANT TO ENCOURAGE YOU TO SET A QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING ON THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

I KNOW THIS IS YOUR LAST MEETING BEFORE SUMMER BREAK, SO MAYBE IT CAN BE ON YOUR FIRST MEETING IN AUGUST, BUT YOU SHOULD MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE IT IS NOT FAIR TO THE COMMUNITY TO KEEP THIS ISSUE HANGING OUT.

IF YOU DON'T HAVE THIS HEARING, THEN YOU WILL BE IN A POSITION WHERE THERE'LL BE A HEARING IN FRONT OF JUDGE FRANK ON YOUR MOTION, BUT WAY PAST THE ELECTION.

THE PEOPLE OF WOODLANDS HAVE TOILED FOR A LONG TIME WITH THIS AND IT'S TIME TO JUST HAVE THE HEARING AND MOVE FORWARD.

I WANT TO URGE YOU FOR YOUR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING THAT YOU HIRE A BROWARD COUNTY EXPERIENCED LAWYER, EXPERIENCED IN LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS WHO KNOWS HOW TO PUT QUASI-JUDICIAL INFORMATION INTO THE MEETING SO THAT THE CITY'S DECISION WILL BE AFFIRMED BY THE COURT.

YOU SHOULD DO THAT FOR YOUR QUASI-JUDICIAL MEETING BECAUSE I DO BELIEVE THAT NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS AT THAT MEETING, THERE MAY BE LITIGATION AFTERWARD, AND IN THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, YOU SHOULD USE A LAWYER WHO IS FROM BROWARD COUNTY.

THERE ARE MANY GOOD EXPERIENCED LAWYERS IN LAND USE, PLEASE HIRE ONE OF THEM.

THE SECOND REASON IS, RECENTLY A SIGN WAS INSTALLED AT BERMUDA CLUB, AND IT SAYS ON THE BOTTOM CITY OF TAMARAC.

IN CASE YOU'RE NOT AWARE, AND I BELIEVE BOTH THE MAYOR AND THE VICE MAYOR ARE WELL AWARE OF THIS, THE INTERSECTION OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD AND WOODLANDS, THE SIGN AT THAT LOCATION IS BASICALLY A TARGET FOR ACCIDENTS.

THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS ACCIDENTS, IT PROBABLY LEADS THE CITY AS THE AREA WITH THE MOST ACCIDENTS.

NO QUESTION ABOUT IT.

LITERALLY, A WEEK DOESN'T GO BY THAT THERE ISN'T AN ACCIDENT.

THE SIGNS HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED MORE THAN ONCE.

IT'S TIME TO PUT UP A DIFFERENT KIND OF SIGN.

[00:20:01]

I'M ASKING THAT YOU BUDGET MONEY TO DO FOR THE WOODLANDS WHAT YOU DID FOR BERMUDA CLUB, WHICH IS, HAVE THE WOODLANDS, PUT CITY OF TAMARAC ON THE BOTTOM AND PROVIDE THEM WITH FUNDS TO BE ABLE TO PUT UP A MUCH MORE STRUCTURALLY SOUND SIGN AT THE ENTRANCE SO THAT WHEN THESE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN, WE'RE NOT FACED WITH THE DILEMMA WHICH WE SEEM TO HAVE BEEN FACED WITH FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS OF CONTINUALLY HAVING TO REPAIR OR REPLACE THE SIGN.

I WOULD ASK THAT YOU LOOK INTO THAT.

I KNOW THAT THERE WAS MONEY THAT THE WHO RECEIVED FROM THE INSURANCE PROCEEDS, BUT IT'S NOT ENOUGH FOR THE SIGN AND I WOULD ASK THE CITY TO MAKE UP THE BALANCE. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. JEFFREY SHAPIRO.

>> JEFFREY SHAPIRO, 60104 ORCHID TREE LANE, TAMARAC, FLORIDA.

IT'S PART OF THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY.

GOOD MORNING TO ALL.

ONCE AGAIN, I'M HERE ON BEHALF AND EILEEN NICHOLSON JUST SPOKE PARTLY ABOUT THAT.

RECENTLY THERE WAS ANOTHER BAD ACCIDENT AT THE ENTRANCE WHERE AN EASTBOUND CAR COLLIDED WITH A VEHICLE COMING OUT OF THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY.

[OVERLAPPING] I DON'T KNOW IF THIRD PARTIES INVOLVED OR IT'S SOMEONE LIVING IN THE COMMUNITY OR JUST LEAVING THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THEY VISITED SOMEONE.

BUT I NOTICED THERE ARE CAMERAS MOUNTED ON THESE POLES ON THREE OF THE FOUR SIDES OF THE INTERSECTION.

MY QUESTION IS, WHY ISN'T THIS BEING MONITORED? IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE MONITORS OF RED LIGHT CAMERA, BUT SOMETHING SHOULD BE DONE.

IF A CRIME IS COMMITTED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AND SOMEONE'S FLEEING, THESE CAMERAS COULD BE USEFUL IN THAT EVENT TOO.

YOU HAVE THREE OTHER COMMUNITIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WOODLANDS AND COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD THAT WOULD ALSO BENEFIT FROM THIS.

MY HOPE IS THAT SOMEBODY LOOKS INTO IT, BECAUSE THESE CAMERAS HAVE BEEN UP THERE.

I UNDERSTAND THEY'RE NOT FOR RED LIGHT, I'M NOT ASKING FOR RED LIGHT, BUT SOMEHOW, WHY WERE THEY PUT THERE IF THEY'RE NEVER TO BE USED? PLEASE TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.

I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND HAVE A GOOD DAY.

>> THANK YOU. IF EVERYBODY IN THE WOODLANDS COMMUNITY WOULD CHECK WITH THEIR PRESIDENTS OF THEIR ASSOCIATIONS THEY WOULD SEE THE UPDATE OF WHAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE TO FIX THAT LIGHT. THANK YOU.

>> I HAVE NOBODY ELSE ON THE LIST.

BUT IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME? SEEING THAT THERE'S NO ONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IS NOW CLOSED.

THANK YOU. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

CITY MANAGER, ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS?

>> THERE ARE NONE, MAYOR.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

VICE MAYOR, YOU HAVE YOUR HANDOUT.

>> PULLING ITEM 4B FROM CONSENT.

>> ITEM 4B IS BEING PULLED FROM CONSENT.

ANY OTHER ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS? ANY ITEM? [OVERLAPPING]

>> MADAM MAYOR, MAYBE RECOGNIZE?

>> YES, COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO PULL ITEM 4B AND ITEM 4C FROM THE AGENDA.

>> ITEM 4B WAS ALREADY PULLED BY VICE MAYOR GELIN, BUT IT IS ALSO REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER BOLTON AND 4C IS NOW PULLED. [OVERLAPPING]

>> I HAVE MY HAND RAISED.

>> SORRY. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER PLACKO FOR THE CONTRIBUTION FOR THE BENCHES.

>> THANK YOU. WE NEED TO VOTE ON IT FIRST, BUT YES, THANK YOU.

WE WILL NOW NEED A SECOND TO MY MOTION OF CONSENT AGENDA MOVING FORWARD WITH 4A AND 4D. DO I HAVE A SECOND?

>> SECOND.

>> THANK YOU.

>> CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ.

>> YES.

>> I DON'T HAVE A 4D.

THERE'S 4A, B, C.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON SAID C.

>> SORRY, MY APOLOGIES.

>> THAT'S CORRECT. BUT MAYOR GOMEZ SAID ITEM 4D. [OVERLAPPING]

>> I DID. MY APOLOGIES.

AMEND THE MOTION FOR 4A.

>> THANK YOU.

[00:25:01]

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU MAYOR GOMEZ.

>> THANK YOU.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> MOTION PASS 5 TO 0. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. CITY ATTORNEY, WILL YOU PLEASE AND NOW ACTUALLY, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, THIS THANK YOU COMES TO YOU.

[LAUGHTER] FOR OUR CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 4B-TR13802,

[4.b TR13802 -Â A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, approving aSettlement Agreement and Mutual Release in the amount of $350,000.00 with WestConstruction, Inc. for the completion and closure of the Tamarac Fire Station 36 Project, theSwim Central Annex Park Project, and the Tamarac Sports Complex Concession BuildingProject; authorizing the appropriate City Officials to execute said settlement agreement;providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date.]

CITY ATTORNEY, PLEASE READ THE TITLE FOR THE RECORD.

>> YES, MA'AM. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS A RESOLUTION OF CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE IN THE AMOUNT OF $350,000 WITH WEST CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR THE COMPLETION ENCLOSURE, THE TAMARAC FIRE STATION 36 PROJECT, THE SWIM CENTRAL ANNEX PARK PROJECT, AND THE TAMARAC SPORTS COMPLEX CONCESSION BUILDING PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE SAID SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEPARABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> THANK YOU. WE NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND.

>> MOVED.

>> SECOND.

>> THANK YOU. VICE MAYOR, YOU PULLED THIS FIRST?

>> YEAH. I JUST WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.

I SUBMIT PROPOSALS TO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ALL THE TIME AND THERE'S VERY CLEAR LANGUAGE IN TERMS OF WHEN PROJECTS ARE NOT MET.

IT'S VERY CLEAR TO ANY BIDDER THAT THERE ARE PENALTIES AND DIRECTIONS AS TO WHAT HAPPENS.

IF WE CLAIM ONE POSITION, WHY ARE WE OFFERING A SETTLEMENT?

>> GOOD MORNING. FOR THE RECORD, JOHN DOHERTY, ACTING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES.

WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH WEST TO TRY TO GET THESE PROJECTS COMPLETED, AND WE'VE ALSO WORKED THROUGH OUR ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ON THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND WE HAVE DETERMINED THIS IS THE BEST OPTION TO CLOSE THESE PROJECTS.

YOU ARE CORRECT. THERE ARE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CLAUSES IN OUR CONTRACTS.

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR THESE THREE PROJECTS ARE IN EXCESS OF $550,000.

BUT WE CONSIDERED ALL THE OPTIONS WORKING WITH THE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND RATHER THAN GO INTO LITIGATION WITH WEST CONSTRUCTION, WE'VE DETERMINED THAT SETTLING THESE THREE PROJECTS FOR 350,000 IS PROBABLY THE BEST OPTION FOR THE CITY.

>> BUT THEY ARE CONTENDING THAT THEY ARE OWED IN EXCESS OF 500,000.

>> YEAH. THE OUTSTANDING BALANCES FOR THE THREE PROJECTS IS ROUGHLY $545,000.

THE SETTLEMENT AMOUNT IS $350,000.

IN ESSENCE, WE'D BE COLLECTING ROUGHLY $200,000 IN LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.

>> YOU'RE CONTENDING THAT THEY ASKED FOR EXTENSIONS, WE PROVIDED EXTENSIONS.

I'M NOT SURE WHAT THEIR CLAIM IS, BUT THEY CLAIM THAT THEY'RE OWED FUNDS.

WHAT IS THEIR CLAIM AS TO WHY IT HASN'T BEEN MET? THEN IF WE AGREE TO THE SETTLEMENT, WHEN WILL THESE PROJECTS BE COMPLETED?

>> WITH THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, THEY HAVE 45 DAYS TO COMPLETE THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS ON ALL THREE PROJECTS.

ALL PROJECTS ARE COMPLETED.

THAT WAS OUR PUSH TO GET ALL PROJECTS COMPLETED, SO ALL PROJECTS ARE COMPLETED AND THEY ARE IN USE, WHICH IS A GOOD THING.

BUT THERE'S REALLY JUST SOME OUTSTANDING PAPERWORK THAT NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED.

EXECUTION OF OUTSTANDING CHANGE ORDERS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT AND FROM THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, THEY HAVE 45 DAYS TO COMPLETE THAT AFTER THE EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT.

>> IS IT REALISTIC FOR IT TO BE COMPLETED IN 45 DAYS?

>> YES.

>> OKAY. THE SMALL AMOUNT OF WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE OR PAPERWORK IS BEING HELD UP BECAUSE THERE'S A DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES?

>> CORRECT.

>> QUESTION FOR THE PROCUREMENT DIRECTOR?

>> MR. GLADSTONE.

>> MORNING, KEITH FOR PURCHASING AND CONTRACTS MANAGER.

>> HOW MANY PROJECTS HAS THIS FIRM DONE IN THE CITY OF TAMARAC?

>> OH, GEE, I THINK THEY'VE DONE ABOUT SIX OR SEVEN PROJECTS, AT LEAST IN THE PAST.

>> HAVE WE HAD THIS CHALLENGE WITH THEM BEFORE?

>> NO, THIS CHALLENGE STARTED ONCE WE GOT INTO THE DEPTHS OF THESE PARTICULAR THREE PROJECTS.

THEY HAD BEEN A VERY RESPONSIVE FIRM IN THE PAST.

>> WHY WERE THEY NOT RESPONSIVE IN THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE?

>> WELL, THAT'S AN ISSUE THAT HAD TO DO WITH THEIR OWN PERFORMANCE AND THEY WERE NOT MEETING DEADLINES, THEY DIDN'T HAVE WORKERS ON THE SITE WHEN THEY NEEDED THEM.

JOHN ACTUALLY CAN PROBABLY GIVE YOU A BETTER PICTURE OF THAT THAN I CAN ACTUALLY.

>> I'M NOT FINISHED. YOU SAID SIX OR SEVEN PROJECTS.

[00:30:07]

WERE THEY ALWAYS THE HIGHEST RANK PROPOSER IN ALL THE RFPS?

>> IT WAS A DESIGN BUILD.

THEY MAY NOT HAVE BEEN THE LOWEST OR THE HIGHEST.

THEY WERE CONSIDERED TO BE THE MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE CITY.

>> IN THIS CASE, THERE WAS NO RFP?

>> THERE WASN'T RFP, ACTUALLY IN ALL THREE OF THESE SITUATIONS, AND AT THE TIME THEY WERE CONSIDERED TO BE THE MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE CITY.

WE HAD NO IDEA WHEN WE MADE THESE AWARDS THAT THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE PERFORMANCE ISSUES.

THEY HAD A GOOD TRACK RECORD, SO WE'D MOVE FORWARD WITH THEM BASED ON THAT GOOD TRACK RECORD AT THE TIME.

>> THE COMMITTEE FELT THEY WERE THE MOST RESPONSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE, ALTHOUGH THEY WERE NOT THE LOWEST COST?

>> I CAN'T SPEAK RIGHT NOW WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE INFORMATION.

I CAN GET THAT TO YOU. I DON'T HAVE IT WITH ME, BUT YES.

>> HOW MANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION FIRMS HAVE WE WORKED WITH ON OUR PROJECTS?

>> ON ALL OF OUR PROJECTS?

>> FORGOT THE QUESTION. I JUST REMEMBER WHEN I FIRST CAME ON BOARD, THERE WERE SEVERAL RFPS OUT, AND I KEPT SEEING THE SAME WINTER OVER AND OVER AGAIN IN THE WEST CONSTRUCTION AND FELT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THAT.

NOW, IT SEEMS LIKE I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER BOLTON BROUGHT THAT UP AS WELL, BUT I THINK THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE SAME COMPANY KEEPS WINNING ALL THE AWARD FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS, BUT I'LL TALK TO THEM AND FIND OUT WHAT THEIR ISSUE IS, BUT THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR NOW. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER BOLTON, YOU HAD YOUR DESIRE TO PULL THIS ITEM TWO?

>> I PULLED THE ITEM FOR A SEPARATE VOTE. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.

>> THANK YOU. NO OTHER QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS.

I SEE NOTHING AT THIS TIME FROM COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

AS SUCH, CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> NO.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> MOTION PASSES 4-1. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. WE WILL NOW GO TO FOR CTR13805.

[4.c TR 13805 - A resolution of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, affirming andratifying the City Manager’s Administrative Order dated June 6, 2022, attached hereto asExhibit â€oeA” and incorporated herein, declaring zoning in progress and prohibiting thesubmission, processing, approval or issuance of any new business tax receipts,development orders or permits for the use of land for new medical marijuana dispensaryfacilities and pharmacies,  in accordance with Chapter 10, Section 10-5.4(U) of the City ofTamarac Code of Ordinances; authorizing and directing the City Manager to undertake studyof these uses and create a long term strategy to ensure adequate placement and access tosuch uses in  accordance with the applicable Florida Statutes; providing that upon theadoption of this resolution affirming the administrative order, no new medical marijuanadispensary or pharmacy application submissions will be accepted during the time periodcovered by this resolution; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providingfor an effective date.]

CITY ATTORNEY, PLEASE READ THE TITLE INTO THE MIC.

>> YES, MA'AM. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS RESOLUTION CITY COMMISSIONER STEVE TRAIN WRECK, FLORIDA, AFFIRMING AND RATIFYING THE SENIOR MANAGERS ADMINISTRATIVE OLDER, DATED JUNE 6, 2022, ATTACHED HERE TO ELIMINATE AND A CORPORATE HEREIN DECLARING ZONING AND PROGRESS AND PROHIBITING THE SUBMISSION, PROCESSING, APPROVAL, OR ISSUANCE OF ANY NEW BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS, DEVELOPMENT ORDERS OF PERMITS FOR THE USE OF LAND FOR NEW MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY FACILITIES AND PHARMACIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 10, SECTION 10-50 FOR YOU OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCES AUTHORIZED IN DIRECTING CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE STUDY OF THESE USES AND CREATE A LONG-TERM STRATEGY TO ENSURE ADEQUATE PLACEMENT ACCESS TO SUCH USES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE FLORIDA STATUTES, PROVIDING THAT UPON THE ADOPTION OF THIS RESOLUTION, AFFIRMING THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, NO NEW MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY OR PHARMACY APPLICATION SUBMISSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED DURING THE TIME PERIOD COVERED BY THIS RESOLUTION, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEPARABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> THANK YOU. I'LL TAKE A SECOND.

>> BOTTOM BORDER THROUGH THE CHAIR QUESTION FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY.

>> THERE'S A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> I SPOKE BEFORE THE SECOND.

I DON'T THINK WE WERE CLEAR ON WHETHER OR NOT THE CHAIR CAN MAKE A MOTION.

>> WE HAVE BEEN CLEAR ON THIS CITY ATTORNEY.

>> YOUR RULES ARE SILENT.

YOUR RULES SAY THAT EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE MOTIONS AND HAVE DISCUSSION.

THE QUESTION IS, AT WHAT POINT, IF ANY, DOES THE CHAIR HAVE TO PASS THE GAVEL? COMMISSIONER BOLTON HAS ASKED FOR MY OFFICE TO RENDER AN OPINION TO THE COMMISSION ON THAT ISSUE, WHICH WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARING.

BUT VERY BRIEFLY, THERE ARE A SUBSET OF RULES.

>> WE'RE OUT OF ORDER, MAYOR.

>> HOLD ON. EXCUSE ME.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS CITY ATTORNEY, IS ANSWERING THE QUESTION, THEN YOU CAN SPEAK.

>> AS I'VE SAID BEFORE, YOU ALL HAVE YOUR OWN RULES OF PROCEDURE.

THERE IS A SECTION IN YOUR RULES OF PROCEDURE THAT BASICALLY STATES AND I'M PARAPHRASING, THAT WHEN THE RULES DON'T ADDRESS A PARTICULAR PROCEDURAL ASPECT, YOU LOOK TO ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER FOR GUIDANCE.

ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER GENERALLY SAYS THAT THEY'RE ENLARGE ASSEMBLIES.

THE CHAIR IS IN THOSE SITUATIONS PASSES THE GAVEL.

THERE IS A SUBSET OF RULES AND ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER FOR

[00:35:02]

SMALL BOARDS THAT DISPENSES WITH THAT REQUIREMENT.

AND THAT'S THE OPINION THAT WE'RE GENERATING AT THIS POINT IN TIME, SUBJECT TO THE COMMISSION SAYING DIFFERENTLY.

THERE ARE TWO SETS OF RULES.

AGAIN, ONE FOR SMALL BOARDS, ONE FOR LARGE ASSEMBLIES.

THE SUBSET OF RULES SAY THAT THERE'S NO NEED TO PASS THE GAVEL.

>> OF COURSE, SMALL AND LARGE BOARDS.

>> THIS IS ITEM CAN BE PUT ON THE WORKSHOP HAS BEEN DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY. WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE.

>> I HAVE ACCESS TO THE CITY ATTORNEY.

HOW ARE SMALL AND LARGE BOARDS DEFINED.

>> THEY GENERALLY SAY THAT SMALL BOARDS OR ANYTHING THAT THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE BOARD IS 12 MEMBERS OR LESS.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> I DISREGARDED. WE KEEP ASKING THE SAME QUESTIONS EVERY MEETING.

>> THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

COMMISSIONER BOLTON, YOU PULL THIS.

>> DID WE GET A SECOND MAYOR?

>> WE DID.

>> WHO WAS THE SECOND CLERK?

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> I PULL THE ITEM FOUR SEPARATE VOTE. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.

>> THANK YOU. SEEING NO OTHER DISCUSSION, CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU, MA'AM. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> NO.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ.

>> YES.

>> MOTION PASSES 4-1. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 5ATR13800,

[5.a TR13800 - A Resolution of the city commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, approving theaward of RFP #22-06R - Digital Marketing Services, to Connectica, LLC and FMO Media for athree year term; for an estimated cost not to exceed $80,000 per year; authorizing theappropriate City officials to execute agreements with Connectica, LLC and FMO Media;further authorizing the City Manager to execute an option to renew after three years for atotal contract period not to exceed five years, including any additions or deletions of specificservices as may be required; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providingfor an effective date.]

CITY ATTORNEY, PLEASE READ THE TITLE FOR THE RECORD.

>> YES, MA'AM. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS RESOLUTION CITY COMMISSION AND SAVE COME BACK FLORIDA APPROVING THE WARD OF RFP NUMBER 2206R.

DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES TO CONNECTICA, LLC AND FMO MEDIA FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM FOR AN ESTIMATED COSTS NOT TO EXCEED $80,000 PER YEAR, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH CONNECTICA.

LLC AND FMO MEDIA FOR THEIR AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN OPTION TO RENEW AFTER THREE YEARS FOR TOTAL CONTRACT PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS, INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS, A SPECIFIC SERVICE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEPARABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I NEED A MOTION IN A SECOND.

>> MOTION MOVED.

>> SECOND.

>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOLTON, SECOND BY VICE MAYOR.

I WILL NOW OPEN THIS ITEM FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS.

IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO MAKE A COMMENT REGARDING THIS ITEM? SEEING NOBODY WISHES TO COMMENT ABOUT THIS ITEM, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE NOW CLOSED.

YOU NEED TO SEE A BAKER OR A SENIOR STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER IS AVAILABLE FOR A PRESENTATION.

>> GOOD MORNING, MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS.

SENIOR BAKER, THE CITY OF TAMARAC, SENIOR STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER.

