[F.2. TBO 50 - Tamarac Water Treatment Control Bldg & Site Improvements - Variance]
[00:07:18]
AND DEVELOPMENT CODE, IS THAT MY VOICE?
[00:07:21]
OH, I THOUGHT IT WAS SOMEONE ELSE.I'LL BEGIN AGAIN. PETITIONER IS CHRIS ZIMMERMAN, DESIGNATED AGENT FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER IN THE CITY OF TAMARACK CASE NUMBER 3-B21 THE PETITION IS A VARIANCE, A REQUESTING OF A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 10-2.4B TABLE10-2.4 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR A SETBACK REQUIRING THE 13 FEET FOUR INCHES IN THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ZONING DISTRICT IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED 14 SORRY REQUIRED FORTY ONE FOOT SETBACK IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN USE OF EXISTING ESSENTIAL FACILITY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
THE LOCATION IS 7803 NORTHWEST 61ST STREET IN TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321.
AT THIS TIME, WE'LL HEAR FROM CITY REPRESENTATIVE.
THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE PLANNING BOARD, ALL VISITORS. FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS CHRISTIAN HORVATH, ASSISTANT PLANNER, CITY OF TAMARACK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
THE TAMARACK WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS VARIANTS.
CHRIS ZIMMERMAN, THE DESIGNATED AGENT FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR THE CITY OF TAMARAC, IS REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR THE REQUIREMENT OF A 13 FEET, FOUR INCHES IN THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ZONING DISTRICT IN LIEU OF...
CHRISTIAN, JUST A MOMENT, OUR SCREENS ARE BLANK.
ON. YEAH, IT IS, BUT WE ARE NOT SEEING IT HERE.
ALL GOOD? OK. ONCE AGAIN, CHRIS ZIMMERMAN, DESIGNATED AGENT FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR THE CITY OF TAMARACK, IS REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A REQUIREMENT OF 13 FEET, FOUR INCHES AND THE PF PUBLIC FACILITIES ZONING DISTRICT IN LIEU OF A REQUIRED 41 FOOT SETBACK IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN USE OF EXISTING ESSENTIAL FACILITY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
LOCATED AT 7803 NORTH WEST 61ST STREET, THE PROPERTY EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE SHALL
[00:10:02]
REMAIN AS A CITY OF TAMARAC WATER TREATMENT PLANT.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF UTILITIES AND A ZONING DESIGNATION OF PF PUBLIC FACILITIES.
THE COMMISSIONER OF DISTRICT TWO IS COMMISSIONER MIKE GELIN.
THE LOCATION OF THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED ON 77TH WAY AND NORTHWEST 71ST STREET AND PERSPECTIVE, THE MAJOR ROAD AND SPACE THAT IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD TO THE EAST AND JUST ACROSS UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD, SOUTHEAST OF THE PLANT IS WATER'S EDGE PARK AS AN IDEA OF WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED. THE CURRENT SLIDE IS FACING NORTH TO GIVE YOU A BROADER VISUAL OF THE AREA.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS INDICATED BY THE RED STAR SHOWN ON THE SCREEN.
THE EXISTING SITE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 8.98 NET ACRES IN PROPERTY AREA.
THE PROPERTY'S MAIN POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM THE PROPERTY ARE ALONG NORTHWEST 61ST STREET, WITH THE NEW SITE PARKING LOT ADDITIONS AS DESCRIBED LATER IN THE PRESENTATION. THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE POINTS OF ACCESS ALONG NORTH WEST 61ST STREET, WHICH PROVIDES FOR MULTIPLE INGRESS AND EGRESS OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY STAFF.
THE SURROUNDING ZONING DISTRICTS THAT BORDER THE PROPOSED USE COMPRISES OF COLONY WEST GOLF COURSE. THEN, WHICH IS ZONED RC AND THEN VERSACE'S GARDENS CONDOS ZONE R3, WHICH IS JUST NORTH OF THAT TO THE NORTH WATERSIDE TOWNHOUSE COMMUNITY LOCATED ZONED R2 TO THE SOUTH, WHICH IS LOCATED SOUTH OF 61ST STREET.
ONE COMMERCIAL PLAZA AND ONE OUT PARCELS ZONE MUN TO THE EAST, WHICH IS THE IHOP AND THE CAMACHO UNIVERSITY PLAZA AND THE WATERSIDE TOWNHOUSE COMMUNITY ZONE R2 TO THE WEST, WHICH IS LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY.
THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO BUILD NEW FACILITIES AND UPGRADE SITE EQUIPMENT IN ORDER TO FULFILL HIS DUTIES OF A FULLY FUNCTIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT FACILITY.
THE HISTORY OF THE TAMARAC WATER TREATMENT PLANT IS A BRIEF HISTORY.
THE PLANT DATES BACK TO ITS ORIGIN OF THE BILL IN 1969, WITH INTENTIONS OF SERVING THE COMMUNITY AS ITS OWN PUBLIC UTILITIES FACILITY.
PREVIOUS TO THE PROPOSED UPGRADES TO THE SITE, THE FACILITY HAS A GOOD HISTORY OF UPKEEP AND MAINTENANCE WITH CURRENT STANDARDS.
WITHIN THE LAST 20 YEARS, THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT HAS MADE UPGRADES TO THE FOLLOWING.
WATER TANKS, THE CLEAR WELL STRUCTURE AND THE BACKWASH FACILITY.
AND ON THE SLIDE, THERE ARE PICTURES SHOWING THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND ALSO A LITTLE BIT TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.
THE NEWS SITE SHALL CONTAIN THREE IMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF THE PURPOSE OF THIS VARIANCE TO HELP ACCOMMODATE THE ESTHETICS AND BEAUTIFICATION OF THE CITY AND ITS RESIDENTS.