TODAY ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, I STAND BEFORE YOU TO REQUEST APPROVAL TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BOTH CONNECTICA LLC AND FMO MEDIA.

GO BACK AND CHANGE THE SLIDE.

FOR ABOUT FOUR YEARS, THE CITY OF TAMARAC'S PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE HAS UTILIZED CONTRACTED DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES TO ENHANCE THE CITY'S EXTERNAL BRAND.

IN 2021, AN INCREASE IN DEMAND FOR DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES EMERGED, PROMPTING A NEED FOR A BROADER RANGE OF SERVICES AND THE INITIATION OF AN RFP IN LATE 2021.

AFTER 38 DAY ADVERTISEMENT PERIOD, SIX DIGITAL MARKETING RFPS WERE SUBMITTED THROUGH THE BIDS AND TENDER SYSTEM.

THE INITIAL SIX SUBMISSIONS WERE REVIEWED INTERNALLY BY AN EVALUATION COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF FIVE CITY OF TAMARAC EMPLOYEES REPRESENTING A RANGE OF DISCIPLINES, EACH OF WHOM HAS FREQUENT CONTACT AND ONGOING INTERACTION COLLABORATION WITH THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE.

TOGETHER, THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE SELECTED THE TOP FOUR OUT OF SIX SUBMISSIONS, AND EACH OF THOSE COMPANIES ACCEPTED INVITATIONS TO PRESENT THEIR PROPOSALS IN PERSON BEFORE THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE.

AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, NOT ONE BUT TWO FINALISTS WERE SELECTED BY THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE TO CAPITALIZE ON INDIVIDUAL STRENGTHS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY.

[00:40:03]

THE TWO FINALISTS WERE CONNECTICA LLC AND FMO MEDIA.

BACKGROUND ON CONNECTICA LLC.

CONNECTICA HAS PERFORMED THE CITY OF TAMARAC'S CONTRACT IS ON DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES SINCE 2018.

AN ALIGNMENT WITH TAMARAC'S PROCUREMENT CODE, CONNECTICA IS A TAMARAC BASED BUSINESS.

CONNECTICA HAS SIX FULL-TIME IN-HOUSE STAFF MEMBERS, CONTRACTOR FOR GRAPHIC DESIGN AND A WEB DESIGNER ALONG SUPPORT BY 25 FREELANCE CONTENT WRITERS.

CONNECTICA HAS A PROVEN TRACK RECORD FOR DELIVERING TIMELY, HIGH-QUALITY VIDEO CONTENT, ESPECIALLY AS IT RELATES TO OUR SPECIAL EVENTS, RECAP VIDEOS AND HIGHLIGHTS VIDEOS THAT WE DO EACH YEAR, ALONG WITH PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES, GRAPHIC DESIGN, ADA COMPLIANCE WORK, WEBSITE MONITORING, AND MORE WITH THE CITY OF TAMARAC PLUS THEY HAVE SECOND TO NONE CUSTOMER SERVICE.

SOME OF THE CONNECTICA ADMISSIBLE CLIENTS INCLUDE, AN ONGOING CONTRACT THAT THEY HOLD WITH THE CITY OF NORTH LAUDERDALE.

CONNECTICA, ALSO HAS DONE PAST PROJECTS WITH THE OLD PLANTATION WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, THE SOUTH BROWARD DRAINAGE DISTRICT, AND A NUMBER OF CLIENTS AND INDUSTRIES SUCH AS NON-PROFITS, HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES COMPANIES, LAW FIRMS, EDUCATION SENSORS, ETC.

I'D ALSO LIKE TO INTRODUCE FMO MEDIA, AND IN ALIGNMENT WITH TAMARAC'S PROCUREMENT CODE, FMO MEDIA LLC IS A QUALIFIED VETERAN OWNED BUSINESS.

FMO MEDIA IS ALSO IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO EXCLUDE CONVICTION HISTORY QUESTIONS FROM THEIR COMPANY'S PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENING PROCESS.

FMO MEDIA IS HEADQUARTERED IN NEW YORK WITH AN ACTIVE REGIONAL OFFICE IN NEARBY SUNRISE, FLORIDA THAT IS STAFFED BY EIGHT IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEES.

IN TOTAL, FMO MEDIA HAS 70 EMPLOYEES WITH A NUMBER OF DISCIPLINES PLACED THROUGHOUT THE NATION.

WHILE FMO MEDIA HAS PROVEN ABILITIES IN VIDEO PRODUCTION, PHOTOGRAPHY, GRAPHIC DESIGN, ETC, THEY STOOD OUT TO THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE FOR THEIR OUT-OF-THE-BOX APPROACH TO SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN STRATEGIES THAT WE BELIEVE CAN HELP TO REIMAGINE THEIR LOOK AND FEEL OF OUR EXISTING SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES BY INCORPORATING MORE TRENDY AND ENGAGING CONTENT, AND TO HELP ELEVATE OUR OVERALL SOCIAL MEDIA PRESENCE.

THIS SLIDE OUTLINES CONNECTICA SCOPE OF SERVICES, WHICH HAS A PRIMARY EMPHASIS ON VIDEO PRODUCTION, PHOTOGRAPHY, GRAPHIC DESIGN, ADA WORK, AND WEB REVIEW.

THE ITEMS MARKED WITH ASTERISKS INDICATES THAT THE SERVICE CAN BE PROVIDED BY BOTH VENDORS.

LIKEWISE, THE NEXT SLIDE IDENTIFIES FMO MEDIA'S SCOPE, WHICH INCLUDES WRITING AND CONTENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, SOCIAL MEDIA SUPPORT, AS WELL AS SEARCH ENGINE MARKETING AND OPTIMIZATION SUPPORT.

MOST RECENTLY, THE CITY'S CONTRACTED DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES WERE PAID BY WAY OF A MONTHLY RETAINER AND IF AWARDED THE TERMS OF THE NEW CONTRACTS WILL SHIFT TO PAYMENT PER SERVICE PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED BUDGETED AMOUNT OF $80,000 PER FISCAL YEAR COMBINED FOR BOTH COMPANIES.

ADDITIONALLY, THE TWO CONTRACTS WILL LAST FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW AFTER TWO NOT TO EXCEED A TOTAL OF FIVE.

THIS CONCLUDES THE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS ALSO HERE IS IAN GERADA FROM CONNECTICA LLC AND MELISSA MIDY FROM FMO MEDIA, IF YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THEM AS WELL.

>> EXCELLENT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

>> THANK YOU. CAN YOU TELL ME, HAVE WE EVER CONSIDERED BRINGING THIS IN-HOUSE? HIRING AN EXTRA PERSON AND BRING THIS SERVICE IN-HOUSE?

>> THAT PARTICULAR THING HAS NOT NECESSARILY BEEN DISCUSSED TO BRING IN-HOUSE, BUT WE DO HAVE, IN THE CURRENT PROPOSED BUDGET WE HAVE REQUESTED AN ADDITIONAL BODY TO BE ADDED TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE.

>> I SEEM TO RECALL TWO OR THREE YEARS AGO WE DID TALK ABOUT THIS AND WE DECIDED IT WASN'T A GOOD IDEA.

HAS IT BEEN CONSIDERED IN THE PAST YEAR OR TWO WOULD BE MY QUESTION.

>> WELL, IT IS BEING CONSIDERED RIGHT NOW, SO YES, WE ARE CONSIDERING ADDING AN ADDITIONAL BODY TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE AND THAT PERSON IS PROPOSED TO BE A WEB CONTENT MANAGER.

>> BEFORE YOU CONTINUE, IF I MAY, CITY MANAGER WANTS TO JUMP IN HERE. CITY MANAGER.

>> I JUST WANTED TO SHARE THAT THE BREADTH OF THE SERVICES THAT ARE PROVIDED BY THESE OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS ARE NOT NECESSARILY WHAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO HIRE IN ONE PERSON PER SE, AND THAT THE COST IS LESS THAN IF WE HAD TO PROVIDE BENEFITS AND PENSION AND ALL THOSE THINGS.

I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT. [NOISE]

[00:45:02]

>> CAN YOU TELL ME THIS $80,000, IS IT SPLIT EVENLY BETWEEN THE TWO COMPANIES?

>> IDEALLY, YES.

WE WOULD HOPE WE WERE SHOOTING TO DIVIDE THEM FUNDS EVENLY BETWEEN BOTH COMPANIES.

>> BUT NOT NECESSARILY, SO IF WE USE, LET'S SAY CONNECTICA AND THEY'VE USED $60,000 OF IT, THEN WE REALLY ARE LIMITING FMO MEDIA TO THE ADDITIONAL 20 AND THAT'S IT?

>> THAT'S CORRECT BECAUSE THE OBJECTIVE IS TO NOT EXCEED THE $80,000 ALL BUDGETED AMOUNT FOR THE COMBINED SERVICES OF BOTH COMPANIES.

>> BUT THAT DIDN'T REALLY ANSWER MY QUESTION.

WHAT I'M SAYING IS, IF ONE USES UP 80 PERCENT OF THE YEARLY DOLLAR AMOUNT, THAT ONLY LEAVES THE 20 PERCENT LEFT FOR THE SECOND FOR EITHER ONE, SECONDLY, WHAT HAPPENS IF THAT'S NOT ADEQUATE?

>> EUNICIA, I'LL START AND THEN MAYBE YOU CAN SHED SOME LIGHT.

WHILE BOTH COMPANIES CAN PROVIDE BOTH SERVICES, I THINK WE HAVE IN MIND DISTINCT TASKS FOR EACH BECAUSE THEY EXCEL IN DIFFERENT AREAS.

THE FMO MEDIA IS, I BELIEVE, EXPERT IN PROVIDING SOCIAL MEDIA PRESENCE, LOOKING AT YOUR WHOLE PLATFORM AND SUGGESTING WAYS TO IMPROVE THAT AND CONNECTICA PROVIDES US VERY IMPORTANT ADA COMPLIANCE REVIEW SO THAT OUR WEBSITE IS IN COMPLIANCE.

THEY'RE THE LOCAL PEOPLE THAT ALWAYS COME TO OUR EVENTS AND TAKE THE VIDEOS AND PICTURES AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

SO I THINK WE HAD IN MIND DISTINCTIVE TASKS FOR EACH.

EUNICIA, YOU CAN ADD TO THAT OR CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.

>> NO, YOU ARE CORRECT.

THE PRICING FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SERVICE, WE'RE PAYING THEM PER SERVICE RENDERED.

THE PRICING IS BROKEN DOWN AND IDEALLY, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO DIVIDE THAT $80,000 BUDGETED AMOUNT BETWEEN BOTH COMPANIES.

BUT YES, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT ONE MAY GET MORE THAN THE OTHER.

BUT WE'RE STRIVING TO BE AS EQUITABLE AS POSSIBLE.

>> DO YOU HAVE THAT LIST AVAILABLE OF PROJECTS YOU SEE BOTH COMPANIES DOING AND WHAT THE DOLLAR AMOUNT?

>> WE HAVE THE SCOPE OF SERVICE AVAILABLE AND IT'S ON THE BACK OF EACH CONTRACT FOR EACH SERVICE PROVIDER.

IT'S BROKEN DOWN PER SERVICE RENDERED AND IT'S ALSO ALONG WITH THE PRICING.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. VICE MAYOR.

>> GOOD MORNING. QUESTION FOR THE PROCUREMENT DIRECTOR.

>> MR. BLACKS.

>> GOOD MORNING, KEITH. GLAD YOU'RE REACHING THE CONTRACTS MANAGER.

>> THANKS. CONGRATULATIONS TO FMO MEDIA AND CONNECTICA.

IT'S GOOD TO SEE A VETERAN OWNED BUSINESS EARNING A CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF TAMARAC.

I BELIEVE BASED ON OUR INTERNAL DATA, WE SPEND LESS THAN HALF OF ONE PERCENT ON TAMARAC LOCAL BUSINESSES AND LESS THAN HALF OF ONE PERCENT ON VETERAN OWNED BUSINESSES.

BUT WHAT CONCERNS ME AS SOMEONE WHO DOES BID ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS AND HAS WON MY FAIR SHARE AND LOST MY FAIR SHARE, THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT POINT DIFFERENTIAL.

FMO MEDIA WAS RANKED NUMBER 1 WITH 393.5 AND CONNECTICA WITH 342.

IN ALL MY TIME SUBMITTING BIDS ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS AND EVEN IN MY TIME HERE IN TAMARAC, I'VE NEVER SEEN A FIRM RANK NUMBER 2 WIN A CONTRACT.

SO HOW DID THE SELECTION COMMITTEE COME TO THAT CONCLUSION?

>> THE SELECTION COMMITTEE DETERMINED THAT THE TWO FIRMS PROVIDED SUCH UNIQUE CAPABILITIES AND THEY FELT THAT THEY WERE VERY STRONG IN THESE AREAS AND THEY FELT THAT IT'D BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY TO HAVE A PRIMARY AND SECONDARY, IN THIS CASE, TWO PRIMARY CONTRACTORS TO PERFORM THE DIFFERENT SKILL SETS THAT WERE REQUIRED FOR THIS PARTICULAR FUNCTION.

IT'S A FAIRLY COMPLEX FUNCTION IN TERMS OF WHO HAS THE TALENT TO PERFORM, WE DETERMINED THAT CONNECTICA HAS A VERY, VERY STRONG TALENTS TO PERFORM MANY OF THE ITEMS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE TASKED WITH AND THEN FMO SHOWED SOME GREAT TALENT TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC AREAS THAT THE COMMITTEE FELT THEY WOULD.

>> WHAT WAS THE VALUE OF THE ANNUAL CONTRACT WITH THE LAST VENDOR?

[00:50:05]

>> WITH CONNECTICA? IT WAS UNDER 65,000. FIFTY THOUSAND.

>> QUESTION FOR CONNECTICA FOLLOWED BY FMO.

>> HI.

>> GOOD MORNING. STATE FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

>> IAN GERADA FROM CONNECTICA.

>> ACTUALLY, I THINK WE NEED YOUR MIC ON.

>> HELLO.

>> THERE YOU GO.

>> SOME OF THE SERVICES THAT WERE DESCRIBED THAT'S BEING CARVED OUT TO FMO, YOUR FIRM DOES PROVIDE THOSE SERVICES, CORRECT?

>> THAT IS CORRECT.

>> SOCIAL MEDIA?

>> CORRECT.

>> OKAY. HAVE YOU BEEN TASKED WITH MANAGING SOCIAL MEDIA FOR THE CITY IN THE PAST?

>> YES WE HAVE FOR THE LAST FOUR COUPLE OF YEARS.

>> FINE. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> ONE MORE QUESTION. ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THIS PORTION OF THE CONTRACT THAT YOU'RE GETTING?

>> FIFTY PERCENT, I'LL BE HONEST WITH YOU.

FINANCIALLY, I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE TOUGH.

>> RIGHT.

>> YOU'VE ESSENTIALLY TAKEN A SERVICE AND CUT IT IN HALF IF YOU'RE GOING TO GO EQUITABLY.

WE STRUGGLED UNDER 65, SO UNDERSTAND THE STRAIN I FORESEE.

THAT'S MY OPINION.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> GOOD MORNING.

>> GOOD MORNING. I LOOKED AT BOTH PROPOSALS.

IS YOUR FIRM CAPABLE OF HANDLING THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF SERVICES OF THE RFP?

>> WE ARE.

>> ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH YOUR PORTION OR A PIECE OF THE CONTRACT?

>> WE ARE.

>> DO YOU HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOUR POTENTIAL REVENUE WILL BE?

>> YES.

>> WHAT WILL IT BE?

>> FORTY THOUSAND.

>> WE'RE PAYING YOU $40,000 TO ESSENTIALLY MANAGE SOCIAL MEDIA?

>> YES.

>> OKAY. WHAT ELSE WILL YOU BE HANDLING? IS IT ONLY SOCIAL MEDIA?

>> IT WILL BE MAINLY SOCIAL MEDIA.

WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANYTHING ELSE AND WE PLAY NICE, SO TO SPEAK.

WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO PROVIDE ANY OTHER SERVICES THAT ARE NEEDED SINCE WE ARE CAPABLE, THE OVERLAPPING SERVICES, VIDEO, GRAPHIC DESIGN, ETC.

>> YOU WON'T BE HANDLING PRESS RELEASES?

>> WE CAN HANDLE PRESS RELEASES.

THAT WAS ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WAS DISCUSSED.

>> EUNICIA, WILL THEY BE HANDLING PRESS RELEASES FOR THE CITY?

>> LIKE SHE SAID, IT WAS ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WAS DISCUSSED, BUT THAT'S STILL SOMETHING THAT THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE STAFF WILL BE TAKING CARE OF PRIMARILY.

THEIR FOCUS WOULD BE ON ADVISING US THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA AND AS SHE MENTIONED, SOME OF THE OVERLAPPING DUTIES.

THAT COULD ALSO INCLUDE VIDEO PRODUCTION, CONTENT WRITING, AND THINGS LIKE THAT TO ENHANCE OUR ONLINE PRESENCE.

BUT WE WOULD STILL PRIMARILY BE TAKING THE LEAD IN THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE WITH MEDIA RELATIONS.

>> HOW DO YOU RANK OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PRESENCE OR PROFILE?

>> ON A 1-10?

>> YOU CAN INCLUDE ZERO IF THAT'S IN THERE.

>> I WOULD SAY FOUR.

>> FOR EUNICIA, IN 2021 YOU SAID INCREASE IN DEMAND FOR DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES EMERGED PROMPTING A NEED FOR A BROADER RANGE OF SERVICES AND THE INITIATION OF AN RFP.

WHAT IS THE INCREASE OF DEMAND FOR DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES? CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT?

>> IN 2021, SOME OF THE INCREASED DEMAND, IT CAME FROM STAFF.

IT CAME FROM INCREASED NEEDS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE IN WANTING TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE PUBLIC IN WAYS THAT WE HADN'T DONE BEFORE AND WE ALSO ASSISTED WITH COMMISSION ACTIVITIES IN 2021 AS WELL.

>> CAN YOU GIVE SOME EXAMPLES OF STAFF NEEDS AND YOUR NEEDS?

>> EXAMPLES OF THINGS THAT WE NEED ADDITIONAL SUPPORT IN?

>> WITH THE DEMAND FOR DIGITAL SERVICES.

WHAT ARE EXAMPLES OF THOSE DEMANDS OF DIGITAL SERVICES?

>> WE INCREASED OUR NUMBER OF IN-HOUSE, INTERNALLY PRODUCED VIDEO PSAS.

WE DID EDUCATIONAL VIDEOS THAT RANGE FROM PUBLIC SAFETY.

WE DID SOME FOCUSED ON BUDGET.

WE STARTED SOME ALSO WITH THE PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

WE WERE CIRCULATING THOSE ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

WE'VE GONE OUT TO MORE EVENTS.

WE'VE BEEN DOING IN-HOUSE PHOTOGRAPHY MORE FREQUENTLY TO ENHANCE THE LOOK OF OUR SOCIAL MEDIA, TO ENHANCE OUR OUTPUTS WITH THE TOMOGRAM.

IN THE PAST, WE HAD NOT BEEN DOING A LOT OF MEDIA ENGAGEMENT IN TERMS OF COMMUNICATING WITH THE MEDIA THROUGH PRESS RELEASES AND MEDIA RELEASES, ETC.

WE'VE BEEN DOING THAT MORE.

WE'VE BEEN UTILIZING PROBABLY MORE SO LAST YEAR THAN THIS YEAR, BUT WE HAVE BEEN UTILIZING OUR EBLAST SYSTEM MORE FREQUENTLY.

ALSO, MORE SO ON THE CITY SIDE, WE'VE BEEN DOING A LOT MORE PROMOTIONS OF PAID ADVERTISING FOR EVENTS WHICH REQUIRES US TO

[00:55:01]

A TIMES DO GRAPHIC DESIGN IN-HOUSE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN CONTENT TO SUPPORT THOSE THINGS AS WELL WHEN WE SUBMIT THEM, SCRIPT WRITING, VOICE-OVER WORK, ETC.

>> OKAY.

FOR FMO, I GUESS YOU'VE DONE A STUDY, YOU'VE MEASURED THE ENGAGEMENT AND ALL THE METRICS YOU TYPICALLY MEASURE HOW YOU FORESEE OR WHAT IS THE MEASURE OF IMPROVEMENT YOU WILL SEE AFTER WE ENGAGE WITH YOU AFTER SAY FOR EXAMPLE, ONE YEAR?

>> I'M PRETTY CONFIDENT WE CAN GO FROM A 4 TO A 10.

BUT KNOWING JUST THE ENGAGEMENT ON, FOR EXAMPLE, THE INSTAGRAM, THE FACEBOOK, THERE'S BARELY A PRESENCE ON TIKTOK RIGHT NOW, LINKEDIN, ALL OF THOSE DIFFERENT THINGS, I FORESEE THE ACTUAL ENGAGEMENT MORE THAN 100 PERCENT KNOWING WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE DO IT.

>> THEN WHAT ARE THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF YOUR STAFF IN SUNRISE? I DIDN'T SEE MUCH DIVERSITY IN THE PRESENTATION OF YOUR TEAM IN NEW YORK.

>> OH, REALLY. NOW WE HAVE A HUGE DIVERSITY, OVERALL.

DEMOGRAPHICS IN TERMS OF MALE, FEMALE, RACES, ETC.

>> EVERYTHING.

>> WE HAVE OUT OF EIGHT PEOPLE, I WOULD SAY THREE OR FOUR OF THEM ARE HISPANIC, TWO OF THEM ARE BLACK, AND THE REST ARE WHITE OR MIXED, ETC.

I THINK IT'S TWO FEMALE PLUS ME, AND THE REST ARE MALES.

>> QUESTION FOR PROCUREMENT IN OR UNISIA.

I TRY TO DO THE LINE-BY-LINE COMPARISON ON THE TWO CONTRACTS.

PAGE 24 OF CONNECTICA AND PAGE 37 OF A SCHEDULE OF SERVICES FOR FMO MEDIA. IT DOESN'T MATCH UP.

FOR EXAMPLE, LINE ITEM NUMBER 4 IS GRAPHIC DESIGN FOR CONNECTICA, AND LINE ITEM NUMBER 4 FOR FMO WAS CONTENT DEVELOPMENT, SOCIAL MEDIA.

I'M TRYING TO DO MY OWN LINE-BY-LINE COMPARISON.

THE ITEMS DON'T MATCH UP.

LINE ITEM 5 IS CONTENT DEVELOPMENT FOR FMO.

IT'S PHOTOGRAPHY FOR CONNECTICA.

LINE ITEM 6 IS PHOTO EDITING, NUMBER 6 FOR FMO IS COPY EDITING.

HOW WERE YOU ABLE TO DO A FAIR COMPARISON WHEN THESE ITEMS DON'T EVEN LINE UP?