SO IF YOU LOOK HERE, WE HAVE A NEW PROPOSED SIX FOOT PRECAST WALL WITH A FOUR FOOT DECORATIVE FENCE ON TOP, WHICH IS LOCATED WEST OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE WATERSIDE COMMUNITY.
BELOW THERE'S A THE 13 FEET, FOUR INCH FRONT SET BACK THAT WE'RE PROPOSING FROM THE FROM THE BUILDING TO THE ACTUAL PROPERTY LINE TO THE SOUTH.
AND WE ALSO HAVE A PROPOSED NEW MONUMENT SIGN TO GO UP FRONT AS WELL.
TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY INCLUDES A TWO, A NEW TWO STORY WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING, ONE STORY FILTER BUILDING, ONE STORY MCC/SCAOA BUILDING, A NEW ONE STORY FLUORIDE BUILDING, NEW CONSTRUCTION OF TWO PARKING LOTS, A NEW FOUR FOOT DECORATIVE SECURITY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ON TOP OF A NEW SIX FOOT CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT WALL AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LANDSCAPING.
GOING TO THE PREVIOUS SLIDE, THIS IS THE WALL THAT WE'RE PROPOSING.
THIS IS THE BUILDING THIS IS THE FLUORIDE BUILDING.
THE TWO PARKING LOTS, ONE WILL BE LOCATED HERE.
ONE WON'T BE LOCATED HERE AND THE FILTER BUILDING THAT'S PROPOSED.
AND I'M SORRY. NEW LANDSCAPE AND FIELD LOCATED IN THIS AREA, JUST SOUTHWEST.
[00:15:01]
THE SLIDE IS A RENDERING OF WHAT THE NEW TWO STORY WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING WILL LOOK LIKE. BEAUTIFULLY DESIGNED AND A MORE UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT MAKES IT EVEN MORE ESTHETICALLY PLEASING TO THE EYE.ON THE SAME SITE OF ITS PREDECESSOR GOING WITH MORE OF A ECONOMIC AND NEUTRAL BUT DECORATIVE COLOR SCHEME, THE PROPOSED WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING SHALL DEMONSTRATE THE STANDARDS, THE STANDARDS THE CITY MORE RECENT PROJECTS HAVE CULTIVATED TOWARDS.
THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT THAT IS ALSO SHOWN ON THE SLIDE WILL BE 41 FEET AND THREE INCHES IN HEIGHT. SECTION 10-5.4 Q VARIANTS, A VARIANCE AS A MEANS OF MODIFYING THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGULATIONS WHEN SUCH VARIANTS WILL NOT BE CONTRARY TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND WHEN OWING THE CONDITION, TWO CONDITIONS ARE PECULIAR TO THE PROPERTY AND NOT THE RESULT OF THE ACTIONS OF THE APPLICANT.
A LITTLE ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE WILL RESULT IN UNNECESSARY AND UNDUE HARDSHIP.
ON THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE VARIANCE REVIEW STANDARDS THAT'S LISTED OUT, AND THERE'S EIGHT OF THEM. THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IDENTIFIES GENERAL VARIANCE REVIEW STANDARDS TO BE EMPLOYED. A VARIANCE SHALL ONLY BE RECOMMENDED IF THE PLANET BOARD REACHES EACH OF THE GENERAL VARIANCE REVIEW STANDARD CONCLUSIONS BASED ON FINDINGS OF FACTS SUPPORTED BY A COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL AND MATERIAL EVIDENCE.
THE EIGHT GENERAL VARIANCE REVIEW STANDARD CONCLUSIONS THAT MUST BE MET TO ENSURE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE ARE SHOWN ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU PROVIDED IN THE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM FOR THE WATER, TURMERIC, WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. ZONING VARIANCE ARE RESPONSES TO THE GENERAL VARIANCE REVIEW STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY TO THE SUBJECT PETITION.
VARIANCE, THE REQUEST FOR VARIANTS REACHES EACH OF THE GENERAL VARIANTS REVIEW STANDARD CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FINDING OF FACTS SUPPORTED BY COMPETENCE, ESSENTIAL AND MATERIAL EVIDENCE. OH, SORRY.
BUT THIS. PETITION SUPPORTER BASED ON THE FACT OWING TO THE SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITION BEYOND THE LANDOWNERS CONTROL.
LANDOWNERS CONTROL THE LITERAL APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS WILL RESULT IN UNDUE AND UNIQUE HARDSHIP TO THE LANDOWNER, AND THE DEVIATION WOULD NOT BE CONTRARY TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST. THE ITEM SUPPORTS GOAL NUMBER FOUR IN THE CITY OF TAMARACK, 2040 STRATEGIC PLAN.
THE APPROVAL OF THE VARIANTS WILL ALLOW FOR THE RELIEF OF THE DEVELOPMENT SETBACK OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THEREBY PROVIDING AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVITALIZE THE APPEARANCE, IMAGE AND ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE COMMUNITY.
THE APPLICANT'S REQUESTS FOR A VARIANCE OF THE SECTION OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLLOWING POLICIES OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY 1.4 IS DESCRIPTED ON THIS SLIDE.
A RECOMMENDATION, THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD FOR A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PROPOSED VARIANCE REQUEST FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 10-2.4(B), TABLE 10-2.4 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES TO THE CITY COMMISSION AT ITS DEC.
EIGHT, 2021, MEETING WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
THE APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR SITE PLAN MAJOR FOR THE TAMARAC WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
JUST TO NOTE, THE APPLICANT, CHRIS ZIMMERMAN, IS PRESENT AT THIS MEETING.
MR. ZIMMERMAN IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD IF REQUESTED.
THIS CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC AT THIS TIME.
PLEASE COME FORWARD. I'D LIKE TO YOU HAVE TO COME FORWARD.
MADAME CHAIR, BOARD MEMBERS MORNING, MY NAME IS STUART WEBSTER OF VERSAILLES GARDENS.
[00:20:12]
I WAS REALLY SURPRISED.I LIVE IN THE AREA ACROSS THE STREET.
AND I WAS ALSO I'M ALSO THE COMMITTEEMAN FOR THE AREA AND I GOT QUITE A FEW CONCERNS THE PUBLIC HAS EXPRESSED, AND THEY HAVE ASKED ME TO COME FORWARD THIS MORNING.
ONE IS WHILE WHAT WE SEE IS PERFECT.
THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS, THE VISUALS, THEY'RE NOT CLEAR AS HOW IT'S GOING TO RELATE. THEY TALK, THERE'S THEY TALK ABOUT A SETBACK, A SETBACK FROM THE ROAD.
THEY THE PERSONS IN THE AREA OR THE HOMEOWNERS IN THE AREA ARE CONCERNED ABOUT A DEVALUATION IN THEIR PROPERTY, AND THEIR CONCERN IS BASICALLY ABOUT THE APPEARANCE.
THIS IS AN EXCELLENT LAYOUT, BUT THEY DON'T SEE IT THAT WAY.
AND THAT'S A CONCERN IN TERMS OF RELATION TO THE ROAD.
WELL IT'S A PUBLIC BUILDING, SO THE PROBLEM SHOULD NOT REALLY BE INCREASED TRAFFIC FLOW.
BUT IT'S THE OVERALL APPEARANCE.
THAT'S ONE. THE SECOND THING, IF THERE WILL BE AN INCREASE IN THE OWNERS, THERE'S ALMOST NO ORDER. SO THEY HOPE IT STAYS THAT WAY.
AND I WOULD INVITE THE THE BOARD TO CONSIDER PUTTING THAT STIPULATION IN THERE AS THIS VARIANCE GOES FORWARD.
THE LAST POINT NOT ONLY WITH THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, BUT I WOULD INVITE THE BOARD TO CONSIDER PUTTING IN WRITING A REQUIREMENT OR THAT AT LEAST EVERY SINGLE PROJECT GOING FORWARD TALKS ABOUT GREENING, WHETHER IT'S FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF SUSTAINABILITY, THE USE OF POWER AS WELL AS OTHER ASPECTS.
I WAS A FORMAL DIVISIONAL PERSON FOR OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR BROWARD COUNTY, SO I'M AWARE OF THE POSSIBILITIES AND IT'S BEST TO LOOK AT IT BEFORE RATHER THAN AFTER.
SO THIS THESE THREE POINTS ARE SEEM TO BE INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT TO THE HOMEOWNERS, ESPECIALLY THE CONCERN ABOUT APPEARANCE AND DECREASE IN THEIR PROPERTY VALUES.
AND THEREFORE THEY TOLD ME TO BE HERE THIS MORNING.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD AT THIS TIME? FOR EITHER THE CITY, I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE GENTLEMAN.
WHERE DO YOU LIVE EXACTLY? NINE HUNDRED COLONY CIRCLE SOUTH VERSAILLES GARDENS.
OK, I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR ON THAT.
THANKS. DON'T LEAVE MR. WEBSTER. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU AS WELL.
DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FOR THE CITY, CITY AND OR THE PUBLIC AT THIS TIME? OK, I WANTED TO ASK ABOUT THE WHEN IT WAS ORIGINALLY BUILT AS A LONG TIME AGO.
WHAT WAS THE SET? DO YOU HAVE ANY RECORDS OF WHAT THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT WAS AT THAT TIME TO INSTALL ANYTHING ON THAT? NO, THIS IS ROB JOHNSON, PLANNING ZONING MANAGER, WE DO NOT HAVE RECORD OF THAT, WE CAN WE CAN IDENTIFY THE EXISTING SET BACK OF THE BUILDING, BUT WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SETBACK WAS. THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN PRIOR TO THE 1975 CODE.
OK. YEAH. SO IT'S IT'S REALLY A MATTER OF WHEN THE ZONING CHANGED.
IT WAS UPDATED AND THE SET BACK WAS CREATED UNDER THE CURRENT CODE OF TWENTY FIVE FEET PLUS ONE FOOT ABOVE TWO STORIES IS WHAT CREATES THE REQUIRED SETBACK CODE.
SO IF THIS WAS A BRAND NEW SITE BEING BUILT TODAY WITH NOTHING ON IT, YOU COULD MEET IT.
IT COULD BE REDESIGNED, OBVIOUSLY, TO MEET IT.
BUT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE IS AN EXISTING, OBVIOUSLY AN EXISTING FACILITY THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO UPDATE WITH THIS NEW BUILDING AND YOU'RE CONSTRAINED BY THE EXISTING BUILT ENVIRONMENT. YOU CAN'T GO SHIFTING TANKS VERY EASILY AND THINGS LIKE THAT, OBVIOUSLY.
SO TO MAKE THAT COMMENT, BECAUSE IT'S A FUNCTION OF THE AGE OF THE FACILITY AND THE FACT THAT THE MODERN CODE THAT APPLIES TO THIS WOULD BE A CODE THAT WOULD BE APPLICABLE IF THERE WAS NOTHING THERE, PROBABLY.
AND YOU COULD MEET THE SETBACK MORE EASILY BY PUTTING AN UPDATED BUILDING ON THE SITE I
[00:25:06]
DID WHEN I WALKED AROUND THERE SAW THE OPEN GREEN AREA TO THE WEST OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. AND I DID JUST WONDER, JUST LOOKING AT IT, WHY THAT WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN A SUITABLE LOCATION.IS THERE ANYTHING YOU CAN ADD ABOUT THAT? WHAT GOES ON IN THAT GREEN AREA, I GUESS I COULDN'T SEE VISUALLY JUST WALKING AROUND THERE, IS THERE ANY CONSTRAINTS THERE? IS THERE ANYTHING BEING USED IN THAT AREA THAT WOULD PREVENT IT FROM BEING PART OF THIS, THIS PROJECT? AND HE. I'M SORRY IF THE APPLICANT CAN COME ADDRESS THE QUESTIONS, PLEASE.