>> SOME OF THE ITEMS WERE AWARDED TO ONE CONTRACTOR AND NOT THE OTHER.

BOTH CONTRACTORS ARE NOT DOING ALL THAT.

THEY DO HAVE SOME OVERLAPPING ONES.

THERE WAS THE SLIDE THAT I SHOWED, THEY HAD THE ASTERISK NEXT TO THEM.

IT SHOWS THE ONES THAT WERE FOR BOTH AND THEN IT SHOWED THE ONES THAT WILL BE FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTOR.

>> WOULDN'T HAVE MADE SENSE TO JUST HAVE TWO SEPARATE RFPS FOR THE DISTINCT SERVICES THAT EACH FIRM PROVIDES?

>> VICE MAYOR, WE WERE LOOKING AT AN OVERALL APPROACH.

WE DID IT TO MAKE A DECISION ON WHAT WE WOULD AWARD TO ANY ONE VENDOR AT ALL.

WE HAD TO PUT THE WHOLE THING OUT THERE SO WE COULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE INDIVIDUAL PROPOSALS AND THEN BE ABLE TO SIPHON IT DOWN FROM THERE.

THAT'S ONE OF THE ADVANTAGES OF THE RFP PROCESS, IS IT DOES ALLOW PROPOSERS TO COME UP WITH THEIR OWN IMAGINATIVE RESPONSES.

WE FELT THAT WE WANTED TO ALL BE UNDER ONE VEHICLE OF ONE RFP SO THAT DECISIONS COULD BE MADE BASED ON WHAT WE ACTUALLY RECEIVED FROM THE VARIOUS PROPOSALS.

>> FMO DO YOU WORK WITH ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES?

>> NOT IN FLORIDA, NO.

>> OUTSIDE OF FLORIDA?

>> IN NEW YORK, WE DO, AND IN WILMINGTON.

>> WHAT TYPE OF SERVICES DO YOU PROVIDE?

>> SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT.

>> WHAT IS THE REVENUE RECEIVED FOR THOSE SERVICES?

>> I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION WITH ME.

>> THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU GUYS BAN THE BOX IN YOUR POLICIES.

BUT I DO AGREE WITH EM OF CONNECTICA, I DON'T BELIEVE THE BUDGET IS ENOUGH TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE SOCIAL MEDIA AND DIGITAL DEMANDS OF THE CITY. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. I WENT THROUGH THE CONTRACTS AND THE BACKUP INFORMATION AND I GOT THE FEELING THAT THIS IS A FORCED MARRIAGE, SO TO SPEAK.

IT WASN'T VERY COHESIVE, THINGS THAT MARY [INAUDIBLE] AND IT MADE ME A LITTLE BIT UNCOMFORTABLE.

[01:00:06]

IF THIS PASSES, I WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO BOTH VENDORS.

IF IT DOESN'T, I WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO BOTH VENDORS.

I'M INCLINED TO VOTE NO, BECAUSE I WANT IT TO PROBABLY GO TO A WORKSHOP TO TALK ABOUT IT SOME MORE.

IF MY COLLEAGUES WOULD BE AMENABLE TO THAT, THAT WILL BE GREAT.

IF NOT, IT'S FINE.

UNISIA TELL ME SOME EXAMPLES OF THE SKILL SETS YOU PROPOSED TO BRING TO THE CITY WHEN YOU INTERVIEWED WITH US?

>> ARE YOU REFERRING TO MY PERSONAL SKILL SETS?

>> YES.

>> I HAVE A BACKGROUND IN MEDIA RELATIONS.

I HAVE A BACKGROUND IN CONTENT WRITING.

IN THE PAST, I'VE MANAGED SOCIAL MEDIA.

>> POINT OF ORDER.

>> I'M SORRY.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, IS THIS AN HR QUESTION? WE DON'T INTERVIEW ANYBODY ELSE EXCEPT THE CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER.

NOW THE PIL IS BEING QUESTIONED AS TO WHAT SHE DOES AND HOW SHE DOES IT AND WHAT SHE APPLIED FOR.

CAN YOU PLEASE CLARIFY THAT?

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> I UNDERSTAND THE COMMISSIONER BOLTON'S QUESTION IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE CONTRACTS THAT ARE BEING UNDER DISCUSSION.

>> NO, IT'S NOT ABOUT UNDERSTANDING COMMISSIONER BOLTON'S QUESTION, MY QUESTION IS WE DO NOT DIRECT OR ORDER OR HIRE OR ANYTHING WITH OTHER THAN YOU OR THE CITY MANAGER.

IT'S COMMISSIONER BOLTON'S QUESTIONING AND EXCUSE ME, IF I SOUND LIKE I'M RUNNING OUT OF BREATH, BUT WITH COVID, IT'S A LITTLE DIFFICULT TO TALK.

THIS IS THE MOST I'VE SPOKEN WITHIN THE PAST WEEK.

MY QUESTION IS, WE DO NOT DIRECT, QUESTION, HIRE STAFF OTHER THAN CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY.

COMMISSIONER BOLTON NOW IS NOW QUESTIONING PIL OFFICERS UNISIA AS TO WHAT SHE DOES AND WHAT SHE WAS HIRED FOR.

IS THAT OUR RESPONSIBILITY AND SHOULD THIS BE QUESTIONED AT THIS MOMENT CONSIDERING WE DO NOT HIRE, DIRECT OR OTHERWISE, ANYONE FROM STAFF?

>> I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER BOLTON'S QUESTIONS ARE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE ITEM BEFORE YOU AND THEY'RE NOT OUT OF ORDER.

>> SO THAT'S NOT A HR ISSUE?

>> I DON'T THINK THAT THIS IS AN HR ISSUE AT ALL.

>> CITY ATTORNEY, I THINK WHERE COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS IS GOING, IT'S BEING ASKED FOR HER RESUME.

AS ASKING FOR HER RESUME, THAT FALLS INTO AN HR ISSUE IS WHAT I THINK THE CONCERN IS.

ASKING FOR EXPERIENCE AND WHAT HER KNOWLEDGE IS IS DIFFERENT.

I THINK IT'S A REPHRASE OF THE QUESTION.

>> AGAIN, I DON'T THINK THAT THE QUESTIONING IS IN THE CONTEXT OF TRYING TO DETERMINE WHAT STAFF IS DOING IN HOUSE VERSUS HIRING [OVERLAPPING].

>> THAT IS NOT HIS QUESTION THOUGH.

>> THAT WAS NOT WHAT THE QUESTION THAT COMMISSIONER BOLTON WAS ASKING CITY ATTORNEY.

>> I BELIEVE IT'S AN APPROPRIATE QUESTION.

>> CAN WE GET HR DIRECTOR TO CLARIFY THAT?

>> OH, COME ON.

>> NO, COMMISSIONER PLACKO IS JUST RIDICULOUS.

WE'RE QUESTIONING OUR OWN STAFF MEMBERS.

>> [OVERLAPPING] WELL, THERE'S A POINT OF ORDER ON THE FLOOR FOR CLARIFICATION AND ONE OF OUR CITY EMPLOYEES IS POTENTIALLY BEING QUESTIONED.

SHE'S BEING QUESTIONED IN A MANNER THAT MIGHT BE A HR ITEM.

OUR HR DIRECTOR IS AWAY FROM THE PODIUM AT THIS TIME.

COMMISSIONER BOLTON, I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO PLEASE REPHRASE YOUR QUESTION IN A MATTER THAT IS NOT ASKING FOR HER RESUME AND HOW SHE GOT HIRED.

CAN YOU PLEASE DO THAT?

>> UNISIA YOU WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF ANSWERING MY QUESTION.

TELL ME HOW YOUR EXPERIENCE AND THE EXAMPLES OF YOUR SKILL SETS LINEUP WITH THE SKILL SETS OF THE VENDORS THAT ARE BEFORE US TODAY.

>> MAYOR, POINT OF ORDER.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON DOES NOT REPHRASE HIS QUESTION [OVERLAPPING].

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, YOUR OBJECTION IS DEFINITELY NOTED.

WE DO NOW HAVE THE HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR ON THE LINE, MR. LORENZO.

[01:05:01]

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON IS QUESTIONING EUNICIA'S ROW AS TO WHAT SHE WAS HIRED FOR, AS TO WHAT SHE'S DOING NOW.

IS THAT APPROPRIATE CONSIDERING THAT WE DO NOT HIRE OR FIRE, OR OTHERWISE ANYONE ELSE EXCEPT THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY.

SHOULD THIS BE A QUESTION COMING FROM THE CITY MANAGER TO EUNICIA, TO MAKE SURE THAT SHE'S PERFORMING, UNDERPERFORMING, LACK OF PERFORMANCE, LACK OF MORE STAFF.

IS THIS QUESTION APPROPRIATE? BECAUSE I DO NOT BELIEVE IT IS, AND CITY ATTORNEY SAYS OTHERWISE, I'M GOING TO LEAVE IT TO YOU TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION, BUT I DO NOT BELIEVE SO.

>> GOOD MORNING, MAYOR, VICE-MAYOR, AND COMMISSION LERENZO CALHOUN, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES FOR THE RECORD.

IN TERMS OF THE ADVICE YOU'VE RECEIVED FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY, I'M INCLINED NOT TO DISAGREE WITH HIM, THAT THE QUESTION IS IN THE PURVIEW.

I DO UNDERSTAND THE PERSPECTIVE THAT THE MAYOR OFFERED IN TERMS OF REPHRASING THE QUESTION TO CAPTURE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE POSITION THAT THE SENIOR STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER IS CURRENTLY PERFORMING IN.

>> FOR A LACK OF CRYSTAL CLEAR ANSWER BECAUSE WE HAVE LAWYERS WHO ARE RESPONDING, I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO ANSWER THE QUESTION THE BEST WAY YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION ON WHAT YOUR JOB IS, AS BEST AS YOU WISH TO ANSWER IT.

YOU ARE NOT ON TRIAL HERE.

THE WHOLE TOPIC HERE IS WHETHER OR NOT THE ITEMS IN QUESTION FOR A CONTRACT [NOISE] ARE SUFFICIENT TO ASSIST THE CITY MPIO TO DO THE JOB THAT IT NEEDS TO DO.

THAT'S WHERE YOUR ANSWERS LIE.

>> TO ANSWER THE COMMISSIONER'S QUESTION.

SOME OF THE DUTIES THAT ARE OUTLINED IN THE DIGITAL MARKETING RFP, THEY DO ALIGN WITH MY OWN SKILL SET THAT I ARRIVED HERE AT THE CITY OF TAMARAC WITH.

I CAN JUST READ DOWN THE LIST.

CONTENT WRITING IS SOMETHING THAT I HAVE A STRONG BACKGROUND IN.

I HAVE A BACKGROUND IN MEDIA RELATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS, AND PR.

I HAVE A BACKGROUND IN EVENT PLANNING.

I HAVE DONE SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT IN THE PAST AS WELL.

I THINK THAT THERE ARE VARIOUS SUBCATEGORIES OF THOSE THINGS, BUT I BELIEVE THAT THAT PRETTY MUCH ANSWERS THE QUESTION.

ALSO I HAVE A BACKGROUND IN CRISIS COMMUNICATION THAT I'VE DONE FOR MY YEARS OF WORKING AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER AS WELL.

>> THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM FMO MEDIA STATED THAT SHE BELIEVES THAT OUR SOCIAL MEDIA IS AT A 4 OUT OF 10.

HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THAT?

>> WELL ONE OF THE SERVICES THAT WE'RE SEEKING TO BRING ON FMO MEDIA TO ADDRESS IS OUR SOCIAL MEDIA.

WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES ARE MODERN.

THAT WE ARE POSTING CONTENT THAT ALIGNS WITH THE PRESENT-DAY TRENDS.

FOR EXAMPLE, BEING ABLE TO FIND FUN WAYS TO PUT OUT REELS ON INSTAGRAM.

THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WE'RE CURRENTLY DOING.

WE'D LIKE TO TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH A CONTRACTOR WHO CAN ADVISE US THROUGH THOSE STRATEGIES BASED ON THEIR EXPERIENCES TO HELP LIVEN UP OUR CONTENT, AND TO STRENGTHEN THE CONTENT THAT'S BEING PROVIDED ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS, BECAUSE THAT IS ONE OF OUR MAJOR EXTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS PLATFORMS HERE IN THE CITY.

>> SINCE YOU HAVE A BACKGROUND IN SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT, YOU ARE SAYING THAT FMO MEDIA WOULD DO A BETTER WORK THAN YOU DO, OR THEY WOULD COMPLIMENT YOUR WORK?

>> THEY WOULD COMPLIMENT MY WORK.

THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE WILL STILL REMAIN ACTIVE.

BUT HIRING OR BRINGING ON DIGITAL CONTRACTING VENDORS, IT WILL HELP US TO FURTHER THE REACH OF OUR WORK, TO BE ABLE TO HELP US TO DO THINGS MORE FREQUENTLY, TO JUST KEEP THINGS MOVING ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

THE CURRENT CONTENT THAT YOU SEE ON SOCIAL MEDIA TO DO EVENT PROMOTIONS, ETC, EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, YOU'LL STILL BE SEEING THOSE THINGS ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS, BUT WE WANT TO REIMAGINE IT.

WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO TAP INTO THEM AS A RESOURCE TO HELP US TO REIMAGINE THINGS, AND TO STRENGTHEN THINGS, SO THEY CAN FURTHER OUR REACH BEYOND WHAT WE CAN DO AS A THREE-PERSON TEAM.

THAT'S WHAT WE'RE INTERESTED IN THEM FOR.

>> THEN YOU'RE SAYING CONNECT-A-CAR, FMO MEDIA, AND YOUR DEPARTMENT WOULD WORK IN TANDEM TO MAKE THE PRESENCE ON SOCIAL MEDIA MORE ACCEPTABLE, MOVING FROM BEFORE, PERHAPS TO A HIGHER GRADE, AT LEAST IN THE OPINION OF FMO MEDIA, AND THAT WOULD FREE UP MORE TIME IN YOUR OFFICE TO DO OTHER THINGS?

>> HOPEFULLY IT COULD FREE UP TIME IN OUR OFFICE TO DO OTHER THINGS. [OVERLAPPING]

[01:10:03]

>> RECLAIMING MY TIME. GO AHEAD.

>> HOPEFULLY IT WILL BE ABLE TO HELP US TO FREE UP TIME TO DO OTHER THINGS IN THE OFFICE AS WELL.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR FMO.

>> YES.

>> YOU SAID THAT THE CITY'S SOCIAL MEDIA, YOU WOULD RATE IT AS A 4, PLEASE ELABORATE JUST SOME MORE ON WHY YOU GAVE THAT RATING, AND THEN I'LL HAVE A FOLLOW-UP QUESTION THEREAFTER.

>> SURE. I SEE IT AS A 4 BASED ON WHAT I BELIEVE WE COULD DO WITH IT.

THERE ARE PLENTY OF EVENTS AND PLENTY OF THINGS THAT ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE THAT I SEE ONE OR TWO LIKES FOR, WHICH MEANS MAYBE 10 PERCENT MORE PEOPLE SAW IT, AND I KNOW THAT THERE'S MORE THAN ONE OR TWO CITIZENS IN THE CITY OF TAMARAC.

>> YOU SAID THAT IT WOULD BE EASY TO ACHIEVE A HIGHER ENGAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

IS THAT BECAUSE OUR ENGAGEMENT IS LAGGING? IF WE HAVE TWO LIKES ON A POST, YOU'RE SAYING THAT THEN INCREASING ENGAGEMENT 100 PERCENT WOULD BE FOUR LIKES?

>> EXACTLY. IT'S GOING TO BE PRETTY EASY TO ACHIEVE IN THAT TERM.

FOUR LIKES IS NOT THE GOAL, BUT THAT'S JUST ONE VERY SMALL EXAMPLE.

IT'S AN OVERALL STRATEGY AS WELL, SO IT'S NOT JUST THE LIKES, IT'S THE REACH.

THERE ARE THINGS YOU CAN DO TO TRACK WHO IS COMING TO EVENTS BASED ON WHAT THEY SAW ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

>> THEN YOU ARE SEEING THAT THE BAR IS SET SO LOW THAT YOU COULD FAR EXCEED IT EVEN WITH LITTLE EFFORT?

>> THAT'S NOT EXACTLY WHAT I MEAN.

I THINK THAT IN ORDER TO HAVE A STRONG SOCIAL MEDIA PRESENCE, THERE ARE JUST SO MANY THINGS GOING ON, SO MANY EVENTS, SO MANY RESOURCES TO LET PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THAT IT'S DEFINITELY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JUST ONE PERSON TO DO THAT.

ARE THINGS GOING OUT? YES, BUT IF WE HAVE A STRATEGY THAT FOCUSES ON CERTAIN CAMPAIGNS, THEN THAT CAN BE REACHED WAY HIRE, 100 PERCENT.

>> FOR INSTANCE, THEN A EVENT, LIKE A JUNETEENTH EVENT, THAT WAS UNDER-ATTENDED, YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU COULD USE SOCIAL MEDIA TO ALERT OUR RESIDENTS THAT THE EVENT IS HAPPENING, IS NOT NECESSARILY THAT THE RESIDENTS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN ATTENDING, THEY JUST DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT?

>> RIGHT.

>> QUESTION FOR CONNECT-A-CAR.

>> THANK YOU.

WE SEE EVENTS LIKE THE STATE OF THE CITY HAVING VARIOUS EQUIPMENT THAT ARE BROUGHT IN LIKE TELEPROMPTERS AND FANCY LIGHTS AND SO ON.

WOULD THIS BE INCLUDED IN THE MONEY THAT YOU'D BE GETTING OR IF YOU'RE PROVIDING THAT SERVICE, YOU WOULD HAVE TO RENT THAT TYPE OF EQUIPMENT SO THERE WILL BE ACCELERATE COSTS AS WELL?

>> WE HAVE THAT EQUIPMENT ALREADY.

ALL EQUIPMENT YOU'VE SEEN IN THE PAST IS OURS.

>> OKAY. SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT FOR $40,000 A YEAR, YOU'D PROVIDE ALL THE SERVICES THAT YOU ARE PLUS YOU WOULD PROVIDE ALL THE EQUIPMENT THAT COMES WITH IT?

>> YEAH, IN ORDER TO DO OUR JOBS, WE HAVE OUR OWN EQUIPMENT, CORRECT.

>> DO YOU THINK THAT $40,000 IS SUFFICIENT FOR THAT AND YOU'D BE COMFORTABLE.

>> NO.

>> AND CONTENT?

>> I DON'T. IT'S NOT BASED ON THE EQUIPMENT OR ANY OF THAT THING, WHAT IT'S BASED ON IS THE REGULARITY OF WHAT IS NEEDED.

FOR EXAMPLE, YOU MAY WANT TO HAVE A VIDEO PRODUCTION FOR YOURSELF OR COMMISSIONER PLACKO, OR EVEN VICE MAYOR GELIN. WHAT HAPPENS IS.

>> CAN YOU JUST SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE.

>> THERE'S A COST TO EACH EVENT AND IF I LOOK AT THE PAST IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF VIDEO PRODUCTION THAT WE WERE ASKED TO DO, WE WERE HITTING 65,000 PRETTY MUCH EVERY YEAR.

I KNOW THAT IT WAS A LOT OF FRUSTRATION WITH VICE MAYOR GELIN WHO WANTED TO GET OUT AND REACH MORE PEOPLE BY DOING SOCIAL MEDIA-TYPE VIDEOS, THAT KIND OF THING, AND THERE JUST WASN'T THE BUDGET FOR IT.

TO LOOK AT IT FROM A HOLISTIC POINT OF VIEW, THAT'S WHAT I MEANT BY, YEAH, I THINK THE BUDGET IS TOO LOW.

>> WOULD YOU HAVE PREFERRED THAT THIS ARRANGEMENT WAS TWO SEPARATE AGREEMENTS,

[01:15:08]

ONE WHERE FMO IS ABLE TO HIT THEIR TARGET AND YOU'RE ABLE TO HIT YOURS?

>> WELL, CERTAINLY THAT WOULD MAKE THINGS BETTER.

HOWEVER, THE ISSUE IS DEEPER THAN THAT.

WHEN YOU LOOK AT RATING A SOCIAL MEDIA FOOTPRINT, A DIGITAL FOOTPRINT, PERSONALLY, YOU WOULD NEVER GET A RATING FROM ME BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY, YOU'VE GOT TO LOOK AT THE UNDERLYING FACTORS AS TO WHY IT IS SO LOW.

IT'S NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE OF ANY KIND OF THING THAT WE'VE BEEN PUTTING OUT BUT THE WAY IN WHICH IT GETS HANDLED.

FOR EXAMPLE, WE ALL KNOW TODAY THAT THE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IS A PAY-TO-PLAY ENVIRONMENT AND UNLESS YOU ACTUALLY PAY TO GET YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS, ETC, ACTUALLY GROWN, YOUR ENGAGEMENT IS GOING TO REMAIN LOW.

THAT TO ME IS SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED FIRST RATHER THAN JUST GIVING AN OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING.

WE, FOR EXAMPLE, NEVER POSTED ONE SOCIAL MEDIA POST IN ALL THE YEARS WE'VE BEEN DOING YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA FOR YOU.

ALL WE DO IS WE PASS IT ON AND THEN THAT GETS PUT UP BECAUSE WE'RE NOT CITY EMPLOYEES.

I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION, COMMISSIONER?

>> YEAH, IT DID. EUNICIA?

>> YES.

>> DO YOU PAY FOR PRESS RELEASES AND HOW MUCH DO WE PAY FOR THAT SERVICE?

>> WE DO NOT PAY FOR PRESS RELEASES AS OF LATE.

>> HAVE WE PAID FOR PRESS RELEASES IN THE PAST?

>> WE'VE PAID FOR PRESS RELEASES IN THE PAST BUT ONLY AT THE REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION FOR INDIVIDUAL RELEASES BUT WE ARE NOT IN THE PRACTICE OF PAYING FOR PRESS RELEASES.

>> SO YOU'VE NEVER PAID FOR NEWSWIRE?

>> EXCUSE ME, IT MAY HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN THE COMMISSION MEMBER WHO REQUESTED THEM PAYING FOR THEM NOT THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, NO.

WE HAVE A PRESS RELEASE DISTRIBUTION LISTS THAT WE HAVE CREATED ORGANICALLY AND INTERNALLY AND THAT IS WHAT WE USE TO DISTRIBUTE PRESS RELEASES BUT IT IS NOT OUR COMMON PRACTICE TO PAY FOR PRESS RELEASES TO GO OUT.

>> HOW SUCCESSFUL HAVE YOU BEEN WITH YOUR ORGANIC LIST?