MORE. CHRIS ZIMMERMAN, PRESIDENT, CPZ'S ARCHITECTS, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER.
ALSO WITH ME TODAY IS NICHOLAS MASHAD.
HE'S OUR ARCHITECT ON STAFF AS WELL, OUR PROJECT MANAGER, ONE OF THE THE MAIN REASON THE BUILDING WAS PLACED WHERE IT WAS IS THERE NEEDS TO BE ACCESS AND VISUAL CONTROL OVER THE TANKS THAT ARE DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH.
IF YOU LOOK AT THAT SITE PLAN, THE WHOLE REASON HERE IS WE COULDN'T TEAR DOWN THE EXISTING BUILDING BECAUSE IT CONTROLS ALL THE TANKS OR ELSE WE WOULD HAVE PUT THIS BUILDING THERE.
OK. BUT WHEN THE BUILDING IS COMPLETED, AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE FLOOR PLAN OF THE BUILDING, THE SECOND FLOOR CONTROL CENTER COMPLETELY OVERLOOKS ALL THE TANKS AND THE CLEAR WELLS THAT ARE THERE.
MATTER OF FACT, THERE ARE TWO CATWALKS THAT GO UP THERE.
SO IF WE WERE TO MOVE IT TO THE WEST OR THE EAST, WE WOULDN'T HAVE CONTROLLABILITY AND VISUAL CONTROL OF THE TANKS AND WHERE THEY ARE.
THEY TEST THAT WATER ALL THE TIME AND THEY TAKE IT BACK TO THE LAB THAT'S ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE BUILDING. SO THERE'S A LOT OF INTERACTION BETWEEN THE SECOND FLOOR IN THOSE TANKS. SO OPERATIONALLY, THAT'S JUST AT THAT DICTATES WHAT HAS TO HAPPEN.
AND THAT'S KIND OF WHAT DICTATED WHERE WE SET IT ON THE SITE.
AND THE PROPOSED SITE IS GOING TO BE THE SAME AS IT IS CURRENTLY AT FORTY ONE FEET.
YEAH, VERY SIMILAR. I THINK OUR STAIR TOWER GOES UP A LITTLE A LITTLE HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING BUILDING, JUST SO WE HAVE ACCESS TO THE ROOF.
SO YOU'LL BE BUILDING THIS WHILE KEEPING OBVIOUSLY THE EXISTING BUILDING IN PLACE AS LONG AS POSSIBLE AND THEN TRANSITIONING INTO THE NEW.
YEAH. ALL THE CONTROL WIRES, ALL.
THERE'S ACTUALLY WE'RE ACTUALLY DOING A SMALL BUILDING DIRECTLY TO THE EAST TO HELP WITH THE CONTROLLABILITY AND RUNNING WIRES AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
YOU'LL SEE A LITTLE SMALL BUILDING RIGHT TO THE EAST OF THE PARKING LOT, AND THAT HELPS US MOVE SOME OF THE CONTROLLED WIRING AND SYSTEMS FROM ONE SPACE TO THE OTHER WHILE WE MAKE THE TRANSITION.
WE ALSO HAVE SOLAR ON THE ROOF AND WE ARE DOING A LOT OF GREEN INITIATIVES IN THE BUILDING WITH AIR CHANGES AND SOME OF THE THINGS WE'RE LEARNING ABOUT.
SO I THOUGHT I'D JUST ADDRESS THAT.
WE ARE NOT DOING A CERTIFIED BUILDING, BUT ALL THOSE SAME DESIGN CRITERIA, THINGS ARE GOING INTO THE BUILDING TO THE GENTLEMAN'S POINT ABOUT ODORS IN THE OPERATIONS OF THIS THING, IT'S JUST MOVING IT FROM THE EXISTING BUILDING TO A NEW BUILDING.
CORRECT. AND CHANGING HOW IT OPERATES.
SO TO SPEAK. SO WE DON'T EXPECT ANY OF THE ODORS TO CHANGE AT ALL.
I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE CITY.
HOW LONG DO WE ANTICIPATE THE CONSTRUCTION? THE TIMELINE, WHEN DO WE ANTICIPATE IT BEING COMPLETED? EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF CONSTRUCTION, AND WE STILL HAVE A FEW MONTHS LEFT TO GET THROUGH OUR APPROVALS THROUGH COMMISSION THROUGH HERE, THROUGH THE BUILDINGS, SO WE'VE PROBABLY GOT ABOUT FOUR MONTHS IN DESIGN, YOU KNOW, IN PERMITTING AND THEN 18 MONTHS FOR CONSTRUCTION.
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU NOW, MR. WEBSTER. YOU MENTIONED IN YOUR COMMENT THAT THE OWNERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT PROPERTY VALUE AND CONCERN ABOUT OVERALL APPEARANCE.
CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC WITH THAT COMMENT? LIKE WHAT DO THEY THINK WILL AFFECT WHAT SPECIFICALLY THEY THINK WILL AFFECT THEIR PROPERTY VALUES, THE CONSTRUCTION OR, YOU KNOW, THE PHYSICAL, THE PHYSICAL BUILDING MADAME BEING SO CLOSE TO THE ROAD OAK, FOR EXAMPLE, ON THE MAP, YOU'LL SEE THAT AREA TO THE WEST, FURTHER TO THE NORTH TO THE NORTHWEST, MARKED PARCEL EIGHT.
IT ALSO HAS THE SAME VISIBILITY LINE TO THE TAX.
[00:30:02]
AND IT'S AWAY FROM THE ROAD.NO, PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MIGHT BE THERE, BUT MAY I RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST THAT PERCEPTION IS A WHOLE ANOTHER THING WHEN YOU'RE LIVING IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND THERE ARE ASKING FOR THE PLANNING BOARD TO POSSIBLY CONSIDER NOT THIS LARGE BUILDING NOT BEING SO CLOSE TO THE ROAD.
THAT IS THEIR PRIMARY CONCERN.
AND I HAVE NO IDEA OF THE LAYOUT.
WE HAVE NO IDEA OF THE TECHNICAL SIDE OF THINGS, BUT ONE SEES THAT POSSIBLE AREA PARCEL A AREA ON THE MAP.
AND THEY ASK FOR CONSIDERATION.
BUT PLEASE UNDERSTAND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PERCEPTION.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RESIDENTS, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HOMEOWNERS, SO THERE NEEDS TO I RESPECTFULLY WOULD SAY THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A BALANCE.
AND IF YOU WOULD ALLOW ME PLEASE TO RESPOND TO THE GENTLEMAN WHO JUST MAKE ANOTHER COMMENT, READ WHAT THE GENTLEMAN JUST SAID MS. MS. CALLOWAY THAT ALLOWED FOR THE THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PETITIONER? CERTAINLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THE RESIDENT HAS A QUESTION SINCE IT IS A QUASI JUDICIAL PROCESS, HE DOES HAVE THE THE ABILITY TO ASK QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT AND TO THE EXTENT THAT THE APPLICANT CAN ANSWER, THE APPLICANT CAN'T ANSWER BECAUSE THEN THAT'S IT IS WHAT IT IS AND YOU CAN TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.
BUT CERTAINLY THERE THERE IS AN ANTICIPATED IN OUR RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR QUESTIONS THROUGH THE CHAIR TO THE APPLICANT REGARDING THE PRESENTATION AND THE MATTER BEFORE YOU.
THANK YOU, MR. HERRING. OK, GO AHEAD AND ASK THE QUESTION AND WE'LL TRY TO GET AN ANSWER TO YOU AS BEST WE CAN.
THE WHOLE THING IS HE MENTIONED PARTICULAR POINTS COMING BACK TO THE WHOLE ISSUE OF GREENNESS. HE MENTIONED THAT THESE THINGS ARE BEING TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
I WOULD RESPECTFULLY ASK, AND ESPECIALLY SINCE THE VICE CHAIR, THERE WERE A COUPLE OF WONDERFUL COMMENTS THAT THE VICE CHAIR HAS MADE IN THAT DIRECTION ANYWAY, THAT IF THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD AS WE GO FORWARD, THAT THESE ITEMS ARE PUT INTO THE VARIANCE THAT THEY HAD AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO GREEN CERTIFICATION ON THIS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER FURTHER BUILDINGS OR PROJECTS OF THIS NATURE.
AND BECAUSE THIS IS NOT ONLY IS A FEATHER IN THE CAP OF TAMARACK, AS WELL AS KUDOS TO THE BOARD, I THINK EVERYBODY WINS.
SO IF IT'S IN THERE, IT'S IN THERE.
IT'S A STIPULATION RATHER THAN JUST A GENERAL COMMENT.
SO THAT AND AS I COME BACK TO THAT FINAL POINT, IT'S PLEASE CONSIDER THE PERCEPTIONS OF THE VIEWS OF THE COMMUNITY AS FAR AS PARCEL A.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION FOR YOU, MR. WEBSTER. ITEM NUMBER TWO POINT NUMBER TWO YOU MADE WAS YOU ASKED ABOUT INCREASE IN ORDERS. I DIDN'T QUITE UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WERE ASKING.
O-D--O-R-S, ODORS O-G-O-R-S OK.
NO, O-D-O-R-S, THE ODORS, OH THE SMELL? THE SMELL.
SORRY ABOUT THAT. I THINK THAT WAS ADDRESSED RIGHT.
AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT STAYS THAT WAY.
YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU. MADAM CHAIR, IF I MAY, YOU KNOW, I BELIEVE HAVING READ THE STAFF REPORT, I BELIEVE IT'S IN THE STAFF REPORT, BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE RECORD IS CLEAR AND THAT THAT STAFF POSITION IS ADEQUATE, PROPERLY ARTICULATED AS FOLLOWS.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPH THAT'S IN THE STAFF REPORT, THAT'S ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE OF YOUR PACKET.
BEFORE THE SITE PLAN, YOU'LL SEE THAT THERE'S THAT BIG RED STAR IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE, AND JUST BELOW IT IS THE EXISTING BUILDING THAT IS THE, YOU KNOW, WHERE THE PLANT FACILITIES ARE BEING OPERATED FROM.
SO THE BOARD UNDERSTANDS THAT BUILDING AND THAT THAT AND THE CAPACITY OF OF THIS TREATMENT PLANTS IS AT ITS LIMITS.
IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S AT ITS THE END OF ITS LIFE CYCLE.
HOWEVER, IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO REPLACE IT WITH WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED IN THE SITE PLAN,
[00:35:02]
THERE CAN'T BE AN INTERRUPTION IN SERVICE.SO THE ONLY PLACE WHERE THE NEW PLANT FACILITIES THE OFFICES CAN GO IS IN THE LOCATION THAT'S BEING REQUESTED WHILE IT'S BEING BUILT.
THAT EXISTING BUILDING THAT'S ON THE PHOTOGRAPH WILL CONTINUE TO BE THERE.
SO THE CITY IS CONSTRAINED BY THE PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS OF THE SITE AS TO WHERE IT CAN PLACE THE NEW FACILITY WITHOUT AN INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE.