>> SOMETIMES I THINK THAT MOST FREQUENTLY, WE FIND OURSELVES ON CALENDAR ENTRIES FOR OUR VARIOUS MEDIA PLATFORMS AND WHEN WE GET ACTUAL STORIES OR ARTICLES AND THAT COVERAGE, IT'S USUALLY WHEN THINGS THAT ARE UNIQUE SOLELY TO TAMARAC COME OUT.

FOR A SAMPLE, WE GOT COVERAGE FOR THE INSPIRATION WAY, WE GOT COVERAGE FOR THE TURKEY TROT AND I BELIEVE THERE WAS ALSO COVERAGE WHEN WE DID THE GRAND OPENING OR THE RIBBON CUTTING OF COLONY WEST, SO THE GRAND RE-OPENING OF COLONY WEST.

THINGS THAT ARE UNIQUE TO TAMARAC, THEY HAVE GOTTEN SOME ATTENTION BUT WE END UP ON THE CALENDAR LISTINGS SO WHEN THEY HAVE ONLINE STORIES ABOUT THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING AROUND TOWN THAT YOU'LL FIND OUR STUFF, OUR CONTENT LISTED, AMONG THOSE THINGS AS WELL.

>> I RESERVE MY NINE SECONDS FOR COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, MAYBE HE HAS SOMETHING PRODUCTIVE TO SAY. THANK YOU.

>> IT'S UNNECESSARY COMMISSIONER [INAUDIBLE]. [OVERLAPPING]

>> TO ADD TO THAT, I ALSO WANTED TO SAY THAT WE USED. [OVERLAPPING].

>> THERE'S NOT A QUESTION ON THE FLOOR FOR ME. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

>> MS. BAKER, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE YOUR STATEMENT, PLEASE DO SO.

>> I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY, JUST TO MAKE SURE I FULLY ADDRESSED COMMISSIONER BOLTON'S STATEMENT OR HIS QUESTION, THAT WE DO PAID ADVERTISEMENT SO YOU'LL FIND FLYERS AND THINGS LIKE THAT ON VARIOUS ONLINE MEDIA PLATFORMS. WE DO PAY FOR THAT BUT WE ARE NOT SENDING OUT PRESS RELEASES AND WE'RE NOT PAYING FOR PRESS RELEASES TO PULL OUT.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> MR. PARKER?

>> THANK YOU.

>> MAY ALSO SIT DOWN?

>> YES.

>> THANK YOU. [LAUGHTER]

>> THANKS.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, YOU'LL GO NEXT.

>> SITTING HERE LISTENING TO ALL THIS, WITH A GREAT DEAL OF RESPECT FOR OUR PIO AND FOR OUR TWO VENDORS, I THINK WE ALL ARE AWARE THAT SOCIAL MEDIA IS DEFINITELY GROWING AND CHANGING DAILY AND WE NEED TO JUMP IN QUICKLY WITH BOTH FEET TO KEEP UP.

HAVING SAID THAT, I DON'T SEE A CLEAR PATH HERE.

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHO'S GOING TO BE DOING WHAT AND I HAVE TO BELIEVE THAT BETWEEN OUR STAFF AND OUR TWO VENDORS, THERE ARE STRENGTHS WITHIN.

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THOSE STRENGTH AREAS ASSIGNED TO EACH OF THE DIFFERENT AREAS RATHER THAN THEY'RE OVERLAPPING AND WE NOW HAVE A VENDOR WHO'S CONCERNED ABOUT THE JOB THAT HE'S BEING GIVEN, THAT THE PAY SCALE IS NOT THERE.

[01:20:02]

THAT CONCERNS ME.

I THINK MAYBE WE NEED TO HAVE SOME MORE DISCUSSION ON THIS, AT LEAST FROM MY MINDSET. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. I WOULD APPRECIATE IF COMMISSIONER BOLTON CAN REFRAIN FROM MENTIONING MY NAME. THAT IS HIS WARNING.

MY THINKING IS THAT WE HAVE TO LOOK BACK FROM WHERE WE CAME FROM TO WHERE WE ARE.

IF WE LOOK AT WHERE WE CAME FROM, WE CAN WE ARE AT A 10.

WE HAVE 10EXED WHERE WE CAME FROM.

YES, IT'S EASY FOR FMO OR ANY OTHER VENDOR TO COME IN AND AS AN OUTSIDER TO SAY, "YEAH, I SCAN ALL YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA AND IT PRETTY MUCH SUCKS." THAT'S EASY, ANYONE CAN DO THAT.

BUT THEY DON'T KNOW WHERE WE HAVE COME FROM.

IT IS UP TO US AS WELL TO PENETRATE OUR RESIDENTS SOCIAL MEDIA.

WHEN I POST SOMETHING, I MIGHT GET TWO LIKES, WHEN I POST SOMETHING THE NEXT DAY, I CAN GET 1000 LIKES.

IT DEPENDS ON THE CONTENT, HOW THE CONTENT WAS CREATED, WHERE THE CONTENT IS BEING PUSHED AT, HOW INTERACTIVE THAT CONTENT IS, AND IF WE'RE TRYING TO SHOVE THIS IN A WAY THAT IT MIXES, EVERYBODY HAS A ROW IN THIS GAME.

PIO HAS A ROW. IT'S A TRIANGLE HERE.

ACTUALLY, NOT EVEN A TRIANGLE, IT'S A SQUARE; IT'S THE COMMISSION, IS THE PIO, AND IT'S THE VENDORS, AND IS SOCIAL MEDIA AS A WHOLE.

TO SAY THAT THE PIO OFFICE IS NOT DOING A GOOD JOB, TO SAY THAT THE PIO OFFICE IS NOT ALLOCATING ENOUGH FUNDS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA IS ALSO.

>> POINT OF ORDER, MADAM MAYOR.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, JUST A SECOND, PLEASE.

COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> I DON'T THINK THAT ANY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON, THIS IS NOT YOUR TIME TO OBJECT TO WHAT HE HAS TO SAY.

A POINT OF ORDER IS ABOUT A SPECIFIC LINE ITEM QUESTION.

YOU WANT SAME THING AFTERWARDS, YOU CAN SAY ANYTHING FOR YOUR TWO MINUTES.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, CONTINUE, PLEASE.

>> POINT OF ORDER, MADAM MAYOR?

>> RECOGNIZED COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M GOING TO BE RECOGNIZED BECAUSE WHEN COMMISSIONER.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, PLEASE PROCEED.

>> DO NOT INFRINGE MY RIGHT TO SPEAK.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON, YOU'RE NOT HERE TO DEBATE.

>> DO NOT ABRIDGE MY RIGHT TO SPEAK.

>> YOU DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT.

>> DO NOT ABRIDGE MY RIGHT TO SPEAK.

>> YOU DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME. YOU ARE NOT RECOGNIZED, FOLLOW THE RULES.

>> DO NOT ABRIDGE MY RIGHT TO SPEAK.

WHEN COMMISSIONER- [OVERLAPPING] DO NOT TURN MY MIC OFF.

IF YOU TURN OF MY MIC AGAIN, I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE YOU REMOVED FROM THIS DAIS. [OVERLAPPING]

>> POINT OF ORDER IS SUPPOSED TO BE FOR A SPECIFIC ITEM OF QUESTIONS, NOT TO DO A CONVERSATION BACK-AND-FORTH. [OVERLAPPING]

>> TURN MY MIC OFF AGAIN AND I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO REMOVE YOU FROM THE DAIS.

>> YES, THAT'S FINE. [OVERLAPPING]

>> EXCUSE ME.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, THE CITY ATTORNEY IS SPEAKING.

>> THE RULES SPECIFICALLY STATE AND I'VE REPEATED THIS NUMEROUS TIMES, THE CHAIR RECOGNIZES WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO SPEAK AND UNTIL THE CHAIR RECOGNIZES WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO SPEAK, WHOEVER HAS THE FLOOR AT THAT MOMENT HAS THE FLOOR.

AS I UNDERSTAND IT, COMMISSIONER BOLTON HAS RAISED A POINT OF ORDER.

I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE POINT OF ORDER IS BECAUSE THE DISCUSSION DEGENERATED INTO EVERYONE'S SPEAKING OVER EACH OTHER BUT UNTIL THEN, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS HAS THE FLOOR.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, PLEASE PROCEED.

>> I ACTUALLY HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE.

>> ACTUALLY, WHATEVER MOTION YOU HAD WAS NOT HEARD SO WILL YOU PLEASE PROCEED?

>> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE COMMISSIONER BOLTON REMOVED FROM THIS MEETING FOR CONTINUAL INTERRUPTION.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, AS MUCH AS I APPRECIATE YOUR ATTEMPTS, THE REALITY IS WE'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE.

I CAN SECOND IT AND IT WILL NOT PASS. [OVERLAPPING]

>> OKAY. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. THAT'S FINE.

WE'LL LET EVERYONE VOTE.

>> SECOND.

>> FOR GETTING OUT OF HAND BECAUSE I'M SPEAKING AND I'M BEING SPOKEN OVER.

>> FINE. I'LL SECOND, CITY CLERK, CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> NO.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> NO.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ? > YES.

>> GOOD ATTEMPT. WE CAN JUST ALWAYS CONTINUE TO HOPE THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY BEHAVE.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, YOU ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF YOUR COMMENTS CAN YOU PLEASE PROCEED.

>> THE MAYOR DID NOT GIVE ME A CHANCE TO VOTE AND UNDER THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S RULES,

[01:25:03]

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE.

>> MY APOLOGIES. I DID NOT REALIZE YOU DID NOT VOTE SORRY.

>> I'M INVISIBLE. YOU FORGET ME?

>> NO I DIDN'T. YOU'RE NOT INVISIBLE.

I KNOW YOU HAVE ISSUES. GO AHEAD.

>> YES. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.

>> NO. YOU'RE ANSWERING WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE REMOVING YOU, IS THAT A YES?

>> MY ANSWER IS NO AND I WOULD LIKE TO A MAKE MOTION TO REMOVE THE MAYOR FROM THE DIAS.

>> SEEING A SECOND.

>> SECOND.

>> THERE'S A SECOND. CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> NO.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> NO.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ.

>> NO.

>> MOTION FAILED 3-2.

>> THANK YOU. NOW, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN CAN WE PLEASE CONDUCT THE BUSINESS OF THE CITY.

IT IS 11 O'CLOCK.

WE ARE STILL ON ITEM 5.

THIS THEORETICALLY SHOULD BE A SIMPLE ITEM.

BUT OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S A LOT OF GAME-PLAYING BEING DONE RIGHT NOW BECAUSE PEOPLE WANT TO PAD AN ITEM FOR ITEM 10C.

WE'LL GET THERE WHEN WE GET THERE.

CAN WE PLEASE WORK ON THE CONTRACT? COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, YOU STILL HAVE TIME.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO PROCEED?

>> YES MAYOR.

>> PLEASE PROCEED.

>> I'M JUST GOING TO MAKE CONCLUDE. MY POINT IS THAT WE ALL HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO ENGAGE WITH OUR RESIDENTS WITH THE CITY.

TAMARAC TALK DOES A GREAT JOB.

THEY HAVE A GROUP OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE.

>> POINT OF ORDER MADAM MAYOR.

>> MY GOSH.

>> YOU ARE NOT RECOGNIZED, COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS HAS THE FLOOR UNLESS THERE'S AN ACTUAL LEGAL QUESTION FOR A POINT OF ORDER.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO GO THERE.

>> IT'S [OVERLAPPING] LEGAL BECAUSE WE AS THE COMMISSION ON THE LAST MEETING SAID THAT WE WOULDN'T TALK ABOUT BLOGS, NOR WE'LL TALK ABOUT POLITICAL COMMITMENTS.

WE SAID THAT WOULD NOT MAKE REFERENCE OF BLOGS.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON, YOU'RE DONE. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, PLEASE PROCEED.

>> I'M NOT DONE.

>> YOU WERE NOT RECOGNIZED.

>> I'VE BEEN ELECTED BY THE RESONANCE OF THIS CITY.

>> STOP IT. WILL YOU PLEASE GROW UP?

>> MADAM MAYOR, I'M AN ADULT.

>> [OVERLAPPING]

>> CITY COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS PLEASE PROCEED.

THIS MEETING IS IN RECESS.

WE WILL COME BACK AT 11:15.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN AS I SAID IT'S 11:15 WE ARE BACK.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

YOU ARE IN PROCESS OF SPEAKING WHEN I CALLED A RECESS.

>> YES MAYOR.

>> DO YOU WISH TO CONTINUE YOUR QUESTIONS?

>> YES MA'AM. IT'S NOT SO MUCH OF A QUESTION IS JUST STATING SOME STUFF.

>> PLEASE PROCEED.

>> I BELIEVE IT IS ALSO OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO SHARE INFORMATION WITH THE RESIDENTS WHETHER WE ARE ON CHATS ON NEXT DOOR, NEXT DOOR SEEMS TO HAVE A LOT OF OUR THOUSANDS OF OUR RESIDENTS ARE ON NEXT DOOR NOW.

IF WE CAN USE THOSE PLATFORMS AND TO OUR SERVICE AS WELL BECAUSE IT'S FREE TO US.

IT'S NOT A COST TO OUR CITY.

SHOULD WE ALLOCATE MORE FUNDS TO THE PIO? SURE I WOULD NOT DISAGREE WITH THAT.

BUT AS MISS UNISIA STATED, WE ARE IN THE WORKS OF HIRING SOMEONE NEW BASED ON A PROPOSED BUDGET, SHOW A PASS, WE'RE GOING TO BE IMPROVING.

ONE LAST THING I WANT TO SAY IS THAT WE ARE NOT IN THE BUSINESS OF SELLING PRODUCTS, WE ARE IN THE BUSINESS OF SERVICE AND WITH THAT, BASED ON THE SURVEY RESULTS, BASED ON OUR CITY SIZE AND OUR BUDGET, OUR STAFF IS DOING A PHENOMENAL JOB.

WE'RE HERE TO SERVE THE PEOPLE AND HOW DO WE BEST SERVE THEM? YES, WE MIGHT HAVE HAD A LOW TURNOUT FOR THIS WEEKEND'S EVENTS.

BUT AGAIN IT WAS FATHER'S DAY WEEKEND.

THERE'S SO MANY VARIABLES WHEN IT COMES TO THINGS THAT WHEN WE ASSUME WE DON'T PROPERLY CALCULATE THOSE COSTS OR HOW WE DO THINGS.

ARE WE DOING A GOOD JOB WITH OUR PIO AND CONNECTICA AND WHOEVER ELSE WANTS TO JUMP SHIP WITH OUR SOCIAL MEDIA? SURE WHY NOT? BUT SPENDING MORE THAN NECESSARILY MEANS ANYTHING.

BECAUSE PEOPLE CAN CLICK ON IT, CAN LIKE IT, AND NOT ATTEND OR BY ''SOMETHING.'' I'M JUST GOING TO SAY ONE MORE TIME WE'RE NOT HERE TO SELL ANYTHING.

OUR CITY IS FULLY BOOKED.

WE HAVE NO MORE SPACE FOR RESIDENTS, MAYBE FOR AN EXTRA 10,000 IN THE NEXT 20 YEARS.

WE'RE HERE FOR SERVICES AND WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT A WAY HOW TO CONNECT TO THOSE RESIDENTS.

REALLY THE ONLY WAY IS THROUGH US.

WE ARE THE EXCHANGE WHICH RESIDENTS USE TO GET TO OUR SERVICES AND WHAT THEY NEED.

THAT IS MY POINT. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

[01:30:03]

>> THANK YOU. YOU CAN PUT THE CLOCK ON FIVE FOR ME.

I AGREE WITH MUCH OF WHAT COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS SAID.

I THINK THAT WHERE WE HAVE COME FROM WHERE WE'VE BEEN, WE'VE COME A LONG WAY.

WE ALSO NEED TO BE KEEPING IN MIND OUR POPULATION.

WE MAY WANT EVERYBODY TO CLICK AND BE ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

THE REALITY IS NOT EVERYBODY IS.

WE JUST HAD OUR BUDGET MEETING LAST WEEK, A GREAT DISCUSSION, AND WE WERE TOLD ABOUT HOW OUR MARKETING REACH IS GOING AND TOMOGRAM IS STILL THE NUMBER ONE WAY WE REACH PEOPLE.

WE'VE ADVERTISED OUR EVENTS AND THIS EVENT, IN A TOMOGRAM AND JUST USING THE JUNETEENTH EVENT.

IT WAS ABSOLUTELY GREAT. IT WAS FANTASTIC.

THE WEATHER WAS ALSO PROBABLY FRIGHTENING FOR PEOPLE.

THERE ARE OUTSIDE SOURCES.

IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT PIO DID NOT DO A GOOD JOB. YOU DID A GREAT JOB.

YOU GOT IT OUT THERE AND I KNOW WE HAD SOME PAID ADVERTISING FOR SOME I THINK IN THE USA AS WELL.

WE'VE DONE SOME GREAT STUFF.

WE CAN'T LEAD EVERYBODY TO OUR EVENTS.

THERE'S ALSO EVERYBODY COMING BACK INTO THE WORLD RIGHT NOW AND GOING TO EVENTS ALL OVER THE PLACE.

IT IS JUST AS MUCH OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO ADVERTISE.

IT'S ALSO THE USER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ATTEND IF HE WISHES AND ALSO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE OUR INTERNET AND OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. I AM SURE JUST LIKE WHEN BEFORE COVID, THERE WERE CERTAIN PEOPLE IN OUR POPULATION DID NOT USE SOCIAL MEDIA.

THEY DIDN'T GO TO FACEBOOK, THEY DIDN'T GO TO INSTAGRAM OR TWITTER WHATEVER IT WAS.

BUT THROUGH NECESSITY, MORE PEOPLE GOT ONLINE.

AS IT IS GROWING AND OUR POPULATION IS GETTING MORE INCLINED TO USE SOCIAL MEDIA, OUR SOCIAL MEDIA WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE BETTER ACCESS.

I THINK CONNECTICA HAS BEEN DOING A GREAT JOB.

I UNDERSTAND THEIR CONCERNS ABOUT THE FINANCES ON THIS.

I DO LIKE THE VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS AND I DO SEE FROM THE VERY DETAILED BACKUP THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE IN YOUR FIRM NFBO, SO THANK YOU FOR THAT.

I'M A VERY WELL-ROUNDED ORGANIZATION JUST AS I KNOW CONNECTICA IS AS WELL.

THIS ISN'T ONE OR THE OTHER AT THIS TIME.

IT SEEMS AT THIS TIME WE NEED A LOT OF SERVICES BECAUSE WE ARE A GROWING CITY.

WE'RE NO LONGER 60,000 PEOPLE, WE'RE 71,000 ALMOST 71,250 PEOPLE.

WE'RE AN ACTIVE COMMISSION.

PART OF THIS STUFF MY OPINION FROM WHAT WE ARE SEEING HERE IS THE FACT THAT WE HAVE AN ACTIVE COMMISSION BUT IT IS NOT PIO'S RESPONSIBILITY NOR WILL IT BE THE HIRED ASSISTANCE, THE EXTENSION OF THE PIO TO FOLLOW EACH OF US INDIVIDUALLY TO MAKE IT ALL ABOUT US BECAUSE IT IS NOT ALL ABOUT US.

IT IS ABOUT WHAT THE CITY HAS TO OFFER AND THAT'S WHAT'S IMPORTANT AND IT IS THE SERVICES.

I THINK THAT THE DIFFERENCES IN THE CONTRACTS, THE THINGS THAT ARE ON THE BACKUP, I THINK IT IS VERY CLEAR WHICH ADDITIONAL SERVICES ARE GOING TO BE UTILIZED FROM WHICH COMPANY.

I BELIEVE IT'LL BE DONE AS EQUITABLE AS POSSIBLE.

I DO BELIEVE THAT WE PROBABLY WILL HAVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE I THINK THAT WE WILL NEED MORE ASSISTANCE.

I KNOW THAT THERE HAS BEEN AN OPEN SEAT FOR OUR MARKETING FOR QUITE SOME TIME.

I THINK THAT THERE HAS BEEN DIFFICULTY IN HIRING THE RIGHT FIT.

NOT THAT THERE AREN'T GOOD PEOPLE OUT THERE, BUT YOU HAVE TO ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT FIT AND PEOPLE WHO ARE USED TO GOVERNMENT WORK AND THE LIKE.

MAYBE THAT'S BEEN A LITTLE BIT REASON WHY WE'VE HAD AN OPEN POSITION AND THEN WE HAD A CLOSED POSITION.

WE ALSO HAVE PEOPLE THAT IN AN ASSISTANCE TO OUR BUDGET, DID AN EARLY LEAVE WHICH LEFT US WITH A HOLE THAT WE DID NOT EXPECT.

THESE ARE THINGS IN PLANNING AND BUDGETING AND SO WE ROLL WITH IT, OR THE WORD OF COVID HIT IT.

THE REALITY IS WE ARE THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX AT THIS TIME.

I THINK THAT WE NEED TO GET THESE SERVICES IN PLACE AND WE CAN ADJUST WHAT WE WILL NEED TO ADJUST WITH AN AMENDMENT AS WE GO THROUGH IT, BUT WE NEED TO GET THESE SERVICES IN PLACE.

I KNOW THAT THERE ARE THINGS THAT WE HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO DO BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T HAD THE SERVICES IN PLACE.

I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO HOPEFULLY PASSING THIS SO WE CAN GET TO THE JOB OF THE CITY, THE WORK OF THE CITY.

FORGIVE ME, THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OUR INDIVIDUAL VIDEOS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OUT OF THE INITIATIVE FUND, NOT THE BUDGET OF THE CITY.

THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THAT INITIATIVE FUND.

IF INDIVIDUALS ON THE DAIS AS WANT TO MAKE VIDEOS THAT ARE SPECIFIC FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES, IT GETS CHARGED WITH MY UNDERSTANDING, OUT OF THE INITIATIVE FUND, NOT OUT OF THE CITY'S BUDGET, WHICH TAKES AWAY FROM WHAT THE SERVICES OF THE CITY WERE NOT ABLE TO GET TO FOR CERTAIN ITEMS. THAT BEING SAID, I'M DONE AND VICE MAYOR HAS TWO MINUTES.

>> THANK YOU. PROCUREMENT, I THINK I GOT FIVE POINTS FOR THE LOCAL BUSINESS PREFERENCE PROGRAM. IS THAT CORRECT?

[01:35:02]

>> YES, THEY DID.

>> OKAY. I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING THE LOCAL BUSINESS PURPOSE PROGRAM TO THE CITY OF TAMARAC AND IT'S GOOD TO SEE IT BEING UTILIZED AND TO THE BENEFIT OF CONNECTED CAR.

IT LOOKS LIKE FOMO MEDIA GOT THREE- AND-A- HALF POINTS.

WAS THAT FOR THE VETERANS BUSINESS PREFERENCE PROGRAM.

>> IT'S FOR COMBINATION AND THE VETERAN'S PREFERENCE FOR WOMEN, 2.5 POINTS AND ONE POINT FOR THE CONVICTION HISTORY.