AND THAT'S IS THEREFORE THE NEED FOR THE VARIANCE.
AND SO WHEN THE NEW BUILDING IS BUILT, WHICH WILL BE AN ENHANCEMENT, YOU KNOW, FROM THE, YOU KNOW, 1950S BLOCK STYLE BUILDING COMPARED TO WHAT'S BEEN SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS, I THINK THAT THAT THERE'S CERTAINLY GOING TO BE AN UPGRADE FROM A VISIBLE STANDPOINT.
IT MAY BE CLOSER TO THE ROAD, YES, BUT IT'S GOING TO LOOK, DARE I SAY, MORE APPEALING THAN WHAT'S CURRENTLY THERE? YES, I UNDERSTAND. OK.
AND THIS PRIMARILY TO THE COMMENTS OF THE OF THE MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC.
SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THE RECORD IS CLEAR IN THAT REGARD.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENT. HOW TALL IS THE EXISTING BUILDING? DO WE KNOW? I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION. OK.
OK. IS IT CONSIDERABLY? PARDON? IT'S A CONSIDERABLY SMALLER I KNOW THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE EXACT INFORMATION, BUT IS IT CONSIDERABLY SMALLER OR SHORTER THAN THE NEW BUILDING PROPOSED? IT'S COMPARABLE. HE AS FAR AS HEIGHT AND STRENGTH COMPARABLE IN HEIGHT, BECAUSE IT IS A TWO STORY BUILDING TO A TWO STORY BUILDING.
I THINK THE ONLY AREA THAT WE MIGHT EXTEND HIGHER IS IN THE STAIR TOWER THAT WE TOOK TO THE ROOF TO SERVICE THE STAIR TOWER RATHER THAN A LADDER OR AN ACCESS HATCH.
WITH SOLAR ON THE ROOF IT JUST MAKES IT A LITTLE HARDER.
SO YOU CAN SEE HERE THAT IS THE HIGHER ELEMENT.
YOU CAN SEE THE HEIGHT ARROW ON THERE, AND THE HEIGHT THAT'S BEING SHOWN IS TO THE TOP OF THE STAIR TOWER. FORTY ONE FEET, THREE INCHES TO SEE WHERE EVERYTHING ELSE IS IS LOWER.
SO AND THAT'S IN THE REAR OF THE BUILDING TO, BY THE WAY, SO IT SITS BACK EVEN FURTHER FROM THE ROAD. OK.
I UNDERSTAND. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD? I JUST WANT TO TO MENTION TO THE GENTLEMAN FROM THE PUBLIC WHO SPOKE, IS THAT A COUPLE OF THINGS THE RESIDENTS WHERE YOU LIVE? AWARE OF WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE? HAVE THEY SEEN THE RENDERING? THROUGH THE CHAIR, THEY HAVE SEEN THESE BECAUSE I HAD MADE A PUBLIC REQUEST AND I HAD SHARED IT.
BUT YOU KNOW, TO THE TRAINED EYE LIKE YOURSELVES.
THAT'S WHY I COME BACK TO THE APPEARANCE.
THEY KNOW THE EXISTING BUILDING.
IT'S BEEN COMFORTABLE FOR THEM IN THE PAST.
BUT HOW THE NEW ONE WILL REPLACE? NO. OKAY, YEAH, I JUST WANTED TO BE SURE THAT THEY HAD THE BENEFIT OF AT LEAST SEEING IT.
THE OTHER THING I WAS JUST GOING TO MENTION IS THAT THIS STILL HAS TO GO THROUGH A SITE PLAN PROCESS. IT IS A PUBLIC PROCESS.
SO THINGS ABOUT GREENING AND YOU KNOW, THE THINGS THAT WERE MENTIONED BY THE APPLICANTS ARE UP HERE ABOUT SOLAR AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
AND THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING WILL COME BACK NOT ONLY TO US, BUT WHAT ELSE GO BACK TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN, THE ACTUAL LAYOUT OF IT.
THIS IS JUST FOR A VARIANCE THAT, AS YOU KNOW, THE DISTANCE FROM THE ROAD.
SO THIS ISN'T THE ONLY TIME THAT THIS IS GOING TO COME FORWARD IN A PUBLIC FORUM.
SO FOR WHAT THAT'S WORTH TO YOU, IF YOU WANT TO BRING UP YOUR COMMENTS AGAIN, YOU KNOW ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY.
YEAH, IF I CAN, IF I CAN MAKE A SLIGHT CORRECTION, THIS ROBERT JOHNSON AGAIN PLANNING AND ZONING MANAGER YEAH, THIS IS A MINOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
SO THIS IS NOT GOING TO GO BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD OR COMMISSION.
THIS WOULD BE THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY.
FORGET WHAT I SAID IN THE COMMENTS IN REGARDS TO THIS.
THIS IS IT. SO THROUGH THE CHAIR, THAT'S WHY I'M HERE.
THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKED TO BE HERE.
AND THE THE SOONER THAT THEY EXPLAIN THEIR CONCERNS THAT IT MAKES EVERYBODY'S LIFE A LOT EASIER. AND PLEASE UNDERSTAND THIS IS NOTHING MORE THAN A STATEMENT.
I'M SURE WE HAVE ALL BEEN THROUGH WHEN THIS ROOM IS PACKED WITH PEOPLE, WITH THEIR
[00:40:05]
HACKLES UP AND SO ON.AND YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK TAMARAC OR ANYBODY ON THE DAIS NEEDS THAT, WHETHER THIS DAIS OR AT A COMMISSION MEETING.
SO THAT'S WHY I WAS INVITED TO COME TO THIS MEETING, AND I THANK YOU VERY, VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. SO I'M SORRY.
REAL QUICK, ROB. I'M LOOKING AT THE STAFF REPORT AND IT SAYS THAT THIS IS A MAJOR SITE PLAN. IS IT MAJOR OR MINOR? IT'S A MAJOR. IT'S A MINOR.
THAT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE THE WAY IT'S WORDED.
IT WOULD BE A DISCREPANCY WITHIN THE REPORT.
IF IT IS, YEAH, REFERENCE IS UNDER THE RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN, APPROVAL APPLICATION AND THE REFERENCES MAJOR.
SO JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT.
OH YEAH, THAT'S A DISCREPANCY.
MR. WEBSTER, I HEAR, UNDERSTAND AND CAN APPRECIATE YOUR YOUR REQUEST FOR AN INITIATIVE AND THE PUSH FOR THE FOR THE FOR THE HAVING A DOCUMENTED IN WRITING IN THE VARIANCES.
ARE YOU DO YOU THINK THE RESIDENTS THAT YOU REPRESENT WILL BE SATISFIED WITH WHAT THEY'RE PRESENTING THE SOLAR PANEL ON THE ROOF AND THE GREEN INITIATIVES FOR THIS PARTICULAR BUILDING? I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU WOULD.
YOU'RE ASKING THAT WE CONSIDER FOR FEATURE, BUT DO YOU THINK THEY'LL BE HAPPY WITH WHAT THEY'VE PRESENTED THUS FAR? I WOULD THINK SO. THANK GOD FOR FIRST STEPS.
THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY FINAL COMMENTS AND OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD AT THIS TIME? I JUST HAVE A MINOR ONE.
DID YOU GUYS DO ANY RENDERING THAT PROBABLY COULD ASSIST THE RESIDENTS? [INAUDIBLE] OR ANYTHING IN PUTS IN THE NEW BUILDING, I'M NOT HEARING YOU CLEARLY CAN SPEAK INTO THE MIC PLEASE? BECAUSE I THINK THAT WILL HELP THE THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND.
ACTUALLY, WE HAVE WE HAVE DONE THREE DIMENSIONAL RENDERINGS ON THE BUILDING, SO WE DO HAVE THEM THAT WE CAN SHARE WITH THE PUBLIC AS WELL.
WE DIDN'T PREPARE TO BRING THEM IN HERE OR WHATEVER, BUT THEY ARE AVAILABLE.
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR ME TO SEE ONE NOW? YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THEM? CAN YOU? JUST DON'T KNOW HOW THIS WORKS WITH THE HEARING, AND I DON'T WANT TO.
WHAT IS IT? IS IT ACCEPTABLE FOR ME TO? I THINK THE STAFF.
I THINK THAT STAFF HAS THE ABILITY OR NOT TO KNOW TO PROJECT THEM.
IF NOT, THEY CAN BE HANDED OUT.
WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED THESE RENDERINGS.
OK, SO THE APPLICANT CAN HAND THEM OUT AND AND DISTRIBUTE THEM YOU ALL CAN TAKE.
I MEAN, I JUST WANTED TO SEE THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE LOCATION THAT'S BEING PROPOSED. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S OK.
WHILE, THAT'S BEING DONE, MADAM CHAIR, AND I PROMISE IT'LL BE THE LAST.
I'VE JUST LOOKED AT JUST GLANCE TO WHAT WAS BEING PASSED IF THERE WAS AN ABILITY ONLINE SOMEWHERE FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE IT.
SO THEY WOULD NOT ONLY TAKE MY WORD, BUT THANK GOD I HAVE SOME KIND OF CREDIBILITY OUT THERE. BUT ALSO I CAN ALWAYS SAY BECAUSE I LOVE TO DIRECT PEOPLE TO TAMARAC.ORG IF AT LEAST FOR A MONTH OR SO, IF IT'S UP THERE.
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S POSSIBLE, BUT WE'LL HAVE MS. CALLOWAY ADDRESS THAT.
THE ITEM IS SCHEDULED FOR THE DECEMBER 8TH CITY COMMISSION MEETING.
WE WILL INCLUDE THIS IN THE AGENDA PACKAGE.
SO WHEN YOU DIRECT YOUR NEIGHBORS TO THE DECEMBER 8TH COMMISSION AGENDA, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO SEE THESE RENDERINGS, WE'LL INCLUDE THEM AND HAVE THEM UPLOAD IT.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU AND THANK YOU.
I'M SORRY, SIR. JUST TO ADD, WE HAVE A CURRENT DEVELOPMENT MAP LOCATED ON OUR TOWN'S WEBSITE THAT SHOWS ALL OF THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT GOING ON IN THE CITY.
SO ONCE IT GOES PAST CITY COMMISSION, I BELIEVE WE ARE ABLE TO UPDATE THE WEBSITE WITH THE RENDERINGS AND THE SITE PLAN PROPOSAL, AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ASSIST YOU INTO GETTING INTO THE WEBSITE. ONE MORE THING? CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE? I JUST WANTED TO SEE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING IN RELATION TO THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SOUTH.
OK. OK, YES, SO THE RED STAR IS THE THE WATER GALLON, THE MILLION GALLON TANK, EXCUSE ME, THIS IS THE EXISTING BUILDING OF THE EXISTING FACILITY.
AND JUST BELOW RIGHT ABOUT HERE IS THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE COMMUNITY IS SOUTH OF
[00:45:06]
61ST STREET, RIGHT? BECAUSE I SEE THAT YOU GUYS ARE ADDING AN ADDITIONAL BARRIER TO DO.SO I MEAN, I'M SATISFIED WITH THAT, THAT'S THAT'S PERFECTLY FINE, BUT I THINK THEY'RE MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE, YOU KNOW, THAT COMING INTO THE SOUTH.
AND WHICH THE RENDERING WILL HELP TO EXPLAIN WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN AS THEY DRIVE ALONG? CORRECT. YES, YOU HAVE A 13 FOOT FOUR INCH SETBACK FROM THE BUILDING TO THE SIDEWALK, WHICH IS THE WHICH IS THE PROPERTY LINE.