>> ONCE AGAIN, TWO ADDITIONAL ITEMS THAT I BROUGHT IN THIS COMMISSION, FOLLOW MY LEAD AND PASS SO GOOD TO SEE THE BENEFIT THERE.

IT DOES SEEM LIKE THERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS THAT THE COMMISSION HAS ON THIS.

INSTEAD OF VOTING NO ON THIS, COMMISSIONER BOLTON, I THINK MY PREFERENCE IS TO MOTION FOR A TABLE IN THIS ITEM UNTIL THE VERY NEXT COMMISSION MEETING.

IN-BETWEEN THAT TIME, WE CAN HAVE DISCUSSIONS WITH CONNECTICA AND FOMO MEDIA TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR CAPABILITIES AND HAVE A DEEPER DISCUSSION.

THEN WE CAN VOTE ON THIS ITEM SO THAT IT MEETS OUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION.

IT SOUNDS LIKE WE HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS ON THIS COMMISSION THAT WE NEED CLARIFIED. THAT'S MY MOTION.

>> IT'S AN ACTUAL MOTION.

>> MOTION TO TABLE.

UNLESS THERE'S ANOTHER DISCUSSION, IF SOMEONE HAS QUESTIONS.

>> YOU ASK FOR A MOTION TO TABLE, WE GOT TO TAKE IT OR YOU'RE ASKING FOR A MOTION TO TABLE.

>> I SEE NO FURTHER.

THERE'S ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, SO I'LL RESERVE MY EMOTION UNTIL ALL THE DISCUSSION ITEMS.

>> BECAUSE THERE'S NO DISCUSSION ON TABLING.

>> I HAVEN'T MADE A MOTION YET.

>> I SAID YES BECAUSE THERE IS NO MOTION ON TABLING.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> THANK YOU MAYOR. I'M INCLINED TO VOTE NO ON THIS BECAUSE I HAVE SO MANY PROBLEMS, ISSUES, CONCERNS WITH HOW IT'S WRITTEN.

THESE LIST OF SERVICES THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED.

IT DOES NOT SEEM LIKE IT'S IN TANDEM WITH EACH OTHER AND WITH THE CITY.

I HAVE CONCERNS WITH HOW CONNECTICA IS BEING PAID A GOOD WAY.

I JUST HAVE SO MANY QUESTIONS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK EACH VENDOR.

THREE MINUTES OR TWO MINUTES JUST DOES NOT CUT IT.

INSTEAD OF VOTING NO, I WOULD SUPPORT VICE MAYOR GELIN'S MOTION TO TABLE THE ITEM.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES. CONNECTICA HAS BEEN A GREAT PARTNER WITH US AND HEARING THOSE COMMENTS GIVES ME PAUSE, SO I WOULD CERTAINLY ENGAGE IN TABLING THIS.

>> OKAY. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> HOW LONG HAVE WE HAD THESE PROPOSALS, MR. NICIA?

>> THEY WERE SUBMITTED IN JANUARY.

>> WHEN WAS THE COMMISSION PRIVY TO THIS INFORMATION?

>> I BELIEVE THAT MAYBE IT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED WHEN THE AGENDA ITEMS WERE UPLOADED.

>> YOU'RE SAYING SIX DAYS?

>> I'M RELUCTANT TO CONFIRM BECAUSE I'M NOT REALLY CERTAIN WHAT OTHER MEDICATIONS HAPPENED THAT I'M NOT PRIVY TO.

>> THIS IS KATHLEEN.

THE AGENDA WAS PUBLISHED ON FRIDAY.

>> WE'VE HAD APPROXIMATELY 144 PLUS HOURS, NOT INCLUDING THE HOURS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN SPENT WITH THE MANAGER FOR THE AGENDA BEFORE IT GOT PUBLISHED.

COMMISSIONERS ON THIS COMMISSION DIDN'T FIND TIME TO QUESTION THE MANAGER OR THE VENDORS OR ANYONE AVAILABLE.

I FIND IT VERY DIFFICULT TO GET ANY BUSINESS DONE WHEN WE CANNOT SPEND TIME WITH OUR MANAGER TO DISCUSS THIS DURING A WORKSHOP WITH THE MANAGER.

THEN WE HAVE FROM FRIDAY UNTIL TODAY, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 144 PLUS HOURS, IT'S JUST BAFFLING.

AGAIN, LIKE THE MAYOR SAID, WE CAN MAKE AN AMENDMENT LATER ON, BUT WE WANTED TO TABLE THIS TO QUESTION WHAT EXACTLY? THE QUESTIONS SHOULD HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND LET THE VENDOR ANSWER THEM ACCORDINGLY.

THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT TIME FOR SEVEN MINUTES FOR US TO QUESTION AND NOT WAIT FOR AN ANSWER, BUT MAKE ALL THE NECESSARY QUESTIONS AND MOVE FORWARD.

I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THIS COMMISSION CONTINUES TO WASTE EVERYONE'S TIME

[01:40:01]

ON ASKING THESE SILLY QUESTIONS WHEN WE COULD HAVE ASKED THESE QUESTIONS 144 HOURS AGO.

IT'S RIDICULOUS.

TALK ABOUT SPENDING TIME.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN, THE CLOCK WAS RUNNING WHEN MR. NICIA WAS SPEAKING, AND SO I ASKED THE CLERK TO PAUSE IT TO GIVE BACK THE TIME.

IF THE COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, WE WERE TALKING OVER YOU.

IF YOU WANT TO FINISH YOUR STATEMENT, YOU CAN.

>> NO I WAS DONE. I JUST DON'T SEE HOW WE CAN AMEND IT LATER ON.

WHAT HAPPENS IF WE HIRE THE WEBMASTER TOMORROW AND THEY BECOME THE MOST AWESOME PERSON THAT WE NEEDED.

NOW WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER THIRD VENDOR OR SECOND VENDOR.

WE CAN JUST MAKE AN AMENDMENT LATER.

I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW FROM TODAY TO THE NEXT MEETING, WHICH IS GOING TO BE IN THREE WEEKS AND WORKSHOPS.

THE LAST LAST MEETING, COMMISSIONER BOLTON SAID, WE DON'T NEED WORKSHOPS.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER.

>> GOOD MORNING, MAYOR COMMISSIONERS, [INAUDIBLE] INTERIM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER.

I JUST WANTED TO STATE A FEW FACTS BEFORE YOU MAKE YOUR DECISION.

LAST YEAR, WE SPENT ABOUT $65,000 ON OUR DIGITAL MARKETING EFFORTS.

THAT WAS COMPLETELY WITH CONNECTICA.

THE YEAR BEFORE THAT, IT WAS AROUND 50, SOME THOUSAND DOLLARS.

THE YEAR BEFORE THAT IT WAS MUCH LESS.

WE'RE PROGRESSIVELY SPENDING MORE MONEY.

THIS YEAR, WE'RE PLANNING TO SPEND ABOUT $80,000.

THE REASON THAT WE HAVE THESE TWO VERY CAPABLE FIRMS THAT WERE RECOMMENDING TO WORK WITH IS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF BOTH INDIVIDUAL SKILL SETS AND CAPABILITIES.

WE HAVE A GREAT WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH CONNECTICA.

WE DEFINITELY WOULD LIKE TO FURTHER THAT AND CONTINUE WITH THAT.

BUT WE ALSO HAVE SOME WITH FOMO.

ONE OF THE TASKS THAT WERE PLANNED TO DO IS TO DEVELOP A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR OUR SOCIAL MEDIA AND DEVISE A NEW ROADMAP, IF YOU WILL.

OUR GOAL IS TO STRATEGICALLY PARTNER WITH THESE TWO VERY CAPABLE FIRMS TO ESTABLISH A BETTER PRESENCE IN THE DIGITAL WORLD.

IN THE SOLE PURPOSE FOR THAT IS TWO, ENGAGE AND REACH OUT TO MORE OF OUR RESIDENTS TO ENCOURAGE THEM TO USE OUR SOCIAL MEDIA FOR OUR SERVICES OR FOR OUR WEBSITE FOR OUR SERVICES.

SO WE'RE ACTUALLY PROVIDING THIS COMBINATION TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE BOTH FIRMS AND UTILIZE THEM AS WE SEE FIT.

WE'RE LOOKING TO SPEND $80,000, WHICH IS 15- $20,000 MORE THAN WHAT WE SPENT LAST YEAR.

IT IS AN IMPROVEMENT OVER WHAT WE'RE SPENDING LAST YEAR.

I JUST WANTED TO LET THAT BE KNOWN.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS.

I DO KNOW THAT CONNECTICA HAS SERVED US WELL AND I KNOW THEY WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO.

I ALSO KNOW THAT THIS ISN'T SET, THAT IT IS ONLY $80,000, IT ISN'T SET THAT THIS IS THE ONLY PATH.

THIS IS OUR MENU AND AS WE PROGRESS THROUGH THE YEAR, WE WILL DETERMINE HOW MUCH OF OUR MENU IS BEING USED.

IF WE NEED TO CHANGE IT LIKE WE DO WITH OTHER THINGS, WE CAN SEE.

WE CAN ALSO SEE THE EFFECTIVENESS WITHIN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS, SEVEN MONTHS. WE HAVE MARKERS.

WE DO EVERYTHING WITH A MECHANISM IN PLACE TO SEE IF WE ARE ACHIEVING OUR GOALS AND I THINK WE WILL DO NO LESS AS WE CONTINUE DOWN OUR PATH.

BUT I THINK IF WE STOP THE PROCESS HERE, WE ARE STOPPING OUR ABILITY TO DO WHAT WE NEED TO DO NOW.

I WOULD THINK THAT BOTH ORGANIZATIONS WOULD AGREE THAT YOU'D LIKE THE PROCESS TO CONTINUE TODAY VERSUS BEING HELD UP FOR ANOTHER COUPLE ACTUALLY WHAT WOULD WIND UP BEING, END OF AUGUST.

BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE A WORKSHOP UNTIL THE END OF AUGUST.

WE HAVE NO WORKSHOPS IN THE BEGINNING OF JULY.

IT WILL BE THE END OF AUGUST THAT WILL HOLD THIS OUT ANOTHER 6, 8 WEEKS BEFORE WE CAN THEN EVEN GET ANY PROGRESS GOING FOR OUR CITY.

I WOULD LIKE US NOT TO TABLE THIS AND LET US GET ON WITH THE BUSINESS OF THE CITY.

LET US CONTINUE TO HAVE OUR CONVERSATIONS AND WHEREVER WE NEED TO AMEND, WE CAN AMEND.

CITY CLERK, THERE IS A MOTION ON THE TABLE AT THIS TIME TO PROCEED.

PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> I WANT TO BE CLEAR ON THE MOTION.

>> THE MOTION IS TO PROCEED WITH C5A, TR13800.

>> MA'AM, THAT WASN'T THE MOTION. I MADE A MOTION.

>> NO, YOU DIDN'T.

>> MOTION TO TABLE UNTIL THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING.

>> OH MY GOSH, WHAT I CAN SAY.

>> NOW THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE.

[01:45:01]

YOU CANNOT HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE AND DISCUSSION THAT'S WHY YOU HAVE TO DO IT.

>> I SAID I'LL MAKE MY EMOTION WHEN THE DISCUSSION IS COMPLETE.

>> THERE'S A MOTION ON THE TABLE TO MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT MEETING WHICH WOULD BE JULY 13TH.

CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU. MAYOR.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> NO.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YEAH.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> MOTION TO TABLE PASS 3D TOOL.

>> VENDORS WILL SEE YOU HERE AT THE NEXT MEETING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS ITEM IS DONE.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WE'RE NOW ON 6ATO2056.

[6.a TO2506 - An Ordinance of the City commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, amendingChapter 2, entitled â€oeAdministration” by creating article XIV, entitled â€oeEmergencyManagement” to provide for emergency management responsibilities, powers, andregulations; repealing obsolete emergency management provisions; providing forcodification; providing a savings provision, providing a conflicts provision, providing forseverability, and providing for an effective date]

ORANGE IS ON FIRST READING.

CITY ATTORNEY, PLEASE READ THE TITLE FOR THE RECORD.

>> YES, MADAM MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

THIS IS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSIONER STEVE TAMARAC FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ENTITLED ADMINISTRATION BY CREATING ARTICLE 14 ENTITLED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES.

POWERS AND REGULATIONS REPEALING OBSOLETE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS.

PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, PROVIDING A SAVINGS PROVISION, PROVIDING A CONFLICTS PROVISION, PROVIDING FOR SEPARABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND.

>> SO MOVED.

>> SECOND.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON WITH THE MOTION, VICE MAYOR WITH THE SECOND.

MS. CALLOWAY IS AVAILABLE.

YOU'LL BE MAKING A PRESENTATION.

SHOULD BE MAKING A PRESENTATION.

DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

>> THANK YOU. MAXINE CALLOWAY FOR THE RECORD, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

JUST WANT TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION THAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR BINDER.

THIS IS RELATED TO AN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE AS STAFF IS PROPOSING ESSENTIALLY JUST TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE PROVISION WHERE YOU CAN FIND EVERYTHING RELATED TO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT.

BEFORE I GO THROUGH THE ORDINANCE, JUST WANT TO PROVIDE SOME BACKGROUND AS TO WHY THIS IS NECESSARY.

THE CITY IN THE PAST HAVE JUST RELIED ON FLORIDA STATUTE.

WE HAVE ALSO RELIED ON JUST ONE PROVISION IN THE CODE AS IT RELATES TO EMERGENCY PURCHASING.

THERE'S NO REAL PROVISION IN THE CODE THAT SPEAKS TO THE AUTHORIZATION OR THE POWER GRANTED TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR EMERGENCY SITUATIONS.

THIS ORDINANCE SEEKS TO DO THAT.

WE'RE HOPING TO PUT EVERYTHING IN ONE PROVISION TO BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE HAVE SEEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS WHERE YOU HAVE THE POWER FOR EMERGENCY IN THE CITY MANAGER AND THEN HOW IT'S DELEGATED AFTER THAT.

THIS AMENDMENT I SAID BEFORE PROPOSES TO PLACE A NEW ARTICLE IN CHAPTER 2.

CHAPTER 2 OF YOUR CODE IS THEIR ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER AND SO ARTICLE 14 WOULD BE A NEW ARTICLE THAT WOULD BE PROVIDED IN THAT ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER.

AS WITH MOST LEGISLATION, IT STARTS OFF WITH THE DEFINITION SECTION.

SECTION 2-429 WOULD BE NEW AND IT WOULD BE YOUR DEFINITIONS PROVISION THAT WOULD SEEK TO DEFINE MOST TERMS THAT ARE RELATED TO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT.

EMERGENCY ITSELF WOULD BE DEFINED AS WELL AS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, BIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY, MAN-MADE EMERGENCY, NATURAL EMERGENCY BUT TRY TO COVER MOST OF THE EMERGENCIES THAT WE CAN ANTICIPATE AND THE DEFINITION FOR THOSE.

THIS WILL ALL BE LOCATED I SAID BEFORE IN ONE ARTICLE, ARTICLE 14, JUST FOR EASE OF REFERENCE AND EASE OF ACCESS.

IN THE EVENT OF ANY TYPE OF EMERGENCY THAT'S DEFINED IN THE DEFINITION PROVISION, THEN SECTION 2-430 PROVIDES FOR WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY.

THAT PROVISION WILL READ FIRST THE CITY MANAGER BY WRITTEN EXECUTIVE ORDER WHICH IS WHAT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PAST, IT WOULD THEN EXECUTE THAT EMERGENCY ORDER AND DECLARE A STATE OF EMERGENCY.

IN DOING SO, THE CITY MANAGER WOULD ALSO IMPLEMENT THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN WHICH THE CITY HAS OR THE EMERGENCY RECOVERY PLAN WHICH THE CITY HAS IN PLACE AS WELL.

THEN THE CITY MANAGER WOULD DELEGATE, CONFIRM, OR DIRECT AS NECESSARY THE POWERS AND DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS, AND OBLIGATION OF THE CITY'S PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT HEADS.

THAT TOO IS DEFINED IN THIS ORDINANCE AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT HEADS ARE DEFINED TO INCLUDE THE FIRE CHIEF, THE POLICE CAPTAIN, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES SO THAT THOSE DEPARTMENT HEADS COMPRISE OF YOUR PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT HEADS.

SECTION 2-430 FURTHER PROVIDES FOR IN THE ABSENCE OF THE CITY MANAGER, THEN IT HAS A LIST IN TERMS OF WHO THEN IS AUTHORIZED TO DECLARE A STATE OF EMERGENCY.

IN THE ABSENCE OF THE CITY MANAGER, THEN IT'S THE ACTING CITY MANAGER.

IN THAT PERSON'S ABSENCE, THEN IT'S THE MAYOR AND IN THE MAYOR'S ABSENCE, IT WOULD BE THE VICE MAYOR.

[01:50:01]

IN THE VICE MAYOR'S ABSENCE, THEN IT'S ANY ELECTED OFFICIAL IN ORDER OF TENURE, OF COMMISSION SERVICE.

IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY ELECTED OFFICIAL, THEN IT WOULD BE THE PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT HEAD AND THAT IS IN ORDER OF TENURE OF EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CITY AND THEN THE DEPARTMENT HEADS ARE LISTED.

AS IT RELATES TO THE POWER THAT IS VESTED IN THE CITY MANAGER, SECTION 2-430 DEFINES THAT FOR US.

WHEN THERE'S A STATE OF EMERGENCY, WHEN ONE IS DECLARED, THEN THE FOLLOWING EXECUTIVE AND POLICE POWER SHALL BE VESTED IN THE CITY MANAGER.

THAT IS THE POWER SET FORTH IN SECTION 2-5 THAT IS RELATED TO THE EXECUTION OF EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDING AGREEMENTS, THE POWERS THAT SET FORTH IN FLORIDA STATUTE 252.38 AND THAT'S YOUR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT POWERS THAT'S RELATED TO MUNICIPALITIES.

THE CITY MANAGER WOULD ALSO HAVE THE POWERS TO IMPLEMENT ORDERS OR ASSIST THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, THE HEAD OF BROWARD COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, BROWARD COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES AND MILITARY SERVICE AND THE NATIONAL GUARD, DESIGNATED BY THE PRESIDENT OR BY THE GOVERNOR.

SECTION 2-430 SPEAKS TO CONFIRMATION OF THE AUTHORITY AND WHAT POWERS THEN REST IN THE CITY MANAGER.

AUTHORIZING EMERGENCY PURCHASES OR PURCHASES MADE DURING STATE OF EMERGENCY.

I DON'T HAVE TO READ THIS ENTIRE SLIDE BUT IT'S MUCH OF THE POWERS THAT WERE VESTED IN THE CITY MANAGER BEFORE RELATED TO THE THINGS THAT HE OR SHE IN THIS CASE WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO DO IN THE STATE OF AN EMERGENCY.

ONE OF THE THINGS LISTED HERE BECAUSE WE LEARNED FROM THE COVID EXPERIENCE AND SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD TO DO DURING THAT TIME.

WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ORDINANCE WAS COMPREHENSIVE AND INCLUSIVE OF ALL THE THINGS THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE STATE OF EMERGENCY.

WE HAD HERE SUCH AS SUSPENDING LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR SEATING WHICH IS SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD TO DO, TEMPORARY SIGNAGE AND BANNERS BUT JUST TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO LIFT CERTAIN REGULATIONS AND TO PROCEED IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY.

THE LIST CONTINUES HERE AS IT RELATES.

WE HAD TO SUSPEND LOCAL BUILDING, ZONING REGULATIONS, REGULATE THE USE AND THE RATION FUEL PRODUCTS, ICE, AND OTHER ESSENTIALS.

THE ABILITY TO INSTITUTE A CURFEW WAS ON THE OTHER SLIDE.

PROHIBIT THE USE OF FRESHWATER SUPPLY FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN COOKING, DRINKING, BATHING.

WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT WAS COMPREHENSIVE IN TERMS OF THE POWERS AND DUTIES THAT WOULD BE PRESCRIBED TO THE CITY MANAGER IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY.

THEN THIS SLIDE'S SECTION 2-430 SPEAK TO ALL THE WAIVERS THAT SHE WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO DO.

WAIVERS OF FORMALITIES SUCH AS PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC WORK, ENTERING INTO CONTRACTS IN CURRENT OBLIGATIONS.

MUCH OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES THAT SHE WAS TASKED WITH IN THE PAST EMERGENCY UNDER AN EMERGENCY ORDER.

WHAT THIS LEGISLATION ALSO DOES, WE HAD IN SECTION 9-67, A PROVISION RELATED TO DISASTER ACCESS AND DEBRIS REMOVAL THAT WAS SEPARATE FROM THE ADMINISTRATION SECTION.

THIS LEGISLATION WILL REPEAL THAT PROVISION AND MOVE IT ENTIRELY INTO ARTICLE 4.

THIS WILL ALLOW FOR EVERYTHING RELATED TO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TO BE IN ONE SECTION OF THE CODE, ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE 14.

THAT CONCLUDES MY SUMMARY OF THE LEGISLATION THAT'S BEING PROPOSED AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

>> THANK YOU. SEEING THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. NO.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. WE ARE NOW GOING

[8.a TO2502 - An Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida,  amending Chapter 22, Article VIII of the code of ordinances of the City of Tamarac, entitled â€oeWaterConservation Regulations”, specifically amending Section 22-303 entitled â€oeYear-RoundPermanent Landscape Irrigation Measures” to extend the schedule in which no water userestrictions are in effect from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm to ensure the safety of our residents andchildren that use the sidewalks during school hours; providing for severability; providing forcodification; providing an effective date.]

TO 8A ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING TO2502 CITY ATTORNEY, PLEASE READ THE TITLE FOR THE RECORD.

>> I BELIEVE WE'RE ON TWO ITEMS FOR SECOND READING.

>> YES. MY APOLOGIES.

SECOND READING. WE JUST FINISHED FIRST.

>> YES. ITEM 8A, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 1022, ARTICLE 8 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO TAMARAC ENTITLED WATER CONSERVATION REGULATIONS, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING SECTION 22-303, ENTITLED YEAR-ROUND PERMANENT LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION MEASURES TO EXTEND THE SCHEDULE IN WHICH NO WATER USE RESTRICTIONS ARE IN EFFECT FROM 7:00 AM TO 6:00 PM TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF RESIDENTS AND CHILDREN.

USE THE SIDEWALKS DURING SCHOOL HOURS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

[01:55:02]

>> THANK YOU. I'LL TAKE A MOTION AND I'LL SECOND.

>> SO MOVED.

>> SECOND.

>> SECOND.

>> A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PLACKO, A SECOND BY VICE MAYOR.

THIS IS AN ITEM THAT IS PUBLIC COMMENTS. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.

IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO MAKE A COMMENT? SEEING NO COMMENTS, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

MS. CALLOWAY IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

VICE MAYOR, IS YOUR RIGHT LIFT FOR DISCUSSION, OR IS YOUR LIGHT JUST LIT AFTER YOUR SECOND?

>> TO VOTE.

>> YOUR LIGHT LIT TO VOTE. THERE'S NO ONE WHO WISHES TO ASK ME ANY QUESTIONS? CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>>MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. THANK YOU.

>> EXCELLENT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

NOW TO 8B,

[8.b TO2503 - An Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, amending theTamarac Code of Ordinances by repealing Sec. 2-425 (3), â€oeFixed Expense Account”, ofArticle XIII, Chapter 2, â€oeAdministration”, entitled â€oeTravel Expenses”, to repealprovisions related to an optional fixed expense account for Elected Officials upon request;providing for codification; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; and providingfor an effective date.]

TO2 503 CITY ATTORNEY, PLEASE READ THE TITLE FOR THE RECORD.

>> YES, MADAM MAYOR. MEMBERS TO COMMISSION, THIS IS AN ORDINANCE CITY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TAMARAC CODE OF ORDINANCES BY REPEALING SECTION 2- 4253, FIXED EXPENSE ACCOUNT OF ARTICLE 13 CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION AND TITLED TRAVEL EXPENSES TO REPEAL PROVISIONS RELATED TO AN OPTIONAL FIXED EXPENSE ACCOUNT FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS UPON REQUEST, PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> THANK YOU. I'LL TAKE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

>> SO MOVED. SO MOVED.

>> SECOND.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO, WITH EMOTION, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS WITH THE SECOND.

THIS ITEM IS A SECOND HEARING.

PUBLIC COMMENTS, OUR PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.

ANYBODY WHO WISHES TO MAKE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS.

SEEING NONE. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE NOW CLOSED, OUR PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

MS. GOOD, YOUTH DIRECTOR, FINANCIAL SERVICES, AND KEITH GLATZ, PURCHASING AND CONTRACTS MANAGER ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

VICE MAYOR, IS YOUR LIGHT LIT FOR QUESTIONS OR JUST TO VOTE?

>> SAME RESPONSES LAST TIME.

>> WELL, THEN YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO TURN IT OFF WHEN YOU'RE DONE.

CITY CLERK, THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION, SO PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. MOVING TO 8C.

[8.c TO2505 - An Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, authorizingthe appropriate city officials to execute an agreement pursuant to Section 7.19 of the City ofTamarac Charter; Awarding an agreement with Westway Towing, Inc., providing for thetowing services for the City of Tamarac for a five year period beginning August 1, 2022through July 31, 2027 including an option to renew for one additional five (5) year period andproviding for month to month extensions as required; Authoring the collection of anadministrative fee of 25% of the maximum towing rates to cover the city's cost pursuant tothe requirements of F.S. 323.002 (4); In accordance with the maximum towing rates asestablished under the Broward County administrative code part IX, chapter 40.50; Providingfor conflicts; Providing for severability; and providing for an effective date.]

IT'S TO2 505 CITY ATTORNEY, PLEASE READ THE TITLE FOR THE RECORD.

>> YES, MADAM MAYOR. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSIONER, CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 7.19 AND THE CITY OF TAMARAC CHARTER AWARDING AN AGREEMENT WITH WESTWAY TOWING INC. PROVIDING FOR THE TOWING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF TAMARAC FOR A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING OF AUGUST 1ST, 2022 THROUGH JULY 31ST, 2027.

INCLUDING AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR ONE ADDITIONAL FIVE-YEAR PERIOD AND PROVIDING FROM MONTH TO MONTH EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED.

AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE FEE OF 25 PERCENT OF THE MAXIMUM TOWING RATES TO COVER THE CITY'S COST PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FLORIDA STATUTE, SECTION 323.0024, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAXIMUM TOWING RATES, IS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE BROWARD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PART 9, CHAPTER 40.50, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'LL TAKE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

>> SO MOVED.

>> SECOND.

>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.

ANYBODY WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS MATTER? SEEING NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS MATTER, THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

MS. GOOD IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS ALONG WITH MR. GLADSTONE, SEEING THAT THERE'S NO DESIRE FROM THIS COMMISSION TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS MATTER, CITY CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. [NOISE] VICE MAYOR GELIN.

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES.

>> MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. WE'RE NOW MOVING TO 10A.

[10.a Designation of voting delegate for the Florida League of Cities Requested by Acting CityClerk Kimberly Dillon]

THE DESIGNATION OF A VOTING DELEGATE FOR THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES REQUESTED BY OUR ACTING CITY CLERK, KIMBERLY DILLON. MS. DILLON.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. MAYOR AND COMMISSION, THIS ITEM IS BEFORE YOU THIS AFTERNOON OR THIS MORNING, THIS AFTERNOON, DUE TO THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES REACHING OUT TO US JUST ASKING TO HAVE THE COMMISSION NOMINATE A MEMBER FROM THE BODY TO BE THE VOTING DELEGATE AT THE NEXT ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN AUGUST.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE ON THIS COMMISSION WHO WILL BE ATTENDING THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE?

[02:00:03]

>> I WILL.

>> I'LL BE AT THE CONFERENCE.

>> WE HAVE COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS AND WE HAVE VICE MAYOR WHO WILL BE AT THE CONFERENCE.

THEREFORE, THERE ARE TWO POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR OUR VOTING MEMBER.

THE OTHER ONE WOULD BE THE DESIGNEE, THE ALTERNATE.

YOU NEED AN ALTERNATE AS WELL?

>> NO MAYOR. IT'S JUST THE DELEGATE TO VOTE.

>> THANK YOU. VICE MAYOR, YOUR LIGHT IS LIT.

>> YEAH. I'LL NOMINATE MYSELF TO BE A VOTING MEMBER.

>> VICE MAYOR HAS NOMINATED HIMSELF.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, DO YOU HAVE ANY DESIRE TO BE THE VOTING MEMBER OR ARE YOU OKAY WITH THE VICE MAYOR BEING THE VOTING MEMBER?

>> I'D LIKE TO BE THE VOTING MEMBER.

IF I CAN SHARE SOME THOUGHTS ON AS TO WHY.

>> PLEASE PROCEED.

>> I RECENTLY WENT TO THE NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS LEAGUE OF CITIES IN JACKSONVILLE AND THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED WAS IMMEASURABLE.

I BELIEVE EVERYONE, REGARDLESS IF YOU'RE NEWLY OR REELECTED OR ELECTED OFFICIAL, SHOULD BE GOING EVERY ANNUALLY.

THAT IS JUST ME GIVING UP TIME ON MY BUSINESSES WAS DONE TO GIVE MORE TIME TO THE CITY ROW, CONSIDERING THAT IT'S NOT A PART-TIME JOB AS WE ALL KNOW.

IT HAS TAKEN A LOT OF MY TIME, WHICH I'VE BEEN LOVING IT MORE.

I FEEL THIS IS ALSO ANOTHER PART OF ME GIVING BACK TO THE CITY, TO THE RESIDENTS TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE AND BE A DELEGATE IN OTHER AREAS AS A CITY NEEDS, AS THE COUNTY NEEDS, AS THE FLORIDA, THE NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES NEEDS.

FOR THOSE REASONS AND ASIDE FROM THAT, I'M GOING TO GO BACK TO COMMISSIONER BOLTON'S THOUGHT ON THE ELECTION, WE DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO WIN.

PERHAPS VICE MAYOR MAY NOT BE THE BEST FIT AT THIS MOMENT.

THEREFORE, I'M JUST GOING TO INCLUDE MYSELF TO BE NOMINATED.

>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR THOUGHTS.

AT THIS TIME, COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> MAYOR, I WAS GOING TO ACTUALLY SUPPORT COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS UNTIL THE LAST STATEMENT.

I'M SAYING THIS BECAUSE HE MAYBE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE VOTING DELEGATE IS.

FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO PROBABLY DO NOT KNOW, THIS IS A TIME THAT YOU ACTUALLY LEARN.

THE VOTING DELEGATE VOTES THE SLATE ONLY AT THAT CONFERENCE, ONLY IN AUGUST.

YOU'RE LIMITED TO THAT ONE TIME.

IT DOES NOT EXTEND UNTIL NOVEMBER.

IT'S NOT A BOARD THAT YOU SIT ON.

IT IS A DUTY THAT YOU FULFILL AT THE CONFERENCE.

WE'VE HAD THE MAYOR SERVE, WE'VE HAD COMMISSIONER FISHMAN SERVE.

I HAVE SERVED BEFORE.

I WOULD HAVE SERVED BUT FOR GIVING SOMEBODY ELSE THE OPPORTUNITY, COMMISSIONER GELIN HAS BEEN HERE FOR A LONGER TIME.

I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE FAIR TO HAVE HIM SERVE THIS YEAR.

IF COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS WANTS TO SERVE NEXT YEAR, I WOULD COMMIT TO MAKING SURE THAT HE SERVES THE NEXT YEAR INSTEAD OF NOMINATING MYSELF NEXT YEAR.

>> WAS THAT A QUESTION TO ME MAYOR?

>> I'M NOT SURE IF COMMISSIONER BOLTON WAS ASKING YOU A QUESTION BUT WE'RE TRYING NOT TO HAVE CROSS-COMMUNICATION COMMISSIONER.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, I THINK THAT YOU DESERVE TO SERVE ON COMMITTEES BOARDS AND THINGS LIKE THIS.

I THINK THAT VICE MAYOR GELIN HAS BEEN HERE FOR SOME TIME.

WHILE I HAVE SERVED, THE MAYOR HAVE SERVED, COMMISSIONER FISHMAN HAS SERVED, COMMISSIONER PLACKO IS NOT INTERESTED.

I THINK THAT VICE MAYOR GELIN SHOULD SERVE THIS YEAR AND IF YOU DEFER TO HIM I'D COMMIT TO MAKING SURE THAT YOU SERVE NEXT YEAR.

>> I GUESS THAT IS A QUESTION TO YOU COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, IF YOU ARE WILLING TO BE THE DESIGNEE AND I DON'T KNOW, GIVE ME A SECOND.

CITY ATTORNEY, ARE WE ALLOWED TO APPOINT AT THIS TIME WHO WILL BE THE APPOINTEE FOR NEXT YEAR? CAN WE PUT THAT IN?

>> THERE IS NOTHING THAT PROHIBITS BUT IT COULD CHANGE.

THERE'S NOTHING AGAIN THAT WOULD PROHIBIT

[02:05:01]

NEXT YEAR FROM SOMEONE PROPOSING SOMETHING DIFFERENT.

BUT YES, YOU MAY.

>> BUT WE MAY. WE MAY ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO CODIFY IT THIS YEAR.

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, ARE YOU WILLING TO ACCEPT THAT, AND THEN WITH THE KNOWLEDGE KNOWING THAT NEXT YEAR IT WILL BE IN ORLANDO BECAUSE IT SWITCHES FROM HOLLYWOOD TO ORLANDO EVERY YEAR.

>> JUST TO GO BACK TO COMMISSIONER BOLTZMANN'S QUESTIONS AND STATEMENTS, I WOULD SAY TO ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION THAT NEVER ASSUME NO ONE OR ANYBODY KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT SOMETHING.

IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO JUST MAKE THE STATEMENT.

AS WELL AS I DON'T FEEL PROMISING ANYTHING TO ANYONE FOR A FUTURE DATE IS NECESSARY.

WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE NEXT MINUTE OF OUR LIVES WILL BE OR THE NEXT SECOND IF WE WILL BE STANDING.

WITH THAT, I BELIEVE CONSIDERING VICE MAYOR'S HISTORY ON COMING LATE TO THE MEETINGS, ON ATTENDING CONSTANTLY ON HIS CELL PHONE DURING THE COMMISSION MEETINGS IT'S VERY INAPPROPRIATE FOR OUR CITY AND GOING OUT TO REPRESENT US IN A LARGER SCALE WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME.

MY ANSWER TO COMMISSIONER BOLTON'S AMENABLE REQUEST, I WILL SAY NO.

JUST PUT UP FOR A VOTE.

>> THANK YOU. SEEING NO OTHER QUESTIONS I WILL PUT IT OUT THERE FOR LAST-IN FIRST-OUT AND WE'LL CALL THE ROLL ON COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS FOR SERVING ON A CONSENSUS.

WE'VE GOT TWO PEOPLE.

>> WE'RE VOTING ON COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS AT THIS TIME?

>> CORRECT.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU MAYOR. MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> WE HAVE ALWAYS HAD THE MAYOR OR VICE MAYOR, SO NO.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> NO.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> NO.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES.

>> CONSENSUS FOR COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS FAILED.

UNDERSTOOD? NOW GOING TO, LET ME LEAD BY DEFAULT BUT WE WILL GO THROUGH THE ROLE FOR VICE MAYOR TO HAVE CONSENSUS TO BE THE VOTING DELEGATE AT THE FAR LEGAL CITIES THIS SUMMER.

>> THANK YOU MAYOR. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> NO.

>> VICE MAYOR GELIN?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON?

>> YES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO?

>> YES FOR THE VICE MAYOR.

>> MAYOR GOMEZ?

>> YES.

>> CONSENSUS FOR VICE MAYOR TO SERVE AS THE DELICATE PASS FOUR TO ONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WE LOOK FORWARD TO BOTH GENTLEMEN ATTENDING AND GETTING GOOD INFORMATION BACK FOR THE CITY.

WE WILL NOW MOVE TO ITEM 10B,

[10.b Reopening Discussion of the City of Tamarac Social Justice Wall Portrait SelectionRequestedby Mayor Gomez]

REOPENING THE DISCUSSION OF CITY OF TAMARAC'S SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL PORTRAIT SELECTION AND THIS ITEM WAS REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

WHEN THE APPROVALS WERE GIVEN TO START THE SELECTION FOR THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL, IT WAS TO PAY TRIBUTE TO INDIVIDUALS WHO DEDICATED THEMSELVES TO BREAKING BARRIERS, BRINGING ABOUT POSITIVE CHANGE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE.

THE SELECTION WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN INCLUSIVE AND EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE CITY OF TAMARAC.

THE CITY AND OUR COMMITTEE COORDINATED SEVERAL OUTREACH MEETINGS.

THE ARTIST MICHAEL PARKER ATTENDED THE MEETINGS AND REACHED OUT TO PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS IN OUR COMMUNITY.

THEIR EFFORTS WERE APPRECIATED.

WHILE EACH PERSON CURRENTLY SELECTED TO BE ON OUR SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL IS VERY MUCH WORTHY, THE WALL IS NOT A COMPLETE REFLECTION OF OUR CITY.

THEREFORE, I HAVE ASKED FOR THIS ITEM TO BE ON THE AGENDA TO CONSIDER SELECTING A PERSON FROM EACH OF THE FOLLOWING COMMUNITIES SO THAT THE CITY OF TAMARAC SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL IS TRULY A REFLECTION OF OUR INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY AND THOSE WHO ADVOCATE FOR OUR RIGHTS AS WE HAD ASKED FOR THEY WERE TO BE LOCAL AS BEST AS POSSIBLE.

SOMEBODY WHO WAS IN THE AREA OF CIVIL RIGHTS WHICH ALSO EXTENDED TO PEOPLE WHO WERE THE FIRST, WHETHER IT'D BE SPORTS, MEDICINE, MUSIC, AND THE LIKE.

I'M ASKING FOR A SELECTION OF SOMEBODY FROM AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES, AFRICAN-AMERICAN, ASIAN PACIFIC, CAUCASIAN, HISPANIC, LGBTQ, AND NATIVE AMERICAN CANDIDATES FOR CONSIDERATION.

IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WE HAVE EIGHT PANELS AND UNDERSTANDABLY IN MY OPINION WE HAVE TWO THAT ARE LOCAL THAT ARE ALREADY ON THE LIST.

[02:10:05]

I DO BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD KEEP THE TWO PEOPLE WHO ARE LOCAL ON LIST WHICH WOULD BE MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE AND JAMES ASTHESTRONG.

AS FOR THE REST OF THE PEOPLE ON THE OTHER COMMITTEE ON THEIR COMMUNITIES TO SELECT, I'M NOT GOING TO SHARE MY OPINION.

I WILL BE HAPPY TO KNOW THAT SOMEBODY FROM EACH OF THESE CATEGORIES WOULD BE A MORE COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF OUR CITY AND I'M HOPING THAT THERE WILL BE SUPPORT FROM THIS COMMISSION TO MAKE THE MODIFICATION.

THIS ITEM IS STEMMING FROM RESIDENTS THROUGH ME AND I HAPPEN TO AGREE WITH THEM VERY MUCH. VICE MAYOR?

>> THANK YOU. IT'S A LITTLE BIT INSULTING FOR THIS TO BE COMING UP NOW.

I JUST WANT TO GO BACK TO THE HISTORY AND I GUESS YOU CAN GET PREPARED TO SPEAK MS. CALLOWAY, PLAN DIRECTOR.

THIS WHOLE THING STEMS FROM THE AMERICAN AWAKENING AFTER THE HORRIFIC MURDER AND THAT WE ALL SAW OF GEORGE FLOYD AND A LOT HAS TRANSPIRED SINCE THEN.

FOR EXAMPLE, JUNE 18TH BECOMING A HOLIDAY.

JUST MOST AMERICANS IN GENERAL JUST HAVING MORE OF AN AWAKENING AND A RECOGNITION OF AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE PLIGHT THAT AFRICAN-AMERICANS HAVE HAD IN THIS COUNTRY.

THE WHOLE IDEA OF HAVING THIS ART CAME UP AFTER THE PASSING OF JOHN LEWIS.

I ATTENDED A CEREMONY PUT TOGETHER BY THE NOW COUNTY SUPERVISOR ELECTION JOE SCOTT IN COLD SPRINGS AND I NOTICED THAT THERE WAS A BIG BUST OF MONTE KING OVER THERE.

THEN I WENT TO ANOTHER EVENT IN BOCA AND SAW A BIG BUST OF MONTE KING IN BOCA RETURN, TWO COMMUNITIES WHERE THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN POPULATION IS NOT VERY WELL POPULATED OR IT WASN'T AT THE TIME THAT THOSE BUSTS WERE PUT UP.

BUT IT WAS CERTAINLY AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF A GREAT AMERICAN LEADER.

I BROUGHT THE ITEM TO THE COMMISSION AND THE COMMISSION AGREED, YES, WE DO NOT HAVE ANY ART IN THE COMMUNITY THAT REFLECTS THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY AND SO THAT'S WHEN THIS COMMISSION DECIDED THAT WE SHOULD.

NOW, I'M CERTAINLY NOT OPPOSED TO ACKNOWLEDGING OR CELEBRATING ANY OTHER COMMUNITY BUT THIS COMMISSION MADE A DECISION ON THIS.

MAYOR GOMEZ, YOU'VE BEEN ON THIS COMMISSION SINCE 2009 OR 2010, I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG BUT IF THIS WAS A CONCERN FOR YOU, THEN WHERE WAS JUSTIN DART IN 2010, WHERE WAS HELEN KELLER IN 2011, WHERE WAS FRANK AIMY IN 2012 OR FRED KOREMATSU IN 2013, OR AMELIA EARHART IN 2014, OR ABRAHAM HESCHEL IN 2015, OR RABBI JOKENPRINT IN 2015, OR CESAR CHAVEZ IN 2016, OR JOBY THE EATER IN 2017, OR GILBERT BAKER IN 2018, OR HARVEY MILK IN 2019, OR SUZANNE LEFLASH IN 2020, OR HARRY HAMILTON HAZE IN 2021? YOU'VE BEEN HERE ALL THIS TIME.

WHY HAVEN'T YOU TAKEN THE LEAD IN SAYING, LET'S DO SOMETHING TO CELEBRATE THIS OR THESE PARTICULAR PEOPLE? THEN WHEN I BROUGHT UP CELEBRATING HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH, YOU'RE ON THE RECORD AS VOTING NO.

SAYING NO, YOU DON'T WANT TO SUPPORT HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH.

IS THIS JUST A SITUATION WHERE THERE'S JUST TOO MANY BLACK FACES FOR YOU ON THAT WALL AND YOU WANT TO SEE SOMETHING DIFFERENT?

>> CITY ATTORNEY, WILL YOU REMIND THIS COMMISSION AGAIN ABOUT BEING PROPER?

>> WE'VE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION TODAY AND I'M GOING TO REPEAT MYSELF.

THE RULES OF PROCEDURE, VERY SPECIFICALLY SAY THAT MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION ARE TO TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT, NOT PERSONALIZE, NOT QUESTION MOTIVES, AND CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER.

THE DISCUSSION IS WHETHER OR NOT TO RECONSIDER ADDING ADDITIONAL PANELS OR I DON'T WANT TO SAY RE-CRAFTING THE WALL, AND THAT'S WHAT THE DISCUSSION SHOULD BE LEFT AT.

PERSONAL MOTIVES AND PERSONAL REASONS ARE TO BE LEFT OUT ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE. THEY ARE VERY CLEAR.

>> HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH IS COMING UP.

LET'S IDENTIFY A PLACE AND A SPACE AND GET THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER AND FIND OUT WHO WE SHOULD RECOGNIZE.

[02:15:04]

FOR NATIVE AMERICANS, I RECALL THAT I BROUGHT UP AN ITEM TO DISCUSS RECOGNIZING OR CHANGING COLUMBUS DAY TO ACKNOWLEDGING INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DAY AND YOU WERE AGAINST THAT AS WELL.

WE MADE A DECISION ON THIS, THIS SHOULD NOT BE FURTHER DISCUSSED.

HOWEVER, IF WE DO WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE OTHER GROUPS OF PEOPLE WE SHOULD DO THAT.

THERE'S PLENTY OF ART AND SPACES THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TAMARAC.

I'M SURE THERE ARE FUNDS LEFT IN THE PUBLIC ART FUND AND FEEL FREE TO COMMENT ON THAT MS. CALLOWAY.

THERE'S NO REASON WHY WE CAN'T ACKNOWLEDGE MORE PEOPLE IN DIFFERENT AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TAMARAC, BUT WE SHOULD NOT CHANGE WHAT WE ALREADY DECIDED ON.

THIS IS MY OPINION. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. AS PRESENTER, I WILL TAKE THE LIBERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO OTHERS DURING THEIR PRESENTATION.

THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THE DETERMINATION BY THE COMMUNITY AND THIS COMMISSION WAS TO HAVE IT BEING A FAIR REPRESENTATION AND AN EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION OF THE POPULATION.

I BELIEVE THAT THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO DID TRY TO GET PUBLIC INPUT.

I THINK THAT THIS COMMISSION DID NOT WANT TO RISK BEING CALLED NAMES BY OTHERS AS CERTAIN PEOPLE LIKE TO THROW AT THEM NOW.