THEN YOU HAVE SIDEWALK GRASS, THEN YOU HAVE 61ST STREET.
IS THERE A MEDIAN IN 61ST, THERE ISN'T RIGHT? THAT'S NOT IT'S A TWO LANE, TWO LANE STREET.
NO PROBLEM. ON 61ST STREET, IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S SOME GREENERY, SOME SHRUBBERY.
ARE THERE WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE CITY TO PUT A [INAUDIBLE] WALL OR ADDITIONAL SHRUBBERY TO ASSIST WITH THE ESTHETICS, SINCE THE COMMUNITY IS SAYING THAT THEY'RE HAVING A CONCERN ABOUT THE NEW BUILDING BEING SO CLOSE TO THE ROAD? IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE CAN DO TO ASSIST IN THEIR ACCEPTING THE BUILDING BEING SO CLOSE TO THE ROAD? THE ARCHITECT? I'M SORRY. YEAH, BUT WE CAN SPEAK.
I'M NOT SURE WE HAVE IT IN THIS SIDE, BUT THE SITE WILL BE SUFFICIENTLY LANDSCAPED, SO THERE WILL BE LANDSCAPE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CODE REQUIREMENT THAT WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE SITE. SO YOU HAVE PARAMETER LANDSCAPING AND LANDSCAPING THAT WILL BE IN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING BECAUSE THIS WAS NOT A SIDE PLAN DISCUSSION.
I THINK STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN JUST TO INFORMATION FOR THE VARIANCE, BUT THE SITE WILL BE SUFFICIENTLY LANDSCAPED, INCLUDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING TO THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING.
DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER CONCERNS, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANYONE ELSE IN THE BOARD? ALL RIGHT. IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD AT THE SITE THIS TIME.
AND I JUST WANT TO THANK THE BOARD AGAIN FOR THE QUESTIONS AND THE DISCUSSION.
I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE HELPFUL WITH HOW WE PRESENT THIS ITEM DECEMBER 8TH AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING. SO STAFF WILL ENHANCE ITS PRESENTATION, INCLUDE MORE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND JUST TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU'VE ASKED THIS MORNING SO WE CAN BETTER INFORM THE PUBLIC AND THE COMMISSION AT THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING.
THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PETITION? MOTION TO APPROVE. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? MADAM CHAIR, IF I JUST SO WE'RE CONSISTENT, I THINK THAT THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL IN THE STAFF AND THE STAFF REPORT ON PAGE FIVE OF THE OF THE APPROVAL.
I'M SORRY, THE STAFF REPORT IT WOULD BE APPROVED OF THE VARIANCE IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN AND [INAUDIBLE] MINOR, NOT MAJOR.
THAT'S CORRECT. FOR THE TAMARACK WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING BY THE CITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, I PRESUME, AND NOT THE NOT THE CITY COMMISSION, SO THAT WOULD BE THE THE RECOMMEND THAT YOU MAKE THOSE MODIFICATIONS TO YOUR APPROVAL TO REFLECT THAT IT'S AN OVERSIGHT PLAN. SO ON PAGE FIVE, NUMBER ONE? YEAH, GOT IT.
ACTUALLY, IT'S ON THE NEXT DOCUMENT THE BOARD ODOM APPROVING VARIANCE IN YOUR PACKET ON.
SO ON PAGE 203, NUMBER ONE AT THE BOTTOM.
I'LL REITERATE MY APOLOGIES BOARD IN PUBLIC.
I'LL REITERATE THE THE QUESTION AND ASKING FOR THE MOTION.
AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO ASK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE.
APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR A SITE PLAN MINOR FOR TAMARAC WATER TREATMENT CONTROL BUILDING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS CASE 4-SP-21 WON BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
THE CITY DRC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE.
NOT CITY COMMISSION, I'M SORRY, SAY THAT AGAIN, PLEASE.
IT WOULD BE THE CITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, NOT CITY COMMISSION.
[00:50:04]
OK. DO YOU NEED ME TO READ IT AGAIN FOR CLARITY.DO YOU WANT ME TO READ THE WHOLE STATEMENT AGAIN FOR CLARITY? I THINK THAT THAT'S RECORD'S CLEAR.
OK, GOT IT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? IF YOU CAN PLACE YOUR A MOTION AGAIN [INAUDIBLE] PLEASE.
MOTION TO APPROVE. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. DAVID MONTFORD, YES.
YES. MOTION TO MAKE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITH CORRECTED CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF PASSED FOUR TO ZERO.
ALL RIGHTY. DO WE HAVE ANY PLANNING BOARD REPORTS ANYONE FROM THE BOARD LIKE TO MAKE A REPORT THIS TIME? NO. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
MS. CALLOWAY DO YOU HAVE YOUR DIRECTOR'S REPORT?
[H. Director's Report]
JUST A QUICK UPDATE ON THE LAST ITEMS THAT WERE CONSIDERED BY THIS BODY.THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, AS WELL AS THE CODE [INAUDIBLE] AMENDMENT FOR SPECIALTY AUTOMOTIVE TREATMENTS INC, HAS NOT YET BEEN HEARD BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
THE TEX AMENDMENT IS SCHEDULED FOR THE DECEMBER 8TH MEETING AND THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS SCHEDULED FOR THE JANUARY 12, 2021 MEETING.
AFTER THOSE ITEMS ARE HEARD, I CAN REPORT BACK TO THIS BOARD AS TO THE OUTCOME OF THOSE ITEMS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPORT.
THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME THIS MORNING.
WE ARE GOING TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.
IT IS NOW 9:58, FIFTY SEVEN A.M.
WE ARE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.