THAT IS WHY IT JUST PASSED WITH LIMITED SELECTION THAT WAS PROVIDED TO US.

I BELIEVE THAT HAD THE PEOPLE IN PLACE TO PRESENT TO US THE OTHER ITEMS. DID THE QUICK SEARCH THAT THE PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY GAVE ME, THEY WOULD HAVE FOUND OTHER PEOPLE TO MAKE THIS A MORE EQUITABLE ITEM FOR DISCUSSION AT THAT TIME.

UNFORTUNATELY, THEY DID NOT BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE TOO AFRAID TO SPEAK THEIR VOICE.

BECAUSE OF RAMIFICATION OF BEING CALLED A RACIST, BECAUSE IT IS CONVENIENT FOR THEM TO HAVE THAT BEING THROWN OUT INSTEAD OF DEALING WITH THE TOPIC AT HAND.

THE TOPIC AT HAND IS THAT THIS WAS A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY TO HAVE A SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL.

IN THIS SPECIFIC COMMISSION FOUR TO ONE DID STATE THEY WANTED AN EQUITABLE SHOWING OF THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL, AND THEY WOULD PREFER THAT IT WOULD BE EXPANDED.

AS I HAD SAID EARLIER, I WILL NOT REPEAT MYSELF FOR THAT.

AS FOR OUR SPECIFIC CULTURAL CELEBRATIONS, THEY ARE TO BE BLENDED INTO ONE TAMARAC.

THAT IS WHAT MY COMMENTS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AND WE ARE ON A SPECIFIC BUDGET.

ALSO FOR PEOPLE TO THROW STONES, I AT LEAST GO TO ALL OF THESE EVENTS.

I STAY, I PARTICIPATE, I ENJOY THE CULTURE AND I CELEBRATE.

I SEE THAT COMMISSIONER PLACKO WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING. PLEASE PROCEED.

>> THANK YOU. FIRST OF ALL, I'M NOT SURE.

I'D LIKE TO VERIFY.

I DON'T BELIEVE THERE ARE EIGHT OPEN SPOTS ON THIS WALL.

>> AT THE TIME WHEN I SPOKE WITH THE CITY MANAGER THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT, THERE ARE EIGHT PANELS.

THERE ARE ACTUALLY EIGHT PANELS.

WE HAVE SIX PEOPLE AND TWO DRAWINGS.

MY THOUGHT WAS THAT WE HAD EIGHT PANELS AND TO REVISE THE PANELS.

I DON'T BELIEVE WE NEED THE DRAWINGS.

THEY'RE VERY PRETTY. I THINK HIS WORK IS VERY NICE.

BUT AS EIGHT PANELS THEN LET'S SELECT EIGHT PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY WE WILL BE PROUD OF AS WHEN THE KIDS ARE WALKING THROUGH FROM SCHOOL TO THE FOOD PLACES AND EVERYTHING TO SHOW THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY A DIVERSE COMMUNITY AND AN EQUITABLE ONE.

>> OKAY. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH ADDING TO.

IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THE TIME WE TALKED ABOUT THIS, THAT THERE WAS RESIDENT INPUT AND WHO THEY THOUGHT SHOULD BE ON THE PANEL.

WE THE COMMISSION WERE GIVEN A LIST AND EACH OF US PICKED OUT OUR TOP THREE.

THAT LIST WAS PUT TOGETHER AND THERE WAS A CONSENSUS WITH THE FIVE THAT WE PICKED.

IF WE'VE HAD COMMUNITY INPUT, LOOK, THERE ARE PROBABLY DOZENS AND DOZENS OF PEOPLE THAT DESERVE TO BE PUT ON THE WALL, HANDS DOWN, NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT.

POSSIBLY WE CAN FIND ANOTHER WAY TO DO SOMETHING WITH SOME OF THESE ON YOUR LIST.

I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM WITH THAT.

WELL-DESERVED. BUT AT THIS POINT, IF OUR RESIDENTS HAVE HAD AN INPUT AND WE ALL HAVE AGREED ON THESE FIVE, I'M NOT SURE THAT WE WANT TO GO BACK TO SQUARE 1 AND START ALL OVER AGAIN.

THE ARTIST, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, IS READY TO GO.

WE MAY BE POSTPONING THAT AS WELL.

[02:20:01]

>> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

I WILL ANSWER SOME OF THOSE QUESTIONS IN A MINUTE OR HAVE STAFF ANSWER, BUT IN THE INTERIM, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> CAN YOU ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS BEFORE I PLACE?

>> SURE. MS. CALLOWAY, ARE YOU HERE OR ONLINE?

>> YES.

>> THANK YOU. THE NUMEROUS OUTPUTS OR THE OUTREACH TO OUR CITY, I KNOW IT WAS AT ONE MEETING THAT WAS HOSTED ALL OVER THE PLACE, FACEBOOK LIVE AS WELL.

THERE WAS ONE RESIDENT IN THE COMMUNITY THAT ATTENDED. IS THAT CORRECT?

>> THAT IS CORRECT MA'AM.

>> OUT OF THE NUMEROUS OUTREACH, WAS THERE A LOT OF CITY RESIDENTIAL INVOLVEMENT?

>> YES. THE ARTIST ALSO ATTENDED AN EVENT IN THE CITY WHERE HE SET UP A TABLE AND WAS ABLE TO RECEIVE SOME FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS WHO ATTENDED THAT EVENT.

>> CORRECT. ABOUT HOW MANY OF THEM WERE ACTUAL RESIDENTS THAT WERE GIVING THE FEEDBACK AT THAT TENT. DO YOU KNOW?

>> NO, I DON'T KNOW.

>> THANK YOU. JUST AS OUR SOCIAL MEDIA DOESN'T ALWAYS GET PEOPLE TO OUR EVENTS OR PEOPLE HAVE OTHER THINGS, I THINK, UNFORTUNATELY WITH THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, IT DID NOT REACH PEOPLE AND PEOPLE DIDN'T PARTICIPATE.

I UNFORTUNATELY DON'T THINK THAT WHETHER IT'S THE ART COMMITTEE.

HOWEVER, WE GOT THROUGH THE ART COMMITTEE THAT IT ACTUALLY DID THE QUICK SEARCH OF LEADERS AND CIVIL ACTIVISTS.

BECAUSE HAD THEY DONE RESEARCH THAT WAS DONE BY A COUPLE OF RESIDENTS IN THE CITY WHO BROUGHT IT TO ME, AND THEN I DID THE SAME SEARCH, THEY WOULD HAVE FOUND THE SAME PEOPLE THAT I DID.

ONE OF THE PEOPLE THAT WAS LEFT OFF WAS IRA THORPE, WHO WAS A NATIVE AMERICAN, WHO WON THE OLYMPICS, AND THEN UNFORTUNATELY HAD HIS OLYMPIC MEDALS STRIPPED.

I THINK THAT THIS ITEM WAS DONE AS BEST AS POSSIBLE, BUT NOT DONE AS COMPLETELY AS POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE US WITH A TRULY REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF PEOPLE TO SELECT FROM.

THERE WASN'T MUCH BACKUP GIVEN TO US ON THE LIST NOR TIMING.

WE WERE GIVEN A LIST AND SAID SELECT.

THEN ACTUALLY SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THE LIST, ONE OF THE PEOPLE ON THE LIST WAS REMOVED.

IT DID NOT HAVE WHAT THE COMMISSION ASKED FOR IN MUSIC AND IN SCIENCE AND IN ATHLETICS ON THAT LIST EITHER.

I THINK IT WAS JUST GIVEN TO US AND WE TOOK THE EASY WAY OUT.

I THINK THAT THE ARTIST IS AWARE THAT THERE'S A POTENTIAL CHANGE.

HE'S GETTING HIS STUFF READY.

BUT IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO MAKE ANY CHANGES.

IF WE WANTED TO CONVERT SOME OF THE PANELS THAT HAVE PEOPLE WHO ARE VERY WELL HONORED AND RESPECTED, BUT ARE IN TRIBUTES ELSEWHERE, WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE TRIBUTES TO THESE OTHER PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT GIVEN THE ACCOLADES OR THE RECOGNITION THAT THEY SO DESERVE.

ACTUALLY, IF YOU WERE JIM, I'M GOING TO GIVE IT BACK TO COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

IF YOU WOULD JUST AT LEAST PUT THE LIST OF PEOPLE SO PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE AUDIENCE MAY NOT REALIZE THAT THERE'S 56 PAGES OF BACKUP THAT HAVE HISTORY ON THESE PEOPLE.

THIS HAS BEEN ASKED TO THE COMMISSION TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY LOOK THE SAME.

BUT THESE ARE THE CANDIDATES FOR CONSIDERATION THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ME FROM RESIDENTS.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. I WOULD AGREE WITH EVERYONE THAT HAS SPOKEN THUS FAR.

IF THAT PANEL DOES GET PLACED AS IS, AND RESIDENTS DO PASS BY, I DON'T THINK THEY'LL SEE A SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL EQUALITY.

THERE WILL BE A DIVISION.

IN MY OPINION, IT DOES NOT REPRESENT THE ENTIRE CITY.

AS WE ALL KNOW, WE HAVE 30 PLUS PERCENT WHITE, 30 PLUS PERCENT AFRICAN-AMERICAN, 30 PLUS PERCENT HISPANIC.

THE BALANCE IS OTHERS.

THERE'S DIFFERENT RELIGIONS, DIFFERENT SEX ORIENTATIONS, AND THE CURRENT WALL DOES NOT DO THAT.

OTHERWISE, I THINK THE WORD SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL IS NOT THE CORRECT TERM THAT SHOULD BE USED IF IT'S JUST AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN WALL.

[02:25:01]

AGAIN, WE HAVE A HUGE DIVERSITY OF RESIDENTS.

I THINK THIS NEEDS TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND A NEW LIST SELECTED BASED ON WHAT WE ACTUALLY REPRESENT. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

>> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

>> COULD WE COMPROMISE AND ADD TWO FROM THIS LIST? I'M JUST AFRAID NOW WE START REMOVING PEOPLE.

WE WILL START OFFENDING PEOPLE AS WELL.

BECAUSE THESE CANDIDATES WE'VE ALREADY SELECTED FOR THE WALL ARE NOW GOING TO BE TAKEN OFF.

THAT COULD BE OFFENSIVE TO SOME PEOPLE.

WHY DON'T WE JUST ADD TWO FROM THIS LIST? THIS WAY IT'S A COMPROMISE.

THAT WOULD BE MY SUGGESTION.

>> COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. WE OFTEN HEAR THAT WE GET OUR BACKUP INFORMATION.

WE GO THROUGH IT, WE PERUSE THE ITEMS, WE MAKE HARD DECISIONS.

I REMEMBER RECEIVING AN EMAIL FROM MR. PARKER.

HE PROVIDED THE OPTIONS THAT WE HAD.

WE HAD TO THEN REVIEW THOSE OPTIONS AND PROVIDE OUR OPINION TO MS. CALLOWAY.

WITH ALL THAT WORK AND NOW WE WOULD BE REGRESSING AND NOT PROGRESSING.

I JUST THINK THAT IT WOULD BE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE TO EVEN MAKE ANY CONCESSIONS AT THIS TIME TO THEN OFFEND SOMEBODY WHO IS ALREADY SELECTED FOR THE PROCESS.

I DID GO THROUGH THE BACKUP INFORMATION AND HAD TIME TO DO IT.

THE MAYOR PRESENTED A WELL-ROUNDED LIST OF PEOPLE WHO I THINK ARE DESERVING OF SPOTLIGHT.

SHE IS TO BE COMMENDED FOR THAT.

I DON'T THINK THAT ANYBODY ON THIS COMMISSION WOULD DISAGREE WITH THE LIST OF PEOPLE THAT THE MAYOR HAS PRESENTED.

IT IS WELL-ROUNDED.

I THINK WHEREVER IT CAME FROM, THOSE PEOPLE ARE TO BE COMMENDED TOO.

BUT THIS COMMISSION MADE A COMMITMENT TO THE PEOPLE THAT WERE SELECTED BY CONSENSUS.

ALL THE WORK THAT WE DID LEADING UP TO THAT COMMISSION MEETING, AND I JUST THINK THAT IT WILL BE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE NOW TO CHANGE COURSE.

I WOULD TEND TO AGREE WITH COMMISSIONER PLACKO THAT MAYBE THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO FOR THESE PEOPLE THAT THE MAYOR HAS BROUGHT FORWARD.

BUT I WOULD NOT BE IN SUPPORT OF THEM LOOKING AT THE LIST AND THEN CHOOSING SOME PEOPLE TO BE ADDED TO THAT LIST.

THEN HOW DO WE SELECT THE PEOPLE THAT WE REMOVE AND WHAT WOULD BE OUR REASONING TO DO THAT? I JUST THINK THAT LEAVES A BITTER TASTE IN PEOPLE'S MOUTH.

WE MADE A DECISION AS A COMMISSION.

I THINK THAT WE SHOULD STICK BY THAT DECISION THAT THE COMMISSION MADE.

I'M VERY, VERY MUCH INCLINED TO MAKING SURE THAT THE LIST OF PEOPLE THAT THEY MAY HAVE BROUGHT FORWARD IS RECOGNIZED IN SOME WAY.

I THINK THAT THEY SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED, BUT THE PROCESS IS ALREADY DONE.

WE SHOULD FOLLOW OUR OWN IDEAS AND ADVICE TO GO FORWARD, PROGRESS AND NOT REGRESS WHEN WE MAKE DECISIONS.

I WOULD BE INCLINED TO SUPPORT A DECISION TO LEAVE THINGS, AS IS WITH A CAVEAT THAT THIS LIST BE LOOKED AT FOR A FUTURE PROJECT IN TAMARAC. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> I THINK I CAN ANSWER COMMISSIONER BOLTON HIS QUESTION.

I BELIEVE THE REASONING IS FOR DIVERSITY [OVERLAPPING]

>> A POINT OF ORDER, MADAM MAYOR.

I DID NOT ASK A QUESTION.

I DID NOT ASK FOR COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> [OVERLAPPING] COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, PLEASE.

WE'RE GOING TO KEEP OUR COMMENTS JUST STRAIGHT.

JUST KEEP THEM, YOU DON'T HAVE TO DIRECT THEM TO ANYBODY.

JUST MAKE YOUR COMMENT WITHOUT NAMES, PLEASE.

>> THE REASONING FOR THIS, I BELIEVE IS FOR DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION.

I DON'T SEE HOW IT WOULD OFFEND SOMEONE IF WE REMOVE ANYONE.

[02:30:07]

A GOOD MIX AND MATCH FOR ALL TYPES OF BODIES THAT HAVE MADE WAVES FOR OUR FREEDOMS FOR OUR SACRIFICES THEY HAVE MADE FOR US TO LIVE TODAY.

IT INVOLVES MANY PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT CULTURES AND RELIGIONS AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

I DON'T SEE HOW WE HAVE FIVE PEOPLE NOW, AND FOUR OF THEM ARE FROM THE SAME RACE.

I WOULD QUESTION ANYONE FROM THIS COMMISSION TO TELL ME HOW IS THAT DIVERSIFICATION AND INCLUSION FOR INDIANS, FOR THE LGBT COMMUNITY, FOR HISPANICS, FOR ASIANS, AND DOES NOT.

FOR THAT REASON, I DON'T BELIEVE IT'S PRODUCTIVE, WE'RE GOING BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND WE HAVE PLENTY OF TIME.

WE DON'T, THIS WALL MAY PERHAPS BE READY BEFORE EVEN THE AMPHITHEATER.

IF CITY MANAGER CAN SPEAK ON THAT, WHICH PROJECT WOULD BE DONE FIRST? IS THAT SOMETHING YOU CAN ANSWER, MS. KATHLEEN?

>> THE MANAGER OR [OVERLAPPING]

>> YES.

>> THE CITY MANAGER? GO AHEAD.

>> YEAH. NO. WE DO NEED TO MAKE A DECISION QUICKLY AS IT RELATES TO THE WALL BECAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION IS UNDERWAY AND THE ARTISTS HAD SAID ABOUT THEIR WORK BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE LAST CONVERSATION THAT WAS HAD BY THE COMMISSION.

IF WE DO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND HAVE THIS DISCUSSION, THE COST WILL LIKELY GO UP AND IT WILL NOT BE DONE BEFORE THE AMPHITHEATER.

CERTAINLY IT WOULD LAG BEHIND THE REST OF THE PROJECT.

ADDITIONALLY, I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT.

MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THERE IS ROOM FOR SIX PANELS, MAYOR.

SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT CLEAR.

I KNOW YOU SAID EIGHT, BUT I JUST CONFERRED WITH MAXINE TO MAKE SURE ABOUT THAT BECAUSE I JUST WANTED THAT TO BE CLEAR.

>> I'M UNCERTAIN ABOUT [OVERLAPPING].

THANK YOU. GO AHEAD. SORRY, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> YES. EVEN TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE REPORT THAT WE SAW OF THE MAKEUP OF OUR COMMUNITY, EVEN GOING BASED ON THAT, LIKE I SAID, 30 PLUS PERCENT AFRICAN-AMERICAN, 30 PLUS PERCENT HISPANIC, ETC.

THAT'S ALREADY THREE PANELS RIGHT THERE.

WE CAN MAKE AN ASIAN INDIAN PANEL AND WHATEVER FIFTH OR SIXTH PANEL THERE IS, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THESE PANELS CURRENTLY DEMONSTRATE WHAT TAMARAC HAS BECOME OR WILL BE IN THE FUTURE UNLESS, THAT'S SO MY COMMENTS. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. JUST ON THE THING FOR THE PANELS, IF WE HAVE SIX PEOPLE WHO ARE BEING HONORED, THIS IS FROM MAXINE, I GUESS, AND TWO THAT HAVE DRAWINGS ON IT.

I'M NOT SURE WHY THOSE DRAWINGS CAN BE CONVERTED TO PEOPLE.

IN TAKING IN LINE SOME OF THE COMMENTS HERE.

MAYBE WE CAN BE ASKING THE ARTISTS IF HE CAN BE CREATIVE.

INSTEAD OF THE PANELS THAT HAVE THE LUNCH COUNTERS, MAYBE HE CAN FIND A WAY TO PUT A COMBINATION OF ONE PERSON FROM EACH OF THESE OTHER COMMUNITIES.

FOR EXAMPLE, TAKE A PERSON FROM AMERICAN DISABILITIES, ASIAN-PACIFIC.

I STILL AS MUCH AS JFK HAS DONE A GREAT JOB.

I DON'T BELIEVE HIS FACE THERE IS APPROPRIATE.

I WOULD SUPPORT CHANGING HIM OUT.

BUT ANYWAY, IF NOT THE HISPANIC, LGBTQ, NATIVE AMERICAN, AND MAYBE WE CAN HAVE THREE ON ONE AND FOUR ON ANOTHER, SMALLER FACES, SMALLER SIGNATURES.

HE'S AN ARTIST. I THINK HE CAN FIGURE OUT A WAY TO MAKE THIS SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL BE MORE EQUITABLE AND MORE INCLUSIVE ABOUT OUR ACTUAL CITY, THEN THAT'S CURRENTLY THERE RIGHT NOW.

BECAUSE THIS IS OUR LEGACY EVERYBODY.

DO WE WANT TO TELL OUR 30, 30 PLUS THAT THEY DON'T COUNT? THE REALITY IS WITHIN THE NEXT CENSUS IS GOING TO BE 20, 20, 20.

WE HAVE A LARGE ASIAN-AMERICAN POPULATION, VERY ACTIVE AS WELL IN OUR CITY.

JUST ALSO NOT BY WHAT WE LOOK LIKE AS COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS SAID, WHO WE LOVE, WHO WE BELIEVE IN, AND WHAT OUR ROLES HAVE BEEN TO MAKE OUR PLACE BETTER.

I DON'T BELIEVE THAT PEOPLE WHO ARE DECEASED REALLY CARE.

THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE HAVE PEOPLE ON THE WALL OR DECEASED.

THEY DON'T HAVE AN EXPECTATION OF BEING PUT ON A WALL AND BEING UPSET.

I ALSO DON'T THINK WE'VE HAD A RUN ON POPULATION

[02:35:02]

CARING ABOUT WHO IS GOING TO BE ON THE WALL, THAT THEY WILL BE UPSET.

BUT WE DO HAVE A NEW GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO ARE CARING AND FEELING THAT THEY ARE BEING LEFT OUT BY THIS COMMISSION ON THIS EQUITABLE SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL THAT HAS NOT BEEN VOTED IN IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THE DIRECTIVE WAS SENT OUT.

WE'RE RUSHING FOR A TIMELINE FOR CONSTRUCTION, AND WE ALL HAVE HEARD HOW CONSTRUCTION GOES ALONG.

THE REALITY IS, THIS IS PHASE II OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND WHY I LIKE IT COMPLETED ON TIME.

IT COULD STILL GET COMPLETED BEFORE THE NEXT PHASE, WHICH IS OUR 35,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, WHICH IS NOT EVEN SCHEDULED TO GO UP.

REALLY WHAT IS IT HOLDING UP IF THIS TAKES AN EXTRA MONTH TO GET THIS DONE AND GETTING IT DONE RIGHT? BECAUSE NOW IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET IT DONE AND GET IT DONE RIGHT. COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

>> MAXINE, ARE YOU AVAILABLE?

>> YES, I AM COMMISSIONER.

>> CAN YOU TELL ME IS THERE AN ABILITY ON THIS WALL TO ADD AND I DON'T WANT TO CALL IT A PANEL, BUT TO ADD SEVERAL MORE IMAGES?

>> BASED ON OUR DISCUSSION WITH THE ARTISTS, ONE ADDITIONAL PANEL IS AVAILABLE, OR THE REPLACEMENT OF ONE IMAGE THAT'S ALREADY BEEN VOTED ON.

I THINK THE MAYOR'S DISCUSSION ON TWO PANEL CAME FROM THE ADDITION OF ONE PANEL AND THE REPLACEMENT OF ONE IMAGE.

WE WOULD HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE ARTISTS AND HAVE A DISCUSSION RELATIVE TO A NEW CONCEPTUAL PLAN THAT MIGHT REMOVE SOME OF THE IMAGES THAT ARE ON SOME OF THE PANELS TO REPLACE IT WITH SOMETHING ELSE.

BUT IN PREPARATION FOR THIS DISCUSSION, WE JUST HAD A DISCUSSION WITH THE ARTISTS CONCERNING THE ADDING ADDITIONAL PANELS AND WE WERE TOLD THAT ONLY ONE COULD BE ACCOMMODATED AND THE REPLACEMENT OF ONE IMAGE COULD BE CONSIDERED AS WELL.

>> THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT THOUGH.

WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADD ONE NEW PERSON.

I REALLY HAVE AN ISSUE WITH TAKING PEOPLE OFF.

SOMEONE WHO'S GOING TO BE OFFENDED.

LET'S FACE REALITY.

YOU CAN'T MAKE EVERYBODY HAPPY.

THAT'S JUST A REALITY.

WE'VE ANNOUNCED AND OBVIOUSLY SOME OF OUR RESIDENTS HAVE SPOKEN OR THESE NAMES WOULD NEVER HAVE COME TO US TO BEGIN WITH.

NOW TO GO OFFEND THOSE PEOPLE, I'M NOT SURE I LIKE THAT IDEA AND WELL, I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND YOUR AND COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS THAT WE ARE NEGLECTING SOME I GET THAT.

IF WE CAN FIND A COMPROMISE, I'M ALL FOR THAT, BUT MAYBE THERE'S ANOTHER WAY TO TAKE THIS LIST OF PEOPLE AND DO THEM, I DON'T KNOW, ON A PLAQUE OR SOMETHING ELSE.

BUT I REALLY DON'T LIKE THE IDEA OF STARTING TO REMOVE PEOPLE.

I'M OKAY FOR ADDING SOMEBODY, BUT I DON'T LIKE THE IDEA OF REMOVING.

IT'S OFFENSIVE TO THOSE PEOPLE AND PEOPLE WHO WANTED THEM.

>> WELL, THAT'S WHY MY LAST COMMENT WAS ASKING ON THOSE PANELS BECAUSE THE LUNCH COUNTER IS NOT A PERSON, SO THAT'S ONE OF THE PANELS AND THE NEW PANEL.

IF THERE IS A WAY FOR THIS ARTIST TO ADD THE PEOPLE THAT WE CAN SELECT, AND IF WE DON'T SELECT IT TODAY, HAVE IT READY FOR US SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR SELECTION, WHICH I GUESS WOULD BE THREE WEEKS FOR THE NEXT MEETING IF WE'RE NOT READY TO DO IT TODAY, BUT SELECT IF THERE ARE MOON NEEDS AS ARTISTS AND MAXINE, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE ASKED THE ARTISTS THIS.

IN MY HEAD, I'M JUST TAKING THE SIZE OF THE PANEL.

CAN WE PUT THREE ON THE PANEL? SMALLER VERSIONS WITH THEIR SIGNATURE AND THEN THE NEW PANEL, ANOTHER THREE OR FOUR.

I DON'T KNOW THE LIST RIGHT NOW OF THREE OR FOUR OF THE NEW PEOPLE TO MAKE THIS MORE INCLUSIVE AND THEY ARE SHARING THIS THREE AND THREE.

JUST MAKE IT EASY FOR RIGHT NOW, FOR DESCRIPTION PURPOSES NOT SAYING FOR HARD AND FAST.

EVERYBODY WHO ALREADY HAS THEIR INDIVIDUAL PANELS HAS THEIR INDIVIDUAL PANELS.

BUT EITHER SELECTING FROM ONE FROM EACH OF THESE GROUPS AND HAVING THREE ON ONE, THREE AND ANOTHER WITH THEIR FACE AND A SMALLER SIZE AND THEIR SIGNATURE, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TAKE EVERY SINGLE PERSON THAT WE HAVE LISTED ON HERE FOR THE ADDITIONAL AND WRITE THEIR NAMES OUT AND PUT IT IN A CREATIVE WAY AND TO CREATIVE FONT TO ENCOURAGE AND SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, WE CAN TAKE GILBERT BAKER AND SAY WHY OR HARVEY MILK FROM, SAY, WHY IN THE LGBT COMMUNITY HAVE THIS WAY WHEN PEOPLE ARE THERE, THE POINT IS TO SPARK CONVERSATION.

THE POINT IS TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO LEARN MORE.

[02:40:01]

THEY'RE NOT JUST SAYING, THIS SOUNDS ALWAYS BEEN THERE BEFORE.

THEY WOULD HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY AND GIVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE THIS SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL THE CREATIVITY THAT I BELIEVE THIS COMMISSION WAS SO HOPING TO HAVE, VICE MAYOR?

>> LIKE TO END THE DISCUSSION AND CALL FIRST CONSENSUS.

>> THERE IS A [OVERLAPPING].

>> I'M ON BOARD OF THAT.

>> PARDON?

>> I'M ON BOARD WITH THAT.

>> UNDERSTOOD. I'M GOING TO WRAP IT UP AND SAY THAT THERE ARE THREE AVENUES.

DO NOTHING AS FARSI OR OSCAR ARTISTS TO GO BACK AND DO A CREATIVE WAY.

IS THERE A QUESTION CITY ATTORNEY? TO GET MORE ON THE LIST.

IF WE HAVE TO NARROW IT DOWN FROM ONE FROM EACH COMMUNITY, WOULD BE BEST, OR IF WE'RE GOING TO DO LISTS EVERYBODY'S NAMES THAT'S ON HERE IN THE LIST ON THOSE EXTRA TWO PANELS.

THOSE ARE THE THREE OPTIONS.

COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS?

>> CAN YOU GO ONE-BY-ONE, GETTING CONSENSUS PLEASE?

>> I WILL.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THAT'S WHAT THE THREE ITEMS. I'LL START IN THE ALTERNATIVE.

THE FIRST ITEM OF CONSENSUS IS FOR ADDING A PANEL, REVISING ONE PANEL, KEEPING THE CURRENT SELECTED PEOPLE AS IS.

BUT JUST ASKING THE ARTIST TO GO BACK AND LIST ALL OF THE PEOPLE IN THE NEW CATEGORIES ON THERE IN SOME CREATIVE FASHION.

THAT'S THE FIRST ONE. I'LL REPEAT IT JUST SO QUESTIONS ON FACE.

THE SECOND ONE IS FOR US TO KEEP A PANEL AS SELECT THESE AS IS AND ADD ON THE TWO PANELS ON THESE TWO PANELS COMBINE ONE PERSON FROM EACH OF THE OTHER ADDITIONAL CANDIDATES IN A SMALLER PICTURE AND SIGNATURE BLOCK TO MAKE IT FIT WITH WHAT'S CURRENTLY ON THE OTHER PANELS.

THE THIRD OPTION [INAUDIBLE], COMMISSIONER PLACKO IS A FOURTH OPTION. GO FOR IT.

>> I HAVE A FOURTH OPTION.

I BELIEVE OUR COMMISSIONER FROM DISTRICT 1 HAS TALKED ABOUT WANTING SOMETHING IN HIS DISTRICT.

IF WE HAVE SOMETHING IN YOUR DISTRICT, WE COULD CERTAINLY HONOR SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN LEFT OFF.

WOULD YOU BE AMENABLE TO THAT?

>> ABSOLUTELY. I THINK THIS LIST IS AN AMAZING LIST.

I WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO HONOR THESE PEOPLE IN MY DISTRICT.

>> I KNOW THE ART COMMITTEE HAS TALKED ABOUT THIS AND IS WELL AWARE OF SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

THERE'S NO WAY WE CAN HONOR EVERYONE THAT WE NEED TO HONOR ON ONE PANEL.

THAT'S JUST REALITY, AND TO TAKE A FULL FIGURE AND PUT THREE ON A PANEL, I THINK MIGHT DIMINISH WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE.

I'M ALL IN FAVOR OF ADDING ONE PANEL. ABSOLUTELY.

>> THERE'S FOUR ITEMS NOW.

>> I'M SORRY.

>> THAT'S OKAY. I PERSONALLY, I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE GOING WITH THE FOURTH ITEM, BUT I THINK THAT IS NOT THE TOPIC AT HAND.

I THINK THAT THE FOURTH ITEM ON A PLACEMENT OF ART THAT IS IN THE FUTURE THAT IS NOT YET SET, IS NOT WHERE WE ARE.

WHEN I SAY IT'S NOT AT HAND, WE'RE TALKING SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THIS ITEM VERSUS SOMETHING THAT IS IN THE FUTURE AND THIS ITEM WAS SUPPOSED TO BE INCLUSIVE AND EQUITABLE.

WE CAN GO BACK.

IT'S NOTHING AGAINST HAVING A SECOND PANEL, THE SECOND ITEM IN THE FUTURE.

BUT I'D RATHER JUST IN MY OPINION, KEEP IT TO THIS, BUT I'M GOING TO GO BACK TO DOING THE THIRD OPTION FIRST.

I'LL START WITH YOU, COMMISSIONER PLACKO. ACTUALLY, WHY DON'T WE DO THIS.

GIVE ME A RANKING. IT'LL BE A HELL OF A LOT IS EXPECTED OF YOU. NEVER MIND.

>> END DISCUSSION, NEXT ITEM.

>> I'M TRYING TO GET A CONSENSUS HERE VICE MAYOR.

>> BUT THE CONSENSUS CAN END THE DISCUSSION.

>> THE CONSENSUS.

>> MADAM MAYOR.

>> WE ARE ENDING DISCUSSION, WE'RE GOING FOR CONSENSUS FOR WHERE THE ITEM WILL GO.

IT'S NOT A TABLING ITEM.

>> MADAM MAYOR, I JUST THINK THAT WE SHOULD LEAVE THIS AS IT IS AND THEN IN THE FUTURE, HAVE A DISCUSSION AS TO HOW WE CAN HONOR THESE PEOPLE.

I'D LIKE THAT TO BE CALLED RIGHT NOW.

>> THAT'S YOUR ITEM. THAT'S YOUR OPINION. THANK YOU.

I'VE GOT THAT. COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

>> MY OPINION WOULD BE TO ADD ONE PANEL AND KEEP THE REST THE WAY IT IS.

>> VICE MAYOR.

>> END DISCUSSION.

LEAVE EVERYTHING AS IT IS, AND USE YOUR LEADERSHIP IN IDENTIFYING ANOTHER PLACE AND LOCATION TO HONOR OTHER PEOPLE.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, YOUR OPINION?

>> I WOULD SAY GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND REDO THIS WALL.

>> OKAY. AS THAT ONE UNFORTUNATELY IS NOT AN OPTION FOR US.

[02:45:01]

WHAT WE HAVE ON THE TABLE IS DO NOTHING.

WE HAVE TWO FOR DO NOTHING AND LEAVE IT AS IS AND ONE FOR ADDING A PANEL AND TRYING TO REVISE IT THAT WAY.

>> WHAT WAS THE THIRD ONE, I'M SORRY.

>> THE REALITY IS THAT THERE IS NO THIRD ONE FOR THERE TO BE RECEIVING ENOUGH CONSENSUS TO MOVE THIS FORWARD.

WHAT IS ON THE TABLE AT THIS TIME IS DO NOTHING OR ADD A PANEL

>> ADD A PANEL.

>> OKAY. THERE'S CONSENSUS TO AT LEAST ADD A PANEL AND ASK THE ARTISTS TO COME BACK WITH A WAY TO INCORPORATE THE PEOPLE ON THE ADDITIONAL COMMUNITIES FOR THEIR RECOGNITION.

MS. MAXINE ADD A PANEL.

>> YES WE ARE.

>> SHE'S MAKING RULES AND SHE'S GOING ON.

>> I KNOW IT'S HARD FOR YOU VICE MAYOR, BUT IF IT'S ANY WAY POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO KEEP YOUR INFANTILE COMMENTS TO YOURSELF, IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED.

>> CITY ATTORNEY?

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO, HEY, IT WORKS.

>> THE CITY ATTORNEY?

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO. NOW, YOUR COMMENT ABOUT THEN A PANEL.

>> CITY ATTORNEY, ARE YOU'RE GOING TO RESPOND?

>> CAN YOU PLEASE.

>> AS A PARLIAMENTARIAN, I'M GOING TO INSTRUCT AND REMIND BOTH OF YOU THAT INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS ARE AGAINST YOUR RULES.

>> YES.

>> A PROFESSIONAL DISCUSSION IS HOW IT SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY ALL PARTIES.

>> YES.

>> POINT OF ORDER. CITY ATTORNEY DO THINK THE LAST COMMENT BY THE MAYOR WAS INAPPROPRIATE?

>> I BELIEVE COMMENTS [OVERLAPPING] FROM BOTH SPEAKERS.

>> SPEAKING TO THAT ITEM, DO YOU THINK THAT THE LAST COMMENT BY THE MAYOR WAS INAPPROPRIATE?

>> I BELIEVE IT'S NOT CONSISTENT WITH YOUR RULES.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH.

>> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I WILL FULLY ADMIT THAT MY COMMENT WAS INCONSISTENT WITH THE RULES.

BUT AFTER BEING BEATEN UP CONTINUALLY BY THIS STARKEY COMMENTS FROM THIS DAY IS WHEN WE ARE TRYING TO GET THE BUSINESS OF THE CITY AT HAND, YES, I CALLED IT WHAT IT WAS AND I PUT IT ON THE RECORD.

[OVERLAPPING] I'M GOING TO TRY TO BRING THIS BACK AS I'VE BEEN TRYING TO DO AND SAY TO COMMISSIONER PLACKO TO PLEASE CLARIFY BECAUSE THE WAY I HEARD YOUR MOTION IS THE WAY I INTERPRETED IT.

SINCE IT WAS NOT SPECIFIC, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO CLARIFY IT.

>> CLARIFY. ADD ONE PANEL WITH ONE PERSON FROM THIS LIST.

>> NOW, WE'RE UP TO ONE PANEL BEING ADDED WITH ONLY BEING ONE PERSON FROM THIS LIST.

I'M GOING TO ASK THIS, INSTEAD OF US CONTINUING TO MAKE DECISIONS ON WHETHER OR NOT HOW MUCH CAN BE DONE ON THIS ONE PANEL, WOULD YOU BE AMENABLE TO LETTING US GO BACK TO MICHAEL, THE ARTIST, MICHAEL PARKER, AND LETTING HIM GIVE HIS OPINION OF WHAT CAN BE DONE VERSUS STIFLING HIS ABILITY TO POSSIBLY HAVE MORE THAN ONE PERSON ON THAT PANEL?

>> MY CONCERN WITH THAT IS THEN YOU DIMINISH THE PEOPLE ON THE PANEL.

IF YOU HAVE THREE PEOPLE ON A PANEL, IT DIMINISHES THE WHOLE IDEA OF HAVING ONE.

WHAT I SAID EARLIER WAS IF WE CAN FIND A WAY TO HAVE SOMETHING STAND ALONE FROM THIS WITH SOME BOARD OR MARBLE PEACE WITH SOME OF THESE OTHER PEOPLE'S NAMES ON IT, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT.

I DO NOT WANT TO DIMINISH THESE PANELS THE WAY THEY STAND.

>> WHICH IS WHY I GO BACK TO HAVING THIS GO BACK TO OUR ARTIST TO BE ABLE TO HEAR THE COMMENTS THAT WE HAVE MADE BECAUSE SOME OF OUR COMMENTS HAVE BEEN VERY MUCH THE SAME, BUT WE'RE NOT THE ARTISTS AND WE'RE PULLING THE CREATIVITY AWAY FROM THE ARTIST.

SINCE IT'S ABOUT ADDING A PANEL AND JUST GIVING AT THIS TIME ABILITY TO THE ARTIST TO COME BACK AND GIVE US AN IDEA OF WHAT THEN WE CAN EITHER SELECT ONE OR NOT AND BEING ABLE TO GIVE THIS COMMISSION MORE TIME TO DETERMINE IF IT HAS TO BE ONE, WHO THE ONE WILL BE BECAUSE WE CAN ALREADY TELL THAT IT IS 12:40 AND NOBODY HERE SEEMS TO WANT TO STAY TO THEN DISCUSS WHO THE ONE PERSON IS GOING TO BE.

>> [OVERLAPPING] I THINK WE CAN CHOOSE IT NOW.

>> I'M TALKING TO COMMISSIONER PLACKO, IT WAS HER SUGGESTION.

[OVERLAPPING]

>> THAT'S NOT HOW YOU DO IT THOUGH.

YOU CAN'T TALK TO EACH OTHER.

>> GOD BLESS.

>> I'M JUST REMINDING YOU OF YOUR OWN RULES.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO SINCE YOU'RE THE ONE WHO SAID THE ONE PANEL, WE'RE FOLLOWING THE RULES AND I'M ASKING YOU FOR YOUR CLARIFICATION ON THIS ITEM.

>> ONE PANEL WITH ONE PERSON ON IT. IS THAT CLEAR?

>> IT IS CLEAR. VICE MAYOR, SINCE YOU HAD SAID YES TO THE ONE PANEL,

[02:50:04]

UNDER THE UNDERSTANDING IT WOULD BE ONE PERSON.

SORRY, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, I STILL CONSIDER THE VICE MAYOR ON OCCASION BY ACCIDENT, I SEE. COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> I'M FINE WITH THAT MAYOR.

>> ONE PERSON, ONE PANEL. FINE.

>> I WOULD LIKE THE ARTIST TO GO BACK AND COME BACK TO US, YES.

BUT IF WE'RE NOT GOING THERE, I'LL TAKE THE ALTERNATIVE.

>> IT SEEMS WE'RE NOT GOING THERE.

WE DO NOT HAVE THE SUPPORT TO GET EVERYBODY AND HAVING AN EQUITABLE SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL AS SO DESIRED.

[OVERLAPPING] AT THIS TIME, WE'RE NEEDING TO PICK ONE PERSON TO ADD TO THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WALL AT THE GROUP.

YOU HAVE A PREFERENCE THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE?

>> I DO NOT HAVE A PREFERENCE.

>> COMMISSIONER PLACKO, DO YOU HAVE A PREFERENCE OF WHO YOU WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE?

>> THROUGH THE CHAIR, CITY ATTORNEY, CAN I MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS?

>> THERE'S NO MOTION, THIS IS NOT A MOTION.

IS IT A TABLE OR IS IT?

>> QUESTION IS TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, NOT TO THE MAYOR.

>> FOR LACK OF A BETTER DESCRIPTION, THERE'S WHAT I WOULD CALL A MOTION OR A DISCUSSION CURRENTLY PENDING AND UNDER YOUR RULES IT NEEDS TO BE DISPOSED OFF BEFORE ANY OTHER MOTIONS CAN BE TAKEN UP. YOU PROCEED.

>> WE'RE PROCEEDING. THANK YOU.

WE'RE PROCEEDING. COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

>> [INAUDIBLE]

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS DID NOT HAVE A SELECTION AT THIS TIME. COMMISSIONER BOLTON.

>> I WOULD GO WITH GILBERT BAKER.

>> OKAY.

>> I HAVE THE QUESTION MAYOR.

>> YES, COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS.

>> IF THOSE THAT GAVE CONSENT TO LEAVE AS IS WHY ARE WE GETTING INPUT FROM THOSE THAT DO NOT WANT TO CHANGE? I'M CONFUSED. WHY DO YOU PERSONALLY BLOCK?

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, I UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DID NOT WISH TO.

THEIR MOTION OR THEIR CONSENSUS FAILED.

THEREFORE, THEY'RE PARTICIPATING IN THE PROCESS TO DETERMINE WHO SHOULD BE ON THE WALL.

DO YOU HAVE SOMEBODY YOU WISH TO SUGGEST?

>> SPEAKING TO ME?

>> YES.

>> NO. I'M GOING TO GO WITH COMMISSIONER PLACKO'S CHOICE.

>> NO PRESSURE TO YOU COMMISSIONER PLACKO.

>> I HAVEN'T CHOSEN.

>> SHE HAS NOT YET CHOSEN.

YOU WANT TO PUT YOUR LIGHT OUT PLEASE, MIC ON.

>> AS COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS WAS ONE OF THE ONES WHO WAS GREATLY AGAINST THIS, I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE HIM CHOOSE ONE.

>> VALI?

>> I WAS NOT AGAINST THIS. I WAS SUPPORTING YOUR ACTIONS.

>> BUT YOU WANTED IT CHANGED. LET'S CHANGE IT.

>> COMMISSIONER VILLALOBOS, YOU'RE GETTING THE DESIRE OF HAVING THE CONVERSATION WITH COMMISSIONER PLACKO, ONE OF THE ONES WHO SUPPORT THE CHANGE.

ALL CANDIDATES, IN MY OPINION ON THIS LIST ARE GOOD CANDIDATES, PLEASE PICK.

>> PICK ONE.

>> MAYOR, DO YOU HAVE ONE THAT'S YOUR PREFERENCE? I'D TAKE ANY PREFERENCE.

MY OVERALL STATEMENT IS WE NEED MORE DIVERSIFICATION.

WE ALL FIGHT FOR DIVERSITY INCLUSION.

IT'S NOT HERE AND IT'S NOT ON THERE NOW AND NOW WE'RE TRYING TO CHOOSE SOMEONE, AND THEN NOW WE'RE HAVING INAPPROPRIATE FEEDBACK.

>> I STILL THINK THAT THERE'S TWO PANELS TO BE HEARD AND I'M NOT REALLY UNDERSTANDING WHY WE'RE BEING SUBROGATED TO ONE PANEL AND THEN MAKING THIS CHOICE, WHICH IS EVEN HARDER AND EXCLUSIVE VERSUS BEING INCLUSIVE AND EQUITABLE.

VICE MAYOR GELIN, YOUR LIGHT IS LIT, YOUR SELECTION?

>> JACKIE ROBINSON.

>> HE'S ALREADY ON THERE.

>> ON WHERE?

>> ON THE PANEL.

>> I DON'T HAVE A SELECTION. I WANT EVERYTHING TO STAY AS IS.

>> MADAM MAYOR [OVERLAPPING]

>> CONSIDERING THAT WE HAVE ALREADY A WHITE REPRESENTATION, AFRICAN-AMERICAN REPRESENTATION, AND CONSIDERING THE HISPANIC IS THIRD IN LINE, CAN WE PLEASE JUST PICK A HISPANIC PANEL IF THERE IS. [OVERLAPPING]

>> HOW ABOUT CESAR CHAVEZ?

[02:55:02]

>> [OVERLAPPING] I WOULD GO WITH CESAR CHAVEZ AS WELL.

THAT IS THREE. [OVERLAPPING] SORRY, DID YOU NOT WANT CESAR?

>> I HAD SAID I'M OKAY WITH THAT.

>> THANK YOU. THE ADDITIONAL PANEL WILL HAVE CHAVEZ AND I WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT MAXINE, YOU SPEAK WITH MR. PARKER, AND IF POSSIBLE, THAT NEXT PANEL WOULD INCLUDE MR. BAKER.

BUT WE CAN COME BACK TO THE COMMISSION AT THAT TIME.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ARE DONE WITH ITEM 10B.

TO THE RESIDENTS WHO ARE WATCHING WHO HAD A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT TO WORK ON THIS WITH ME, I THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I THANK YOU FOR STANDING UP AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.

>> [OVERLAPPING] NO DISCUSSION ON 10C FOR ME.

>> WE'RE REMOVING 10C.

IT IS CURRENTLY 12:43.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED.

WE WILL SEE YOU HERE ON JULY 13TH, I BELIEVE.

HAVE A GREAT 4TH OF JULY, HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY, HAPPY CANADIAN DAY, HAPPY [INAUDIBLE].

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.